[HN Gopher] The Political Afterlife of Paradise Lost
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The Political Afterlife of Paradise Lost
        
       Author : drdee
       Score  : 47 points
       Date   : 2024-11-19 22:35 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.newstatesman.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.newstatesman.com)
        
       | pge wrote:
       | In case anyone is interested, the full text of Paradise Lost with
       | helpful annotations is available online at Dartmouth:
       | 
       | https://milton.host.dartmouth.edu/reading_room/pl/intro/text...
        
         | cess11 wrote:
         | It's also on Standard Ebooks, in case one considers the
         | annotations distracting:
         | https://standardebooks.org/ebooks/john-milton/paradise-lost
        
         | kibwen wrote:
         | I know that people spend a lot of time fixating on how to write
         | a good opening line for their books ("It was a dark and stormy
         | night", etc.), but Paradise Lost has I think the most beautiful
         | _closing_ passage of any book (spoilers for The Bible):
         | 
         |  _They looking back, all th ' Eastern side beheld_
         | 
         |  _Of Paradise, so late thir happie seat,_
         | 
         |  _Wav 'd over by that flaming Brand, the Gate_
         | 
         |  _With dreadful Faces throng 'd and fierie Armes:_
         | 
         |  _Som natural tears they drop 'd, but wip'd them soon;_
         | 
         |  _The World was all before them, where to choose_
         | 
         |  _Thir place of rest, and Providence thir guide:_
         | 
         |  _They hand in hand with wandring steps and slow,_
         | 
         |  _Through Eden took thir solitarie way._
        
         | Frummy wrote:
         | HN discussing this link in old thread here:
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38876560
        
       | KineticLensman wrote:
       | The book being reviewed by TFA is not itself a review of Paradise
       | Lost, but a study of how people have interpreted Paradise Lost
       | since it was published in 1667. TFA says 'The biggest story that
       | Reade is telling is that of slavery.'
       | 
       | YMMV, but I don't think that this was Milton's main message -
       | IIRC from reading PL years ago at school, the main story was
       | Satan's rebellion against God. Satan was presented as a sort of
       | heroic anti-hero, who has some great lines, although he
       | eventually (of course) loses. So, I guess I'm saying please don't
       | let this review of a book that highlights lots of peoples'
       | reactions to PL influence your judgement of the underlying source
       | text.
        
         | tupshin wrote:
         | "the main story was Satan's rebellion against God"
         | 
         | so Satan rebelling against being enslaved?
        
           | KineticLensman wrote:
           | More like the rebellion of a subject against their king,
           | which isn't quite the same as slavery used in TFA (which is
           | mainly the slavery of the blacks under the whites).
        
           | sigzero wrote:
           | Wrong and not even close.
        
       | user3939382 wrote:
       | I found the first 20% of this book a bit tedious as I got used to
       | the style of English, but I'm glad I stuck it out. Eventually it
       | became very natural to read and the beauty of the language is
       | something I'm not sure I've encountered anywhere else.
       | 
       | At least through a contemporary lens I didn't get the impression
       | it was political whatsoever. What it did seem to do was fill in
       | the (many) blanks present in the corresponding biblical
       | narratives.
        
         | cvoss wrote:
         | Yeah, the political or otherwise ideological nature is read
         | _into_ the work. It doesn 't come _out of_ the work. But, I
         | think, precisely because PL is one of the greatest masterpieces
         | of the English language, it becomes a focus for that kind of
         | attention, where people want to construe it for their own
         | objectives. See also the centuries-long debate running through
         | the likes of William Blake, C.S. Lewis, and Philip Pullman on
         | whether or not we should see Satan as the sympathetic and
         | virtuous hero. That debate is a touchstone of religious
         | ideological conversation.
         | 
         | As an aside, I find that PL fills the blanks in the biblical
         | narrative almost too well! There are some aspects of our modern
         | cultural understanding of what angels, demons, and Satan are
         | like that come straight out of PL and have no foundation in the
         | biblical narrative. It leads to a lot of confusion among
         | religious persons because they end up believing in these
         | details that don't come from the avowed authoritative source.
         | 
         | You may have heard a Christian try to claim that Adam ate the
         | fruit after Eve did, with the express purpose of not being
         | separated from her---that he knew she'd be exiled, so he
         | intended to stay with her by being exiled himself. In that way,
         | Adam acquires a sympathetic and heroic tint in his role in the
         | Fall. But this is completely fabricated by Milton! It's
         | straight from PL and nowhere to be found in the biblical
         | narrative.
        
         | beezlebroxxxxxx wrote:
         | > At least through a contemporary lens I didn't get the
         | impression it was political whatsoever.
         | 
         | The poem has a strong republican sentiment (lowercase 'r')
         | throughout. During Cromwell's control, he argued for
         | republicanism; he likely composed much of the early elements of
         | the poem while in hiding after Restoration, fearing very
         | correctly for his life; and he remained a republican for all
         | his life. Milton's characterization of Satan in the poem is
         | incredible because of the way he chooses this unlikely figure
         | to channel so much of his misgivings and criticisms of absolute
         | and monarchical power.
         | 
         | In a modern context, it's fascinating to see how much sympathy
         | Milton can make for Satan (a figure who, in most modern secular
         | contexts, is far more commonly simplistically presented as pure
         | evil incarnate) and how the poem poses evergreen questions
         | about the role and nature of grievance, revolution, vengeance,
         | power, and the masses in governance.
        
           | KineticLensman wrote:
           | > it's fascinating to see how much sympathy Milton can make
           | for Satan
           | 
           | When I read PL at school, Satan came across as a really cool
           | dude who could fly! Admittedly I was (much) younger then.
        
             | beezlebroxxxxxx wrote:
             | One of the fascinating consequences of PL's incredible
             | storytelling and poetry is to humanize Satan. Unlike the
             | Son of God, or God themselves, Satan seems _far_ more
             | multifaceted. He has hopes, dreams, ambitions, and
             | ruminates and obsesses over his own failings as well
             | whether freedom from tyranny, as he sees it, is worth
             | getting cast out of heaven for. To him, he lost paradise.
             | These things make him feel alive in the poem, like a real
             | person, a creation entirely Milton 's own.
        
       | brodouevencode wrote:
       | Using religion as a basis for political ideology is nothing new.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-11-20 23:01 UTC)