[HN Gopher] Why did people rub snow on frozen feet?
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Why did people rub snow on frozen feet?
        
       Author : naberhausj
       Score  : 22 points
       Date   : 2024-11-15 21:50 UTC (1 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (outdoors.stackexchange.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (outdoors.stackexchange.com)
        
       | DiscourseFan wrote:
       | Yeah but clearly people wouldn'tve been doing it if it hadn't
       | worked, so what is the reason for trying that specific
       | traditional method?
        
         | unclad5968 wrote:
         | The only thing I can find is that heating too fast might cause
         | gangrene.
        
         | bqmjjx0kac wrote:
         | > people wouldn'tve been doing it if it hadn't worked
         | 
         | That's a bold claim!
        
           | krisoft wrote:
           | Yeah. Maybe someone who got rubbed with snow got randomly
           | better completely unrelated to the treatment and then
           | superstition run wild with that coincidence.
           | 
           | Or maybe people understood initially that you should do the
           | rubbing next to a fire. And then the rubbing only has
           | positive efect because it lets the person administering it
           | feel when the heat is too much, and naturally adjusts the
           | distance to prevent burns or injury from too fast warming up.
           | 
           | Or maybe someone told people to do it because they thought it
           | might help and never bothered to check if it does anything or
           | not.
           | 
           | Or maybe people did know it does nothing but there was no
           | other option and doing something about the injury felt better
           | than doing nothing.
           | 
           | Maybe it was doing mechanically nothing but the care and
           | personal touch had a beneficial effect due to placebo.
           | 
           | Maybe it made the injury worse, thus more likely that they
           | amputated and paradoxically that saved the injured from worse
           | outcomes like gangrene.
           | 
           | There is so many other possibility than "if they did it it
           | must have worked". Who knows.
        
         | norgie wrote:
         | This was addressed in the accepted answer:
         | 
         | > rapid rewarming from open campfires or other sources of dry
         | heat caused so much devastation.....Dry heat from ....open
         | fires....cannot be controlled. Excessively high temperatures
         | are usually produced, resulting in a combined burn and
         | frostbite, a devasting injury that leads to far greater tissue
         | loss.
         | 
         | Sounds like it was an overreaction to applying excessive heat
         | to the frostbitten tissue.
        
         | hiatus wrote:
         | > Yeah but clearly people wouldn'tve been doing it if it hadn't
         | worked
         | 
         | Like bloodletting, leeches, lobotomies...
        
         | robbiep wrote:
         | Without being overly condescending, you do realise that most of
         | the things that have been done throughout history, along with
         | many we still do, are the result of cultural practice and have
         | no evidence base whatsoever?
         | 
         | Whilst 1956 seems to be a fairly late date to stop what would
         | seem in the surface to be a counter intuitive practice, 80
         | years earlier blood letting was still in vogue
        
           | exe34 wrote:
           | people still pray to personal gods to this day, expecting
           | them to prioritise their petty little lives while others are
           | suffering/dying of things that could be trivially solved with
           | a bit of knowledge and technology.
        
         | riccardomc wrote:
         | Clearly
         | 
         | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_unproven_methods_aga...
        
         | JumpCrisscross wrote:
         | > _people wouldn'tve been doing it if it hadn't worked_
         | 
         | Now do trepanation and corpse medicine.
         | 
         | Like, look around you. We're a stupid species. Not
         | consistently. But a lot. We've _always_ been a bunch of apes
         | banging around.
        
       | aaron695 wrote:
       | They are as dumb as HN users, would you not just look up old
       | medical texts?
       | 
       | https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/248760861 (1953)
       | This must be done very slowly. The longer the part has been
       | exposed to the cold the longer must be the time taken over
       | restoring the circulation.       Applying warmth, for instance,
       | would almost certainly set up moist gangrene. Normal treatment
       | would be to place the patient in a cold room and rub the frozen
       | extremities with snow.
       | 
       | What did the Germans say on this. This was obviously part of
       | their concentration camp experiments.
       | 
       | (1951) Don't rub snow, don't use heat. Experimenting with drugs -
       | https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/139910391
       | 
       | It's a good example of how slowly information moved pre-internet
       | society.
        
       | incognito124 wrote:
       | I've experienced rapid warming of hands when handling snow
       | without gloves. Maybe it's the same mechanism?
        
       | sdwr wrote:
       | I believe the logic is to heat gently through friction, and to
       | promote blood circulation through manipulation.
       | 
       | Warming up cold body parts is painful, so maybe it's about
       | distracting from the pain as well.
        
         | bongodongobob wrote:
         | Yeah it's extremely painful. I jumped into a frozen lake years
         | ago and ran to a shower afterwards. Turned on the water, just
         | slightly warm and it felt like my fingers and toes got smashed
         | by a hammer.
        
           | renewiltord wrote:
           | Some spas have this if you'd like to mimic it mildly. Aire in
           | London has a very cool pool from which you can go to a very
           | hot pool. I really enjoy the pins and needles effect.
        
       | cyberax wrote:
       | One thing to keep in mind, is that if somebody is hypothermic and
       | not just frostbitten, then rapid re-warming is a bad idea.
       | 
       | Body protects itself by shutting down blood flow to skin and
       | extremities, keeping the core warm. So if the extremities are
       | rapidly re-warmed, then blood vessels in them dilate. And then
       | blood starts flowing through oxygen-depleted tissues that are
       | cold and full of accumulated metabolic waste.
       | 
       | Not a good combination, and you might end up with organ damage as
       | a result.
       | 
       | Gradual re-warming instead gives the body time to slowly clear
       | the waste as blood flow re-establishes itself.
        
       | schiffern wrote:
       | Perhaps it started with people misunderstanding / misremembering
       | _drying off_ by rubbing snow on wet skin. Being soaking wet in
       | cold conditions can be a death sentence so you need to dry off
       | quickly, and this is one of the recommended methods.
       | 
       | https://www.ncexped.com/drying-off-snow/
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-11-15 23:00 UTC)