[HN Gopher] Show HN: Feels Like Paper
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Show HN: Feels Like Paper
        
       "Feels Like Paper!" is a series of prototypes about augmenting
       physical paper through AI. Various ML models, LLMs and a mixed
       reality headset are used to infuse physical paper and ink with
       properties of the digital world without compromising on their
       physical traits.
        
       Author : MoroL
       Score  : 235 points
       Date   : 2024-11-27 18:43 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.lukasmoro.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.lukasmoro.com)
        
       | jitl wrote:
       | I love the lens effect at the bottom of the viewport and design
       | of the site overall, really cool. Do you have a post about that
       | effect - or is the best way to learn about it in the developer
       | tools?
        
         | MoroL wrote:
         | Thank you. You can investigate progressive blur.
        
         | muti wrote:
         | Too bad it makes the whole thing laggy enough that I didn't get
         | past the first few paragraphs on my phone, and there's no
         | obvious way to disable it
        
           | jitl wrote:
           | Alas :( my phone is fine scrolling at 120hz with the effect
           | (iPhone 15 pro max)
        
         | r87 wrote:
         | I'm the opposite end of spectrum. I really disliked the frosted
         | glass look on images as they loaded and left the page before
         | finishing reading due to how off-putting I found it to be.
        
           | swores wrote:
           | It didn't make me leave the page, but I agree that I too
           | found the effects annoying and off putting.
        
           | chronogram wrote:
           | I also left the page early. I enjoy reading, and wasn't able
           | to do that as effectively on this website.
        
         | oneeyedpigeon wrote:
         | As another top-level comment pointed out, this is a bit of a
         | dark-pattern to indicate paywalled content. In this case, I
         | think it would be better without it.
        
       | echoangle wrote:
       | This site is lagging a bit, maybe turn down the blur effects on
       | every single element
        
         | hmottestad wrote:
         | It's actually fine on my phone. I've got the latest and
         | greatest though.
        
       | WD-42 wrote:
       | Maybe getting hugged to death? Every image is blurry (I'm
       | assuming this is pre-load optimization thing).
        
       | vunderba wrote:
       | From the article: _Keichii Matsuda wrote a manifesto called
       | "GODS". In it he describes an anaphor for augmented reality
       | rooted in pagan animism. Unlike monotheistic Western approaches
       | of interfacing artificial intelligence like ChatGPT or Siri, he
       | advocates to leverage the possibility of augmented reality
       | technologies to extend places and objects to populate the world
       | with many different agents or "gods"._
       | 
       | Author should read Daemon by Daniel Suarez written in 2006 that
       | explores the idea of persistent and potentially powerful AR
       | entities that interact with humans. It also loosely plays with
       | the idea of AR somatic gestures acting as a mystical conduit for
       | "primitive incantations" that have a physical affect on the real
       | world.
        
         | MoroL wrote:
         | Hey, thanks for the literature recommendations and pointer.
         | Will definitely have a look at them.
        
         | heisenzombie wrote:
         | A subject also tackled in the (oft HN recommended)
         | https://qntm.org/ra
        
         | thrtythreeforty wrote:
         | Others have suggested _Ra_ for those that find this concept
         | compelling. Let me also recommend basically all of Karl
         | Schroeder 's work, which touches on machine intelligence in
         | lots of ways. The steampunk Virga series has AIs which act on
         | behalf of nature, _Lady of Mazes_ has  "votes" which are
         | physical embodiments of political movements, and _Ventus_ has
         | sentient terraforming robots who no longer think as humans do.
        
         | TeMPOraL wrote:
         | Lords of Kobol, hear my prayer.
         | 
         | I guess we're bound to switch between polytheism and monotheism
         | as technology advances. Some could say, all of this has
         | happened before.
        
