[HN Gopher] A counter-intuitive guide to better leadership
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       A counter-intuitive guide to better leadership
        
       Author : mooreds
       Score  : 84 points
       Date   : 2024-11-07 18:20 UTC (4 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (sudarkoff.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (sudarkoff.com)
        
       | wobblyasp wrote:
       | > Reed Hastings' decision to pivot Netflix into original content
       | production is a great example ... based on years of experience in
       | entertainment and technology
       | 
       | Is it? How do you show that? Was he just lucky? Did he divine the
       | right answer by listening to the voice in his head?
       | 
       | I don't disagree with the premise; when your body is screaming at
       | you to do something that should feel unnatural you should be
       | listening. That's evolution and learned experience trying to
       | steer you away from danger or toward some kind of reward. But the
       | blanket statement of "Stop analyzing your gut feelings" is just
       | silly.
       | 
       | My gut tells me to do stupid shit all the time; if I didn't spend
       | time thinking through the impacts of what may appear to be an
       | "irrational" decision I'd expect to make many mistakes. This also
       | gives leaders a complete scapegoat excuse when things explode
       | (see WFH vs RTO, explosive hiring vs mass layoffs); hey, he was
       | just following his gut, can't get it right every time.
        
         | mulmen wrote:
         | > I don't disagree with the premise; when your body is
         | screaming at you to do something that should feel unnatural you
         | should be listening. That's evolution and learned experience
         | trying to steer you away from danger or toward some kind of
         | reward. But the blanket statement of "Stop analyzing your gut
         | feelings" is just silly.
         | 
         | Unless you're a pilot. Or a serial killer.
        
         | WgaqPdNr7PGLGVW wrote:
         | > My gut tells me to do stupid shit all the time
         | 
         | Does it? Can you provide some examples?
         | 
         | My intuition rarely lets me down. Perhaps you don't have enough
         | experience in the areas where you are trying to listen to your
         | gut?
         | 
         | I'm sure if I was trying to apply my intuition to an area I
         | didn't understand at all it would let me down.
         | 
         | That is different from listening to my intuition in a field I
         | have been working in for almost two decades.
        
           | awesome_dude wrote:
           | You only have to read my sorry posting history to see where
           | my intuition has let me down.
        
       | melvinroest wrote:
       | I'm sorry, I'm doing that HN thing again where one reacts to the
       | title. I think there's definitely merit to not analyze your gut
       | feelings. With that said, I would have a framework on when it is
       | appropriate to trust them at least.
       | 
       | I once wrote a literature review essay assignment [1] on when to
       | trust your intuition and why meditation can help you to feel your
       | intuition better. It was for a class called cognition and emotion
       | at the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. I remember specifically to
       | write about this as it was _slightly_ outside of the scope of the
       | class. The professor green lit it because it was about cognition,
       | emotion and we did have a lecture on how intuition worked in the
       | brain.
       | 
       | That assignment has been life changing for me. Before it, I
       | didn't really know much about how to train my intuition.
       | Afterwards, I had an idea.
       | 
       | The assignment has been a long time ago, but what has remained in
       | my mind is that:
       | 
       | 1. Your intuition can only be trusted when you're an expert on
       | something - or at least have some experience.
       | 
       | 2. The experience needs to have enough volume and enough
       | regularity. Think chess, but poker is fine too. With poker you
       | just need more examples but ultimately there's regularity in the
       | game. It's just more fuzzy. However, the literature showed that
       | getting expertise/experience in something like clinical
       | psychology can be way tougher as a clinical psychologist sees a
       | low amount of patients (not thousands but dozens) and many
       | clinical diagnoses are fuzzy in unpredictable ways as we have
       | little clue with many conditions how things are caused or if
       | we're even talking about the same thing inside a particular
       | condition (e.g. many misdiagnoses happen).
       | 
       | 3. Experience is narrow. You think you're a people person? Sure,
       | but if you've only been a people person in the US, it won't
       | transfer well to other cultures. Your intuition will fool you.
       | There's a relearning period needed there.
       | 
       | 4. You can strengthen to feel your intuition by enhancing your
       | interoceptive awareness. This can be done by mindfulness
       | meditation.
       | 
       | Yea, that's it? I think?
       | 
       | It's in part based on the work of Kahneman and Klein. Not the pop
       | psychology books but their actual academic work. It's also based
       | on some neuroscience that other researchers did. I vaguely
       | remember something about beginner and expert Shogi players
       | (Japanese chess).
       | 
       | [1] https://melvinroest.github.io/articles/intuition.pdf
        
         | andrewmcwatters wrote:
         | > I'm sorry, I'm doing that HN thing again where one reacts to
         | the title.
         | 
         | :) Yes, but it's not every day that someone also follows up
         | with a paper.
        
