[HN Gopher] In Memory of Stiver
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       In Memory of Stiver
        
       Author : thunderbong
       Score  : 444 points
       Date   : 2024-11-04 06:56 UTC (5 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (blog.jetbrains.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (blog.jetbrains.com)
        
       | oytis wrote:
       | Didn't know about that side of his talent. Among broader Russian
       | audience Stiver was known as a maintainer of the largest pirate
       | library in Russian (see
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41634780).
        
         | ptero wrote:
         | It is also broader than just Russian and bigger than just
         | pirate. Flibusta has been my go-to source for books for many
         | years.
        
         | myth_drannon wrote:
         | Didn't realize that! His death sent shocks across the Russian
         | speaking internet because he was the maintainer of Flibusta but
         | noone spoke about his other passion.
        
         | rob74 wrote:
         | That might explain why the article is so light on personal
         | details - either he asked them to keep them private, or maybe
         | they're not aware of his real identity at all?
        
           | selivanovp wrote:
           | They're aware, that's why they presented him as a "German
           | programmer" and completely avoided his flibusta endeavour.
           | The author from JetBrains is Russian himself.
        
           | Kwpolska wrote:
           | Why does everyone have to share their real life identity on
           | the Internet? Why do you care?
        
             | znpy wrote:
             | Many people base their judgment of somebody on the person's
             | ideals rather than actual accomplishments. My gut feeling
             | is that gp wanted to evaluate Stiver on something else
             | rather than personal accomplishments.
             | 
             | It's another sign of the performative society we live into,
             | where work and accomplishments don't matter but virtue
             | signalling does.
        
               | rob74 wrote:
               | Funny that you're judging _me_ by assuming that I want to
               | judge _him_. It just struck me as unusual (and a bit sad)
               | to see this obituary without anything personal. But I don
               | 't feel in any way "entitled" to get any personal
               | details, far from it...
        
             | hnisoss wrote:
             | related https://sive.rs/anon
        
               | Kwpolska wrote:
               | > If you defiantly refuse to say who you are, it can make
               | people angry that you're upsetting social reciprocity.
               | You know who they are, but they don't know who you are.
               | It feels rude. An obsessive personality might make it
               | their damn mission to figure out who you are!
               | 
               | To be frank, fuck them. I'm not inventing an entire
               | persona and stuff just to make some weirdos happy.
        
       | jrpelkonen wrote:
       | Back in the day, I had to deal with some poorly documented closed
       | source Java applications (e.g. IBM WebSphere). Tools like
       | Fernflower and its precursors were invaluable to fill the gaps.
       | 
       | Thank you, Stiver, and R.I.P.
        
         | patwolf wrote:
         | I worked on WebSphere back in the day. There were a lot of pre-
         | compiled libraries provided by other IBM teams. I too made good
         | use of decompilers (probably jad at the time) as it was often
         | easier than trying to track down the source.
        
           | AstroJetson wrote:
           | I also had a huge library of decompiled Websphere libraries.
           | IBM was always sending patches and we would go "ok, what does
           | this do?" "Fixes your problem?""How""Really well." So it got
           | decompiled to see what it did.
           | 
           | There were lots of "We think your patch is doing XYZZY, we
           | see where our code should be doing that. We've updated our
           | code and the problem went away."
           | 
           | Fernflower was awesome. RIP Stiver, glioblastoma can be an
           | ugly way to die.
        
             | mananaysiempre wrote:
             | > glioblastoma can be an ugly way to die.
             | 
             | He opted for an assisted suicide:
             | https://flibusta.is/node/684900.
        
             | melling wrote:
             | "A year after undergoing a world-first treatment for
             | glioblastoma, Australian doctor Richard Scolyer remains
             | cancer-free."
             | 
             | Probably only a decade away from curing it. Unfortunately,
             | medicine can evolve slowly.
             | 
             | https://www.bbc.com/news/world-australia-69006713.amp
        
       | petesergeant wrote:
       | > a German programmer of Russian origin
       | 
       | I wonder how much of a boom Russia will see from emigres
       | returning home if the political environment lets up a little
        
         | trhway wrote:
         | Not much. Russia is a country of just 140M people. With wider
         | availability of education/etc. size of population matters more
         | and more.
        
