[HN Gopher] The global surveillance free-for-all in mobile ad data
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The global surveillance free-for-all in mobile ad data
        
       Author : todsacerdoti
       Score  : 189 points
       Date   : 2024-10-23 11:39 UTC (11 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (krebsonsecurity.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (krebsonsecurity.com)
        
       | sandworm101 wrote:
       | Many worry about how these tools will be used to persecute people
       | such as women seeking reproductive medical services. That is a
       | problem. But what will people think of those same tools being
       | used to enforce protection orders, to spot parole violators? I
       | know where my opinions fall, but I also realize that the bulk of
       | the population would trade in their privacy for any perception of
       | increased safety.
        
         | jcgrillo wrote:
         | If I were in law enforcement, had no morals, and just wanted to
         | convict as many people as possible I'd build a system that
         | automatically assembles a virtual dossier on _everyone_ using
         | these data streams. Then I 'd implement detection heuristics
         | that look for interesting dossiers. These could be used as the
         | "classified" component of a case built by parallel
         | construction[1].
         | 
         | [1]https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallel_construction
        
           | potato3732842 wrote:
           | Not even. It's worse. They aren't even useful for that.
           | 
           | They've tried that approach but it's actually less efficient
           | than "good old fashioned police work" because it turns out
           | that 99/100 of your hits are gonna be lawful weirdos, 1/100
           | is gonna be a petty drug dealer and the career advancing
           | prosecution you actually wanted would have been much easier
           | to find by using normal methods like inferring that a dealer
           | has a supplier, a spy has a handler, etc, etc and trying to
           | suss out who those people are. The NSA figured all this out
           | post 9/11 when they were building data haystacks in search of
           | terrorists.
           | 
           | What the data haystacks do get used for is dragnet policing
           | wherein an agency picks some crime they're gonna go hard on,
           | pulls up a bunch of results of people who probably did it,
           | tosses all the people who are likely to pose any risk to them
           | (e.g. you don't see the ATF knocking on doors asking about
           | Temu glock switches in bad parts of Detroit) and kicks in the
           | doors of whoever's left.
           | 
           | The data haystacks are also really useful for witch hunts
           | when they get egg on their face and need to make someone pay,
           | like that time they prosecuted anyone and everyone who they
           | could construe as having done anything to help the kid who
           | bombed the Boston Marathon, and the January 6 people of whom
           | a great number were certainly just hapless.
           | 
           | And this is in addition to the usual "opposition research"
           | like the FBI bugging MLK and all that sort of crap.
        
             | dylan604 wrote:
             | If you had a location that was a known drug hot spot, you
             | could use this data to see who frequented that location.
             | Using that info, you could use "good old fashioned police
             | work" to contact each person and get them to roll on
             | someone else. That's much easier than sitting in a stakeout
             | trying to ID those that come and go.
        
               | jcgrillo wrote:
               | Or you watch them, find out where the stash house is, and
               | call in an "anonymous tip" to another agency. They get a
               | warrant, raid the stash, and it's all above board (or
               | near enough).
               | 
               | Parallel construction makes the mere existence of these
               | data sets extremely dangerous.
        
             | dboreham wrote:
             | Surely ML is better than that? Otherwise no targeted
             | advertising would work.
        
             | wepple wrote:
             | Any references to back up the suggestion that a data driven
             | approach doesn't work?
             | 
             | Not being skeptical, but curious
        
           | pessimizer wrote:
           | You can do things far more interesting than that with the
           | dossiers on everyone that absolutely exist right now and that
           | algorithms are constantly being run over. You can frame
           | people for crimes for which you _know_ they will have no
           | defense, exactly like the Stasi did, and privately confront
           | them about it. As they plead their innocence, tell them that
           | you want to believe them, and if they can do a little work
           | for you, they 'll not only be arrested, but be rewarded! How
           | would you like a job at Mother Jones, or the Guardian?
        
         | jareklupinski wrote:
         | > the bulk of the population would trade in their privacy
         | 
         | i think most people are on the fence / undecided, and the few
         | that do "pick a side" only do so based on their personal life
         | experiences (which includes family and community influences)
        
           | mmooss wrote:
           | First, it's not a binary choice. It depends on the
           | circumstance.
           | 
           | Also, people are influenced by what other people say,
           | especially people in tech. You can see people on HN saying
           | how hopeless it all is. People on HN and your social circle
           | are listening to what you say.
        
