[HN Gopher] Black Hole Puzzle
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Black Hole Puzzle
        
       Author : besmirch
       Score  : 24 points
       Date   : 2024-12-02 20:10 UTC (2 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (johncarlosbaez.wordpress.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (johncarlosbaez.wordpress.com)
        
       | dmitrygr wrote:
       | This is a relevant-ish short story by Greg Egan on humans jumping
       | into a black hole:
       | https://www.gregegan.net/PLANCK/Complete/Planck.html
        
       | cvoss wrote:
       | It is argued that Bob sees light from Alice's crossing of the
       | horizon at the same instant Bob himself crosses. Isn't this true
       | of all matter that enters? When Bob enters, he sees everything
       | that ever fell into the black hole "before" him, at all once? Is
       | it blinding? Does it fry and scramble Bob? Or is it so redshifted
       | that Bob survives?
        
         | kobalsky wrote:
         | this is my uninformed guess.
         | 
         | why would bob see anything? I understood that the event horizon
         | is a threshold, not a shell that you cross and suddenly can see
         | inside.
         | 
         | to see something photons have to bounce on something and reach
         | our eyes, we stop seeing stuff inside the horizon because those
         | photons don't bounce back and they are pulled into the
         | singularity.
         | 
         | my logic said that if light can't escape the horizon, then it
         | can't escape alice to reach bob, even if he's inside the
         | horizon, photons can't suddenly go backwards from alice until
         | bob, they are being pulled further inside.
        
           | Sharlin wrote:
           | No, we're talking about _images_ of things, photons emitted
           | by everything that has fallen in before, _before_ they
           | crossed the horizon.
        
           | cyberax wrote:
           | The objects can emit photons by themselves.
           | 
           | The problem is that (classically) when you cross the event
           | horizon, the photons that you emit at just that moment will
           | _stay_ _in_ _place_ forever.
        
         | mtdewcmu wrote:
         | I'm going to guess. From Bob's perspective, Alice's ship would
         | still be able to block light. So he wouldn't be able to see
         | what was ahead of him through the back of Alice's ship; Alice's
         | ship would occlude his view.
        
         | insapio wrote:
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firewall_(physics)
        
         | cyberax wrote:
         | > Isn't this true of all matter that enters?
         | 
         | Not quite. He will see the light emitted by _all_ of the matter
         | that has fallen in before him, but only in an infinitely small
         | area.
        
       | _petronius wrote:
       | There's a good episode of PBS Spacetime about Penrose diagrams:
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T4oYvSH6jJ8
       | 
       | It gets a little far into the weeds in a very "the map is not the
       | territory" kind of way, but is fun none the less.
       | 
       | I think (it is not addressed to my satisfaction in the video)
       | that it is implied that from inside the black hole, assuming it
       | was formed from a collapsing star, you would see all around you
       | the event horizon: behind you, the unverise at the time you
       | crossed the event horizin, in front of you, the surface of the
       | star at the moment of its collapse. The singularity, as the post
       | covers, exists only in your future, so you could not see it, even
       | though you will always end up there.
        
       | cyberax wrote:
       | > However, when any of the starships behind him crosses the
       | horizon, the captain of that starship will see Bob in front of
       | them, also crossing the horizon!
       | 
       | This is a tricky point. The 51-st captain will see the ships in
       | front of him getting slower and slower, the distance between them
       | growing less and less. At the horizon, they'll be separated by
       | zero distance.
       | 
       | But how can that be? Imagine that you're looking at a line of
       | cars in front of you, while sitting in a bus. You can see far
       | ahead, and you can project the distances between cars onto your
       | windshield. Now you go out of the bus and look at the cars ahead
       | of you again from your regular height. Now you get down on your
       | knees, and look again. And then lie down on the road and look
       | ahead again.
       | 
       | That's exactly how it would feel for that captain, any lateral
       | distances between ships will keep getting smaller and smaller,
       | until they completely disappear at the horizon. All the ships in
       | front of you will be squished into a line, and the ship in front
       | of you would block the view.
        