         | e12e wrote:
         | Reminds me of the escaped AIs of Willam Gibson's sprawl
         | triology, as in "Count Zero" (1987) - all though they only
         | manifest in cyberspace - VR not AR:
         | 
         | > (...) The man smiled at Bobby. "Count Zero," he said, "they
         | tell us that's your handle."
         | 
         | > "That's right," Bobby managed, though it came out as a kind
         | of croak.
         | 
         | > "We need to know about the Virgin, Count." The man waited.
         | 
         | > Bobby blinked at him.
         | 
         | > "Vyej Mirak" -- and the glasses went back on -- 'Our Lady,
         | Virgin of Miracles. We know her' -- and he made a sign with his
         | left hand-- 'as Ezili Freda."
         | 
         | > Bobby became aware of the fact that his mouth was open, so he
         | closed it. The three dark faces waited. Jackie and Rhea were
         | gone, but he hadn't seen them leave. A kind of panic took him
         | then, and he glanced frantically around at the strange forest
         | of stunted trees that surrounded them. The gro-light tubes
         | slanted at every angle, in any direction, pink-purple
         | jackstraws suspended in a green space of leaves. No walls You
         | couldn't see a wall at all. The couch and the battered table
         | sat in a sort of clearing, with a floor of raw concrete.
         | 
         | > "We know she came to you," the big man said, crossing his
         | legs carefully. He adjusted a perfect trouser-crease, and a
         | gold cufflink winked at Bobby. "We know, you understand?"
         | 
         | > "Two-a-Day tells me it was your first run," the other man
         | said. "That the truth?"
         | 
         | > Bobby nodded.
         | 
         | > "Then you are chosen of Legba," the man said, again removing
         | the empty frames," to have met Vyej Mirak." He smiled.
         | 
         | > Bobby's mouth was open again.
         | 
         | > "Legba," the man said, "master of roads and pathways, the loa
         | of communication . . ."
         | 
         | > Two-a-Day ground his cigarette out on the scarred wood, and
         | Bobby saw that his hand was shaking
        
       | repeekad wrote:
       | The blur effect on the bottom of the page makes me feel like I'm
       | constantly about to be price walled, haha
        
       | Parfait__ wrote:
       | The blur effect is not good at all man. Just do a regular loading
       | spinner or skeleton.
        
       | bberenberg wrote:
       | I really enjoy the "Mark & Comment" prototype. I want to read
       | more on paper, but really don't like digitizing my notes. This
       | flow seems much better for me. As AR devices improve, I expect
       | this kind of low tech / high tech fusion will improve our
       | experiences in novel ways.
        
         | phildenhoff wrote:
         | Yeah I'm very interested in this. I'd love to be able to easily
         | create digital representations of handwritten notes, even if
         | that requires me to markup specifically-formatted documents.
         | 
         | I love reading paper (and eink) but I hate losing notes, and I
         | don't have a good process for importing those notes to my
         | Logseq database.
        
       | alex_smart wrote:
       | Whatever service you are using to host your website is not doing
       | a very good job. Tiny <1kb assets are taking upto minutes to
       | load.
        
         | MoroL wrote:
         | Sorry for that. I use Vercel.
        
       | bix6 wrote:
       | I was a little confused at first but I really enjoyed this.
       | Awesome work!
        
         | MoroL wrote:
         | Thank you.
        
       | luismedel wrote:
       | IMHO, an interesting content a bit devalued by the presentation.
       | Sometimes less is more (I know, nothing new)
        
       | xnx wrote:
       | Neat. https://dynamicland.org/ was the first thing I though of.
       | Glad you referenced them on the page.
        
       | brcmthrowaway wrote:
       | Tell me when there isn't a 1kg headset involved in any of this.
        
       | gtothesquare wrote:
       | It is much better enjoyed in a desktop.
       | 
       | Love the butterfly!!!
       | 
       | Kudos for experimenting not just with AI but with webdesign. The
       | hover preview is really neat too.
       | 
       | keep it up!
        
       | heisenzombie wrote:
       | I love this, I'm a big fan of this approach to technology. The
       | weakness in this approach, for me, is that these examples seem to
       | be mediated through AR glasses, which kind of undoes the analog-
       | ness of the whole thing a bit.
       | 
       | For an (old!) example that doesn't use glasses, I'm reminded of
       | https://www.topobox.co/
        
       | pimlottc wrote:
       | Thin gray text on an off-white background is not very easy to
       | read, especially on mobile
        
         | LocalPCGuy wrote:
         | And not very accessible as well (fails color contrast
         | standards, just over 3:1, 4.5:1 is minimum). I thought light
         | grey text on a light background finally went out of style a few
         | years back.
        
       | RheingoldRiver wrote:
       | That is a dead butterfly [0] being reanimated, not a live
       | butterfly flying
       | 
       | [0]: https://www.emilydamstra.com/please-enough-dead-butterflies/
        
         | herodotus wrote:
         | Thanks for providing that link. What an amazing artist!
        
         | MoroL wrote:
         | Agree 100%. Needs iteration. Thanks for the link.
        
         | flopsamjetsam wrote:
         | Until I clicked on the link, I thought you were just using a
         | metaphor :)
        
         | beepbooptheory wrote:
         | Ugh one of those things I kinda hate to know now.
        