             | dylan604 wrote:
             | No they're not. You preaching against tech just comes
             | across as wack job crazy to those that don't care or
             | already disagree. Maybe they aren't as far as thinking
             | you're a wacko, but they've definitely grown tired and
             | calloused from the non-stop and probably at least ignore
             | it. Evidence by all the people continuing to use social
             | media.
             | 
             | Convenience wins out for the vast majority of people.
             | People just want to be left alone and have nice things. As
             | long as it is just advertisers knowing everything, the
             | masses just won't care. Even if the state starts to take
             | action, as long as it doesn't happen to them, they won't
             | care either.
        
               | mmooss wrote:
               | History shows clearly that people can be very motivated
               | by political and social issues; they will die for them.
               | Right now, for example, people on the right are very
               | motivated and active, often to their own detriment in
               | terms of wealth, health, politically and socially.
               | 
               | For some reason, when it comes to other causes, people
               | repeat the obviously false (and hypocritical) right-wing
               | talking point that it's all useless and hopeless.
               | 
               | (Throwing around words like 'wack' and 'preaching' isn't
               | evidence or a stronger argument.)
        
               | dylan604 wrote:
               | >(Throwing around words like 'wack' and 'preaching' isn't
               | evidence or a stronger argument.)
               | 
               | These are not my words, but words I've been called when
               | droning on and on about the evils of social media and ad
               | tech. <shrug>
        
         | ideashower wrote:
         | The U.S. Government is purchasing tools like these and using
         | them: https://www.404media.co/inside-the-u-s-government-bought-
         | too...
         | 
         | This has been a widespread problem for the better part of at
         | least half a decade, likely much more.
        
           | sailfast wrote:
           | To do it on their own would be illegal. To buy it from a
           | commercial vendor is an easy contract to write. Quite
           | something. Perhaps we should write a new law making it
           | illegal.
           | 
           | They managed to outsource it on accident just because of a
           | shared need with advertisers to target people.
        
         | michaelt wrote:
         | _> But what will people think of those same tools being used to
         | enforce protection orders, to spot parole violators?_
         | 
         | If only our society had some orderly process to balance privacy
         | with public safety - such as by having the cops explain to a
         | judge _why_ they need to track a given person, for how long,
         | and so on.
         | 
         | Perhaps also some rules about what counts as a good enough
         | reason, and telling judges they can't grant overly broad,
         | blanket permission.
         | 
         | Someone should put something in the constitution about that.
        
           | jcgrillo wrote:
           | Counterpoint:
           | 
           | > One DEA official had told Reuters: "Parallel construction
           | is a law enforcement technique we use every day. It's decades
           | old, a bedrock concept."
           | 
           | Constitution or not, they're doing it.
        
             | TechDebtDevin wrote:
             | They're also using these tools to stalk women[0]
             | 
             | [0]: https://theweek.com/speedreads/651668/hundreds-police-
             | office...
        
         | 93po wrote:
         | if you have a legal reason to track someone, make them wear a
         | tracker. don't make everyone else lose their privacy and
         | freedom to move without government oversight
        
       | mdaniel wrote:
       | > such as AccuWeather, GasBuddy, Grindr, and MyFitnessPal that
       | collect your MAID and location and sell that to brokers.
       | 
       | Welp, that's the final straw I needed to nuke that fucking
       | GasBuddy app from my phone. Goddamn I hate them so much
        
         | 2OEH8eoCRo0 wrote:
         | It's a damn shame. I've stopped using pretty much all apps
         | because I can't trust any of them. My phone is practically
         | stock.
        
           | mdaniel wrote:
           | I would _guess_ that the systemic solution to this problem is
           | one of those whole device VPNs that doesn't choose to hide
           | your location but rather blocks access to ad and tracker
           | networks. I actually have DDG's Privacy Pro VPN
           | <https://duckduckgo.com/duckduckgo-help-pages/privacy-
           | pro/vpn...> but my life experience has been that it breaks
           | more things than it helps but I guess it's time to at least
           | try it
        
           | casenmgreen wrote:
           | It's worse than you think.
           | 
           | There are popular third-party libraries, used by apps,
           | offering whatever functionality.
           | 
           | Those third-party libraries do deals with whoever, to include
           | into the library whatever code it is the whoever wants to get
           | out onto a ton of phones.
           | 
           | I worked for a company in Germany, who wanted to get some
           | Bluetooth base station detection functionality out into
           | phones, so they could track people.
           | 
           | Company put Bluetooth base stations into a bunch of
           | locations, and then paid a major third-party library to
           | include their code.
           | 
           | Bingo. One week later, millions of phones being tracked.
           | 
           | When you install an app, you are in fact installing God knows
           | what from shady friend-of-a-friend-of-a-friend, who's got
           | money.
           | 
           | Do not install commercial apps. Only install open source
           | apps. Anything else, you're going to be abused, whether you
           | know it or not.
        
