[HN Gopher] The Analog Thing: Analog Computing for the Future
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The Analog Thing: Analog Computing for the Future
        
       Author : cgeier
       Score  : 52 points
       Date   : 2024-11-19 17:09 UTC (5 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (the-analog-thing.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (the-analog-thing.org)
        
       | szvsw wrote:
       | There's no better introduction to signals and systems than a
       | modular synthesizer IMO - the combination of tactility and
       | audibility for multi-sensory learning is so great at building
       | intuition - and more importantly, excitement! - for signal
       | processing.
       | 
       | This looks like a cool project in the same spirit!
        
         | omani wrote:
         | I agree. I highly recommend [0] Moritz Klein's channel. amazing
         | explanations and learning effect.
         | 
         | [0] https://youtube.com/@MoritzKlein0/videos
        
         | ObscureScience wrote:
         | Cool, I was thinking about the other way around, using an
         | analog computer to build synthesizers.
        
           | youngtaff wrote:
           | This fella is using it as part of his music making
           | https://www.instagram.com/stephano.music/
        
       | Ductapemaster wrote:
       | In my upper-division analog electronics class (the hard one), our
       | lab project throughout the quarter was to build an analog
       | computer that simulated the physics of a bouncing ball. Physical
       | variables of the system were adjustable (gravity constant,
       | coefficient of restitution, etc), and the ball was "released" by
       | pressing a button. The output was viewed on an oscilloscope.
       | 
       | One of the hardest 10 weeks of my life, but also one of the most
       | rewarding. Our team was one of the few that actually got it
       | working in the end. I had to custom-make a gigantic breadboard to
       | hold the entire circuit.
       | 
       | Today I still work in hardware, but mostly with digital circuits.
       | While my analog knowledge has decayed over the last decade, that
       | project and it's success gives me great confidence any time I
       | have to deal with the domain.
       | 
       | If you want to take a look, here's a pretty similar project:
       | https://www.analogmuseum.org/english/examples/bouncing_ball_...
        
         | klysm wrote:
         | Did the mathematical model being used have a differentiable
         | heigh function? I'm imagining it would be the simplest if it
         | didn't but that could cause problems in the electronics.
         | 
         | Also what components did you have access to, just op amps?
        
           | Ductapemaster wrote:
           | Just op-amps and FETs for the active components. The design
           | from my memory was:
           | 
           | - To get position, 2 integrators were applied to an
           | adjustable voltage representing gravity.
           | 
           | - The FETs were used to set initial states of the
           | integrators.
           | 
           | - A comparator used to detect the table (y=0), flip the
           | velocity and apply a scaling factor for restitution
           | 
           | The math was actually quite simple given its just the
           | standard velocity equations -- the challenge was in handling
           | state changes in the electronics.
           | 
           | I looked around a little more and this video is a very close
           | replica of what we built:
           | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qt6RVrmvh-o
        
         | leeter wrote:
         | > Today I still work in hardware, but mostly with digital
         | circuits. While my analog knowledge has decayed over the last
         | decade, that project and it's success gives me great confidence
         | any time I have to deal with the domain.
         | 
         | Do you think about the analog qualities of your traces when
         | laying things out? If so then the course was well taken.
         | 
         | In my observations I've found that too many digital engineers
         | assume a differential pair will save them without actually
         | fixing the impedance and parasitic issues. Particularly as the
         | timings of things become so much more precise analog is so
         | important. People forget that a digital circuit is just an
         | analog one under the covers.
        
         | djcooley wrote:
         | My version of this was a 10-week discrete RF circuits course in
         | graduate school. We had to build a fully functional GHz
         | transceiver out of small FR4 PCBs (< quarter wavelength) and
         | throw-away leaded BJT transistors. Neither were suitable for
         | GHz circuits, so the course was hard by design. I learned so
         | much and developed an intuition for electromagnetics that I
         | still carry 20 years later.
        
       | daft_pink wrote:
       | is it possible to buy this thing in the USA (no vat)
        
       | fidotron wrote:
       | As a different sort of analog computer, I have long been
       | wondering about a "compiler" for fluidic logic that can output
       | devices you could 3D print which would then operate on pneumatic
       | or hydraulic signals. Probably entirely useless, but wouldn't be
       | affected by an EMP!
       | 
       | That idea was shamelessly inspired by the soft fluidic robot some
       | years back.
        
         | InitialLastName wrote:
         | > wouldn't be affected by an EMP!
         | 
         | Even better, it would only be affected by relatively rare
         | phenomena, such as vibration, temperature change, orientation
         | and rotation.
        
         | Animats wrote:
         | Something like that is inside some automatic transmissions.
         | 
         | Sperry UNIVAC once built a 4-bit fluidic ALU as a demo, but it
         | was useless.
        
       | lagrange77 wrote:
       | I've ordered one last holidays and haven't had the time to use it
       | yet. Unfortunately it doesn't fit in the famous dev board drawer.
        
       | SoftTalker wrote:
       | Prior discussion:
       | 
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36165513 (2023)
       | 
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28614840 (2021)
        
       | zachbee wrote:
       | It's a cute toy and a fun educational tool, but "computing for
       | the future" seems like a bit of an overstatement.
        
         | sushid wrote:
         | I think they're saying analog computers could be the future of
         | computing.
         | 
         | Veritasium explains it really well in general here (and demos
         | the device) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GVsUOuSjvcg
        
       | Animats wrote:
       | A built-in scope display would be nice. Like this $10 module.[1]
       | Then you could use this standalone. They charge EUR 499 for the
       | thing, after all.
       | 
       | The way you usually run an analog computer is to put it into fast
       | repeat mode (which they call REPF), where it cycles between
       | initial condition mode and run mode. Outputs go to a scope. Then
       | you can twiddle the knobs and see the output respond immediately.
       | 
       | The other modes are used mostly during setup and debug.
       | 
       | Hours of fun. Ages 14 and up.
       | 
       | [1] https://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/YIXINTAI-
       | DSO138-Digit...
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-11-19 23:00 UTC)