           | cgh wrote:
           | And Russia's demographic crisis is going to get a lot worse,
           | cementing its irrelevency as a world power:
           | https://www.economist.com/europe/2023/03/04/russias-
           | populati...
        
             | riehwvfbk wrote:
             | So let's see, Russia's population is 1/2 that of the US and
             | it's irrelevant. But the US population is 1/5 of China's.
             | When do you expect to see irrelevance of the United States
             | as a world power?
        
               | trhway wrote:
               | Right now US has 156M college educated people, China -
               | has been quickly increasing that number during last 10-20
               | years and currently reached 218M. Thus we see emergence
               | of China as rivaling superpower. You can look at China's
               | rate of new college admissions and make a reasonable
               | projection when a number of senior (10-15 years of
               | experience) professionals in China will dwarf that in US.
               | 
               | >Russia's population is 1/2 that of the US and it's
               | irrelevant.
               | 
               | not yet. Quickly moving that direction though. No yet
               | there mostly because of USSR built resources like nuclear
               | weapons, space program, educational and scientific
               | foundations from that time (USSR was an empire of 250M
               | population of proper USSR plus the Eastern Block which in
               | particular produced technology - Bulgarian computers,
               | Hungarian buses, Polish built ships, including Navy ones,
               | etc.) All that in Russia is falling behind and apart.
        
               | riehwvfbk wrote:
               | 156M out of a total ~300M population are college
               | educated?
        
               | trhway wrote:
               | My mistake - i used 46% out of 340M from the quick Google
               | search. Actually it is
               | 
               | https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaeltnietzel/2024/02/01/p
               | erc...
               | 
               | "The percentage of adults in the U. S. between the ages
               | of 25 to 64 with college degrees, certificates or
               | industry-recognized certifications has increased from
               | 38.1% in 2009 to 54.3% in 2021"
               | 
               | so something like 100M.
               | 
               | And if we look here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Educati
               | onal_attainment_in_the_... it is more like 70M.
        
               | ekianjo wrote:
               | College education is not a super good proxy for
               | superpower status... Even more so nowadays.
        
               | 082349872349872 wrote:
               | A << college >> being what in the States would be called
               | a "Jr High", probably not.
               | 
               | (that said, china seems to have done much better with
               | broad secondary education than india did with targeted
               | tertiary education)
        
               | cgh wrote:
               | Maybe read the article, Ivan.
        
               | FpUser wrote:
               | Maybe learn to be civil Joe.
        
               | riehwvfbk wrote:
               | Hey, it's OK, I'm just a bot after all.
        
               | christophilus wrote:
               | I'm not an expert, but demographic trends are bleak for
               | Russia, not particularly good for China, and only a bit
               | better for the US. Only time will tell what it all means.
               | The world has never seen demographic collapse on the
               | scale we're witnessing, so people who confidently predict
               | the consequences are speculating. That said, losing super
               | power status seems like a reasonable bit of speculation.
               | I don't see a path to maintaining it while in demographic
               | collapse.
        
         | protomolecule wrote:
         | Most likely Stiver emigrated in the 90s for economic reasons --
         | Russia was in shambles. There are about 11 millions of
         | emigrants of Russian origin [0], but I highly doubt that many
         | will come back even if tomorrow we get a new liberal president.
         | 
         | [0] https://publications.iom.int/system/files/pdf/WMR-2022.pdf
        
         | pk-protect-ai wrote:
         | How do you change the political environment in a dictatorship
         | where ruling class has all the power and majority of the money
         | and controls what you should read, watch or talk about?
        
           | rob74 wrote:
           | Well, the Russians already tried it once, more than 100 years
           | ago, with limited success unfortunately...
        
             | 082349872349872 wrote:
             | A while ago on HN I said the Cheka learned all their
             | techniques from the Okhrana and people took me literally,
             | even replying to the effect that there was no personnel
             | continuity.
             | 
             | What I'd meant is that, having been on the receiving end of
             | all the Okhrana's dirty tricks, and having learned the hard
             | way, the Cheka knew very well indeed how to play those
             | games by the time they were on top.
        
             | protomolecule wrote:
             | I'd say it was too successful.
        