           | autoexec wrote:
           | Stay away from Samsung. Their default apps (which you often
           | can't uninstall or disable) collect massive amounts of data.
           | The default Samsung keyboard that came installed with an old
           | Galaxy I had was logging every single letter I typed in every
           | app and sending it to a third party whose privacy policy said
           | it was being used for marketing research, to determine my
           | intelligence, education level, habits, attitude, etc.
        
         | arcanemachiner wrote:
         | Seems like one of those apps that would work fine from the
         | website.
        
           | mdaniel wrote:
           | (a) I'm about to find out (b) at least some casual tire-
           | kicking shows that their mobile website is just as ragingly
           | dumb as the app is, so that actually makes me feel a little
           | better - it's not that the app itself is stupid, it's that
           | their dev team is
        
             | jjulius wrote:
             | Genuinely curious, since I've never heard of the app until
             | this very moment - do you actually find that you save a
             | noticeable amount on gas? I tend to notice that prices are
             | _incredibly_ similar from station to station in whatever
             | general metro area I 'm in, to the point where it almost
             | doesn't make a difference which station I go to. Has it
             | actually shown a benefit wrt driving out of your way as
             | opposed to stopping at the most convenient spot on your
             | commute?
        
               | mdaniel wrote:
               | Reasonable people are going to differ about what
               | "noticeable" means, and it will further differ based on
               | the size of the tank in your vehicle, since a $0.04
               | difference times 8 gallons is not going to be the same as
               | times 75 gallons
               | 
               | But, to answer your question, yes: I just checked and the
               | spread seems to be $5.19 to $4.19 here. But to circle
               | back to your original premise it's quite possible that
               | even $15-ish is not worth the glucose/time spent
               | interacting with this objectively terrible app and then
               | driving to some likely inconvenient station
        
         | frogblast wrote:
         | You can still use the app. You get asked both to have the app
         | get access to the MAID, and get access to location. If this is
         | a problem, it is a problem because you said Yes to both. You
         | could have said No. You can change that choice now.
         | 
         | If you go to Settings -> Privacy, the top two options in iOS 18
         | are:
         | 
         | * Auto-deny Advertising ID access
         | 
         | * Which apps have location access ("X always, Y while using the
         | app" is summarized right at the top)
        
           | mdaniel wrote:
           | I thank goodness I don't use iOS because I enjoy having the
           | ability to use MY phone as if _I_ own it and not Tim Apple
        
             | dbtc wrote:
             | I haven't used android in a while, how is it different?
        
               | nobody9999 wrote:
               | LineageOS[0] (and/or other non-Google OS)+F-Droid[1]
               | (and/or other third-party app stores) allow you to avoid
               | Google altogether. Which is nothing new.
               | 
               | Is that possible with IOS to avoid Apple? I think not.
               | 
               | [0] https://lineageos.org/
               | 
               | [1] https://f-droid.org/en/
               | 
               | Edit: Clarified my question as to what's possible with
               | IOS.
        
         | us0r wrote:
         | I've been bitching about GasBuddy since at least 2018 (I'm sure
         | even further I'm too lazy to keep looking).
         | 
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16776028#16776762
         | 
         | I've pretty much deleted all apps. I'm working on dumping my
         | phone all together but shit like mandated 2FA is screwing that
         | up.
        
           | philipov wrote:
           | At this point, 2FA is the only thing I use my phone for
           | anymore. It's the only reason I even have a phone; I spent
           | about a year without one until I had to for 2FA. But I don't
           | need to carry it around anywhere for that. It would be
           | inaccurate to call it a "mobile" device.
        
             | waterproof wrote:
             | It wouldn't be too hard to create a physical device that
             | can only be used to set up and retrieve Authenticator-app
             | style 2FA codes.
             | 
             | All you'd need is a camera to read QR codes, a display, a
             | few kB of storage and some pretty basic processing.
             | 
             | But then I guess that storage would need to be encrypted
             | with some sort of authentication. Hmm.
        
               | fsflover wrote:
               | Sounds a bit like Precursor.
        
       | reaperducer wrote:
       | The first time I ran into the concept of having my mobile phone
       | data sold to a third-party was in 2003, when I went to the Czech
       | Republic.
       | 
       | Right after I crossed the border from Austria, my U.S. cell phone
       | started lighting up with spam SMS messages. At first, it was from
       | the local cell phone carrier welcoming me to .cz. A few minutes
       | later, a message from T-Mobile letting me know I was roaming in
       | another new country. Then a few minutes after that, SMS spam for
       | hotels, then restaurants, then casinos. All of this in a time
       | before "smart" phones.
       | 
       | I'm not surprised to see it's gotten so much worse.
        