           | tail_exchange wrote:
           | It ruined pretty much all butterfly drawings for me. It's the
           | kind of thing that is better not knowing lol
        
             | stevage wrote:
             | I think it's overblown. It made me pay more attention to
             | butterflies in the real world and what I see is when landed
             | they often flap their wings intermittently. So I just think
             | of the drawings with wings open as catching one of those
             | moments.
        
               | jerkstate wrote:
               | I agree with your sentiment, the human body is sometimes
               | considered most beautiful with the limbs extended in
               | dance, that does not mean it is always posed that way. I
               | lay in the "corpse pose" every day, it does not mean I am
               | dead.
        
         | teach wrote:
         | _Ce n 'est pas un papillon._
        
         | pertique wrote:
         | I'd also link to a recent HN post [0] exploring butterfly
         | flight. The top comment shows the actual flight pattern of a
         | butterfly.
         | 
         | Perhaps zombie butterfly fly differently, but otherwise it's
         | doubly dead.
         | 
         | This isn't a real nit, but I figured I throw it out there
         | anyway.
         | 
         | [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42183079
        
         | mewpmewp2 wrote:
         | I understand when butterflies are standing by their wings
         | wouldn't be that far ahead, but is it the case also when they
         | are flying? That is not so clear to me. When flying it seems
         | there can be a lot of variance where their wings can be.
        
           | gcanyon wrote:
           | The moment I saw the live vs. dead comparison it hit me:
           | center of lift vs. center of mass. Why would the butterfly's
           | wings ever project that far forward when there is zero mass
           | out there to lift? I suppose it's not impossible -- maybe the
           | butterfly is hard-braking? But in normal flight that just
           | wouldn't work. I never thought about it like that before, but
           | now I can't unsee it.
        
             | mewpmewp2 wrote:
             | Out of curiousity I took a look at some midflight photos as
             | well as slow mo videos. It could also vary by butterfly
             | type, but there were definitely midflight photos were I saw
             | wings quite extended front. Also in slow mo it almost looks
             | as if they are swimming through air where they extend wings
             | front to grab air and bring them back down. I suggest
             | taking a look at some slow mo videos. It now occurs to me
             | why there's a swimming technique called butterfly. The
             | animation in the web app doesn't do the swimming technique
             | justice, it's rather static, but at least I do think at
             | certain point they have their wings quite extended, so
             | unless you animate this whole thing, I don't think it's as
             | fair to call it dead compared to if it's standing by with
             | wings extended.
        
               | gcanyon wrote:
               | That's fair -- to something as small as a butterfly the
               | air is much more soup-y, so swimming is maybe a better
               | description than flying. That would imply they do need to
               | extend forward beyond their head to pull forward through
               | the air.
        
           | Ratelman wrote:
           | There is quite a variation in its wing position while flying:
           | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=odvYot6Rldw&ab_channel=Earth.
           | .. So at least some butterflies do actually move their
           | forewings significantly forward of their head while in flight
           | (as stated by edamstra on June 2nd, 2017 - comment on the OP
           | link)
        
             | mewpmewp2 wrote:
             | I took a look at some slow mo videos and midflight photos,
             | and these were really interesting. In particular what
             | seemed interesting is how in some videos they almost like
             | swam through the air in which case they did extend their
             | wings up front as if to grab air under it and then they
             | brought them back down. So the animation on the web app is
             | more static, but I don't think it's fair to call it a dead
             | butterfly based on that. Also I think I now understand why
             | there's a swimming technique called butterfly.
             | 
             | Seeing those slow mo videos and some of the images in the
             | edamstra link I think it's a bit unfair to criticise some
             | of the things like earrings etc, because with many of those
             | it's very plausible they could be mid-flight moments
             | (especially earrings as they are literally in the air).
             | 
             | And the "dead butterfly" shirt seems to be very aware and
             | all of those could be same butterfly during its flight
             | representing all the possible positions.
        
               | TheSpiceIsLife wrote:
               | Butterfly can also refer anything open / wide-open.
        
       | sram1337 wrote:
       | That butterfly is very distracting. So much so that I didn't read
       | the article.
       | 
       | I don't see a way to make it go away
        
         | gsinclair wrote:
         | When I scrolled down on mobile, the butterfly was no longer
         | visible.
        
       | MoroL wrote:
       | Hi everyone, my traffic today is high so my website might become
       | slower soon, because it surpasses my budget for "Fast Data
       | Transfer" from Vercel. I am sorry for any inconvenience.
        
         | FractalHQ wrote:
         | I often proxy Vercel through Cloudflare for a free cache layer
         | on their edge cdn.
        
