[HN Gopher] Axiomatics: Mathematical thought and high modernism
___________________________________________________________________
Axiomatics: Mathematical thought and high modernism
Author : hhs
Score : 35 points
Date : 2024-10-27 14:47 UTC (8 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (old.maa.org)
(TXT) w3m dump (old.maa.org)
| alan-crowe wrote:
| The review distills the book's view of the difference between
| pure mathematics and applied mathematics. "applied" split from
| "pure" to meet the technical needs of the US military during WW2.
|
| My best example of the split is
| https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symmetry_of_second_derivatives
| Wikpedia notes that "The list of unsuccessful proposed proofs
| started with Euler's, published in 1740,[3] although already in
| 1721 Bernoulli had implicitly assumed the result with no formal
| justification." The split between pure (Euler) and
| applied(Bernoulli) is already there.
|
| The result is hard to prove because it isn't actually true. A
| simple proof will apply to a counter example, so cannot be
| correct. A correct proof will have to use the additional
| hypotheses needed to block the counter examples, so cannot be
| simple.
|
| Since the human life span is 70 years, I face an urgent dilemma.
| Do I master the technique needed to understand the proof (fun) or
| do I crack on and build things (satisfaction)? Pure
| mathematicians are planning on constructing long and intricate
| chains of reasoning; a small error can get amplified into a error
| that matters. From a contradiction one can prove anything.
| Applied mathematics gets applied to engineering; build a
| prototype and discover problems with tolerances, material
| impurities, and annoying edge cases in the mathematical analysis.
| A error will likely show up in the prototype. Pure? Applied? It
| is really about the ticking of the clock.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2024-10-27 23:00 UTC)