[HN Gopher] Math and puzzle fans find magic in Martin Gardner's ...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Math and puzzle fans find magic in Martin Gardner's legacy
        
       Author : ColinWright
       Score  : 58 points
       Date   : 2024-10-30 09:51 UTC (2 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.scientificamerican.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.scientificamerican.com)
        
       | ykonstant wrote:
       | Another fantastic resource is Boris Kordemsky's book The Moscow
       | Puzzles:
       | 
       | https://www.amazon.com/Moscow-Puzzles-Mathematical-Recreatio...
        
         | I_complete_me wrote:
         | I think it was this book where I first saw the puzzle:
         | Does New Year's Day fall more often on a Saturday or a Sunday?
         | 
         | Such a simple puzzle with to (then) me such depth of knowledge
         | to uncover the answer.
        
           | bumbledraven wrote:
           | I don't see it there:
           | https://archive.org/details/boris-a.-kordemsky-the-moscow-
           | pu...
           | 
           | Do you recall the solution? It seems like a tricky problem.
           | No approach occurs to me aside from a brute force analysis of
           | the 400 year Gregorian calendar cycle, accounting for the
           | complete leap year rules (under which, e.g., 1900 was not a
           | leap year but 2000 was).
        
           | tromp wrote:
           | Unless you're considering a limited date range, it should
           | fall equally often on both in the limit since neither 365 nor
           | 366 (leap year) are multiples of 7.
        
             | madcaptenor wrote:
             | So you'd think that, and it is approximately true. But the
             | calendar repeats every 400 years (there are 97 leap years
             | in 400, and 497 is a multiple of 7). And 400 isn't a
             | multiple of 7, so you can't have it work out exactly.
        
         | jeifneioka wrote:
         | Don't forget Raymond Smullyan.
        
       | anthk wrote:
       | Recreational math and games boosted both computing and science.
       | 
       | Unix was born to play games. And Curses was born for Rogue.
        
       | beardyw wrote:
       | All of his Scientific American articles were available as a CD I
       | have. Not sure if they are online yet.
       | 
       | As a youngster they were a source of wonder to me.
        
         | glimshe wrote:
         | What is this CD? I like old compilations.
         | 
         | Edit: found it, it's called "Martin Gardner s Mathematical
         | Games: The Entire Collection of His Scientific American
         | Columns"
        
         | Jtsummers wrote:
         | https://bookstore.ams.org/view?ProductCode=GARDNER-SET
         | 
         | Cambridge University Press also started on a project to revise
         | and re-release all of it but that stalled out, they published
         | four books.
         | 
         | https://www.cambridge.org/us/universitypress/subjects/mathem...
        
       | smath wrote:
       | Gardeners books and sci-am columns are an amazing resource to get
       | kids and teens interested in math.
       | 
       | In the present time, I find Simon Singh's parallel.co.uk has been
       | doing interesting work holding weekly math circles for kids -
       | deftly engaging kids with mathematical ideas. I attend a circle
       | with my 9 yo every Sunday.
        
         | rahimnathwani wrote:
         | > Simon Singh's parallel.co.uk
         | 
         | Perhaps you mean https://parallel.org.uk/ ?
         | 
         | I'm curious what the age range is? My son is 8.
        
       | pvg wrote:
       | https://archive.is/hyF0u
        
       | vundercind wrote:
       | His annotated _Alice in Wonderland_ is really nice, too.
        
       | zahlman wrote:
       | For clarity: the article is written today, but Martin Gardner
       | died in 2010.
        
       | masfuerte wrote:
       | > The question is, can you think of a single shape that looks
       | like a triangle from one side, a circle from a second side and a
       | square from the third side?
       | 
       | He goes on to say that it resembles a household item. I can
       | visualise the shape, but I can't think of anything that it looks
       | like. Does anyone know what item it is?
       | 
       | There's a picture here:
       | 
       | https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1947363/is-there-a-...
        
         | schoen wrote:
         | It looks like lipstick to me. Or possibly the end of a
         | screwdriver or chisel.
        
         | parlortricks wrote:
         | Looks like an interchangable end to a cake frosting spatula.
        
         | BriggyDwiggs42 wrote:
         | Was thinking an axehead
        
       | whatshisface wrote:
       | This one was my favorite:
       | 
       | "A carpenter, working with a buzz saw, wishes to cut a wooden
       | cube, three inches on a side, into 27 one-inch cubes. He can do
       | this job easily by making six cuts through the cube, keeping the
       | pieces together in the cube shape. Can he reduce the number of
       | necessary cuts by rearranging the pieces after each cut? Either
       | show how or prove that it's impossible."
       | 
       | - Martin Gardener
        
         | madcaptenor wrote:
         | Lbh arrq fvk phgf orpnhfr lbh arrq gb rkcbfr rirel snpr bs gur
         | prageny phor.
        
       | acomjean wrote:
       | There is Gathering for Gardner non profit.
       | 
       | for recreational math:
       | 
       | https://www.gathering4gardner.org/
       | 
       | They have conferences and talks and post on youtube:
       | 
       | https://www.youtube.com/c/G4GCelebration
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-11-01 23:00 UTC)