         | dylan604 wrote:
         | A few years ago, I visited Detroit, and the next morning I
         | received the messages from the Canadian (assuming Rogers)
         | telecom welcoming to Canadia. I was spared the rest of the
         | spam. Though it was the first time that I had ever considered
         | the tech issues of being near a border and receiving multiple
         | national signals like that must be a "fun" challenge.
        
         | kjkjadksj wrote:
         | I flew to somewhere else in the US last month and I started
         | getting political sms spam dependent on that location. It took
         | a good two weeks after I got back for my sms spam to normalize.
        
       | TechDebtDevin wrote:
       | Use and Configure Pi-Hole[0]
       | 
       | [0]:https://jeffmorhous.com/block-ads-for-your-entire-network-
       | wi...
       | 
       | Also a video for those more YT inclined:
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eCA24qJBG8Q
        
         | nickburns wrote:
         | This does nothing for a mobile device that either concurrently
         | maintains its cellular 'data' connection together with its Wi-
         | Fi connection (and whose apps are permitted to access both)--or
         | leaves the LAN without connecting remotely via a force-tunneled
         | VPN. And even _with_ such a VPN, the cellular NIC continues to
         | maintain baked-in alternate routes on both Android and iOS. All
         | that 's before we even get into specific Pi-Hole and LAN
         | config, not to mention DoH.
         | 
         | Krebs and everyone else he cites is right--it's time for Apple
         | and Google to eliminate MAID altogether.
         | 
         | ETA: Do not downvote this parent! _Use trustworthy ad blockers
         | anywhere and everywhere you can!_
        
         | autoexec wrote:
         | DoH/DoT along with hardcoded IPs make DNS ad blocking
         | impossible.
        
           | switch007 wrote:
           | And TLS. Sure it stops lots of other bad things, but it is
           | quite the blocker to doing content filtering of the page
           | contents.
        
           | TechDebtDevin wrote:
           | Do you know of any blogs/articles I can read more on this?
        
             | autoexec wrote:
             | https://ericlathrop.com/2021/03/dns-over-tls-lets-google-
             | ser...
             | 
             | It isn't just people using DNS filtering for ads that have
             | this problem. Network admins at companies face the same
             | problem (see for example
             | https://cleanbrowsing.org/help/docs/block-dns-filtering-
             | evas...)
             | 
             | Some browsers, apps, or devices _might_ let you disable DoS
             | /DoT or _might_ let you configure it to use your own DNS
             | server, but none of them have to let you and even when they
             | give you that option they can still do whatever want
             | (https://discourse.pi-hole.net/t/chromium-bypasses-pi-hole-
             | by...)
             | 
             | Obviously any application or device using a hardcoded IP
             | address will bypass DNS entirely so DNS filtering isn't
             | going to work. See https://old.reddit.com/r/pihole/comments
             | /djacup/im_starting_...
        
           | OptionOfT wrote:
           | Not sure why you're downvoted.
           | 
           | You create a server and host it on IP x. You create a cert
           | for it. You add the public key to your app.
           | 
           | Your app can now communicate with that IP over port 443 with
           | that certificate. Remember that the idea that the domain must
           | match the one in the certificate is a setting, enforced by
           | the browsers. If you run your own code you can perfectly
           | override that.
           | 
           | Now you can do whatever you like on that connection.
           | 
           | In fact, you don't HAVE to go that far. Many applications
           | these days do private key pinning and use that connection to
           | load the ads. IMDb does that on the iPhone.
           | 
           | MyQ and myBMW use the same to 'protect' the connection. MyQ's
           | implementation of this, and subsequent implementation of
           | CloudFlare's bot protection completely broke home-assistant's
           | connection. All because they want you to use their app (and
           | get bombarded with ads).
           | 
           | Doh/DoT was supposed to bring in MORE privacy for users, as
           | it allowed users to resolve addresses without the system
           | servicing the connection (ISP / StarBucks / McDonald's) from
           | being able to see or modify the responses (think captive
           | pages).
           | 
           | But all it brought was more spying. I am a firm believer that
           | I should be able to inspect all traffic that an application
           | sends out over my internet connection.
        
           | ndriscoll wrote:
           | Not completely impossible. You could have a default deny
           | firewall, have your DNS resolver trigger an update to allow
           | outgoing connections to the resolved IPs, and possibly also
           | require connections pass though an SNI-sniffing proxy that
           | only allows domains that your DNS resolver has allowed.
           | Essentially by default you'd be blocking all custom
           | protocols, and you'd only allow what looks like well-behaved
           | TLS web traffic to allowed domains to flow.
           | 
           | Bad traffic could flow to a "good" domain, and then you need
           | to decide whether that domain is actually "good".
        
