[HN Gopher] A pretty visualisation of the European power grid (2...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       A pretty visualisation of the European power grid (2022)
        
       Author : 9dev
       Score  : 181 points
       Date   : 2024-11-28 14:33 UTC (8 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (121gigawatts.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (121gigawatts.org)
        
       | user_james92 wrote:
       | pretty cool graphs
        
       | onionisafruit wrote:
       | From the bottom of the page:
       | 
       | > TL;DR: we can delete most of the emissions of the developed
       | world today by switching heating & car and truck transport to
       | electrical - if we make sure we generate all electricity with
       | near-zero emissions. Just building more renewable generation
       | won't solve it though, as you still need to make sure it covers
       | all consumption everywhere. This map intends to show why that's a
       | complicated problem, and why we should also be smart about where
       | we build renewable generation so that most of the generated
       | energy can also be used and not thrown away because the grid
       | can't handle it.
       | 
       | This is what I wonder about when I drive through West Texas and
       | see massive wind farms in the middle of nowhere.
        
       | skywal_l wrote:
       | A little faster and clearer one in my opinion:
       | https://app.electricitymaps.com/
        
         | andix wrote:
         | Copper Sushi doesn't load for me, but I'm wondering how it is
         | going to beat the awesome electricitymaps. They have all the
         | data and quite a good viewer.
        
           | skagenpilot wrote:
           | It shows a much finer grained representation of the whole
           | transportation network. So you have much better idea of where
           | is electricity produced and consumed within each country.
           | When it comes to figuring out what the electricity mix is
           | made of, electricitymaps is clearer.
        
         | insane_dreamer wrote:
         | two different things; electricitymaps.com is a much more macro
         | view, nice for looking at inter-country flows, whereas this one
         | is great for looking at individual generation points and flows
        
       | skagenpilot wrote:
       | When looking at France, at a zoom level where one can see the
       | whole country, all the green dots are located next to nuclear
       | power plants. It's a good reminder that the french grid is mostly
       | powered by nuclear.
       | 
       | It'd be nice to see the same map over summer to see if the
       | different electric mix then gives birth to a different map.
        
         | insane_dreamer wrote:
         | if it wasn't for France having primarily used nuclear power
         | decades ago, Europe as a whole would be in a much much worse
         | state when it comes to CO2 emissions. That makes it abundantly
         | clear that nuclear needs to be a part of the mix when it comes
         | to non-emission generating energy production.
        
           | briandear wrote:
           | Any data on how much France has slowed the decrease of global
           | temperatures? Is there a "nuclear power to degrees saved"
           | converter?
        
             | insane_dreamer wrote:
             | someone could calculate the savings in CO2 emissions over
             | all the power generated by nuclear energy each year in
             | France, since the power stations were built, vs coal plants
             | (which would have been the alternative at the time)
        
             | palata wrote:
             | I can't say if this question is asked in good faith.
             | 
             | Pretty obviously it's better than what the other European
             | countries have been doing.
        
           | fsh wrote:
           | France has 12% of Europe's population, and its primary energy
           | is 45% from fossil fuels and 40% from nuclear power. The
           | effect on Europe as a whole is therefore pretty small.
        
             | realusername wrote:
             | France is simultaneously one of the most populated
             | countries in the EU and the of the top transitioned
             | countries, it does make a difference
        
             | thrance wrote:
             | I think you included transportation in your stats: planes,
             | cars, trucks and boats. The electrical mix in France
             | includes only 8% from fossil fuels, of which 7% come from
             | natural gas. The rest is mostly nuclear, hydroelectric,
             | wind and solar. In that order.
             | 
             | France also regularly sells its surplus to neighboring
             | countries.
        
               | masklinn wrote:
               | > France also regularly sells its surplus to neighboring
               | countries.
               | 
               | And in order to do that it has pretty massive lines to
               | neighbours meaning it also acts as an exchange platform
               | (for a profit) e.g. if there are strong winds it can buy
               | electricity from an oversupplied german grid and sell it
               | to italy.
               | 
               | https://app.electricitymaps.com/map/24h provides live
               | views of the european electricity grids, and France is
               | the only country which is consistently green (and often
               | dark green aka under 50gCO2eq/kWh) without being blessed
               | with enough hydro for most or all of its requirements (as
               | Iceland and Norway are).
        