           | riehwvfbk wrote:
           | The ruling class is not a monolith, it's made of people with
           | their own idea who are constantly vying for a better
           | position.
           | 
           | Just this week some part of the US ruling class got some
           | better seats in the game of musical chairs. The game's not
           | much different anywhere in the world, other than the window
           | dressing.
        
             | 082349872349872 wrote:
             | Goldstein, _The Theory and Practice of Oligarchical
             | Collectivism_ (1948) has a description of the game which
             | agrees with Veblen, Luttwak, Bueno de Mesquita  & Smith,
             | and probably a few others over the last five thousand
             | years.
             | 
             | If the mid wishes a circulation of elites, they must ally
             | with the low against the high; if the high wishes to
             | prevent this, they can ally with the low against the mid.
             | 
             | A crucial point on which Goldstein, Squealer, and the 2
             | Ronnies, agree is that no matter which way these alliances
             | are sorted in theory, somehow in practice the low always
             | wind up more or less where they started.
             | 
             | > _Oh, it 's the meek! Blessed are the meek! Oh, that's
             | nice, isn't it? I'm glad they're getting something, 'cause
             | they have a hell of a time._ --Mrs. BN
        
         | centur wrote:
         | I don't think it will see any, people moved from Russia not
         | because a single person in power, but because of systemic
         | problems on all levels - kindergartens, schools, police and
         | safety, rights to do a legit business. It's never a head
         | person, it's always a system that been enabled and groomed by a
         | head person or party
        
         | danielodievich wrote:
         | Nobody will go back.
         | 
         | One of more interesting experiences from early 2000s in
         | Microsoft was when Microsoft Russia finally crossed 1B in
         | revenue by finally having Gazprom/Sberbank buy all the sh*t
         | that they were pirating before. By doing so, the country was
         | eligible to do the yearly business review in person, instead of
         | over whatever passed for Zoom back then, I don't remember
         | anymore. Olga D...can't remember her last name was the country
         | manager, one of the few women in such position at the time. She
         | invited everyone in russian community (hello rodina email list)
         | to come to the Microsoft conference center in building 34 to
         | listen to repeat of what she did earlier that week to Ballmer.
         | This was the only microsoft event with catered vodka and caviar
         | I've been to, but anyhow, after presentation of the financial
         | stuff it turned a bit into a recruiting event - hey, come back
         | to the motherland, the water is nice, look they are buying
         | software licenses like civilized people, here is the pay scale
         | from levels 61 and up, etc etc. There were ~400 people in the
         | room, and the uptake was 0 (zero). All of us who were there in
         | the room were not there in motherland for a reason.
        
           | throw-the-towel wrote:
           | You and your peers remember the Russia of the 1990s, dirt
           | poor, barely avoiding famine, with a completely collapsed
           | society and state. The new emigrants remember the Russia of
           | the 2010s, with classy restaurants, developing
           | infrastructure, cheap housing and whatever consumer goods
           | money can buy, and that's very different. Your experience
           | from 20 years ago does not apply anymore.
        
             | usrnm wrote:
             | To be fair, your experience from 5 years ago is just as
             | irrelevant. Russia under sanctions is very different.
        
               | protomolecule wrote:
               | Only politically. Economically it's mostly the same.
        
               | aix1 wrote:
               | I assume when you say "politically" you include the
               | ongoing war in Ukraine. I think it's a huge factor in
               | this context, given its impact and the risks it presents
               | to folks (especially young men) who choose to remain in
               | Russia.
               | 
               | By some estimates, 900K people have left Russia since the
               | invasion [1], of whom 100K were IT specialists leaving in
               | 2022 alone [2] (I haven't looked at the figures since
               | then). I think that's a pretty strong indication of the
               | sentiment.
               | 
               | And wrt the economy, didn't the Central Bank just
               | increase the benchmark rate to 21% [3] (with another 2%
               | hike widely expected in December)?
               | 
               | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_emigration_during_t
               | he_...
               | 
               | https://www.technologyreview.com/2023/04/04/1070352/ukrai
               | ne-...
               | 
               | https://meduza.io/en/feature/2024/10/29/russia-s-key-
               | interes...
        