             | JohnMakin wrote:
             | couldn't they just hide their ad endpoints behind the proxy
             | that serves their site? I can think of multiple ways to do
             | this that aren't very difficult. I have had to implement
             | something in my work to get past certain adblocking
             | behavior that was going by domain
        
               | ndriscoll wrote:
               | Sure, but now you've at least made them use a more
               | expensive L7 proxy to do it, and you can decide to block
               | malicious actors like that entirely (blocking the "good"
               | domain).
        
               | JohnMakin wrote:
               | nginx can do this pretty easily by just using proxy_pass
               | directives, if I recall, it has been a while though
        
               | ndriscoll wrote:
               | Yes, you can do it with an L7 proxy. You've been able to
               | do that all along though, so I suppose there are reasons
               | why surveillance networks prefer to not proxy through the
               | websites that host their scripts. That has nothing to do
               | with DoH to subvert network security monitors though.
        
       | ToucanLoucan wrote:
       | _This turned into a hell of a rant, I apologize but I 'm still
       | kind of proud of it._
       | 
       | --
       | 
       | We made surveillance capitalism the default method of financing
       | every free-at-point-of-use service on mobile devices before we
       | understood what that meant, and people now have zero perception
       | of the worth of mobile-based software. People happily pay for
       | desktop software but the decades of everything on a phone being
       | free by default despite the economics of that making no sense
       | have made it borderline impossible to sell software to people for
       | their phones.
       | 
       | At the same time government has been completely asleep at the
       | fucking wheel with regard to any regulation to protect consumers.
       | Consumers shouldn't have to know the "tradeoffs" of free
       | software, they shouldn't need to vet vendors of software on app
       | stores for privacy policies. People should be _protected by
       | default._ This  "informed consumer" garbage is why we can't get
       | anything done in a regulatory sense because these companies will
       | make the argument that users consented when talking to any
       | layperson user of MyFitnessPal will have you understand they
       | really did not within 5 goddamn minutes.
       | 
       | Could people read terms of service? Yes. Do they? No, because
       | people have shit to do and nobody aside of an activist or someone
       | with an interest in it is going to read 110 pages of terms of
       | service each from the 50 services they're currently using and
       | it's unreasonable to suggest that they should, and that's JUST
       | the reading, even if they read it, do they _understand_ it?
       | Because most people according to a stat I saw recently about the
       | United States read at about a sixth grade level, which is going
       | to be a struggle to get through any legal document. And 4%
       | apparently are completely illiterate.
       | 
       | I don't mean to rant here but this pisses me off so much. Our
       | entire society is constructed around a set of assumptions about
       | people who are at least some level of educated, with decent
       | english literacy, who have the time and energy to dedicate to
       | managing these various things, and yeah, if you're that
       | theoretical person, you can probably do quite well for yourself
       | in the United States. But what if you _aren 't?_
       | 
       | What if you're one of the millions who have to work three fucking
       | jobs to survive and don't have time to read the terms of service
       | for twitter, and just want to relax? What if you're illiterate?
       | What if you're disabled in some way that impedes your ability to
       | read, or your ability to understand what data harvesting is or
       | means? Does your inability to meet the standard I've outlined
       | above just mean you're fodder for the scummy business alliance,
       | ready to be taken advantage of at every single turn by everyone
       | who can, because it's more profitable that way even if it means
       | you will be broke, exposed, and/or otherwise exploited at every
       | single turn and probably have a pretty miserable life?
       | 
       | I am long tired of living in a society that is clearly, bluntly,
       | at every turn designed for _companies_ to live and thrive in and
       | not _people._ I 'm tired of people being hung out to dry because
       | "freedom." Nobody needs or wants the freedom to be recklessly and
       | hopelessly exploited to the ends of the goddamn earth, and I'm
       | sick of pretending there's no way for us to know that difference.
       | 
       | /rant
        
         | nickburns wrote:
         | Long and winding but you make cogent points. Shit pisses me off
         | too. Already a couple 'but, but... they consented to this when
         | they installed it!' comments here. Those types know not what
         | kind of corporate misbehavior they enable, nay are complicit
         | in.
        
         | CAPSLOCKSSTUCK wrote:
         | I know it goes beyond cell phones, but as someone who agrees
         | with you and has the means and know-how, I find opting out
         | through personal choice impossible. If you don't carry a cell
         | phone, how do your loved ones reach you in an emergency? etc.,
         | so the only real way to win is through regulation. And the laws
         | and enforcement won't change anytime soon for the reasons you
         | mention. Super frustrating.
        
