[HN Gopher] Austen and Darwin converged on the question of beauty
___________________________________________________________________
Austen and Darwin converged on the question of beauty
Author : gmays
Score : 39 points
Date : 2024-11-19 13:29 UTC (9 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (aeon.co)
(TXT) w3m dump (aeon.co)
| kitd wrote:
| Something not mentioned is that Austen lived very close (c. 2
| hour walk away) to the home of Rev Gilbert White, who many regard
| as the world's first naturalist.
|
| His method of detailed observations of common animals, insects
| and plants living in their natural habitats (rather than dead in
| cases) was quite revolutionary in its day, became popular in the
| scientific world at that time and almost certainly influenced
| indirectly Darwin's own studies. He even wrote a detailed study
| of earthworms, something Darwin did later famously, though
| there's no suggestion of direct influence.
|
| It would not be a surprise if Austen became well acquainted with
| the works of a famous local "celebrity" as White as well.
| delichon wrote:
| I read someone call Austen the Drosophila melanogaster of
| evolutionary psychology. They seem to study her work like
| theologists study bibles. The fruit fly comparison makes it sound
| like they are studying a specimen. But my theory is that they
| recognize her as a colleague who happened to write in a different
| genre.
| Electricniko wrote:
| I was recently reading Washington Irving's first book, from 1809,
| where he mentioned Darwin arguing that humans are descended from
| monkeys, and I thought "that seems a little early." Turns out he
| was talking about Charles Darwin's grandfather, Erasmus, who laid
| some of the groundwork for Charles, and he was famous for writing
| romantic poems about scientific subjects like reproduction of
| flowers to help encourage more people to get involved with
| science.
| graemep wrote:
| Ideas about some form of evolution go back a long way - to
| ancient times.
|
| What Darwin (and Wallace) did was provide an explanation of the
| mechanism that drove it.
| Anotheroneagain wrote:
| Ornamentation makes perfect sense as long as it consumes rare
| resources.
|
| When you can find enough resources to build expensive
| ornamentation in good times, you can probably survive hard times
| decently well, only your ornamentation will suffer.
|
| But when you use all the resources that you can get for breeding
| as much as possible in good times, the population will probably
| collapse in bad times.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2024-11-19 23:02 UTC)