               | protomolecule wrote:
               | In Russia programmers working at accredited IT-companies
               | are safe from mobilization [0]
               | 
               | > I think that's a pretty strong indication of the
               | sentiment.
               | 
               | Some left following their western employers, some fled
               | from the mobilization in 2022.
               | 
               | >And wrt the economy, didn't the Central Bank just
               | increase the benchmark rate to 21%
               | 
               | It did, that's why I said 'mostly'. Kremlin is pumping
               | money into defense industry and into payments to contract
               | soldiers, the Central Bank is doing what it can to curb
               | the inflation. Overall it hasn't affected the life much.
               | 
               | [0] https://www.gosuslugi.ru/armydelay
        
               | oytis wrote:
               | > Kremlin is pumping money into defense industry and into
               | payments to contract soldiers, the Central Bank is doing
               | what it can to curb the inflation.
               | 
               | Well, yes, and what do you think the impact of it is
               | going to be on the economy?
        
               | protomolecule wrote:
               | The lowest unemployment ever, some redistribution of
               | wealth in favor of workers in the military industry and
               | soldiers.
        
               | oytis wrote:
               | That's the immediate result. But what about later, when
               | the war is over? Military expense is non-productive,
               | economically it's the same as just giving people money
               | for free while they are sitting on the couch (nobody is
               | killed in the latter case though).
               | 
               | Military overspending literally killed Soviet Union, and
               | people returning from Afghanistan war made guaranteed the
               | unforgettable social climate after that. I don't see any
               | reason to be bullish on Russia, even if Trump now gives
               | up Ukraine for Putin.
        
               | protomolecule wrote:
               | Yes, Russian economy will crash after the war, just like
               | American after the end of WW2.
        
           | pkd wrote:
           | I know somebody who relocated his entire family after 20+
           | years in the U.S and is loving it. People are not as
           | monolithic as we are likely to believe sometimes.
        
           | zczc wrote:
           | Head of Microsoft Russia was Olga Dergunova.
           | 
           | As for "nobody will go back" - agree in general, but at least
           | Anton Nossik did go back.
        
         | cyberax wrote:
         | Russia has plenty of resources, and is severely under-
         | populated. So yep, it has a huge growth potential.
         | 
         | But the political system will have to be reformed first.
        
           | jojobas wrote:
           | And by "reformed", you mean "burnt to the ground, for real
           | this time".
        
             | cyberax wrote:
             | Burning systems to the ground does not work. The end result
             | is almost always worse than before.
             | 
             | Russia actually has a rather functional bureaucracy that is
             | holding the country together. All it really needs is
             | decentralization of power, probably similar to the German's
             | model.
        
         | selivanovp wrote:
         | It's happening already. Like significant part of recent
         | JetBrains struggles with lower quality of their products is due
         | to they had to relocate people out of Russia, and some people
         | just don't like to live abroad. Their Kotlin lead returned to
         | Russia and works in Yandex now. About half the people that
         | relocated during 2022 returned already, and if the war in
         | Ukraine will finally end in 2025 a lot more will return back
         | home.
        
           | 9dev wrote:
           | > if the war in Ukraine will finally end in 2025 a lot more
           | will return back home.
           | 
           | And how do you suppose this will happen? By Trump cutting a
           | deal with Putin leaving Ukraine out to die, or what?
           | 
           | The Russian soldiers might return home. The Ukrainians won't.
           | There won't be a home to return to, and in many cases, there
           | won't be anyone left to return.
        
             | riehwvfbk wrote:
             | Generally speaking, wars tend to end.
        
               | 9dev wrote:
               | Specifically speaking, however, we are talking about
               | Russia illegally invading and occupying Ukraine, a
               | sovereign state both Russia and the USA have explicitly
               | declared to keep its territorial integrity intact in
               | exchange for its nuclear weapons. We are talking about
               | this because the president-elect of the USA has curiously
               | exclaimed to be able to "end the war" in a single day,
               | and the only way that is possible is by simply
               | sacrificing the country to Russias imperialist urges;
               | that _specifically_ implies millions of people loosing
               | their lives, their home, their language, their history,
               | their families, and their belongings.
               | 
               | Wars end, true. Exactly _how_ this war ends is crucial.
        
