[HN Gopher] The Saturn V FUELDRAULIC Gimbal System (1963)
___________________________________________________________________
The Saturn V FUELDRAULIC Gimbal System (1963)
Author : NaOH
Score : 35 points
Date : 2024-11-04 20:47 UTC (5 days ago)
(HTM) web link (www.powermotiontech.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.powermotiontech.com)
| rwmj wrote:
| Short but interesting answer about why "fueldraulic" systems are
| still used, including on the Boeing 777, and F35:
| https://aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/24787/why-is-fu...
| pfdietz wrote:
| The Merlin engine in the Falcon 9 also uses fuel (RP-1) as
| hydraulic fluid, I believe.
| dotancohen wrote:
| I don't know about today, but early Falcon 9 gridfin actuators
| used an open loop of RP-1 as the working fluid as well. It
| would drain into the tank, and be burned in the engines on
| descent.
| fuzzfactor wrote:
| After the Saturn V was retired, they put one out in the front
| yard of the Johnson Space Center.
|
| It was kind of sizable, and for years you could see it when you
| drove by on NASA Road 1.
|
| Laying sideways where the different stages were laid end-to-end,
| and walk right up and touch it, with outdoor photo ops all over
| the place.
|
| Eventually they built buildings to enclose it, which you now have
| to go inside if you want to take a look.
| embedded_hiker wrote:
| And the one time I have ever been to Houston, they were
| constructing that building and I couldn't see the Saturn V :(
| dotancohen wrote:
| I remember seeing it in Florida when I was young, and when I
| took my kids to the US for a wedding a few years ago that was
| one of our stops. We say a Falcon 9 night launch, too.
|
| The Saturn V was so impressive. I hope to take the kids to a
| Starship launch to instill in them too the awe of rocketry and
| space exploration.
| acyou wrote:
| Why does the hydraulic system need 2000 psi and the fueldraulic
| system only needs 50 psi?
|
| Then they needed to double hydraulic pressure to 4000 psi for the
| new rocket, but never explained the key considerations. Seemed
| like it would be the same actuator?
|
| Cool article.
| cvz wrote:
| The way the article describes that diagram is misleading. The
| whole diagram is the fueldraulic system, and it's 50 psi on the
| return side and 2000 psi on the high pressure side like a
| regular hydraulic system.
| pixelpoet wrote:
| They had Comic Sans in 1963?
| PittleyDunkin wrote:
| Do you think the diagrams are from 1963?
| pixelpoet wrote:
| Wasn't really being serious :)
| quercusa wrote:
| I love those mid-century names: FuelDraulic, Hydra-Glide,
| PowerGlide, Ultramatic
| greggsy wrote:
| My personal fave is hydropneumatic suspension, mainly because
| it's in the Citroen DS (my favourite MCM car).
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2024-11-09 23:00 UTC)