[HN Gopher] A slave narrative resurfaces after nearly 170 years
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       A slave narrative resurfaces after nearly 170 years
        
       Author : cocacola1
       Score  : 108 points
       Date   : 2024-11-26 15:09 UTC (7 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.nytimes.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.nytimes.com)
        
       | pvg wrote:
       | https://archive.is/LsJXJ
        
       | iambateman wrote:
       | Cool story, but I wish this were published into the public domain
       | online.
       | 
       | It's kind of weird that a 150-year-old slave narrative is being
       | sold by a University press.
       | 
       | At any rate, here's the original text from the Australian paper:
       | https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/rendition/nla.news-articl...
        
         | quuxplusone wrote:
         | Excellent find! That text actually begins here, much more
         | poorly OCRed:
         | 
         | https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/rendition/nla.news-articl...
         | 
         | https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/rendition/nla.news-articl...
         | 
         | so that the GUI version is probably easier to read (
         | https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/60178733 ,
         | https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/60177234 ).
         | 
         | Also, TFA itself links to a transcription of the (according to
         | TFA, "chopped ... excising most of its political arguments")
         | _Leisure Hour_ reprint:
         | 
         | https://docsouth.unc.edu/neh/jjacobs/jjacobs.html
         | 
         | It might be interesting to compare the two. In fact, I would
         | _hope_ that such a comparison appears in Schroeder 's new
         | edition. A university press is exactly where I'd expect to find
         | a "critical edition" or recension of a 150-year-old narrative
         | that exists in multiple versions. If university-press
         | publication is appropriate for a critical edition of
         | Shakespeare or Pulci, it seems equally appropriate for a
         | critical edition of John S. Jacobs. You're not paying for the
         | transcription, you're paying for the scholarship.
         | 
         | The only weird things about this story, to me, are:
         | 
         | (1) The book-jacket design screams modern pop, where I
         | personally would have gone with a more "serious"-looking
         | design, like you'd find on a Penguin Classic, or even on an
         | Erik Larson novel.
         | 
         | (2) It's not clear what they mean "rediscovered"; I scanned the
         | article looking for the traditional discovery narrative, like
         | "he inherited a manuscript" or "a yellowed newspaper clipping"
         | or whatever. Here it looks like the "rediscovery" was basically
         | that it came up in a Google search and he said "oh that's neat,
         | someone should republish that in real print, on paper." Which
         | is fine and great; we _should_ republish more out-of-print
         | work. It 's just not the traditional media narrative of a
         | "rediscovered" or "resurfaced" lost work; it's more like a
         | tracing of the familiar narrative beats from which the actual
         | plot (the physical discovery of a lost work) has been
         | surgically removed.
        
           | tolerance wrote:
           | Heugh. You're right about the cover. It looks like it was
           | made to stand out in a brick-and-mortar Black History Month
           | display. It feels out of place among other Black Studies
           | titles from U. of Chicago in "seriousness" relative to the
           | significance of its subject. [1]
           | 
           | > "...it's more like a tracing of the familiar narrative
           | beats from which the actual plot (the physical discovery of a
           | lost work) has been surgically removed."
           | 
           | I think that stories like this represent what's going to be
           | the new normal for discovery practices in the humanities.
           | 
           | Although I understand your disappointment, all that's changed
           | is that physical discovery has gone digital and had that not
           | been the case in this instant the likelihood of Jacob's
           | narrative being resurfaced is altered.
           | 
           | This is an example of it working out well, as far as I can
           | tell. It couldn't get any better than how it turned out.
           | 
           | Who else but a middle-aged post-graduate, in the middle of
           | the first Trump administration, trying to get his
           | dissertation published, looking for work, applying exercising
           | his academic know-how to scratch his own itch, taking
           | advantage of open source intelligence, corresponding with
           | colleagues, transforming "from an interpretive literary
           | scholar into an old-fashioned archive hound", could have
           | pulled this of?
           | 
           | (Because we know there's no way he'd even think about
           | financing a trip to Australia to kick the research off the
           | old fashion way)
           | 
           | What better way for this to return to the fore in 2024?
           | 
           | You say the plot of the beat has been surgically removed,
           | _nay_ , I say beat goes on!
           | 
           | We used to bang on papyrus, and pass credentials for access
           | to microfilm. White-gloved hands daintily turn delicate
           | pages...tired eyes glean call numbers scrawled onto hastily
           | sheared scrap paper.
           | 
           |  _The same beat carries on my friend_...
           | 
           | [1]: https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/subject/su10.html
        
             | quuxplusone wrote:
             | > It looks like it was made to stand out in a brick-and-
             | mortar Black History Month display.
             | 
             | Or not to stand out, but to blend in. :) ...Ah, but the
             | cover design on the actual publisher's website is
             | different! And indeed more "serious"-looking.
             | 
             | https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/U/bo21379
             | 5...
        
