[HN Gopher] Porygon Was Innocent: An epileptic perspective on th...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Porygon Was Innocent: An epileptic perspective on the infamous
       Pokemon episode
        
       Author : Aissen
       Score  : 108 points
       Date   : 2024-11-13 19:48 UTC (3 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.animefeminist.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.animefeminist.com)
        
       | outworlder wrote:
       | > These include Absence Seizures, when a person stops what they
       | are doing altogether, loses awareness but does not collapse or
       | have visible convulsions; Myoclonic Seizures, when a person's
       | limbs suddenly jerk uncontrollably but they remain conscious and
       | aware; and Tonic Clonic Seizures where a person loses
       | consciousness, collapses, and their whole body convulses.
       | 
       | I've witnessed something that I've never seen described anywhere
       | - a very similar thing to an 'absence seizure', but the person is
       | still aware and responding but seem unable to break away from the
       | empty stare even when they try.
        
         | NeuroCoder wrote:
         | There are all kinds of presentations for seizures. Ones in the
         | frontal lobe are particularly hard to catch based on external
         | presentation. If one is suspected of having seizures they will
         | get a continuously monitored EEG where times associated where
         | the seizure like state is monitored electrically. Sometimes
         | it's a really weird presentation of a seizure or sometimes it's
         | psychogenic. Either way it's good to have these people get some
         | help I'd it keeps happening.
        
         | _def wrote:
         | This is the first time I came across this somewhere else other
         | than this one person I know that has this. Fascinating.
        
         | PaulHoule wrote:
         | This movie
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Looker
         | 
         | is usually panned but it has a lot of great ideas in it
         | including a light pulse gun that reliably causes absence
         | seizures. Probably my favorite weapon from sci-fi movies
         | although I have a soft spot for the zap gun out of _Battlefield
         | Earth_ which must be like one of those ray guns that Hubbard
         | thought people have been using to implant us with bad ideas for
         | trillions of years.
         | 
         | Just a bit ahead of its time it's like a 1984 movie that came
         | out in 1981.
        
         | d1sxeyes wrote:
         | That sounds like a focal aware (simple partial) seizure. There
         | are other things that it could be but if you want to search,
         | you could try starting with those keywords.
        
       | aaaronic wrote:
       | I thought it was common knowledge that Pikachu was the culprit.
        
         | Aissen wrote:
         | I think it is, but the article really is about giving more
         | context around what happened, and how it impacted the industry.
        
         | hinkley wrote:
         | Pikachu isn't real but the writers are.
        
           | the_af wrote:
           | It's probably more the animators than the writers at fault.
           | (Though not on purpose, of course).
        
       | asynchronous wrote:
       | I'm glad they bring up the techniques of ghosting and others to
       | pass the Harding test, and the outcry from western audiences
       | about it. Because personally, I find the diminishing of the
       | animation quality really distracting during those hype scenes.
       | 
       | I wish we could find some solution where we distribute the
       | epileptic-safe versions alongside the unsafe ones and users could
       | choose.
        
         | ziddoap wrote:
         | > _I wish we could find some solution where we distribute the
         | epileptic-safe versions alongside the unsafe ones and users
         | could choose._
         | 
         | They seem to be able to distribute uncensored & censored
         | versions for some of the more risque or violent shows, as well
         | as various levels of censorship for different regions. So, the
         | solution is sort of already there, there's just not enough
         | motivation I guess.
        
         | VincentEvans wrote:
         | I wonder what people think about that part of the article where
         | the author paints people who want to see the unedited version
         | of the show in a negative light. The author presents "but i am
         | not epileptic" crowd as ableist and insensitive.
         | 
         | I strongly disagree and this kind of take makes me sympathize
         | with the author less than I would otherwise, subconsciously.
         | 
         | I can simultaneously support the idea that we should make
         | adjusted content for people with epilepsy, or in a more general
         | sense - it is a sign of elevated society to strive to
         | accommodate people with disabilities or differences, but at the
         | same time resent the notion that accomplishing the above has to
         | mean that asking for an unaltered experience is "wrong".
         | 
         | I feel that putting those two demands on the opposite sides of
         | the scale is "wokeism".
        
           | the_af wrote:
           | I think the author does a fine job of pointing out you don't
           | know whether this scene can harm you (you can be hit by it
           | while not having had a seizure before in your life), so you
           | cannot make an a priori judgment on whether you can safely
           | watch the scene unedited.
           | 
           | So playing the edited scene seems like the safest choice for
           | everyone...
        
