[HN Gopher] Now lie in it: an uxntal retrospective
___________________________________________________________________
Now lie in it: an uxntal retrospective
Author : surprisetalk
Score : 53 points
Date : 2024-11-01 17:28 UTC (5 days ago)
(HTM) web link (wiki.xxiivv.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (wiki.xxiivv.com)
| stavros wrote:
| This has strong Urbit vibes, somehow.
| cpach wrote:
| Dunno. IMHO, it feels a lot more practical than Urbit.
| recursive wrote:
| I can basically understand what it is. So to me, it's very
| different.
| surprisetalk wrote:
| Urbit is an underrated project! It was definitely an
| inspiration for the language I'm working on:
|
| [0] https://scrapscript.org
| TOGoS wrote:
| I probably want to talk to you about programming language
| ideas.
|
| What are your thoughts on Unison[0], which also uses hash-
| addressed code and managed effects?
|
| [0] https://www.unison-lang.org/
| surprisetalk wrote:
| Sure, feel free to email me anytime :)
|
| [1] hello@taylor.town
|
| Unison seems cool! I met some Unison folks a few years back
| and our visions didn't have much overlap. Nice people, but
| their fundamental design decisions with hashes/effects/etc
| are incompatible with the web I'm trying to build.
| compressedgas wrote:
| I thought it was more https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CHIP-8
|
| The Urbit nock machine is very different.
| kragen wrote:
| Last time someone said that on here, one of the responses was,
| "Uxn is to Urbit as science is to scientology."
|
| It may not be quite true (Urbit isn't completely fake) but it's
| sure funny.
| stavros wrote:
| Interesting, I've never heard of Uxn before, I'll take a
| closer look, thank you.
| pjs_ wrote:
| something tells me they might not entirely appreciate that
| comparison haha
| stavros wrote:
| I'm not very familiar with either project, but they have
| similar names.
| sevensor wrote:
| > I am not convinced that computers solve any real problems
| either.
|
| This strikes me as such a strange thing to say that I think I
| must have misunderstood what they're getting at.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2024-11-06 23:02 UTC)