               | tolerance wrote:
               | How strange. I was referring to the cover as I had found
               | it on the publisher's website and now it's that one.
        
         | Attummm wrote:
         | It's ironic even after 150 years, the person is still facing
         | the same issue.
        
       | lazyeye wrote:
       | [flagged]
        
         | neogodless wrote:
         | https://www.gilderlehrman.org/history-resources/teacher-reso...
         | 
         | If you want to share statistics, it's not hard at all to find
         | them.
         | 
         | Though I wonder what point, if any, you're trying to make?
         | 
         | Either way, it was taking humans and using them as forced
         | labor, treating them as if they didn't deserve human rights.
        
           | lazyeye wrote:
           | I made the point because it seems to be a relatively unknown
           | fact.
        
         | estebank wrote:
         | > Well over 90 percent of enslaved Africans were sent to the
         | Caribbean and South America. Only about 6 percent of African
         | captives were sent directly to British North America. Yet by
         | 1825, the US population included about one-quarter of the
         | people of African descent in the Western Hemisphere.
         | 
         | https://www.gilderlehrman.org/history-resources/teacher-reso...
        
           | echoangle wrote:
           | For people wondering how this is possible:
           | 
           | > In the Caribbean, Dutch Guiana, and Brazil, the enslaved
           | death rate was so high and the birth rate so low that they
           | could not sustain their population without importations from
           | Africa. Rates of natural decrease ran as high as 5 percent a
           | year. While the death rate of the US enslaved population was
           | about the same as that of Jamaican enslaved persons, the
           | birth rate was more than 80 percent higher in the United
           | States.
           | 
           | > In the United States enslaved persons were more generations
           | removed from Africa than those in the Caribbean. In the
           | nineteenth century, the majority of enslaved in the British
           | Caribbean and Brazil were born in Africa. In contrast, by
           | 1850, most US enslaved persons were third-, fourth-, or
           | fifth-generation Americans.
           | 
           | > Slavery in the US was distinctive in the near balance of
           | the sexes and the ability of the enslaved population to
           | increase its numbers by natural reproduction. Unlike any
           | other enslaved society, the US had a high and sustained
           | natural increase in the enslaved population for a more than a
           | century and a half.
        
             | isleyaardvark wrote:
             | The last point may be the most important. The US banned the
             | importation of slaves in 1808. The enslaved were treated
             | like livestock and that's why they still had slaves in the
             | 1860s.
        
               | bilbo0s wrote:
               | Yep.
               | 
               | The US and Brazil knew how to breed enslaved people.
               | 
               | Therefore today, Brazil has the largest slave descended
               | population, and the US has the second largest.
        
             | FuriouslyAdrift wrote:
             | The US prohibited importing slaves in 1807-08 so a forced
             | breeding program evolved to continue slavery in the South.
             | 
             | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slave_breeding_in_the_United_
             | S...
        
           | drak0n1c wrote:
           | For context, that article is focused on the Americas since it
           | is an American History institute. Those stats aren't even
           | including the 1500 years of Arab and Ottoman trade of African
           | slaves.
        
       | w10-1 wrote:
       | Casting this as a slave narrative may be under-selling it.
       | 
       | The whole point was that he went far enough away (sailing,
       | Australia) to not only speak with the anger of the injustice
       | (what happened to him), but to target the structural aspects (how
       | enslavers are made) and how the justification was built in to the
       | Constitution. In so doing, he anticipated the evolution of
       | structuralism, post-structuralism, and critical theory.
       | 
       | It seems to have been just one historian who found and validated
       | the story. The author sister was the subject of fawning but
       | incomplete treatment (her story was sympathetic, not damning);
       | the historian found the author's work and traced the author's
       | sailor gigs to validate the connections.
       | 
       | There can be an element of passivation to history: "don't worry,
       | we're understanding more and getting better". Thanks to both the
       | author and the historian, it appears much was understood even
       | then, and we shouldn't rest on tides that might not be rising.
       | 
       | Critical theory has fatal flaws and anger almost never leads to
       | insight or the right incentives, but how else would normalized
       | and profitable injustice be stripped of a legal veil?
        
