[HN Gopher] Unicode uses elephants as baseline comparison of cul...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Unicode uses elephants as baseline comparison of cultural frequency
       for emoji
        
       Author : thunderbong
       Score  : 67 points
       Date   : 2024-10-15 03:28 UTC (3 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.unicode.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.unicode.org)
        
       | brudgers wrote:
       | Direct to criteria:
       | https://www.unicode.org/emoji/proposals.html#frequency-evide...
        
         | dang wrote:
         | I put that URL above. Thanks!
        
       | scrps wrote:
       | As much as it is meant to be a serious document for proposals I
       | started cracking up at:
       | 
       |  _The commercial petitions for taco played no part in its
       | selection; the taco was approved based on evidence in its
       | proposal, not the petitions._
        
         | bombcar wrote:
         | They say this as the committee shovels thousands of "free
         | chalupa" coupons from Taco Bell into suitcases.
        
           | scrps wrote:
           | Turns out Big Taco's (/s) fingers were in the guac:
           | 
           | https://www.change.org/p/unicode-consortium-the-taco-
           | emoji-n...
        
       | Freak_NL wrote:
       | Elephants are fine animals, but the Unicode standard features a
       | distinct and disturbing lack of guinea pigs -- as well as
       | capybaras -- severely limiting the range of my digital
       | expression.
       | 
       | (I mean, if we can have 'taco'...)
        
         | tmnstr85 wrote:
         | 2nd
        
         | AceJohnny2 wrote:
         | you should start a petition!
         | 
         | (/s because from TFA "Petitions are not considered as evidence
         | since they are too easily skewed")
        
           | Dalewyn wrote:
           | Boat owner: "We have a new boat and we need a name, let's
           | have the internet vote! It can be the people's boat!"
           | 
           | Internet: "Boaty McBoatface."
           | 
           | Boat owner: "Democracy is a mistake."
        
             | akira2501 wrote:
             | "Democracy is fine. You tried to cheap out on marketing and
             | you got what you paid for."
        
               | netsharc wrote:
               | Reminds me of the Priiiiillll debacle:
               | https://heideblog.com/2011/05/12/eine-abstimmung-fur-
               | raserei... (the title is in German and is unconnected)
               | 
               | TL; DR: washing-up-detergent maker Pril does online
               | competition and promised to put the winning design on
               | shelves, the design that got most votes:
               | https://heideblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/screen-
               | shot...
               | 
               | Somewhere online there's a pic of these things on the
               | shelves/they did make them as collectibles.
        
               | bombcar wrote:
               | I'd buy it. I love stuff like that.
               | 
               | Boaty McBoatface is the most famous boat behind the
               | Titanic, so it definitely worked.
        
               | Retric wrote:
               | If I saw that Peil design on store shelves I'd likely buy
               | it, so it likely worked quite well as a limited edition.
               | Really click the line and ask yourself if you'd do the
               | same. https://heideblog.com/wp-
               | content/uploads/2011/05/screen-shot...
               | 
               | The inherent issue with these campaigns is the select for
               | initial response not how long you're going to like some
               | design.
        
               | Dalewyn wrote:
               | That is awesome.
        
             | dustyventure wrote:
             | If marketers found that any vote spontaneously creates the
             | invested interest a democratic process needs then we all
             | would have starved during the subsequent storm of pointless
             | elections.
        
         | notatoad wrote:
         | https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&q=elephant...
         | 
         | capybara and guinea pig are both far less popular than taco or
         | emoji
         | 
         | interestingly, the spike of taco in google trends seems like it
         | might be correlated to it's addition to emoji - that spike
         | would be about a year after iOS got the Taco emoji.
        
           | TheAceOfHearts wrote:
           | Capybaras are a rising trend in the last few years. There's a
           | ton of fan pages with cute capybaras pictures and videos. You
           | need to invest early.
        
             | squidgedcricket wrote:
             | Capybaras don't have shit on hyraxes. I'm trying to be an
             | early adopter, but like all hot new products that seem to
             | be out of stock everywhere.
             | 
             | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyrax
        
               | rsynnott wrote:
               | They're disadvantaged in the cute-animal stakes by their
               | name, I think. The name implies something large,
               | dangerous, and possibly mythical; it really doesn't fit
               | with "round fuzzy thing somewhat smaller than a cat".
        
               | itishappy wrote:
               | Solid market analysis. I'd like to subscribe to your
               | newsletter.
        
           | bombcar wrote:
           | Capybara are being artificially held down because there isn't
           | a confident and convenient emoji for them!
           | 
           | I suppose you could start a popular open source project and
           | name it the word you want to become an emoji.
        
         | IncreasePosts wrote:
         | Without any relative scale, can you even tell the difference
         | between a capybara and a guinea pig?
        