               | elihu wrote:
               | Interesting to see they have data for Russia now. I think
               | that's new.
        
               | fsh wrote:
               | Most countries use way more primary energy for heating
               | and transportation than for electricity generation. It
               | would be disingenuous not to include this.
        
               | RandomThoughts3 wrote:
               | It's fairly disingenuous to mix both actually when they
               | don't mingle. Especially when you consider that both
               | heating and transportation are going in the direction of
               | using more electricity which is actually favorable to the
               | French choice.
        
             | insane_dreamer wrote:
             | You're not counting the energy outflows from France to
             | neighboring countries.
             | 
             | Also, France gets 70% of its energy from nuclear, not 40%.
        
               | moooo99 wrote:
               | > Also, France gets 70% of its energy from nuclear, not
               | 40%.
               | 
               | No, it gets 70% of its electricity from nuclear.
        
               | RandomThoughts3 wrote:
               | Mixing electricity with transport and heating in a single
               | metric is such a dishonest argument you have to be as
               | intellectually bankrupt as an anti-nuclear ecologist to
               | make it.
        
           | barbazoo wrote:
           | Not sure if that still holds true nowadays with renewable
           | energy and storage having got cheaper and cheaper.
        
             | realusername wrote:
             | The result speaks for themselves, Germany still hasn't
             | reached France 90s levels of emissions.
        
               | pydry wrote:
               | Energiewende didnt start in 1973, it was first authorized
               | in late 2010.
               | 
               | France's nuclear program was also very, very expensive: h
               | ttps://www.i-sis.org.uk/The_True_Costs_of_French_Nuclear_
               | Po...
        
               | kergonath wrote:
               | You can say whatever you want when discussion the cost of
               | nuclear in France because of the structure of its nuclear
               | industry. Part of it comes from the government's budget,
               | so depending on your point of view it can be accounted
               | for differently. Then, there are externalities
               | (pollution, greenhouse gases, etc). And then there are
               | strategic aspects and associated costs. The alternative
               | in the 1970s was skyrocketing oil, which is much more
               | costly at the planet's level, and was on track to be much
               | more costly at the country's level as well. And in the
               | meantime, consumers got reasonably cheap and clean
               | electricity for decades.
               | 
               | Skimming your source, I would not trust it very much.
        
               | pydry wrote:
               | >The alternative in the 1970s was skyrocketing oil
               | 
               | They imported and still import just as much oil as anyone
               | else.
        
               | RandomThoughts3 wrote:
               | They in fact import far less gas than Germany and let's
               | not even look at coal.
        
               | anton96 wrote:
               | I have no clew how come the difference on what's usually
               | said on this forum and the situation in Europe.My only
               | understanding is that the US as whole is more sunny that
               | gives a better ratio solar panel and produced
               | electricity.
               | 
               | Maybe also it's a provider thing ? From country to
               | country, you can always have things that seem randomly
               | more expensive. Germany is more renewable but more
               | expensive than France, is it because of their national
               | company is benefiting citizen properly or is it because
               | the remaining gas part drives up the cost ?
        
               | thrance wrote:
               | Germany may use more renewables in volume, but it is
               | absolutely dirtier than in France. Their electrical mix
               | makes use of lots of natural gas and lignite coal, the
               | worst kind, both expensive and very dirty.
        
               | qayxc wrote:
               | Compare to the PAST, not the present! As you can see, the
               | trend is downwards and steadily at that:
               | https://www.destatis.de/EN/Themes/Economic-Sectors-
               | Enterpris...
               | 
               | Rome wasn't built in a day and I find it hilarious to
               | advocate for nuclear power instead, if the average
               | construction time (not even taking into account the prior
               | mountain of bureaucracy) is over a decade. Not a single
               | nuclear power plant built in past 15 years in Europe has
               | been on time or on budget. Not even close.
        
               | masklinn wrote:
               | > As you can see, the trend is downwards and steadily at
               | that
               | 
               | Lignite numbers:
               | 
               | 2019: 114TWh, 18.7%
               | 
               | 2020: 92TWh, 16%
               | 
               | 2021: 110TWh, 18.8%
               | 
               | 2022: 116TWh, 20%
               | 
               | 2023: 88TWh, 17%
               | 
               | I've seen steadier terminal alcoholics.
        
