[HN Gopher] Blame the Gerbils
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Blame the Gerbils
        
       Author : Vigier
       Score  : 39 points
       Date   : 2024-11-12 04:43 UTC (18 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.lrb.co.uk)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.lrb.co.uk)
        
       | treetalker wrote:
       | https://archive.is/4YwT6
        
       | delichon wrote:
       | After reading this, "Celebrating the Gerbils" may be a more apt
       | title. He is "blaming" them for the rise of Europe via the after
       | effects of the transmission of a terrible disease. It is a sort
       | of justification for the policy positions of a recent Marvel
       | villain.                 Gamora : I was a child when you took me.
       | Thanos : I saved you.       Gamora : No. We were happy on my home
       | planet.       Thanos : You were going to bed hungry, scrounging
       | for scraps. Your planet was on the brink of collapse. I'm the one
       | who stopped that. You know what's happened since then? The
       | children born have known nothing but full bellies and clear
       | skies. It's a paradise.       Gamora : Because you murdered half
       | the planet.       Thanos : A small price to pay for salvation.
        
         | PittleyDunkin wrote:
         | Unrelated, but surely thanos would need to murder half the
         | universe every few years to keep the charade running
        
           | otikik wrote:
           | Yeah, he divided a geometric curve by 2
        
           | misnome wrote:
           | Yes, this always extremely bothered me.
        
           | shawn_w wrote:
           | He's known as the Mad Titan, not the Smart Titan.
        
         | Vecr wrote:
         | Thanos had a horrible policy. In many cases it wouldn't help
         | (either it would cause societal collapse or things would go
         | back to being a problem), and even when it does it would
         | usually not be worth it.
         | 
         | If he has to get rid of 50% of the people, shouldn't he at
         | least put them into some sort of computer system, so the
         | remaining people could at least talk to them after?
         | 
         | Then put a guardian system in orbit around every planet to
         | protect the uploads and prevent any recurrences of problems.
        
           | andrewfurey2003 wrote:
           | Bro its a movie.
        
             | Vecr wrote:
             | I didn't watch it (I read a plot summery) but I did watch
             | what I think was _Captain America_ or _Captain America: The
             | Winter Soldier_ and they had a guy uploaded into a
             | computer. That 's earlier in the timeline, right? So it's
             | proven doable in the universe they set up with the films.
        
               | andrewfurey2003 wrote:
               | Yeah but that doesn't sell movie tickets
        
         | tolerance wrote:
         | I don't exactly know how you drew your conclusion from the
         | text, but the justification that you've identified with the aid
         | of that movie dialogue makes sense to me. Although I don't read
         | the justification itself from the book review, the example
         | you're giving seems to indicate to the inherent bias that I
         | would expect from a book that covers European expansion.
         | 
         | So are you interpreting that the book is framing European
         | expansion post-plague as Europe "saving" territories that
         | didn't experience the advantages that they did?
         | 
         | If so, good catch and a cautionary tale.
        
         | Barrin92 wrote:
         | > It is a sort of justification for the policy positions of a
         | recent Marvel villain.
         | 
         | Just because it goes against someone's taste doesn't mean it
         | isn't true. Historical analysis obviously shouldn't depend on
         | whether it jibes with the sentiments of people who write Marvel
         | characters.
         | 
         | We do have a real world example of this effect that's much more
         | recent than the plague, China's one child policy. And one
         | outcome is exactly what's observed in the article, higher
         | household saving and educational spending per child and as a
         | consequence accelerated capital accumulation in one generation.
         | By creating a smaller cohort and funneling all resources into
         | that cohort they leapfrogged over the high population growth
         | low per capita investment Malthusian trap that the article
         | talks about.
         | 
         | https://personal.lse.ac.uk/jink/pdf/onechildpolicy_ccj.pdf
        
       | nkpv wrote:
       | There was talk of gerbils !!!
        
       | Hilift wrote:
       | >England did not return to its pre-plague population until about
       | 1625, 280 years after the first strike. During most of that
       | period Western Europe had about half the population it had in
       | 1345. And yet 1400-1500 'is the very century in which Western
       | Europe's global expansion began', the period of what has been
       | called 'the Great Divergence' between Europe and the rest of the
       | world. 'The Black Death and the Rise of Europe', as Belich's
       | subtitle has it, do seem to be linked in time, and it may not be
       | a coincidence.
       | 
       | This period also coincided with the renaissance and the European
       | wars of religion. Europe was a busy place.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-11-12 23:01 UTC)