           | consteval wrote:
           | One solution is dumb phones! It's an idea I've been toying
           | with but haven't committed to yet.
           | 
           | I think it could work. You can call, text (probably hard, I
           | remember those swipe-out keyboards) so you should be good in
           | an emergency. But that's it - the rest you do on your
           | desktop, where you have far greater control over the software
           | you use and far less data available (no location, no photos,
           | etc).
           | 
           | The trouble is there's some gaps. If you want decent
           | pictures, you'll need a camera. If you want to do something
           | simple like check your email, it's a whole thing.
        
             | vmfzdq wrote:
             | I think the trouble spreads further than that. In so many
             | cases mobile phones have become the defacto tool for people
             | that it's functionally impossible to survive without them.
             | 
             | I recently graduated college and by my senior year a lot of
             | college functionality was done over phones (and phones
             | only, no desktop or browser options). This ranged from
             | ordering food at an official campus store, to requesting an
             | advisior meeting or basic administrative functionality
             | (tracking financial aid, filing a course exemption
             | request). Granted, for the last you still could do it via
             | other methods like email or an in person visit, but it was
             | _heavily_ deincentivized. Even the LMS switched to
             | something that was designed as mobile forward.
             | 
             | The other thing I've noticed is that some countries like
             | India effectively run on the phone and a dumb phone doesn't
             | cut it for any business deals or even purchases. It's all
             | done on the phone. You use your phone to order groceries,
             | pay for them, and then track the delivery.
             | 
             | I'm actually flying now and things like TSA digital ID and
             | CBP's MPC make it such a massive QoL difference that I
             | think you'd be hard pressed to find people who'd willing go
             | back.
        
         | mistrial9 wrote:
         | > asleep at the fucking wheel with regard to any regulation to
         | protect consumers
         | 
         | cursing aside, you are doing them a favor by saying "they are
         | asleep" .. it is not that simple; misaligned incentives for
         | decision makers is a polite phrase
        
           | ToucanLoucan wrote:
           | I mean, with regard to tech in specific I think it's a bit of
           | both? Every time anything to do with technology hits the
           | congress and ends up on C-SPAN it is always _so fucking
           | embarassing._ It 's like watching grandma and grandpa try and
           | riddle out a new Smart TV's remote, except there's way more
           | of them, and a subset of them are proud they don't understand
           | a fucking thing about what they're talking about.
        
             | jcgrillo wrote:
             | If you want to be in the U.S. diplomatic corps you have to
             | pass the foreign service exam. The same requirements should
             | apply to running for national office. That would at least
             | set a literacy baseline. It'll never happen though.
        
         | renjimen wrote:
         | Good rant. The dominant global ideology is neoliberalism AKA
         | free market economics, which has regulatory laxness as its
         | bedrock. That's why fixing this basic shit is an uphill slog,
         | rather than common sense.
         | 
         | Neoliberals look at GDP rising and have faith that the world is
         | good. It's time to call these folks out for what they are:
         | dogmatic zealots.
        
           | psd1 wrote:
           | GDP is a crappy measure of a nation's wealth.
           | 
           | It's a passable measure of the financial class's wealth,
           | which is not the same thing at all.
           | 
           | The use of GDP as the headline number in demagoguery is a
           | psyop
        
         | losteric wrote:
         | It's interesting that American neoliberalism perpetuates this
         | thinking of staunch independence, an unrealistic notion that
         | every man fully defends and stands for their own interests. It
         | seems to espouse _creating_ the terrifying Hobbesian ""natural
         | state""... any notion of collective defense by default, as
         | outlined here, is rejected as "idealistic socialism /paternal
         | states"... even that phrase, "paternal", being used as a
         | pejorative says so much about the American psyche (I still
         | blame Cold War-era anti-communist propaganda for lobotomizing
         | America's society thinking capabilities).
         | 
         | That's really the key difference between US and European
         | thinking on privacy. Europe was slow but always thought it was
         | fucked up. Americans don't seem to grasp why they should care
         | or understand how perverse their blindsight is.
        
         | JohnMakin wrote:
         | > I don't mean to rant here but this pisses me off so much. Our
         | entire society is constructed around a set of assumptions about
         | people who are at least some level of educated, with decent
         | english literacy, who have the time and energy to dedicate to
         | managing these various things, and yeah, if you're that
         | theoretical person, you can probably do quite well for yourself
         | in the United States. But what if you aren't?
         | 
         | Not to be overly cynical, but I believe this is a feature, not
         | a bug. I don't believe it's isolated to any one political
         | ideology though. The system seems to rely on a perpetual
         | underclass, and if you are slightly outside the norm or
         | deficient, the system tends to use you as mulch for the uber
         | wealthy's private jet funds.
        