               | masklinn wrote:
               | > Germany is more renewable but more expensive than
               | France
               | 
               | No, germany is more renewable but it's also more coal,
               | any time there's no wind the coal plants start up. And
               | they burn lignite (because that's what in germany e.g.
               | that's what the Baggers strip mine).
               | 
               | As a consequence, Germany's electricity emissions are
               | absolute garbage:
               | https://app.electricitymaps.com/zone/DE/12mo
               | 
               | It's not as bad as Poland which basically runs entirely
               | off of coal, but it's absolutely at the bottom of the
               | european barrel.
               | 
               | Also electricity storage still isn't much of a thing (and
               | while germany has two pumped hydro station they have very
               | little capacity), so in periods of high winds germany
               | actually pays its neighbours to take electricity off its
               | grid so it doesn't collapse (at this point it has
               | hundreds of hours of negative spot prices every year).
               | 
               | Which is getting problematic because increase in wind
               | generation in said neighbours means the issue is
               | spreading as they too need to get rid of their wind
               | production at those times.
        
               | qayxc wrote:
               | > No, germany is more renewable but it's also more coal,
               | any time there's no wind the coal plants start up.
               | 
               | Hm. The actual facts say otherwise, though:
               | https://www.destatis.de/EN/Themes/Economic-Sectors-
               | Enterpris...
               | 
               | So number go DOWN, not up, is what I'm seeing.
        
               | masklinn wrote:
               | > Hm. The actual facts say otherwise
               | 
               | They don't.
               | 
               | > So number go DOWN, not up, is what I'm seeing.
               | 
               | The comment I replied to is comparing germany to france.
               | The map I linked literally tells you that in 2024 Germany
               | generated 370g CO2 equivalent per kWh, where France
               | generated 32, that's an objective number you can straight
               | up read.
               | 
               | Yes Germany is 58% renewable versus France's 28
               | (something the map also tells you), but then 30% are gas
               | and especially coal, _the link you provide agrees with
               | that_. Coal is _insanely_ polluting, especially because
               | Germany mainly uses lignite which is the least energy
               | rich coal (so even more emissions for the same
               | production), coal represents  >3/4th of its emissions.
               | 
               | Meanwhile gas is a minor component of france's
               | electricity mix (pretty much just peaking plants and a
               | few combined cycle district heating plants) and coal is a
               | rounding error.
        
             | aziaziazi wrote:
             | What storage are you referring too? I see residential ones
             | in houses but absolutely nothing of state-scale, which is
             | necessary to keep industries and services running.
             | 
             | Materials used for current storage technologies are
             | expected to see demand skyrocket. We're still to see the
             | renewables going further than the residential proof of
             | concept on a society scale.
             | 
             | God bless plutonium.
        
               | kieranmaine wrote:
               | The CAISO (California Independent System Operator) grid
               | is a good example of large scale battery use (1). Texas
               | is also seeing a ramp up of battery storage (2).
               | 
               | Whilst battery demand will increase it's expected costs
               | will continue to decrease - "Innovation reduces total
               | capital costs of battery storage by up to 40% in the
               | power sector by 2030 in the Stated Policies Scenario"(3)
               | 
               | 1. https://www.gridstatus.io/live/caiso?date=2024-11-27
               | 2. https://modoenergy.com/research/ercot-battery-energy-
               | storage... 3. https://www.iea.org/reports/batteries-and-
               | secure-energy-tran...
        
               | barbazoo wrote:
               | > Materials used for current storage technologies are
               | expected to see demand skyrocket.
               | 
               | We haven't even specified what kind of storage technology
               | we're talking about yet you already state that "materials
               | used for current storage technologies are expected to see
               | demand skyrocket". Are you referring to batteries? There
               | are countless other technologies to "store" energy.
        
               | CalRobert wrote:
               | Eh... plutonium? I think uranium is the usual choice.
               | 
               | Home batteries can be part of a grid level response but
               | this is nascent.
        
               | rsynnott wrote:
               | France, unusually, actually does, or at least did, use
               | significant amounts of plutonium (a combo of
               | decommissioned weapons and nuclear reprocessing output)
               | in nuclear energy generation, but yeah, primarily
               | uranium.
        
