[HN Gopher] Generative AI could generate tons of e-waste by deca...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Generative AI could generate tons of e-waste by decade's end
        
       Author : bikenaga
       Score  : 24 points
       Date   : 2024-10-29 21:24 UTC (1 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (techxplore.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (techxplore.com)
        
       | wildrhythms wrote:
       | But have you considered all the money to be made storing and
       | running ads on that e-waste?
        
         | ForOldHack wrote:
         | Even in death, old TVs still command attention.
        
       | drewbeck wrote:
       | Fortunately we will just be able to ask AI what to do about it.
       | I'm sure it will come up with something.
        
         | pimlottc wrote:
         | It keeps telling me to allocate more resources to making paper
         | clips
        
         | lagrange77 wrote:
         | "Oh, thank you for pointing that out, you're totally right! My
         | previous answer would have killed humankind as a side effect.
         | Here's an updated version of the solution: ..."
        
       | louwrentius wrote:
       | The current AI craze doesn't feel like it's really about AI. It's
       | Silicon Valley being desperate for (growing) growth and
       | shareholder value.
       | 
       | Another obvious aspect it that it may help do work that could be
       | done by people, thus helping to keep the worker class - that's
       | you! - subdued, fighting amongst yourselves.
       | 
       | Meanwhile the 'good stuff' can only be offered by those large
       | companies, who have the power to make them 'good enough' thus
       | making the rest more dependent.
       | 
       | It's been a while since 2007, all the incentives are there to
       | keep the ball rolling, but it will stop at some point.
       | 
       | Then we IT people with six figure salaries will learn that we
       | should have listened more to David Graeber.
        
         | kylehotchkiss wrote:
         | Don't you think people will get bored of it? I am starting to.
         | 
         | Apple has a few new cool AL based components in iOS 18. But one
         | of the ones they've spent the past year harping on is the
         | Cowboy frog emoji generator.
        
           | digging wrote:
           | Getting bored of it isn't the same as having no use for it.
           | This stuff is 2 years old; we haven't figured it all out.
           | Even if all development on the actual models stopped now,
           | we'd still be seeing new uses of LLMs emerging for years to
           | come.
        
             | ForOldHack wrote:
             | We have no use for crypto-currency or Carriages. In 1910
             | there were 240,000 carriage manufactures in the U.S, only 4
             | years later, there were 5. There are still 2. Technology
             | does that. It does not matter how old... If its useless,
             | its useless. Did we figure a use for the appendix?
        
           | Mistletoe wrote:
           | > But one of the ones they've spent the past year harping on
           | is the Cowboy frog emoji generator.
           | 
           | You know it sounds like a line from a David Foster Wallace
           | novel, but nope it's real life. I get that a lot these days.
        
         | gruez wrote:
         | >The current AI craze doesn't feel like it's really about AI.
         | It's Silicon Valley being desperate for (growing) growth and
         | shareholder value.
         | 
         | Isn't this true statement about literally any other technology?
         | Do you think the railroad craze[1] was really about railroads?
         | 
         | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Railway_Mania
         | 
         | >Another obvious aspect it that it may help do work that could
         | be done by people, thus helping to keep the worker class -
         | that's you! - subdued, fighting amongst yourselves.
         | 
         | >Meanwhile the 'good stuff' can only be offered by those large
         | companies, who have the power to make them 'good enough' thus
         | making the rest more dependent.
         | 
         | If you replaced the preceding paragraphs to be about weaving
         | machines, this could pass for ned ludd's writings.
        
       | xnx wrote:
       | Dupe: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41974159
        
       | kylehotchkiss wrote:
       | One Person's Trash is Another Crypto Miners Treasure.
        
       | Synaesthesia wrote:
       | Funny because "e-waste" is also how I would characterise the
       | content that these generative AI models output.
        
         | ForOldHack wrote:
         | Saying AI will generate tons of e-waste is redundant. AI is
         | waste.
        
       | jiggawatts wrote:
       | These "generates e-waste" articles are _political hit pieces_. I
       | hope we're all intelligent enough to recognise the absurdity of
       | the statement.
       | 
       | In case it is unclear, a similar article was going around the
       | Internet a few years ago complaining about the "tons of e-waste
       | created by Apple Airpods".
       | 
       | Yes, that's true in the sense that Apple was producing "tons" of
       | e-waste annually... two of them. One ton wouldn't be "tons", you
       | see, so the article was technically correct in the dumbest and
       | most nakedly deceptive way possible.
       | 
       | Waste is about inefficiency. It implies no or negative utility.
       | There's a hint of huge landfills and truck after truck of bulky
       | stuff filling that up.
       | 
       | AirPods and AI chips are the _opposite_ of inefficient! They're
       | some of the smallest, densest, _most concentrated_ and space-
       | efficient products ever made by man.
       | 
       | To invoke the word "waste" in juxtaposition to these things is so
       | absurd, so contrary to their essential nature that it's clearly a
       | deliberate falsehood, signalling membership in a group by its
       | absurdity. It's like the official statements on RT that yet
       | another oligarch "fell out" of a window. Everyone _knows_ what
       | really happened there. The claim of defenestration is a coded
       | signal telling the listeners a very different message to the
       | verbatim text.
       | 
       | Someone who is scared of AI wrote this article or had it written
       | on their behalf. It's the product of a Luddite, or someone whose
       | job is about to be replaced.
       | 
       | "Stop the efficiencies! My career as a copy editor is at risk! I
       | mean... it's surely _wasteful_ to optimise my job away with a
       | chip that's a mere square inch in size and weighs a gram!"
        
       | 94b45eb4 wrote:
       | It's a race to create an AI good enough to solve the e-waste
       | problem before the e-waste problem becomes such a large problem
       | that it prevents AI advancement.
        
         | soco wrote:
         | It's a race to ignore all this, calling it "woke snowflake
         | worries lol", and enjoying the short term economical benefits
         | of AI making the shareholders happy. And I'm not even
         | sarcastic.
        
           | ForOldHack wrote:
           | Until of course, "Demon Seed" comes true.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-10-29 23:00 UTC)