               | selivanovp wrote:
               | Russia is not imperialistic, Russia was fine with Ukraine
               | as a sovereign state. More of it, due to current
               | geopolitical shift, Russia is even more interested in
               | Ukraine being a sovereign state, a buffer between Russia
               | and NATO.
               | 
               | The problem is that USA twice messed with Ukraine
               | sovereignty, first in 2004, and then in 2014 turned this
               | country to a proxy, puppet state, bulwark against Russia.
               | And that's why this war started, because Russia can not
               | allow Ukraine to be turned into a hostile state,
               | ideologically driven by hatred towards Russia and
               | Russians and manipulated by NATO, with bases on its
               | territory.
               | 
               | Russia is fine with Ukrainians, if you're unaware, Russia
               | accepted the largest number of Ukrainian refugees of all
               | countries. Most of these people got Russian citizenship.
               | It's actually Ukraine, that turned Zelensky into a king
               | with absolute power, dismantled all the opposition party,
               | oppressed Russian language, culture, religion, wiping
               | history, and basically brainwashing population with
               | targeted hatred. The reality is: Ukrainian dystopian
               | regime is hanging on Western support. Without money and
               | weapons they can't even feed their people anymore, but
               | already turning women to cannon fodder, and no doubt,
               | that in a few month they'll force their kids to go to
               | tranches also. Because Ukrainian leaders don't care about
               | Ukraine or Ukrainians, all they care is their pockets,
               | that are filled by the war, and their goal is to prolong
               | this war for as much as possible.
        
               | aguaviva wrote:
               | _The problem is that USA twice messed with Ukraine
               | sovereignty, first in 2004, and then in 2014 turned this
               | country to a proxy, puppet state, bulwark against Russia.
               | And that 's why this war started, because Russia can not
               | allow Ukraine to be turned into a hostile state,
               | ideologically driven by hatred towards Russia and
               | Russians and manipulated by NATO, with bases on its
               | territory._
               | 
               | It seems you may not appreciate the extent to which the
               | sources you're getting these narratives from may be
               | woefully uninformed, and/or simply lying to you.
               | 
               | None of this "puppet state" stuff, or the descriptions of
               | events in 2004/2014 that you're echoing here has any
               | connection to reality. If the Ukrainian government were
               | simply a "puppet" of the United States, then it would
               | have evacuated from Kyiv after the 2022 invasion just
               | like the former was advising it to do. But it did the
               | complete opposite, instead.
        
               | 9dev wrote:
               | Most of what you've written is just plain wrong, but I'm
               | not responsible for clearing up the propaganda.
               | 
               | Let me just say this: No political fear of any foreign
               | influence on a bordering country ever justifies invading
               | this country, killing its citizens, and destroying its
               | infrastructure. No matter how you try to frame it, Russia
               | committed crimes in Ukraine, which it is completely
               | responsible for. You may try to blame the victim here,
               | but that will never become the truth.
        
           | oytis wrote:
           | It's a different case. People who didn't want to move
           | anywhere were virtually forced to, and after realising the
           | struggles of being an immigrant decided to return.
           | 
           | People who made the decision themselves and have already
           | settled in the new place seldom come back.
        
       | dvektor wrote:
       | Really appreciated the time someone spent putting that together,
       | good article.
       | 
       | R.I.P Stiver
        
       | ssousa666 wrote:
       | Interesting to learn the human side of a tool I use almost every
       | day. RIP Stiver
        
       | indrora wrote:
       | Fernflower is one of the few really powerful java decompilers out
       | there that had good support for the bad bytecode that dex2jar
       | would produce.
       | 
       | I've spent many hours pouring through the output of Fernflower
       | looking for what some obfuscation algorithm has come up with.
       | 
       | Dogspeed, Stiver. Your work, "legitimate" or not, has benefitted
       | the world. o7
        
       | YouWhy wrote:
       | Here's a man who lived for much of the same ideals as Aaron
       | Swartz, and was able to make a tremendous impact on the Russian
       | internet universe while also laying low and quiet.
       | 
       | I'm awfully sad Stiver passed away before old age, but happy that
       | at least it was not due to adversity.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-11-09 23:01 UTC)