             | VincentEvans wrote:
             | Putting up a warning (and maybe this warning should be more
             | prominent, or some other mechanism ought to be invented if
             | warnings are not effective) - is what we currently do to
             | accommodate people with food allergies. Does it make sense
             | to take peanut butter off the store shelves, and completely
             | eradicate all nuts, dairy, and wheat out of all food
             | products?
             | 
             | Are people who want to make PB&J "ableist"?
        
               | speerer wrote:
               | In the UK, many schools do just this to defend allergic
               | people against the threat that homemade lunches would
               | otherwise pose.
        
           | fossuser wrote:
           | It's also odd that there seems to be a large overlap of
           | autistic, disabled, queer or trans, anime fans with far left
           | politics (add in the requisite bluesky/mastodon account). It
           | doesn't necessarily mean anything - but that kind of union of
           | disparate things always sets of some skepticism alarms for me
           | around social contagion or general mental illness that makes
           | me distrust the argument as presented, like there's some
           | detail being left out in pursuit of some partisan goal.
           | 
           | I also just have an allergic reaction to people calling
           | others *ist at this point too, espeically when trying to
           | leverage some policy against them.
        
           | asynchronous wrote:
           | I also think they're somewhat manipulating statistics to
           | their benefit- they start by saying "1 in 100 people have
           | epilepsy" but it's an untrue statement that 1% of people have
           | the type of epilepsy that would react to this specific
           | example of flashing lights between 5-25 a second.
        
         | the_af wrote:
         | > _I wish we could find some solution where we distribute the
         | epileptic-safe versions alongside the unsafe ones and users
         | could choose._
         | 
         | How would the users choose though?
         | 
         | "I want to risk an epileptic fit" vs "I don't want to risk
         | one"? And if you do have a fit due to an underlying condition
         | you didn't know about, and you break your back or suffer some
         | injury (as the author narrates having experienced, though not
         | due to Pokemon), would the broadcaster be legally at risk?
         | 
         | It doesn't seem crazy to me to play it safe here...
        
       | mmmlinux wrote:
       | Serious question for epileptics. Are those failed LED flashing
       | street lights an issue? I feel like they must be. Even to me they
       | can be disorientating at night when the one flashing lamp on the
       | exit ramp is the main light source.
        
         | monetus wrote:
         | While anything could push you over the edge, it seems like 5 to
         | 20 hz is the bitter spot that will make someone flop around. I
         | don't have tonic-clonics anymore, but the strobes still trigger
         | some seizure activity in me.
         | 
         | To your question, not too bad of an issue unless you're easily
         | triggered. Their speed is kind of off, ime.
        
         | SkeuomorphicBee wrote:
         | I cant speak for epileptics, but I do suffer from
         | photosensitive migraines (which the author briefly mentioned in
         | the article), and in my case failing flashing LED lights are
         | indeed an issue. Luckily for me it is not as instantaneous as a
         | seisure, I feel it building up over many seconds, so in many
         | situations I can just look away or close my eyes and it doesn't
         | turn into a full blown migraine (just a kind of "hangover" in
         | my head).
        
         | _def wrote:
         | I'm not epilectic but I'm always super annoyed when someone
         | walks their bicycle and the led front light keeps pulsing in
         | bright rapid flashes because of the dynamo
        
           | isoprophlex wrote:
           | God yes. Primo headache material. Seems so lazy too, to
           | design a light that goes full blast as soon as there is
           | enough voltage from the dynamo. Stick a capacitor in there
           | for chrissakes!
        
           | jandrese wrote:
           | I don't see that, but I do see a fair bit of ultra-bright
           | LEDs set to strobe mode because some study somewhere said
           | that was the most visible to vehicles. Now I get blinded and
           | dazzled by both oncoming and leading bikes.
           | 
           | I don't know why bike headlight manufacturers are so damn
           | insistent on improving safety by blinding everybody else in
           | the vicinity. Why do so few bike headlights have a "low beam"
           | mode? Instead its 1,000,000 lumens in a 180 degree cone
           | turning night into day but burning out the retinas of
           | everyone else on the trail.
        