         | MoroL wrote:
         | Sorry everyone my website is now paused. I migrate it to
         | Cloudflare rn.
        
       | risenshinetech wrote:
       | Seemed like it would be interesting to read, but I slammed the
       | back button once the butterfly (wtf), blur effect, and thin grey
       | font on a white background overwhelmed me.
        
         | FractalHQ wrote:
         | I liked the fun animation, but I agree that the text should be
         | darker for readability / accessibility.
        
         | pmontra wrote:
         | Agreed. The correct text color is the one of the titles. The
         | paragraphs are too gray, they have not enough contrast. Place a
         | sheet of paper from a book or a magazine side to side with that
         | page and the text on the paper will be much easier to read
         | 99.99% of the times. Is there any irony in that? Given the
         | subject of the post, maybe not. It's a demonstration that
         | hundreds of years of paper typography yield a better ergonomy
         | than 30 years of the web.
        
         | ryukoposting wrote:
         | Design choices like these tend to negatively influence my
         | opinion of whatever I'm about to read. That's a shame, too,
         | because the demonstration that followed is a very rare use case
         | for AR and AI that didn't make me roll my eyes.
        
         | asgerhb wrote:
         | I slammed the reader-mode button, which unfortunately killed
         | the videos.
         | 
         | Not having looping/procedural animations in your articles is an
         | accessibility feature. People with ADHD simply can't read
         | blocks of text if there's visual noise flitting about
         | everywhere.
        
       | ksec wrote:
       | This Deployment is paused by the owner.
       | 
       | Your connection is working correctly.
       | 
       | Vercel is working correctly.
        
         | bmicraft wrote:
         | That's interesting, I'm getting SSL_ERROR_NO_CYPHER_OVERLAP in
         | Firefox. And ssllabs.com can't even test the site apparently.
         | 
         | I wonder it those those are connected somehow.
        
       | xelxebar wrote:
       | > The intricate user experience of physical paper is unmatched...
       | 
       | So much this. Our hands have such a disproportionate
       | concentration of nerves compared to the rest of our body, it's a
       | shame current tech is soley focused on visual and audio
       | interaction (with some very minor haptics).
       | 
       | A piece of paper or book has texture, heft, temperature, and
       | stiffness which our hands pick up on and interpret so
       | effortlessly we don't even consciously notice most of the time. I
       | want those information channels in my user experience. Leafing
       | through paper and books has so many nice features: the weight
       | distribution tells you about how far along you are; fingers can
       | flip pages or between chapters with high fidelity and high
       | feedback for tracking the context switch; earmarking or sticky
       | notes encode metadata that's immediately available when needed
       | and hidden otherwise, without having to navigate layers of
       | organization; the mechanics of splaying out multiple pages on a
       | table is effortless compared to manipulating desktop windows; we
       | even subconsciously pick up on non-uniformities in physical
       | layout, which helps with disambiguation---i.e. noise is
       | information.
       | 
       | Don't get me wrong, the interactivity of screens is wonderful,
       | and e-ink dose bring one tiny nicety of paper to them, but I
       | think we've barely even begun to tap into the possibilities of
       | computer user interfaces.
       | 
       | FWIW, very terse languages like APL have the very nice property
       | that programming with pen and paper actually feels natural, and
       | you actually see it happen organically during discussions amongst
       | array programmers. I think our current programming paradigms may
       | be more constrained by HCI limitations than we realize.
        
       | MoroL wrote:
       | Sorry everyone. My hosting was not prepared for the amount of
       | traffic while I migrate you can find the explorations on Twitter
       | as well.
       | 
       | https://x.com/lukas_moro/status/1829487148078412019
       | https://x.com/lukas_moro/status/1838207092471050645
       | https://x.com/lukas_moro/status/1847299759603699906
        
         | leerob wrote:
         | (I work at Vercel) It seems like you possibly have a spend cap
         | on, which would automatically pause your site when a certain
         | amount of spend is hit. Vercel is working correctly in this
         | case.
         | 
         | If you are hosting a lot of video files, I would recommend
         | using Vercel Blob (object storage). This is a better fit for
         | larger volume assets like images or videos, versus "fast data
         | transfer" as you mentioned in another comment for critical
         | assets like stylesheets or scripts.
         | 
         | Happy to help out if you have questions, email is lee at vercel
         | dot com.
        