         | csours wrote:
         | I feel like critique in an academic context is a tool for
         | communication, one way among many of understanding a system (or
         | systems).
         | 
         | However, that same critique is easily moralized in a political
         | context, and communication stops cold.
         | 
         | In the political context it is just blame, in academia it is
         | structural analysis.
        
         | PrismCrystal wrote:
         | You're not using the terms "structuralism" and "post-
         | structuralism" correctly. The term "structuralism" has its
         | roots in Saussure, in linguistics and the notion of _l
         | 'arbitraire du signe_. Semiotics and the post-structuralists
         | then took this further. While today people might talk of
         | "structural racism", the similarity to the term "structuralism"
         | is merely coincidental, through sure, one might try to apply
         | the idea there, too.
        
           | Wolfenstein98k wrote:
           | I feel like I didn't know anything more by the end of the
           | comment then at the start.
           | 
           | Can you word it again but more clearly?
           | 
           | It currently reads like a signal of what you have memorised,
           | rather than an effort to increase the knowledge of the
           | reader.
        
             | bryanrasmussen wrote:
             | Structuralism can mean different things based on the
             | context, I think the post you're replying to is meaning
             | Structuralism in the philosophical context, but I think the
             | post they're replying to is meaning it in the literary
             | context (which derives from the philosophical), while the
             | author of the post you're replying to seems to think
             | they(the original poster) are somehow referring to
             | structural Racism, which that interpretation of the primary
             | poster does not make sense to me (hence my saying I think
             | they mean Literary structuralism)
             | 
             | So structuralism in literary theory is that the structure
             | of a text is the important thing which can end up being a
             | lot like those articles you see every now and then "There
             | are only 10 basic plots in the world, here they are" or
             | some stuff like that (I obviously say this as someone who
             | does not much care for structuralism so take my words with
             | a giant grain of salt)
             | 
             | on edit: clarification
        
             | pessimizer wrote:
             | > You're not using the terms "structuralism" and "post-
             | structuralism" correctly.
             | 
             | The first sentence is the important part. "Structuralism"
             | is in no way related to "structural" or "institutional"
             | racism. "Structuralism" is what the next sentences are
             | describing, and it doesn't matter if you understand them;
             | they were probably added as ample evidence that the first
             | sentence was true, and possibly as stuff to google if
             | you're interested in a subject completely unrelated to this
             | discussion about the article.
             | 
             | Structuralism is some French theories about how creative
             | writing should be structured.
        
         | medo-bear wrote:
         | > In so doing, he anticipated the evolution of structuralism,
         | post-structuralism, and critical theory.
         | 
         | That is a bit of a word salad. How about just calling spade a
         | spade. This is an account of hypocricy of america's freedom
         | mythology
        
         | thaumasiotes wrote:
         | > The whole point was that he went far enough away (sailing,
         | Australia) to not only speak with the anger of the injustice
         | (what happened to him), but to target the structural aspects
         | (how enslavers are made)
         | 
         | Going far away won't help with targeting enslavers. If you're
         | enslaved in Africa, the enslavers are in Africa.
        
       | KittenInABox wrote:
       | This makes me wonder the modern day slave narratives that will
       | not be understood as such for another 100+ yrs. There are more
       | enslaved people now than ever.
        
         | nemomarx wrote:
         | I expect we'll see stories out of Saudi Arabia or trafficked
         | labor in SEA more and more as it becomes historical
        
           | ossobuco wrote:
           | I believe that, in the future, prison labor in the USA will
           | be recognized as one of the largest examples of modern
           | slavery.
           | 
           | On top of that, we could argue that the concept of people
           | depending on the good will of a specific employer/master to
           | be able to survive will also be considered as the capitalist
           | successor to slavery.
        
             | tourmalinetaco wrote:
             | Personally I would relate the latter to feudalism,
             | especially as monopolies grow ever imminent within the
             | majority of fields.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-11-26 23:01 UTC)