[HN Gopher] The Porsche Macan EV Is Being Recalled Because Its H...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The Porsche Macan EV Is Being Recalled Because Its Headlights Are
       Too Bright
        
       Author : josephcsible
       Score  : 13 points
       Date   : 2024-12-03 21:47 UTC (1 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (insideevs.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (insideevs.com)
        
       | josephcsible wrote:
       | This sentence stood out to me:
       | 
       | > Due to a software data set error, the affected vehicles were
       | programmed from the factory after the Economic Commission for
       | Europe (ECE) specs, whereas U.S.-spec vehicles need to conform to
       | the requirements of the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard
       | (FMVSS).
       | 
       | Presumably, if there were a way for the headlights to comply with
       | both US and EU regulations, they'd just have them be that way
       | everywhere, rather than having to deal with multiple
       | configurations at all. So are the US and EU both saying that each
       | other's way is wrong and too dangerous?
        
         | echoangle wrote:
         | Since the brightness seems to be the issue, the only way I his
         | makes sense to me is:
         | 
         | The US limits the brightness to X, the EU limits the brightness
         | to Y, and Y > X.
         | 
         | Porsche could just make every car globally use X, but they're a
         | luxury brand so they probably try to use Y where they can, even
         | if it is a bit of work to differentiate between markets.
        
           | tomatotomato37 wrote:
           | Porsche is also based in the EU so starting with a design
           | that meets EU specs and then adjusting export models as
           | needed is probably their procedure anyway
        
           | Symbiote wrote:
           | It's a significant difference. I doubt any manufacturer would
           | want to limit their European vehicles to the American
           | maximum:
           | 
           | > European lighting standards (UNECE) allow over two times
           | the light output from high beam headlight systems as compared
           | to the U.S. (Broertjes, 2018). U.S. compliant systems allow a
           | vehicle maximum of 150,000 candela while European compliant
           | systems allow a vehicle maximum of 430,000 candela (Official
           | Journal of the European Union, 2018). This provides for gains
           | in sight distance, but also increases the potential for glare
           | to affect oncoming and preceding traffic when high beams are
           | not dimmed.
           | 
           | And
           | 
           | > 3. European specification systems consistently provided
           | more roadway lighting when an oncoming vehicle was
           | approaching, or a preceding vehicle was close.
           | 
           | > a. Based on static target illumination data, the increase
           | in roadway lighting could be as much as 86 percent
           | (comparison of average European specification high beam to
           | U.S. specification low beam).
           | 
           | https://www.aaa.com/AAA/common/AAR/files/ResearchReportEuroS.
           | .. (scroll to at least page 19-20 for illuminating
           | illustrations).
        
             | maxerickson wrote:
             | The low beams on newer US cars are already blinding.
             | 
             | Do people in the EU consistently behave politely and turn
             | them off when appropriate?
        
             | r00fus wrote:
             | I remember when driving in the EU (France) that most cars
             | allow you to adjust the angle of the beams, so you may have
             | more light but it's often pointed down.
             | 
             | Unsure if that was just the few vehicles I drove or if it's
             | EU-wide.
        
           | Kon-Peki wrote:
           | This recall is for the high-beams. And yes, the EU allows
           | brighter high-beams than the US.
           | 
           | This seems to be the extent of the recall. But there are
           | other differences between the EU and US. For example, on
           | _what_ the headlights are illuminating. US headlights shine
           | more light off to the right of the vehicle than EU and I
           | think it is due to the assumption that roadside signs are
           | more often lit via headlights /refection in the US vs sign-
           | mounted lighting in the EU.
           | 
           | I think most people agree that EU regulations allow for
           | significantly better headlights than US regulations allow.
           | But those better headlights _must_ be paired with an
           | expensive adaptive system or they become terribly dangerous.
           | If you compare  "cheap car" headlights in the US vs EU they
           | are probably very similar in performance.
        
           | thephyber wrote:
           | Brightness of two headlights is not a single floating point
           | number.
           | 
           | There are regulations governing the spread/angle, the minimum
           | brightness, the maximum brightness, how much an object at X
           | distance is illuminated, whether the angle of the beams is
           | too bright in the vision of oncoming drivers, etc.
        
         | potato3732842 wrote:
         | >So are the US and EU both saying that each other's way is
         | wrong and too dangerous?
         | 
         | Real life disagreements on minor technicalities between
         | competing bureaucracies are not zero sum or conducted in
         | breathless hand wringing internet rhetoric. It's more like a
         | disagreement on a FOSS mailing list.
        
           | groos wrote:
           | I believe EU allows directionally controllable projector
           | headlights (my description, I don't know the official name).
           | These can be brighter because they can be directed away from
           | oncoming traffic. The US, in contrast, is lagging in
           | approving this technology and puts an absolute limit on the
           | brightness.
        
         | thephyber wrote:
         | There are some notable value judgements that are different
         | between US and EU regulations.
         | 
         | I remember reading that the US car safety rules generally
         | assume that the people in the car do not follow the rules,
         | whereas EU regulations assume they follow the law and use
         | seatbelts.
         | 
         | US crash safety tests don't care about the damage the car does
         | to pedestrians, but EU regulations do factor that in.
         | 
         | https://www.npr.org/2015/10/16/449090584/why-arent-auto-safe...
        
           | KK7NIL wrote:
           | > US car safety rules generally assume that the people in the
           | car do not follow the rules > US crash safety tests don't
           | care about the damage the car does to pedestrians
           | 
           | As a EU citizen living in the US, this makes perfect sense.
           | 
           | The quality of driving here is far lower, I often see
           | vehicles without plates or temp tags and it's not unusual to
           | hear about uninsured drivers hitting people.
           | 
           | It's ironic that such a car centric country naturally ends up
           | with terrible drivers because of the low barrier to entry.
        
       | tradertef wrote:
       | There are too many cars with this problem. Especially high trucks
       | and SUVs whose beams blinds drivers in front of them..
        
       | tester756 wrote:
       | In general new cars have annoying lightings in compare to old
       | cars
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-12-03 23:00 UTC)