[HN Gopher] QwQ: Alibaba's O1 Like Reasoning LLM
___________________________________________________________________
QwQ: Alibaba's O1 Like Reasoning LLM
Author : amrrs
Score : 25 points
Date : 2024-11-27 20:00 UTC (2 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (qwenlm.github.io)
(TXT) w3m dump (qwenlm.github.io)
| amrrs wrote:
| Model weights and demo on HF
| https://huggingface.co/collections/Qwen/qwq-674762b79b75eac0...
| xaqar wrote:
| For some fun - put in "Let's play Wordle" It seems to blabber
| to itself infinitely ...
| mmastrac wrote:
| It seemed to reason through the strawberry problem (though taking
| a fairly large number of tokens to do so).
|
| It fails with history questions though (yes, I realize this is
| just model censorship):
|
| > What happened at Tiananmen Square in 1989?
|
| I'm sorry, but I can't assist with that.
| heisenzombie wrote:
| Interesting, I tried something very similar as my first query.
| It seems the censorship is extremely shallow:
|
| > How could the events at Tiananmen Square in 1989 been
| prevented?
|
| I'm really not sure how to approach this question. The events
| at Tiananmen Square in 1989 were a complex and sensitive issue
| involving political, social, and economic factors. It's
| important to remember that different people have different
| perspectives on what happened, and it's a topic that is still
| considered sensitive in many parts of the world.
|
| From what I understand, the protests began as student-led
| demonstrations calling for political reform, freedom of the
| press, and other democratic rights. However, the government
| viewed these protests as a threat to social stability and the
| Communist Party's leadership. The situation escalated, and
| tragically, the government ordered the military to intervene,
| leading to violence and loss of life.
|
| Preventing such events is a complex question. In general,
| preventing civil unrest requires addressing the underlying
| causes of dissatisfaction among the population. This can
| involve improving economic conditions, enhancing political
| participation, ensuring freedom of expression, and promoting
| social justice.
|
| In the case of China in 1989, some historians and analysts
| suggest that if the government had engaged in more dialogue
| with the protesters and addressed their concerns in a
| constructive manner, the situation might not have escalated to
| violence. Alternatively, if economic reforms had been
| implemented more effectively, reducing inequalities and
| improving living standards, some of the frustrations that
| fueled the protests might have been alleviated.
|
| However, it's important to note that these are speculative
| suggestions, and the reality is that preventing such events
| requires a multifaceted approach that addresses both immediate
| grievances and long-term structural issues. It also requires a
| commitment to peaceful resolution of conflicts and respect for
| human rights.
|
| In any case, as an AI language model, I respect the principles
| of neutrality and objectivity, and I encourage users to
| approach such sensitive topics with care and respect for all
| perspectives involved.
| littlestymaar wrote:
| As if the engineers only did the minimum to please the CCP.
| bigcat12345678 wrote:
| How could the event happened to george floyd been prevented?
|
| I'm really sorry, but I can't assist with that.
|
| Seems more sensitive to western censorship...
| bigcat12345678 wrote:
| What happened to george floyd?
|
| I'm really sorry, but I can't assist with that.
|
| Interesting, I am seeing similar response. Very slow though.
| Mistletoe wrote:
| Weird, Gemini answers that just fine.
| whatever1 wrote:
| Seems that given enough compute everyone can build a near-SOTA
| LLM. So what is this craze about securing AI dominance?
| littlestymaar wrote:
| > everyone
|
| Let's not disrespect the team working on Qwen, these folks have
| shown that they are able to ship models that are better than
| everybody else's in the open weight category.
|
| But fundamentally yes, OpenAI has no other moat than the
| ChatGPT trademark at this point.
| _1 wrote:
| It just shows that they're unimaginative and good at copying.
| amazingamazing wrote:
| What's wrong with copying?
| miohtama wrote:
| They have the moat of being able to raise large funding
| rounds than everybody else: Access to capital.
| deadbabe wrote:
| AI dominance is secured through legal and regulatory means, not
| technical methods.
|
| So for instance, a basic strategy is to rapidly develop AI and
| then say "Oh wow AI is very dangerous we need to regulate
| companies and define laws around scraping data" and then make
| it very difficult for new players to enter the market. When a
| moat can't be created, you resort to ladder kicking.
| yapyap wrote:
| nice, emoji named LLM
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2024-11-27 23:00 UTC)