       | itishappy wrote:
       | Fun! I think there's an interesting hidden puzzle in the first
       | sentence:
       | 
       | > 101 starship captains, bored with life in the Federation,
       | decide to arrange their starships in a line, equally spaced, and
       | let them fall straight into an enormous spherically symmetrical
       | black hole--one right after the other.
       | 
       | Does this problem have a globally consistent solution? In the
       | curved spacetime around the blackhole, can everyone agree on what
       | equal spacing means?
        
       | jiggawatts wrote:
       | Any such blog / article / video that features a Penrose diagram
       | is just wrong, because it's using mathematics that doesn't apply
       | to the physical universe.
       | 
       | Penrose diagrams draw black holes as if they have existed
       | forever, and will last forever -- that's what the "future
       | infinity" line _means_.
       | 
       | Obviously black holes form at some finite time, and Stephen
       | Hawking showed that they evaporate in a finite time.
       | 
       | This matters. A lot!
       | 
       | Fundamentally, relativity does _not_ allow observers to disagree
       | on observations of _what_ , only _when_. If an outside observer
       | never observes someone falling into a black hole _then they
       | cannot fall in_. It 's just that simple! Again, for the slow
       | people at the back of the class: Observers _cannot disagree on
       | this_. If there is a paradox in your model, then your model is
       | broken, end of story.
       | 
       | There is this weird aspect of modern physics of holding on to the
       | almost-mystical "woo" aspects far more than is justified in
       | either the mathematics or observations. Quantum Mechanics and
       | cosmology are especially rife with popularisations of what
       | amounts to science fiction story telling. It's fun to think about
       | wormholes, white holes, alternate universe accessible trough
       | black holes, etc... I've read these novels, they were fun! Not
       | physical though, natch.
       | 
       | Much more realistically: An infalling observer is slowed down
       | relative to the outside universe _and the stellar remnant that
       | formed the black hole_. Effectively, the hapless infalling victim
       | sees the black hole and the universe both  "speed up".
       | 
       | The error most people make here is that they assume that the
       | black hole is already fully formed in the _infinite past_ and is
       | "completed", making it a mathematically perfect sphere in a
       | sense.
       | 
       | No!
       | 
       | It _hasn 't finished forming_ because as its gravitational field
       | increases its time distortion increases. Its formation is "frozen
       | in time" (actually just very very slow), it is _never fully
       | formed_.
       | 
       | Infalling observers see this slowdown _speeding back up_ , so
       | what they observe is the light of the black hole evaporation
       | getting blue-shifted and brighter until right before
       | mathematically they would have "fallen past the event horizon"
       | what they're actually seeing is akin to a supernova exploding in
       | their face. They're blasted into subatomic particles, joining the
       | radiation of the black hole evaporation many trillions of years
       | into the future... but not _infinitely_ into the future.
       | 
       | This model solves _every_ paradox of black holes, making them
       | boring and not sci-fi exciting again, which is why you haven 't
       | heard about it! Uncool stories don't get repeated on blogs for
       | ad-clicks.
       | 
       | Just remember: there are no infinities in the universe, and
       | anyone using one in their theory is almost certainly just making
       | stuff up to sound cool.
       | 
       | PS: Penrose is also behind the kook notion that brains are
       | quantum _despite all evidence_.
        
         | while_true_ wrote:
         | It irks me so many physicists/cosmologists jump from the
         | mathematical GR singularity at the center of a BH to "matter
         | there has infinite density." That's highly unlikely, it's
         | probably quark plasma.
        
       | coolThingsFirst wrote:
       | Pure existential dread. There is a force out there that can eat
       | our solar system as if though it's a cracker.
       | 
       | This universe is bizarre af, it shouldn't even exist and us too
       | but somehow it does.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-12-02 23:00 UTC)