           | Freak_NL wrote:
           | Certainly. Capybaras are semi-aquatic mammals, and their head
           | as a consequence is positioned significantly higher than
           | their bodies, resulting in a general pose which can only be
           | described as 'regally aloof'.
           | 
           | Cavies on the other hand look like adorable furry idiots with
           | a much less angular -- in fact, rotund -- outline.
           | 
           | Aside from both being rodents and (apparently) delicious,
           | these are quite different animals.
        
             | latexr wrote:
             | The head shape is also quite different, as are the ears and
             | eyes. I'm struggling to understand how someone could mix
             | them up.
        
               | IncreasePosts wrote:
               | My implication was "at the resolution of an emoji" - you
               | can clearly tell the difference in real life, but what
               | about when you only have 18x18 pixels to work with?
        
               | Freak_NL wrote:
               | If you can't tell the difference between a capybara and a
               | guinea pig, you won't be able to tell the difference
               | between a cat and a dog either. The former pair differs
               | more in terms of their silhouette than the latter. 18x18
               | probably means you won't be able to tell quite a lot of
               | emoji apart, but don't blame these rodents for that.
        
           | bombcar wrote:
           | This annoys me so much - squirrel on iPhone offers you an
           | emoji that is clearly a chipmunk.
        
             | Freak_NL wrote:
             | Chipmunks are squirrels though. 'Squirrel' is the family
             | name for a bunch of these rodents.
             | 
             | > Any of the rodents of the family Sciuridae distinguished
             | by their large bushy tail.
             | 
             | (https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/squirrel)
        
               | bombcar wrote:
               | I don't care who they send, prairie dogs and squirrels
               | are different and deserve different emojis!
        
               | ygra wrote:
               | Maybe after Han unification we also need a squirrel
               | unification and leave this distinction to the font which
               | is picked based on the region you're in ...
               | 
               | That being said, I already cannot parse many emoji and
               | would love tooltips what they are supposed to represent
               | in all places.
        
               | bombcar wrote:
               | Yep, that's how I learned you can directly google an
               | emoji and find the emojipedia page for it.
        
       | spondylosaurus wrote:
       | These guidelines note that emoji proposals for "specific people,
       | whether fictional, historic, living, or dead" will be rejected
       | outright, but most versions of the rockstar emoji are an obvious
       | Bowie homage!
        
         | Cyberdog wrote:
         | David Bowie transcends history and fiction, life and death.
        
           | saalweachter wrote:
           | He was an archetype, and therefore not a specific person.
        
         | shervinafshar wrote:
         | Aladdin Sane persona, to be precise: https://david-
         | bowie.fandom.com/wiki/Aladdin_Sane_(persona)
        
       | jerf wrote:
       | While a perfectly reasonable request on its own terms, it also
       | definitely reminds me of the brown M&M story, which if you are
       | one of today's 10,000 [1], is https://effectiviology.com/brown-
       | mms/ .
       | 
       | No elephant -> toss immediately. Save time.
       | 
       | [1]: https://xkcd.com/1053/
        
         | alwayslikethis wrote:
         | I'm one of them! It's a great read, thanks
        
       | dmonitor wrote:
       | > There is already an emoji for frog, which can be used to
       | represent all amphibians.
       | 
       | I'm not a big fan of this example. Does "lizard" represent all
       | reptiles? "dog" all mammals? I suppose salamanders are
       | taxonomically similar enough to lizards that specific amphibian
       | emoji aren't necessary for them, but that's not the reason given.
        
         | giraffe_lady wrote:
         | Lyra Belacqua would have been a master emoji texter.
        
         | bombcar wrote:
         | We already have combining characters (for example you can make
         | emojis with various skin shades) and they should enable
         | "alternates" for other emojis.
         | 
         | Let there be ten thousand cat breed emojis via combining
         | characters!
        
           | rsynnott wrote:
           | This is, IIRC, how the lime works; according to the Unicode
           | consortium, a lime is a green lemon.
           | 
           | (It would be much more fun if they'd just represented them as
           | citrus hybrids with ZWJs.)
        
         | rsynnott wrote:
         | Once they open the door to other amphibians, they will end up
         | getting drawn into the whole "do toads exist" debate, and it
         | frankly just isn't worth it.
        
       | m-hodges wrote:
       | Google has a lot of power over emojis, huh.
        
       | lifthrasiir wrote:
       | It is actually something more of reducing the number of faulty
       | submissions, because the popularity _alone_ doesn 't get emoji
       | registered. Everyone should look at the L2 register to see a
       | (very tiny) portion of emoji proposals that clearly motivate this
       | section and others. (Most proposals are directly sent to the
       | Emoji subcommittee, so the L2 submission is relatively rare.)
        
       | stackedinserter wrote:
       | Yet we have an emoji for pregnant dude.
        
         | HeatrayEnjoyer wrote:
         | That's a subset of a larger emoji family, not a standalone.
        
       | pico303 wrote:
       | Taco is my zsh prompt, but I'm now tempted to switch to elephant.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-10-18 23:02 UTC)