       | vmaurin wrote:
       | I worked 12y the ad-tech industry, and 3y in a company using this
       | kind of data to measure performance of "drive to store"
       | campaigns: doing online campaign, then seeing if people visit the
       | actual real store based on geo data. The company was actually
       | controlled by the CNIL (French regulator) according GDPR, so we
       | were "anonymizing" data, meaning hashing one way the IFA (unique
       | phone id for advertiser) and storing location within a 300mx300m
       | square I put some quote around anonymizing because geo data from
       | your phone in the evening/night is enough to know where you live
       | (with 300m precision). The rest of the industry in France and
       | Europe was still a far west though (around 2020)
        
       | drawkward wrote:
       | Advertising is a virus that eventually infects all ecosystems.
        
         | antiframe wrote:
         | And that is why I use exclusively open source software that
         | respects the user.
        
           | m463 wrote:
           | that sounds suspiciously like an ad. :)
        
           | pixelpoet wrote:
           | Governments and big tech/media try to brand anyone
           | knowledgeable about privacy measures as pedophiles, and it's
           | incredibly effective because they control the laws and
           | narrative. Doesn't help that a huge fraction of people
           | conflate having something to hide with not wanting everything
           | be public, and in the vast majority of cases are blissfully
           | and willfully ignorant so long as they get their Instagram or
           | TikTok.
           | 
           | At a societal level we fully deserve all this because
           | apparently we can't be fucked to care about basic rights
           | anymore (cf. "everyone gets the government they deserve"),
           | too lost in Huxley's dystopian future of infinite dopamine
           | distractions.
        
           | photonthug wrote:
           | > And that is why I use exclusively open source software that
           | respects the user.
           | 
           | We're all proud of you but this is barely related to avoiding
           | ads. You can build your own car too, and you'd still have to
           | look at the billboards on the highway. Or you could build
           | your own phone and never giving anyone the number, then
           | you'll _still_ get to enjoy 5 spams /day during election
           | season when someone decides to simply call every phone number
           | in the region.
           | 
           | Ads are the new certainty besides death and taxes. If they
           | aren't in your face yet, be assured that whole legions of
           | shitheads are very busy trying to make it happen.
        
           | realusername wrote:
           | Even if you would never see an ad in your life somehow, you
           | would still have to pay for it on the products you buy.
           | 
           | The advertising industry is so large that it's basically
           | private taxation, except that you get nothing in return from
           | it.
        
             | add-sub-mul-div wrote:
             | The best concert I ever saw was one I only knew was in town
             | because of an ad.
             | 
             | My interests align with advertisers to an extent. I do want
             | to know what products are out there. I'm an adult, I won't
             | forget that their descriptions of their products are
             | biased.
             | 
             | Surveillance advertising is a bad thing, but it doesn't
             | help to take the most extremist position possible.
             | Advertising is information, and it's not difficult to use
             | that information to your benefit.
        
               | n_plus_1_acc wrote:
               | Billboard ads don't yell as you at least. They are like
               | two orders of magnitute less annoying than video ads
        
               | drawkward wrote:
               | I follow the bands I care about seeing. There are other,
               | less intrusive modalities for communication than
               | advertising.
        
       | janalsncm wrote:
       | We can go back and forth on whether police should have access to
       | this data and what regulations should be put on how/why it should
       | be accessed. I think reasonable people can disagree about
       | details, and cultural expectations around privacy and safety
       | probably means there isn't a single best answer.
       | 
       | But I don't think anyone can honestly say the right amount of
       | regulation is zero, which is what we have now. It is absolutely
       | bonkers to me that anyone off the street should be able to gather
       | such highly granular data about any other person as long as they
       | can pay.
        
       | alexashka wrote:
       | Banning advertising would fix it the corporate level.
       | 
       | Philosopher kings would fit it at the political level.
        
       | pnw wrote:
       | Can someone explain how this works on iOS post Apple's removal of
       | IDFA? The advertising ID (MAID) in any specific app is relevant
       | only to that app, so it seems like it would be useless for
       | profiling? I don't see how apps can access any other identifiers
       | on iOS. Even the wifi MAC address is randomized.
       | 
       | If you've gone one step further and disabled location access for
       | apps and disabled the global ad id, it would seem difficult to do
       | the searches described.
       | 
       | The article refers to "25 percent of Apple phones". Is that just
       | legacy phones running older versions of iOS prior to removal of
       | IDFA?
        
         | lcnPylGDnU4H9OF wrote:
         | I think the 25% is referring to the users who willingly select
         | the option to allow tracking. It sounds like this report
         | actually corroborates Apple's claims of the impact of this
         | decision.
        
