[HN Gopher] Letters by Oliver Sacks review
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Letters by Oliver Sacks review
        
       Author : tintinnabula
       Score  : 57 points
       Date   : 2024-10-28 05:00 UTC (5 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.theguardian.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.theguardian.com)
        
       | nomilk wrote:
       | > Letters represents a mere fraction of the total in his
       | archives, which runs to more than 200,000 pages
       | 
       | whoah. Sacks averaged about 11 pages per day for 50 years (that
       | are known about).
        
       | nomilk wrote:
       | The contrast in Sacks's hobbies made me laugh. Amusing to see a
       | neurologist, who's complemented for being
       | 
       | > a brilliant and vivid mind, a man whose intellectual appetite
       | was vast, and whose professional and creative passions - far from
       | being the self-absorbed obsessions of a pedant - were first and
       | foremost an act of reaching out, the means through which he
       | sought to communicate with others, a "love affair with the world"
       | 
       | and whose work, _Letters_ , is
       | 
       | > crammed with off-the-cuff profundities, moments of elevated
       | perception that briefly unriddle the more inscrutable aspects of
       | human nature
       | 
       | can still enjoy the simpler (and funny) things in life, like
       | bulking up via powerlifting:
       | 
       | > As a man of 30, dallying with powerlifting, Sacks routinely
       | bragged to his parents about his weight, how much he could lift,
       | the amount he ate - "I love to shake the pavement as I walk, to
       | part crowds like the prow of a ship." At Mount Zion, special
       | scrubs had to be made to accommodate his bulk, and he found
       | himself in disfavour with his superiors for stealing patients'
       | food.
        
         | ttctciyf wrote:
         | > The contrast in Sacks's hobbies
         | 
         | Though you wouldn't know if from TFA, Sacks was also a life-
         | long enthusiast of mind-altering substances[0]. His 2012
         | _Hallucinations_ [1] inquires into the etiology and social and
         | phenomenal aspects of its subject by examining cases from his
         | patients and from his own recreational episodes and is a
         | completely fascinating read!
         | 
         | 0: See, for example,
         | https://www.npr.org/2020/09/21/915224016/neurologist-oliver-...
         | 
         | 1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hallucinations_(book)
        
       | motohagiography wrote:
       | shame that these guys are just myths now. while I haven't read
       | Sacks, the description reminds me of writers like plimpton,
       | hemmingway, and thompson, who were the protagonists of their own
       | stories and writing to capture an essence that we were just sold
       | as fiction because it's the only way anyone would believe it.
       | 
       | i was disappointed to read the article though. he sounded really
       | cool, and I don't think the author did him the justice that
       | another man who knows those things or has done them could have
       | recognized or appreciated.
        
       | jcims wrote:
       | He made a few appearances on the RadioLab podcast. Always one of
       | my favorite to listen to.
        
       | alexey-salmin wrote:
       | Sacks books left me deeply impressed but up to this day I don't
       | know if they are scientifically accurate or partially fictional
       | or exaggerated. Wikipedia is not a reliable advisor on such
       | matters so any credible review recommendations are welcome.
        
         | Optimal_Persona wrote:
         | Watching "Brilliant Minds" probably won't help, great to see
         | Zachary Quinto as Dr. Wolf ;-) https://www.nbc.com/brilliant-
         | minds
        
       | aamargulies wrote:
       | I was lucky enough to attend a lecture given by Dr. Sacks circa
       | 1988. He was a resident speaker for the University of California
       | campuses and had come to UCSC to talk about Awakenings and other
       | topics. He was such a sensitive, kind, gentle person.
       | 
       | It was a privilege to simply be in the audience and the audience
       | was very small. For some reason students didn't take advantage of
       | the opportunity, right in front of them, to come and see him
       | speak. Baffling.
       | 
       | When I saw him, he was in his mid-fifties and the picture of an
       | English academic doctor/professor. It is a kick to see what he
       | looked like in 1961. That BMW he's sitting on is a classic.
       | 
       | The world lost a very special person when he died in 2015.
        
       | paganel wrote:
       | Wasn't sure what was so special about the letters written by a
       | mid-century neurologist, one among many, until I got to this part
       | at the very start of the article:
       | 
       | > A young queer man with a growing interest in motorcycle
       | leather, Sacks had other reasons to leave
       | 
       | He might have been a great guy, I couldn't tell, cause the
       | reviewer was first and foremost interested in who this guy was
       | having intercourse with, and not in what he was actually
       | saying/believing/thinking of. Many such cases of late.
        
       | levocardia wrote:
       | Has anyone read the book? The New Yorker had some excerpts from
       | his letters recently (around the "awakenings" era) and they
       | seemed a bit haphazardly put together at first glance - more of
       | interest to a literature scholar than a casual reader. Should I
       | just stick with his actual books, or would a casual reader enjoy
       | the letters too?
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-11-02 23:01 UTC)