             | kergonath wrote:
             | New renewable installations are getting cheaper, but are
             | still far from being numerous enough to overcome their
             | terrible load factor and enable switching off some baseline
             | production plants. And storage at a grid level is pretty
             | much inexistant, except for a couple of pumped hydro
             | plants.
             | 
             | There is a significant mismatch between reality and the
             | kind of headlines we see in tech-focused media. These hype
             | future products as if they were already widely available,
             | which creates a false idea of the actual situation in the
             | real world.
        
               | Symbiote wrote:
               | Britain has switched off its coal plants.
               | 
               | At least some of that is surely because of renewable
               | power, mostly wind.
        
               | p_l wrote:
               | And because solar and wind power boost sales of gas
               | turbine power plants that can spin fast enough to react
               | for the wind and solar instability
        
       | cynicalsecurity wrote:
       | Russians taking notes.
        
         | openrisk wrote:
         | Thats why the more decentralized the more resilient. No single
         | point of failure, redundancy in routing. Ahh, yes. just like
         | the internet used to be :-)
        
         | wongarsu wrote:
         | If the Russians don't already have agents in most major power
         | companies their intelligence service is slacking
        
       | t55 wrote:
       | Rendering could be more performant, but pretty graphs!
        
       | fulafel wrote:
       | The highlighted saturated links are a nice touch.
        
       | throw0101a wrote:
       | Meta: for those unfamiliar, 1.21 GW is a reference to the 1985
       | movie _Back to the Future_. Clip of the scene in question:
       | 
       | * https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BDuZqYeNiOA
       | 
       | * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Back_to_the_Future
       | 
       | If you haven't seen it, the entire trilogy is worth checking out:
       | very fun and quite family friendly.
        
         | w-m wrote:
         | If you are a regular HN reader who is (or was until this post)
         | unfamiliar with Back to the Future, I'd love to know three more
         | random facts about your life. In my world view, you are part of
         | a fascinatingly small group of people.
        
           | parhamn wrote:
           | Part 3 came out in 1990. So, anyone born after (less than 34
           | years old) who didn't bother to go back and watch it, would
           | be sufficient? I'm familiar with the series' existence, but
           | had no idea what 1.21 reference was. AMA, hah.
        
           | irrational wrote:
           | I have kids that are in their late 20s. They never watch
           | older movies unless someone forces them to. There is so much
           | new media coming out that they don't feel the need to watch
           | older movies, even if everyone is telling them it is very
           | good.
        
           | wrboyce wrote:
           | I've been on the BTTF ride at... wherever in Florida it is,
           | and I loved that as a teenager. The films just never really
           | appealed though for some reason. I guess one related fact
           | would be I have a lot of gaps like that in the movies I have
           | seen. For instance, people are often shocked that I've never
           | see any of the Indiana Jones movies (also loved the rides!);
           | but Star Wars I could probably recite the scripts of.
           | 
           | I don't think I have any other facts that are very
           | interesting, but then again I didn't think not having seen
           | BTTF was all that interesting either. For the record I was
           | familiar with 1.21GW and what it related to... I don't live
           | under a rock!
        
           | nakedneuron wrote:
           | +2
        
           | swatcoder wrote:
           | Since the franchise hasn't been rebooted like so many others,
           | it hasn't seem the $$$ marketing that would introduce it to
           | new generations.
           | 
           | Like The Princess Bride or Labyrinth, BTTF currently remains
           | a phenomenom of the 80's and 90's -- familiar to most from
           | that time and deeply treasured by some, but not refreshed and
           | sustained the way the Star Wars, Star Trek, Marvel/DC, etc
           | brands have been.
        
         | kubanczyk wrote:
         | I thought they mean "jiggawatts" in the movie, i.e. more than
         | bazzillion watts. Where do people pronounce gigawatts like
         | that?
        
           | hollerith wrote:
           | On movie sets back when no one used "giga-" in daily
           | conversation.
        
           | seszett wrote:
           | The French dub is famous (in France of course) for saying
           | gigowatts.
           | 
           | Giga just wasn't as commonly used an SI prefix as it is now I
           | guess.
        