           | voytec wrote:
           | Is ERR_SSL_VERSION_OR_CIPHER_MISMATCH the effect of this cap?
           | If so - that's a really weird approach at blocking a website.
           | > openssl version         OpenSSL 3.4.0 22 Oct 2024 (Library:
           | OpenSSL 3.4.0 22 Oct 2024)         > openssl s_client
           | -connect www.lukasmoro.com:443         Connecting to
           | 2a06:98c1:3120::b         CONNECTED(00000005)
           | 00E167F201000000:error:0A000410:SSL
           | routines:ssl3_read_bytes:ssl/tls alert handshake
           | failure:ssl/record/rec_layer_s3.c:908:SSL alert number 40
        
             | leerob wrote:
             | No, I am referencing the "deployment paused" page.
        
           | xyzzy_plugh wrote:
           | This is fine content for private communications with your
           | customer but rubs me the wrong way posted here. It doesn't
           | read to me that your customer is being negative about Vercel
           | in any way, so to me it feels arrogant to come here and say
           | "well actually you can't afford us."
           | 
           | If you feel differently, and think it's acceptable to do so,
           | why not instead say that on the error page? "Customer has
           | exceeded their budget. Please add additional funds."
           | 
           | If you don't think such messaging is appropriate, then I'm
           | curious why you think doing it here would be?
           | 
           | If you want to be truly helpful to your customer, you would
           | consider raising or temporarily uncapping their traffic as a
           | gesture of good will.
        
             | leerob wrote:
             | The "deployment paused" screen is shown publicly when hard
             | spend limits are reached for a project. These limits are
             | configured by the user.
             | 
             | Spend controls aren't necessarily about affordability, it's
             | often for peace of mind (similar to a fixed price server,
             | or a disposal card with a limit).
             | 
             | I also don't view them as being negative on Vercel (we
             | likely could have alerted them better, as it seems this
             | caught them off guard).
             | 
             | Their traffic isn't capped and they can change this if they
             | prefer. But I'm guessing there's some large asset causing
             | unexpected usage, which is why I offered my email. Happy to
             | walk through it with them and figure out a path to
             | optimize.
        
               | woodrowbarlow wrote:
               | i think HN has a high bar for when somebody comments as a
               | representative of their company. it's not uncommon for
               | someone repping their company to step in with a comment
               | like "i've temporarily added credits on your account so
               | your post can stay up".
               | 
               | fwiw, i read your comment as just trying to be helpful.
               | but sometimes there is an assumption that if you're
               | publicly representing your company, then you're also
               | enabled to make reasonable ad-hoc overrides as an
               | outreach opportunity.
        
           | omnimus wrote:
           | When the cheap static site hosting became "you have a spend
           | cap on"...
           | 
           | As William Wallace once said " they may take our servers, but
           | they'll never take... OUR FREEDOM!"
        
         | wheybags wrote:
         | Fwiw I host some static html websites on a cheap ovh vps (used
         | to be a literal core i3 kimsufi box for a couple hundred a
         | year, it's very slightly beefier now), and have hit the front
         | page of hn with that setup several times with no issues.
         | 
         | Not trying to attack anyone for their tech choices, just a
         | little reminder that the simple solutions are still there and
         | they are cheap and work really well :p
        
       | kayvulpe wrote:
       | Anyone else getting ERR_SSL_VERSION_OR_CIPHER_MISMATCH?
        
         | system2 wrote:
         | I did:
         | 
         | This site can't provide a secure connection www.lukasmoro.com
         | uses an unsupported protocol.
         | ERR_SSL_VERSION_OR_CIPHER_MISMATCH
         | 
         | It is a cloudflare site but the SSL is Google Trust Services
         | (https://pki.goog/).
         | 
         | It is likely cloudflare SSL mode (full/strict/flexible) might
         | be screwing up the site SSL. It usually happens to me when I
         | launch a brand new site with freshly migrated DNS. I won't
         | waste more time, also www version of the site points at
         | somewhere else. Well...
        
       | MoroL wrote:
       | The project is currently available here.
       | https://folio-2-0.pages.dev/paper
        
       | MoroL wrote:
       | Back online again sorry for the down-time.
        
       | hellweaver666 wrote:
       | I'm sure this is very interesting but given that you decided to
       | use light grey text on a white background the whole page was
       | unreadable.
        
       | nomilk wrote:
       | 404 for me.
        
       | hombre_fatal wrote:
       | I think the loading blur effect is cool and, if it weren't for
       | the drama queens on HN, inoffensive.
        
       | alt227 wrote:
       | I really dont like the blur effect on the photos. Every time I
       | scroll down the page I think my internet is broken!
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-11-28 23:01 UTC)