       | outworlder wrote:
       | > Unlike with "Electric Soldier Porygon" the movie continued to
       | be shown unedited in American cinemas throughout its entire run.
       | Since the movie failed to pass the Harding Test, an alternative
       | cut had to be shown in the UK, Ireland, and Japan. This meant
       | that for at least two months of its theatrical run, Pixar had a
       | safe cut they could show to English speaking American audiences
       | and yet still chose to have the unsafe version in US cinemas.
       | 
       | Exhibit A - companies will only ever do anything if they are
       | forced to, even if what they are doing is harmful and compliance
       | is relatively easy.
        
         | meltyness wrote:
         | An optimistic take is that the organization was simply too
         | incompetent to identify and assess the financial risk of
         | injuring someone.
        
       | isoprophlex wrote:
       | Okay strong "forbidden fruit" vibes here; I had the strongest
       | compulsion to look up that scene on youtube. It's _very_
       | unpleasant to watch, at least to me. No wonder this gave people
       | seizures.
        
         | Jaxan wrote:
         | It's crazy: full frames with a solid blue and red alternating.
         | To me also very unpleasant, but an effect I haven't seen
         | before.
        
           | MrLeap wrote:
           | I've recently noticed reminiscent effects in Arcane. They
           | have some vfx that quickly alternate between yellow and
           | magenta or yellow and blue. Not full frame.
           | 
           | I think they look rather striking. It's a shame that kind of
           | thing is a danger to some.
        
         | the_af wrote:
         | Very uncomfortable to watch indeed.
         | 
         | I wonder how the animators themselves could stand it.
        
         | layer8 wrote:
         | I had to look it up as well (I had already tried many years
         | ago, but back then it wasn't on YouTube yet) and I actually
         | like it a lot artistically. There should be a way to safeguard
         | people whom it causes issues for, while still allowing others
         | to enjoy it.
        
         | Sohcahtoa82 wrote:
         | Link for the lazy: https://youtu.be/B4wSFjR9TMQ
         | 
         | I didn't find it that bad, but over time I've found that I
         | think I keep my screen's brightness a little lower than most
         | people, because I don't find light themes to be blinding.
        
       | anotherhue wrote:
       | Gee this seems like an actual useful feature to build into smart
       | TVs.
        
         | GaggiX wrote:
         | I was thinking about the same thing, also as an accessibility
         | feature for your phone or software for your PC (I imagine this
         | last one already exists).
        
           | mbrubeck wrote:
           | Apple's "Dim flashing lights" accessibility option is built
           | into tvOS, iOS, iPadOS, and macOS.
        
         | bitwize wrote:
         | The NES Classic is somehow able to detect rapidly flashing
         | screens in its built-in games and temporally blur them as an
         | anti-seizure measure. Nintendo certainly learned its lesson
         | from the Pokemon incident.
        
           | jonny_eh wrote:
           | That's a better solution than putting warnings in front of
           | every game.
        
             | recursive wrote:
             | The cookie banners of the 90s
        
       | GaggiX wrote:
       | For more context:
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denn%C5%8D_Senshi_Porygon
       | 
       | The Wikipedia article also has the scene that you can watch at
       | your own risk.
        
       | neilv wrote:
       | > _I have seen many fans, in the face of being told the reason
       | for these changes, say that it doesn't matter because they aren't
       | personally epileptic. This is, as you might understand,
       | incredibly personally frustrating, and yes, very ableist. In
       | saying this, these fans claim that disabled people do not have a
       | right to feel safe when watching their favorite series, and that
       | their wellbeing doesn't matter in comparison to a few brighter
       | shots of teenagers using their magic powers to punch each other._
       | 
       | As a person who's never had a seizure, and who doesn't want to
       | find out the hard way that I'm vulnerable, nor have anyone
       | vulnerable be harmed, I get angry at filmmakers who throw in
       | rapid strobe light scenes.
       | 
       | (Secondarily, it even happens in non-action movies, so you can
       | get the sudden strobe lighting when you're just watching a movie
       | at night, in a dimmed living room, to wind down from the day
       | before bed.)
       | 
       | It's often a nightclub scene, but most recently it was a fight
       | scene with gratuitous strobe light.
       | 
       | The strobing is usually a surprise, as evidenced by the startled
       | note to my initial curse word.
       | 
       | An engineer solution would be to make a software filter that
       | operates on video playback in real time.
       | 
       | A lawyer solution would be to wait for someone's family to be
       | devastated, then sue the perpetrator so hard that US companies
       | start caring.
       | 
       | A social media mob solution would be to downvote punish movies
       | that did this, then go through the credits, and downvote all the
       | other properties in which those people are involved.
       | 
       | A human solution would be for people to be more considerate and
       | responsible.
        