         | CalRobert wrote:
         | I'd love to normalise pronouncing gigabyte as jigabyte
        
       | post-it wrote:
       | Something I've wondered for a while: if the whole continent is on
       | a synchronized grid, how can countries tell to or from whom
       | they're exporting and importing electricity. I can see how they
       | can measure their total imports or exports by comparing
       | generation to consumption, but how do they figure out which
       | neighbour they're getting electricity from / sending it to?
        
         | Filligree wrote:
         | By measuring current flows across the wires.
        
         | dismalaf wrote:
         | You don't. You guess based on generation, consumption and where
         | the power lines are hooked up.
        
           | Gud wrote:
           | Absolutely false. Current flow is metered using current
           | transformers.
           | 
           | full disclosure: I install high voltage switchgear for a
           | living.
        
             | dismalaf wrote:
             | Seeing current flow through switches isn't the same as
             | seeing specifically where _your_ power is coming from.
             | 
             | Like, if power from several different sources flows into a
             | single substation before it goes to your home, you know
             | exactly _which_ source created the electricity you 're
             | using?
             | 
             | And if I purchase power from a 100% renewable company, is
             | it always only electricity from their generators, never
             | ever mixed in with power from other grid sources during
             | downtime?
             | 
             | No, it's just best estimates based on generation,
             | consumption and flow.
             | 
             | That's like taking a bucket of water out of the ocean and
             | saying you know where it came from. Sure, it might have
             | come from the nearest estuary, but odds are it got mixed in
             | with water that originated somewhere else.
        
               | rightbyte wrote:
               | Kirchoff's laws applies though. It should be possible to
               | calculate where the power in your outlet comes from for
               | the power line operators.
        
               | fulafel wrote:
               | Electricity transmission is a bit like water pressure and
               | distribution. You're not going to get the same electrons
               | (or water molecules) that you subscribed to from various
               | producers in the distribution network put in, the flow
               | causality and the physical embodiments of production are
               | different though related things.
        
         | cjrp wrote:
         | Do you mean, for example, that the UK is importing energy from
         | France, but where are they importing it from?
        
         | skagenpilot wrote:
         | There are five synchronous areas in Europe, the largest one
         | being the synchronous grid of continental Europe [1].
         | 
         | Each national grids has interconnections with other grids and
         | you can measure the flow of power through these
         | interconnections to know who is sending electricity or getting
         | electricity from neighbours.
         | 
         | [1]
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synchronous_grid_of_Continenta...
        
         | fsh wrote:
         | You can measure the flow of power by calculating the vector
         | product of the current and voltage in the power line. EEVblog
         | has a very good explanation video how this is done in an
         | (analog) domestic watt-hour meter:
         | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_3DXcB9-xE
        
         | fulafel wrote:
         | For completeness - that's just one grid included in this viz,
         | for the map of the different european grids see:
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synchronous_grid_of_Continenta...
         | 
         | (Russia is another big chunk of Europe but not included in the
         | above map, though I think it may be the same grid with the
         | Baltics)
         | 
         | For the question, measuring the flow of electricity is just
         | normal power engineering, your home electricity meter does it
         | as well. It's not so much the countries doing it though.
        
           | markvdb wrote:
           | The Baltics are disconnecting from the Soviet era BRELL grid
           | with Russia and Belarus in two months [0].
           | 
           | https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/baltic-countries-
           | leave-...
        
             | toomuchtodo wrote:
             | Additional info: https://spectrum.ieee.org/baltic-power-
             | grid
        
         | locallost wrote:
         | It's a fair question. Energy charts has both the physical flows
         | and trading charts for Germany.
         | 
         | E.g. trading https://www.energy-
         | charts.info/charts/energy/chart.htm?l=en&...
         | 
         | Physical flows https://www.energy-
         | charts.info/charts/energy/chart.htm?l=en&...
         | 
         | And it's not the same, so sometimes there is just "transit",
         | although transit here should I guess be understood very
         | loosely. I also assume they just know who paid for what.
         | 
         | Edit: although upon re-reading I think you probably asked
         | something else. Sorry in that case.
        
       | coreyp_1 wrote:
       | I get irrationally angry when a map is skewed in this way and
       | there is no way to change it. The more you zoom in, the worse the
       | distortion is made to be. Even zooming all the way out does not
       | eliminate the angular distortion. This took actual effort on some
       | programmer's part! Who ever thought that this is a good idea?!?
       | 
       | It's like those navigational mini maps (car or computer game)
       | that won't keep north pointing up... only worse.
        