       | strangattractor wrote:
       | Sounds like an attempt to analyze the very thing the article
       | claims should not be analyzed.
        
       | jschveibinz wrote:
       | Interesting HN post today on Zarathustrian philosophy:
       | 
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3s1t0hrl4pE
       | 
       | Are gut feelings naturally based on one's moralities or sense of
       | justice? Are leaders typically moralistic in their decisions?
       | 
       | Chris Hitchins would probably argue that morals are innate--but
       | what about in business? What if your gut feeling is based on some
       | unjust yet common practices? Does that make you a "better"
       | leader?
       | 
       | Just tossing this out there...
        
       | schmidtleonard wrote:
       | Your gut feelings want you to slam down McDonalds cheeseburgers
       | one after another, day after day. Some degree of self-control is
       | probably warranted.
        
         | biorach wrote:
         | Come on, that's not what they're talking about at all.
        
           | schmidtleonard wrote:
           | It's exactly what they are talking about. Metaphorical or
           | literal, gut feelings can become wildly miscalibrated, e.g.
           | due to food going from scarce to common. Introspection and
           | discipline are needed to keep it from going terribly wrong,
           | and while diet is a good example and riffs off the metaphor
           | it absolutely applies to other gut instincts too.
        
         | spython wrote:
         | Honestly, my gut is much less welcoming to the idea of me
         | visiting McDonalds than my mouth.
         | 
         | My gut says "I will feel bad", my mouth screams "tastebuds
         | demand an experience!"
        
           | schmidtleonard wrote:
           | Right, and there are better burgers than McDonalds. My point
           | here is just to bring up an example of instincts getting
           | horribly miscalibrated in a way that highlights the need for
           | thoughtfulness and self-control.
           | 
           | Make no mistake, the term self-control doesn't just apply to
           | food instincts, it applies to people instincts too. Your
           | instincts want you to go around assuming that ugly people are
           | bad and pretty people are good, but if you avoid every uggo
           | you're gonna miss out (especially in tech) and if you trust
           | every handsome salesman you meet you're gonna get rolled.
           | Thoughtfulness and self-control are always warranted.
        
             | spython wrote:
             | You can calibrate your gut feeling, though. You do it,
             | every day, as you go through life. You get a gut feeling
             | that a specific person might be difficult, and you can
             | override it consciously.
             | 
             | But I often find that the "gut" feeling is more often
             | right, and the unexplainability of it comes from the fact
             | that it takes hundreds of little things into account and
             | models future interaction outcomes and presents the feeling
             | you will have in the end as "gut feeling". Your own black
             | box of neural networks in your gut.
        
         | slashdave wrote:
         | On the contrary, my gut feelings tell me that eating a lot at
         | McDonalds will make me sick.
        
         | bdamm wrote:
         | Exactly. This trope gets repeated all the time about "listen to
         | your inner voice" or "gut feelings" and we hardly ever talk
         | about the alternatives. My gut tells me all kinds of things,
         | sometimes contradictory things depending on the time of day.
         | And its all but impossible to discern the difference between
         | what my "gut" is telling me vs what the little voice in my head
         | is telling me, which may very well be at odds. Plus all this is
         | corrupted by "dopamine chasing" behaviors, or the equivalent.
         | Add on top of that people for whom their gut instincts may have
         | led them into pain in the past. It's not simple at all.
        
         | WgaqPdNr7PGLGVW wrote:
         | > Your gut feelings want you to slam down McDonalds
         | cheeseburgers one after another, day after day.
         | 
         | Are we talking about the same thing here? When the article is
         | talking about gut feelings it is referring to intuition.
         | 
         | Your intuition is probably telling you eating McDonalds
         | cheeseburgers day after day is a mistake even while the scales
         | are telling you it is fine.
        
       | tetha wrote:
       | Mh. I'm treating too many things like chess, but in chess,
       | intuition of very competent players tends to be deep pattern
       | recognition. This kind of positive or constructive intuition in a
       | concrete context warrants analysis imo.
       | 
       | This analysis allows discovery of the patterns recognized by the
       | competent person, which teaches. The master level player
       | calculates a couple of moves, and then ends up worried about a
       | tactical threat. That's a useful way to think to learn about.
       | 
       | I have the same thing in tech. I can usually and pretty quickly
       | figure out in what area and component an issue would be in. Our
       | new colleagues have developed a habit of asking Why. And this has
       | led to great knowledge sharing sessions and has in fact taught me
       | a few things as well.
       | 
       | Though at the same time, among the technical leaders of the
       | company, we've started to accept negative intuition without much
       | explanation as well. If two or three people with decades of
       | experience don't feel good about a decision, that's a bad thing.
       | Even if they cannot voice that in a concrete way so far. Hiring
       | is similar - an actual, but not necessarily concrete or
       | constructive Nay out of 3 is a Nay overall.
        
