[HN Gopher] Opera will always help you block ads natively
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Opera will always help you block ads natively
        
       Author : josephcsible
       Score  : 21 points
       Date   : 2024-10-26 17:09 UTC (5 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (blogs.opera.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (blogs.opera.com)
        
       | josephcsible wrote:
       | > We plan to continue supporting Manifest V2 extensions in Opera
       | independently of what will happen to other browsers.
       | 
       | Once Google rips the MV2 code out of Chromium entirely next year,
       | are Opera's developers really going to have the resources
       | necessary to maintain such a hard fork?
        
         | whatyesaid wrote:
         | Maybe if Opera, Arc, and Brave people joined forces... Without
         | a combined effort they lack the power of Chrome store and
         | developer docs.
         | 
         | Worst comes to worst they can use the Firefox engine. The MV2
         | extensions don't need much work to leap over for Firefox
        
           | dlachausse wrote:
           | This is why it's so critical that we don't consolidate onto
           | monocultures. It is crucial that Firefox and WebKit continue
           | to be viable alternatives to Chromium.
        
         | stavros wrote:
         | How open source is a browser if entire other _companies_ can 't
         | maintain a fork?
        
           | josephcsible wrote:
           | Open-source-ness only depends on the source code being
           | released under a suitable license. It has nothing to do with
           | complexity or maintainability of it.
        
             | JadeNB wrote:
             | > Open-source-ness only depends on the source code being
             | released under a suitable license. It has nothing to do
             | with complexity or maintainability of it.
             | 
             | That's a definition, but I think that stavros was proposing
             | that, much like Microsoft's "open" formats for Office, if a
             | codebase is so complex that no-one else, not even with the
             | resources of a full company, can maintain it, then at best
             | its open sourceness is pro forma.
        
               | murderfs wrote:
               | By that logic, Linux isn't open source. Plenty of
               | companies have abandoned products because maintaining a
               | downstream fork of the kernel is too hard.
               | 
               | Companies not being willing to invest resources into
               | maintaining a fork doesn't mean it's not open source.
        
               | stavros wrote:
               | Yep, exactly. The disagreements here come down to a
               | "spirit vs letter" debate. Yes, Chromium is open source
               | by the letter of the law, as it's licensed under a FOSS
               | license, but FOSS comes with certain expectations that
               | you'll be able to use and modify the source code in
               | certain ways.
               | 
               | The fact that Google has managed to make a codebase open,
               | but extremely onerous to actually maintain a fork of,
               | does actually go against the spirit of FOSS a bit, in my
               | opinion.
        
           | KetoManx64 wrote:
           | Oh hey! Small world! I recently used your Static site
           | generator to convert a subset of my Joplin notes into a
           | website which I used as a showcase for employers and that
           | showcase ended up being the thing that got me my initial
           | interview with the company I'm now working for. Thanks for
           | making the converter public and saving me a bunch of time
           | from not having to write one myself from scratch!
        
             | stavros wrote:
             | Oh nice! I'm really glad that was useful, I use it for
             | myself but I didn't know if anyone else did!
        
       | cebert wrote:
       | " As of the end of 2023, Opera Software was 72.4% owned by
       | Kunlun, a Chinese public company, making it a subsidiary of that
       | company. Opera CEO James Yahui Zhou is a controlling shareholder
       | in Kunlun." [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opera_(web_browser)]
        
         | add-sub-mul-div wrote:
         | You shouldn't just get to post this passive aggressive crap.
         | Tell me why this outrages you or why you want it to outrage me.
         | Vaguely hinting that I should be distrustful of people who live
         | across some border because they look and talk different and our
         | governments have tension is not enough to get me going.
        
           | cebert wrote:
           | I don't personally want a browser, which is such an important
           | element of my personal and professional life, owned by a
           | Chinese company. Additional, Opera isn't fully open source. I
           | also don't trust Google.
        
           | Sakos wrote:
           | Nobody said anything about people looking or talking
           | different. The defining features of the Chinese government,
           | such as its authoritarian nature and its values that are
           | completely opposed to most Western values, have nothing to do
           | with these two things.
        
       | aucisson_masque wrote:
       | Well we'll see in a year when Google completely shut mv2 support.
       | Until then it's very easy to speak, especially when you have very
       | few market share and everything to gain with marketing stunt and
       | not much to lose.
        
         | troymc wrote:
         | Opera already does ad blocking before you add any extensions,
         | so the manifest v3 thing is a bit of a red herring.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-10-26 23:01 UTC)