         | socksy wrote:
         | Also got annoyed by this, but worked out pretty quickly that if
         | you hold down right click and drag then you can change the
         | angle
        
         | _Microft wrote:
         | You can also change the perspective by simultaneously holding
         | the Ctrl key and moving the mouse.
        
           | progval wrote:
           | Or move the cursor while right-clicking.
        
         | locallost wrote:
         | Don't get angry so much over minor things, your older self will
         | thank you. Somebody did something for free, gave it to you for
         | free, and so they did not do a perfect job. There are worse
         | things in life.
        
       | ramon156 wrote:
       | > we can delete most of the emissions of the developed world
       | today by switching heating & car and truck transport to
       | electrical
       | 
       | Don't forget the fact that we need batteries to store the power,
       | which is a much more annoying problem.
        
         | wongarsu wrote:
         | Heating and transport are the easiest in that regard. Most
         | trucks drive during the day have the driver resting during the
         | night. At night there's little demand, but wind and nuclear
         | continue generating, so from a grid standpoint that's the
         | perfect time to charge all the trucks. Cars can similarly be
         | mostly charged during the night, as that's when they are at
         | home. Heat demand is more variable, but heat is much easier to
         | store than electricity itself. Everyone with a boiler already
         | has a heat store at home. If you make the boiler a bit larger
         | you can configure it to only heat when there's excess
         | electricity (typically the night or at peak solar power around
         | noon). And that's before you start with more efficient heat
         | storage devices, like heating sand instead of water.
         | 
         | All of those solutions require infrastructure investments and
         | smarter grids (likely with real-time pricing to incentivize
         | consumers to use power when there's an excess, and an API so
         | devices like chargers and boilers can act on this information
         | without user input). But they don't require power storage at
         | the grid level.
        
       | praveen9920 wrote:
       | One observation I could make from the visualization is that major
       | cities have very big power generation centers, despite that they
       | seem to be drawing power from surrounding areas. It is very
       | apparent near London. I guess it is obvious that bigger cities
       | have more demand from both industrial and residential
       | consumption.
        
       | danbtl wrote:
       | Was this made with a visualization library? Or is this custom
       | code on top of Mapbox?
        
       | hughes wrote:
       | Hugged to death? Map is not loading.
       | 
       | Edit: Loaded after a few refreshes. Slowness relates to loading
       | static assets from coppersushi.herokuapp.com
        
       | zwaps wrote:
       | (German) offshore seems to be missing
        
       | bschne wrote:
       | Someone also set up a bunch of Graphana dashboards with European
       | electricity data at https://energygraph.info/
        
       | roschdal wrote:
       | Don't share this map of the power grid, or the terrorists will
       | use it to end us all.
        
         | kubanczyk wrote:
         | A map is not a territory.
        
       | KennyBlanken wrote:
       | Impressive - Norway and Sweden are exporting ~6GW right now with
       | Finland throwing in for another GW.
       | 
       | Probably contributing to the high percentage of EV sales. In
       | Finland 90% of new vehicle sales are EVs. Sweden and Norway are
       | at ~%60, and have a greater share of PHEVs.
       | 
       | "EVs, they're gonna be a bloodbath" and "they don't work in the
       | cold", indeed /s
       | 
       | Never seems to occur to people that "I don't ever have to stand
       | outside in the cold pumping gas into my car" and "I can have my
       | car warmed up by the time I get in to go somewhere" are really
       | popular features.
       | 
       | Also, they didn't build out their EV charging infrastructure via
       | legal settlement, leading to having chargers owned and operated
       | by a company ambivalent about maintenance and repair.
       | 
       | Europe as a whole is 24%, rising at a good clip. Also surprising
       | is Romania - ahead of everyone except the Scandinavian countries
       | and way, way ahead of all the former soviet states.
        
       | hokkos wrote:
       | My visualisation of physical flow between countries or zones, you
       | can see the net flow with arrow of relative size and colors :
       | 
       | https://energygraph.info/d/7dWs1mVVk/interconnect-physical-f...
        
       | internet_points wrote:
       | Is it missing hydroelectric?
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-11-28 23:00 UTC)