       | bitshiftfaced wrote:
       | > Contrary to common wisdom, which suggests using analysis to
       | verify gut feelings, intuition often works better as a final
       | check on analytical decisions.
       | 
       | This doesn't mean not to analyze your gut feelings. I don't see
       | where the author makes this case at all. You can do both. You can
       | pay attention to your gut feeling as a final check on analytic
       | decisions _and_ you can try to understand where that gut feeling
       | is coming from (and in fact I believe you should).
        
       | yokto wrote:
       | This reminds me of this quote I love:
       | 
       | > "[They] placed too much weight on the introspections that they
       | generated at that moment in time, and thus lost sight of their
       | more enduring attitudes." [1]
       | 
       | The quote refers to this study [2] in which subjects had to chose
       | a poster to take home. The group who was instructed to think
       | about their reasons for their initial choice, and had the option
       | to change it, were less satisfied with it three weeks later. As
       | the abstract says:
       | 
       | > When people think about reasons, they appear to focus on
       | attributes of the stimulus that are easy to verbalize and seem
       | like plausible reasons but may not be important causes of their
       | initial evaluations.
       | 
       | This suggests that satisfaction is more correlated with initial
       | gut feeling than reasoning, at least for aesthetic choices, but I
       | think in many other cases as well.
       | 
       | [1] https://sci-hub.st/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)00401-2
       | 
       | [2]
       | https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/014616729319301...
        
       | JohnMakin wrote:
       | I use my intuition a lot and have learned to listen to it.
       | Sometimes though, it sucks when you intuit something, turn out to
       | be correct, and you don't really have a good explanation to your
       | peers as to why you knew it was correct. I remember one time in
       | my career, we knew we had a rogue server somewhere (out of
       | probably 100k+) we had to decommission but no one in the org knew
       | where it was and everyone that did had long been gone. All we
       | knew was that it was out there in the stack somewhere, because
       | we'd see the effects of its existence elsewhere in the metrics,
       | but this thing was like a complete ghost. All we had to go on in
       | the end was nginx logs that had hundreds of thousands of IP
       | addresses in them, go through them one at a time with a script
       | and run a certain curl to it, and hope we got lucky it was the
       | one we wanted. Even then there was a ton of false positives.
       | 
       | I was skimming through it on a call and a certain address just
       | popped out to me. I said "that's the one, I'm pretty sure I've
       | seen that before." I had no real reason to believe this, I just
       | had a very strong feeling that I recognized it from somewhere and
       | felt like it was the right one. Sure enough it was. People on the
       | call wanted to know how I knew, and I couldn't really describe
       | it, it was just pure gut. That doesn't really translate well in a
       | professional setting, people will think you're weird or
       | withholding/hiding something.
        
         | kqr wrote:
         | Isn't this the sort of thing e.g. Klein researches? You can
         | read up on that to get better terminology to discuss your
         | intuition in terms of.
        
       | AcerbicZero wrote:
       | One of my personal favorite reasons to yell at the sky is the
       | legions of managers who style themselves as "leaders", who show
       | up to provide exactly zero leadership (at best), and actively
       | derail projects led by anyone other than them.
        
       | svilen_dobrev wrote:
       | Reminds me of this article that seems disappeared from web, so
       | here my copy:
       | 
       | https://www.svilendobrev.com/1/MeetingtheSpecandOtherSoftwar...
       | 
       | "Warm fuzzies aren't in the spec."
        
       | zug_zug wrote:
       | Eh, the more I think about it though the more I can think of
       | times that "Going by my gut" when my brain and gut disagreed
       | where my gut was wrong.
       | 
       | Like suppose you're talking to somebody over text and your gut
       | says they're being an asshole, but your brain is rereading what
       | they say and can't find anything specific to call out.
       | 
       | Which is correct?
       | 
       | Well, I've found that the gut is systematically unreliable in a
       | number of situations... Are you in a bad mood for example? They
       | say never go food shopping when you're hungry.
       | 
       | Not to say mind > gut, because that's just as stupid as saying
       | gut > mind. The point is that there are dozens of variables
       | (variables like mood) we need to learn in such evaluations, and
       | generalizations can rarely be useful.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-11-07 23:00 UTC)