       | JohnMakin wrote:
       | > One unique feature of Babel Street is the ability to toggle a
       | "night" mode, which makes it relatively easy to determine within
       | a few meters where a target typically lays their head each night
       | (because their phone is usually not far away).
       | 
       | There are very few reasons in my mind that anyone, especially law
       | enforcement, would need this "feature" and they're all pretty
       | dark.
        
         | jcgrillo wrote:
         | I could see this being extremely valuable to law enforcement if
         | they're planning on making an arrest. They're a lot more likely
         | to not get shot by the suspect if they know they're asleep.
         | It's also the sort of thing that's not germane to making their
         | case against the suspect--it's tactically relevant but
         | strategically irrelevant. So we need something more than the
         | 4th amendment here? That's actually a question I'm not a lawyer
         | and don't know what this actually implies. Naively, it seems to
         | me that if information is inadmissible in making their case,
         | law enforcement _should have no access to it_ and, probably,
         | neither should anyone else.
        
           | JohnMakin wrote:
           | That only would matter on no knock warrants, right? That's
           | the best case I can think of (still bad imo, I think no knock
           | warrants are abused and lead to bad outcomes more often than
           | good ones).
        
             | jcgrillo wrote:
             | Yeah I agree it all adds up to nothing good.
        
       | CatWChainsaw wrote:
       | If the insane micromanagey level of tracking were legally
       | designated by its proper practical result, which is stalking, it
       | would be a crime. And since the modern zeitgeist is ruled by the
       | Ruthlessness Gap, anyone who works in "advertising"/tracking
       | ought to have their personal information and whatever they used
       | their surveillance techniques to snoop on gets broadcast in a
       | public database. That could be one great application for Google
       | Glass... watching the watchers.
        
       | amarcheschi wrote:
       | If I use an ad id on android, is this id the identifier I can use
       | to make a gdpr request to brokers regarding accessing and
       | deleting my data? I don't have an ID but I'd be curious about
       | doing that, in a similar way to xandr with its uuid2 (although
       | xandr does just looks bad and not this terrible)
        
       | cookiengineer wrote:
       | Additionally to an OpenWRT [1] Wi-Fi router or Adguard Home [2]
       | DNS proxy that you can run for yourself, there's also this
       | excellent app firewall project called NetGuard [3].
       | 
       | The developer got kicked out of the Play Store for bogus reasons,
       | and had to continue to develop it as an externally funded effort.
       | Support him, buy a pay what you want license, and give him a
       | couple bucks for it if you value open source software like this.
       | 
       | (I'm not affiliated with the project, I just love the app and it
       | runs on all my degoogled devices)
       | 
       | Additionally, degoogle your phone by installing an open source
       | ROM like GrapheneOS [4] or LineageOS [5], and install only the
       | most essential apps on your phone.
       | 
       | There's also App Warden [6] which audits installed apps, by
       | scanning them for malicious libraries and adtrackers. It's based
       | on the dataset provided by Exodus Privacy [7] where you can
       | search for Apps or their APK identifiers and find out what kind
       | of fingerprinting libraries they're using. For example, this is
       | what the Facebook App uses behind the scenes [8].
       | 
       | Don't install gapps and neither the google play services. If you
       | want an app store for the convenience of updates of open source
       | apps, there's also f-droid [9], a libre app store for Android.
       | 
       | Additionally you should keep in mind that every app that needs
       | google play services to run is spyware, by definition of what
       | these services offer as APIs. Websites that require you to
       | install their app to "verify" you are usually spying on your
       | activity. Ditch them, your life continues without giving them
       | your focus time.
       | 
       | Focus time is a limited concurrency, spend it only on the things
       | you really need, not on what you really want.
       | 
       | [1] https://openwrt.org/toh/start
       | 
       | [2] https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-user/services/dns/adguard-
       | hom...
       | 
       | [3] https://netguard.me/
       | 
       | [4] https://grapheneos.org/
       | 
       | [5] https://wiki.lineageos.org/devices/
       | 
       | [6] https://gitlab.com/AuroraOSS/AppWarden
       | 
       | [7] https://reports.exodus-privacy.eu.org/en/
       | 
       | [8] https://reports.exodus-
       | privacy.eu.org/en/reports/com.faceboo...
       | 
       | [9] https://f-droid.org/
        
         | wepple wrote:
         | Care to clarify what these things do and why it's relevant to
         | the posted article?
        
           | cookiengineer wrote:
           | I tried to clarify it a little more, but I think if I would
           | go into more detail I should write a separate article about
           | it. It's relevant as to that I'm describing what you can do
           | against the mentioned problems in the article, and how to
           | avoid being surveilled by advertisement conglomerates.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-10-23 23:00 UTC)