         | Vecr wrote:
         | What do you mean by downvote? Has Reddit become real life?
         | Given what people get away with for art a simple warning at the
         | start is probably all that you need.
        
           | neilv wrote:
           | Downvote, loosely, such as on social media sites/apps that
           | have up/down votes, and with minimal stars on interfaces that
           | use those. I don't know a good term or phrase for it.
        
         | marcosdumay wrote:
         | Entertainment is becoming more and more "in your face" harmful
         | as technology evolves.
         | 
         | From night-clubs that move high-power lasers around blinding
         | people, concerts with sound-walls that people have to use ear
         | protectors to get close, events with closed-loop air-
         | conditioning that poison (and contaminate, but the trend on
         | that is unclear) people by not taking enough outside air, to
         | whoever invented that safer fireworks can be used close to
         | people. And yeah, the strobo and UV lights.
         | 
         | Governments aren't rushing to fix optional activities, so yeah,
         | expect all of those to get worse.
        
           | Aloisius wrote:
           | Wait, how do closed-loop air conditioners poison anyone?
           | 
           | And who is using high powered lasers to blind people in
           | clubs? And when hasn't getting too close to music required
           | hearing protection? Even a flute is over 90 dB.
        
             | lcnPylGDnU4H9OF wrote:
             | > And when hasn't getting too close to music required
             | hearing protection? Even a flute is over 90 dB.
             | 
             | Not that it's impossible for a symphony to play so loudly
             | that one needs ear protection but that the giant speakers
             | on the concert stage are engineered and tuned to output
             | sound that's as loud as possible such that everyone within
             | a certain distance of them is likely to suffer hearing loss
             | without protection from such damage.
        
       | shadowgovt wrote:
       | The mechanics of the human optical system are absolutely wild,
       | and the abstraction many have of "the eye just gathers pixels and
       | sends them to the brain to interpret" is just wrong.
       | 
       | One of the most fascinating things to me about virtual reality
       | was the discovery that we can mitigate VR nausea by giving people
       | temporary "tunnel vision" when they are repositioned in space
       | without their bodies being moved in the real world. For a
       | significant percentage of users, it's the motion in the
       | peripheral vision that leads to the gross dissociative-body
       | nausea, and simply cutting off that stimulus helps significantly.
       | And for other people, it doesn't!
        
         | crooked-v wrote:
         | Distill that down further and you get iPhone motion sickness
         | protection, where just having dots overlaid on the phone screen
         | that move based on the accelerometer noticeably help reduce
         | nausea (or at least they sure do in my case).
        
       | taylorbuley wrote:
       | An interesting viewpoint. And from it, a good example of how
       | failure can be positive -- even when it hurts.
        
       | hinkley wrote:
       | I really resent the use of "unsuitable for some viewers" in story
       | arcs. Is someone with epilepsy just supposed to watch the rest of
       | the series with a hole in the middle of the story? Why even do
       | that. Tell the writers to fuck right off and try again.
        
       | chriskanan wrote:
       | I don't understand why in the current era we don't have videos
       | just post-processed by the media player / TV. That seems like it
       | would increase accessibility while not irritating folks who do
       | not have epilepsy.
       | 
       | I tried to search to see if something like a plugin existed for
       | VLC, and I didn't find anything. Seems like it should be solvable
       | at least if the media can be parsed ahead of time or with some
       | delay for a live feed.
        
         | MBCook wrote:
         | I've wondered about that too.
         | 
         | My immediate suspicion is liability fear. If you add that
         | feature, even if it helps a tons of people, someone will sure
         | you when it doesn't help them/their family member.
        
           | zeta0134 wrote:
           | I'd just market it as a comfort feature rather than a safety
           | one. I don't have epilepsy but I also don't particularly
           | _like_ strobing flashing screen effects, especially in older
           | games. Having an option to turn them off increases my
           | enjoyment, even if it doesn 't really affect my safety.
        
         | xahrepap wrote:
         | Similarly, I would love if videos/blurays/streams/etc had a way
         | to adjust volumes separate from each other. So many movies have
         | such loud music and quiet dialog. So I'm constantly adjusting
         | the volume between different scenes.
        
