[HN Gopher] MdBook - a command line tool to create books with Ma...
___________________________________________________________________
MdBook - a command line tool to create books with Markdown
Author : peter_d_sherman
Score : 36 points
Date : 2024-11-10 20:00 UTC (2 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (rust-lang.github.io)
(TXT) w3m dump (rust-lang.github.io)
| peter_d_sherman wrote:
| Related:
|
| GitHub Gist: "Document Conversion":
|
| https://gist.github.com/datacustodian/4483fff487a0ef70c7b760...
|
| https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_document_markup_langua...
|
| https://pandoc.org/
|
| https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39164002
|
| https://asciidoc.org/
| jonhohle wrote:
| Pandoc allows Markdown with fallback LaTeX which works
| incredibly well, imho. I suppose that is if you like both
| Markdown and LaTeX (along with the rest of its ecosystem).
| cyberax wrote:
| While we're on the topic of MD, what's the best system for
| Markdown-based static blogs these days? With good code
| highlighting, images, colors, etc.
| Simpliplant wrote:
| I've been using Astro lately and loving it. It feels dead
| simple, has amazing defaults, and is easily extendable.
| jyap wrote:
| A few that come to mind:
|
| Jekyll - written in Ruby
|
| Hugo - written in Go
|
| Zola - written in Rust
| nemosaltat wrote:
| I've been running quarto [0] for a few months now and I'm happy
| with it. Posts are saved as .qmd, with a little bit of special
| front matter for formatting and tagging. `quarto render`
| converts the .qmd(s) according to a simple config file. [0]
| https://quarto.org/
| j_bum wrote:
| +1 for quarto. I love it for my personal website, and I use
| it on a daily basis to create technical reports for my day
| job.
| Arnavion wrote:
| It's `pandoc --from markdown-smart --to html5` for me.
| greggsy wrote:
| VitePress and Docusaurus seem decent. I think VitePress might
| be more suited to blogging, but I admit I haven't actually used
| or tested either.
|
| https://docusaurus.io/
|
| https://vitepress.dev/
| ognarb wrote:
| I love hugo, it's a bit complex to get started with but
| extremely powerful. And the backward compatibility is very
| good, I started using that 4 years ago and aside of a handful
| of small issues which could be resolved in 5 min, my websites
| could be upgraded without any issue. This wasn't my experience
| with Jekyll.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2024-11-10 23:00 UTC)