[HN Gopher] Unicode uses elephants as baseline comparison of cul...
___________________________________________________________________
Unicode uses elephants as baseline comparison of cultural frequency
for emoji
Author : thunderbong
Score : 37 points
Date : 2024-10-15 03:28 UTC (2 days ago)
(HTM) web link (www.unicode.org)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.unicode.org)
| brudgers wrote:
| Direct to criteria:
| https://www.unicode.org/emoji/proposals.html#frequency-evide...
| dang wrote:
| I put that URL above. Thanks!
| scrps wrote:
| As much as it is meant to be a serious document for proposals I
| started cracking up at:
|
| _The commercial petitions for taco played no part in its
| selection; the taco was approved based on evidence in its
| proposal, not the petitions._
| Freak_NL wrote:
| Elephants are fine animals, but the Unicode standard features a
| distinct and disturbing lack of guinea pigs -- as well as
| capybaras -- severely limiting the range of my digital
| expression.
|
| (I mean, if we can have 'taco'...)
| tmnstr85 wrote:
| 2nd
| AceJohnny2 wrote:
| you should start a petition!
|
| (/s because from TFA "Petitions are not considered as evidence
| since they are too easily skewed")
| Dalewyn wrote:
| Boat owner: "We have a new boat and we need a name, let's
| have the internet vote! It can be the people's boat!"
|
| Internet: "Boaty McBoatface."
|
| Boat owner: "Democracy is a mistake."
| akira2501 wrote:
| "Democracy is fine. You tried to cheap out on marketing and
| you got what you paid for."
| dustyventure wrote:
| If marketers found that any vote spontaneously creates the
| invested interest a democratic process needs then we all
| would have starved during the subsequent storm of pointless
| elections.
| notatoad wrote:
| https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&q=elephant...
|
| capybara and guinea pig are both far less popular than taco or
| emoji
|
| interestingly, the spike of taco in google trends seems like it
| might be correlated to it's addition to emoji - that spike
| would be about a year after iOS got the Taco emoji.
| TheAceOfHearts wrote:
| Capybaras are a rising trend in the last few years. There's a
| ton of fan pages with cute capybaras pictures and videos. You
| need to invest early.
| IncreasePosts wrote:
| Without any relative scale, can you even tell the difference
| between a capybara and a guinea pig?
| Freak_NL wrote:
| Certainly. Capybaras are semi-aquatic mammals, and their head
| as a consequence is positioned significantly higher than
| their bodies, resulting in a general pose which can only be
| described as 'regally aloof'.
|
| Cavies on the other hand look like adorable furry idiots with
| a much less angular -- in fact, rotund -- outline.
|
| Aside from both being rodents and (apparently) delicious,
| these are quite different animals.
| spondylosaurus wrote:
| These guidelines note that emoji proposals for "specific people,
| whether fictional, historic, living, or dead" will be rejected
| outright, but most versions of the rockstar emoji are an obvious
| Bowie homage!
| Cyberdog wrote:
| David Bowie transcends history and fiction, life and death.
| shervinafshar wrote:
| Aladdin Sane persona, to be precise: https://david-
| bowie.fandom.com/wiki/Aladdin_Sane_(persona)
| jerf wrote:
| While a perfectly reasonable request on its own terms, it also
| definitely reminds me of the brown M&M story, which if you are
| one of today's 10,000 [1], is https://effectiviology.com/brown-
| mms/ .
|
| No elephant -> toss immediately. Save time.
|
| [1]: https://xkcd.com/1053/
| alwayslikethis wrote:
| I'm one of them! It's a great read, thanks
| dmonitor wrote:
| > There is already an emoji for frog, which can be used to
| represent all amphibians.
|
| I'm not a big fan of this example. Does "lizard" represent all
| reptiles? "dog" all mammals? I suppose salamanders are
| taxonomically similar enough to lizards that specific amphibian
| emoji aren't necessary for them, but that's not the reason given.
| giraffe_lady wrote:
| Lyra Belacqua would have been a master emoji texter.
| m-hodges wrote:
| Google has a lot of power over emojis, huh.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2024-10-17 23:01 UTC)