[HN Gopher] IBM RISC System/6000 Family
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       IBM RISC System/6000 Family
        
       Author : rbanffy
       Score  : 22 points
       Date   : 2024-12-01 19:42 UTC (3 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (computeradsfromthepast.substack.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (computeradsfromthepast.substack.com)
        
       | sillywalk wrote:
       | There are a ton more old computer ads/brochures here:
       | 
       | https://www.1000bit.it/ad/bro/brochures.asp
        
         | rbanffy wrote:
         | I love these time capsules. They tell a lot about how we
         | perceived computers back then.
        
       | NaOH wrote:
       | >If the title includes the name of the site, please take it out,
       | because the site name will be displayed after the link.
       | 
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
        
       | Felger wrote:
       | I believe the Oracle 8 SQL Server we used at school in the
       | starting of the '2000 was running on a RS/6000 system on AIX.
       | 
       | Nice system, had a good memory from it performance-wise. MySQL
       | was not a serious competitor at that time.
       | 
       | The machine had often overheating issues starting from the
       | beginning of june when ambiant temp rose above 24/25deg. We did
       | not have CVAC in the building.
        
       | semessier wrote:
       | amazing pieces of machinery the IBM RS/6000
        
       | guerrilla wrote:
       | Those things were always so expensive, even used for years after,
       | and now hard to even find. I remember wanting one back in the day
       | when I was running Gentoo on my old 500Mhz PowerBook G3. So loud
       | though...
       | 
       | Today we have Raptor Computing's stuff instead.
       | 
       | https://secure.raptorcs.com/content/TL2WK2/purchase.html
        
       | rwmj wrote:
       | clabretro did an interesting video on the hardware of a 1997
       | PowerPC RS/6000 machine:
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8IFtnD5oOM
        
         | st_goliath wrote:
         | There is also a 1h video from NCommander, where he ports Doom
         | to AIX on an RS/6000:
         | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XzhCGSE7KKw
         | 
         | At the time also posted on HN:
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31485616
         | 
         | It provides a few details on the software stack, particularly
         | also the set of compat-APIs for porting Linux applications.
        
       | ataylor284_ wrote:
       | Did some development for a server application that supported
       | RS/6000 among other platforms. AIX on RS/6000 was a nice enough
       | Unix but, being used to Solaris, everything seems just slightly
       | off. I think it performed slightly worse for the same price as
       | Sparc hardware for our purposes, but some customers wanted an all
       | IBM solution (we also supported an OS/2 client).
       | 
       | The main thing that stands out was a tool (smitty?) that could do
       | system configuration and IIRC it could show you the steps to do
       | it manually as well.
        
         | neverartful wrote:
         | Yes, the sysadmin tool was awesome. There were 2 versions: one
         | graphical (smit) and the other text/console based (smitty).
         | Both versions had the same capabilities.
        
         | pjmlp wrote:
         | One of the big differences is that it is also COFF based like
         | Windows, and Aix shared objects have similar capabilities, with
         | private by default, import files, and having the capability to
         | let the compiler handle delay loading of specific symbols.
         | 
         | I used Aix 5 series quite a bit, and looking at docs it seems
         | to still have the same capabilities.
        
           | netbsdusers wrote:
           | They have even cooler capabilities - A single XCOFF library
           | can act as both shared and static libraries
        
         | sillywalk wrote:
         | I think the other thing is the Object Data Manager (ODM)-
         | configuration data about devices, networking configuration,
         | etc. is stored as objects, as opposed (or in addition to?) to
         | text files.
         | 
         | I also believe the AIX software package manager uses ODM.
        
       | neverartful wrote:
       | One of the interesting things about these systems is that the
       | early versions (like shown in the ads), didn't have a single CPU
       | chip package. The CPU was on a card and was comprised of various
       | chips and circuitry that you could see (not all hidden on the
       | inside of a single CPU package). It was not until the P2SC
       | (Power2 Super Chip) that everything made its way onto a neat and
       | compact CPU form factor that we typically think of. This P2SC was
       | first made available IIRC on the 7013 Model 595.
        
       | gregw2 wrote:
       | The finest contribution of AIX to Unix, copied (with varying
       | attempts at improvements) by its 90s competitors and eventually
       | into Linux, was its jounal filesystem.
       | 
       | The order of magnitude improvements to fsck on bootup and overall
       | filesytem reliability were non trivial.
       | 
       | SMIT was abit too non-unixy to catch on but I've always wondered
       | in the back of my mind whether it influenced systemd...
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-12-01 23:00 UTC)