         | wizzwizz4 wrote:
         | The software to do this doesn't exist. We have some software to
         | assess the "epilepsy-safety" of a given piece of media, but
         | it's proprietary and afaik not realtime.
         | 
         | There was a bounty to make an open-source replacement, but I've
         | lost my link. I've still got the WCAG info sheet, though:
         | https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG22/Understanding/three-flashes-or...
         | if anyone wants to have a go. (I'd suggest making a standalone
         | application, plus something that works with GStreamer.)
        
         | dalbin wrote:
         | There is a feature called "Dim Flashing Lights" available on
         | iOS, and the algorithm with multiple implementations is on
         | Github : https://github.com/apple/VideoFlashingReduction
        
         | devnullbrain wrote:
         | That pushes the onus onto the disabled person to avoid places
         | and rooms with TVs that haven't had the setting enabled,
         | repeatedly asking the same questions and revealing their health
         | history to feel safe in public.
        
       | ompogUe wrote:
       | On the other side of the coin: have a kid with epilepsy. After
       | learning about possible effects of K448/Mozart's sonata in D
       | Major, we keep a copy of it on all our phones, and it does seem
       | to relax him when he is having a seizure.
       | 
       | https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-95922-7
       | 
       | Always thought it was funny that the only other song they had
       | found (up until 2021) with a similar audio signature was from
       | "Yanni Live at the Acropolis"
       | 
       | Also, I found and watched the porygon episode in the last year,
       | and it's certainly pretty intense.
        
       | alexey-salmin wrote:
       | > I have seen many fans, in the face of being told the reason for
       | these changes, say that it doesn't matter because they aren't
       | personally epileptic. This is, as you might understand,
       | incredibly personally frustrating, and yes, very ableist. In
       | saying this, these fans claim that disabled people do not have a
       | right to feel safe when watching their favorite series, and that
       | their wellbeing doesn't matter in comparison to a few brighter
       | shots of teenagers using their magic powers to punch each other.
       | 
       | I don't get it. Why is it bad wanting to see the unsafe version
       | for yourself?
       | 
       | > Over 2500 fans signed a change.org petition asking Crunchyroll
       | to take down this edited, safe, version of the series and instead
       | upload an unedited version that was true to the original vision--
       | even if it had the potential to cause seizures.
       | 
       | That's not how I read the petition in question. People are asking
       | to get access to the original that they know exist. I can't find
       | a paragraph that demands deletion of the edited safe version.
       | 
       | >> As fans, we implore Crunchyroll to try to acquire an uncut
       | version of the simulcast as we are paying good money each month
       | for the services they provide.
        
         | 999900000999 wrote:
         | This is a giant liability issue for any company.
         | 
         | If you want the raw version, I'm sure it's out there...
        
         | PittleyDunkin wrote:
         | > I don't get it. Why is it bad wanting to see the unsafe
         | version for yourself?
         | 
         | Of course, it isn't bad in itself. In full context, however, it
         | looks a lot more like "lobbying a site to cater to your needs
         | rather than the needs of others".
         | 
         | The truth is somewhere between the two perspectives, and good
         | faith is required to see this. I suspect that your frustration
         | is due not seeing how others lack this good faith.
        
         | makeitdouble wrote:
         | Reading from the petition:
         | 
         | > This petition may be pointless and may not affect the outcome
         | of this season, but if not that, hopefully it can affect
         | Crunchyrolls future simulcasts from suffering the same fate as
         | Jujutsu Kaisen is right now.
         | 
         | I'm not a CR customer, have they ever offered multiple versions
         | of their synchronized on air series ?
         | 
         | I'd assume it would only be a single chosen version, with
         | perhaps an alternative days or months after airing, but from an
         | effort and financial perspective I wouldn't expect it.
         | 
         | At no point does the petition ask for separate versions (it
         | argues the dimmed version make them nauseous), it's a commenter
         | that surfaces the option, so I see TFA's point standing.
        
       | Waterluvian wrote:
       | Is it possible to program a look ahead filter that detects too
       | much sudden change across a window of frames and blanks it or
       | somehow stifles it?
        
       | AdmiralAsshat wrote:
       | It seems to be something of an urban legend that the original
       | Pokemon seizure clip was subsequently _rebroadcasted_ by Japanese
       | news stations in the immediate aftermath of the first broadcast,
       | thus increasing the number of impacted viewers. I can 't find any
       | source backing that claim, though, in the Wikipedia article.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-11-13 23:00 UTC)