[HN Gopher] The not-so-glamourous origins of standard railway tr...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The not-so-glamourous origins of standard railway track gauge
       (2021)
        
       Author : fanf2
       Score  : 33 points
       Date   : 2024-10-16 17:42 UTC (5 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (garethdennis.medium.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (garethdennis.medium.com)
        
       | thmsths wrote:
       | I feel like this story is even better than the wrong meme that
       | sparked it.
        
         | readthenotes1 wrote:
         | ' in 1845, Robert Stephenson made the following statement: "If
         | I had been called upon to do so, it would be difficult to give
         | a good reason for the adoption of an odd measure -- 4 feet 8
         | and a half inches." '
         | 
         | Well, the half inch is accounted for , but not the original 5'
         | plateway.
        
         | jcranmer wrote:
         | I think that the meme even had legs in the first place is due
         | to the fact that 4'81/2" is an objectively weird gauge--why the
         | 1/2"? That the 4'81/2" track gauge can be traced to
         | Stephenson's decision isn't hard to figure out, nor is the fact
         | that there is some measure of continuity between older forms of
         | railway-like systems and railways. I expect that the meme came
         | about from someone interpolating those facts to assume that the
         | 4'81/2" gauge came from a precise reconstruction of some Roman
         | thing, since it's also decently common knowledge that Roman
         | units are not the same as imperial units. The rest of the meme
         | (tying this fallacious history of the track gauge to the size
         | of a rocket part) is very obviously complete balderdash to
         | anyone with a modicum of railroad engineering.
         | 
         | Or put more succinctly:
         | 
         | The original meme: 4'81/2" exists because exact replica of
         | Romans.
         | 
         | The truth: As laid it, it was originally exactly 5'. But we
         | changed what we use to measure gauge, so it's now reported as
         | 4'8". Stephenson changed that to 4'81/2" because that allowed
         | him to fix a problem he had without having to replace anything.
         | 
         | And honestly, "cheap engineering fix" is a more interesting
         | explanation to a conundrum than "Romans."
        
       | legitster wrote:
       | The grain of truth is that Romans and wagon builders and etc all
       | determined that somewhere vaguely between 4 and 5 feet was an
       | optimal width for vehicle axles. Which is not really a
       | "standard", especially given Romans didn't even have a
       | universally standard measurement system, but to a degree it's an
       | interesting case of convergent design.
       | 
       | Obviously people just love simple explanations and latching onto
       | goofy conspiracies though are going to love drawing a straight
       | line between any two points.
        
         | inglor_cz wrote:
         | If you walk around Pompeii, the paved streets still have ruts
         | from wagons being driven through them, and the ruts seem to be
         | fairly close to the standard railway gauge. Certainly close
         | enough to provoke the idea.
        
       | bragr wrote:
       | >The predominant track gauge in the South was actually 5 feet.
       | [...] had the Confederacy won the American Civil War the US would
       | likely have adopted that as their standard gauge.
       | 
       | That is a weird assertion, considering a victory for the
       | Confederacy would have likely meant their independence, not
       | taking over the North. Wouldn't a Confederate victory make the
       | remaining Union states' options on standardizing easier?
        
         | jcranmer wrote:
         | The Pacific Railroad Act of 1863 established that the gauge of
         | the first transcontinental railroad was to be 4'81/2", which is
         | I believe the first time the US actually legally established a
         | particular gauge. Some states had established their own
         | (non-4'81/2") gauges before then, but it looks like by the eve
         | of the Civil War, 4'8"-4'9" gauge (the various gauges in this
         | range can be treated as identical for rolling stock purposes)
         | was the plurality of track.
         | 
         | By the Civil War, it looks like you have a Midwestern standard
         | gauge, a Northeast standard gauge separated into two islands by
         | a I think 5'6" New York/New Jersey gauge, and Ohio using a
         | 4'10" gauge separating these two networks; the South's network
         | --which is _far_ less dense--is 5 ' gauge; and now you get
         | transcontinental railroads being planned for a 4'81/2" gauge.
         | Now it is true that the Southern railroads largely switched to
         | the 5' gauge as a result of connecting to the original few
         | lines that connected isolated lines being 5', but a similar
         | process in the North also broke up the non-standard gauge
         | areas, and between the much smaller track area of the South and
         | the fact that there were almost no 5' lines outside of the CSA,
         | it is incredibly unlikely that the creeping 5' would ever have
         | been adopted in the US.
         | 
         | (From attempting to browse the Confederacy's laws, I don't
         | think they ever fixed a gauge for the routes they authorized to
         | be completed).
        
       | readthenotes1 wrote:
       | Plate way
       | 
       | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plateway
        
         | basementcat wrote:
         | I'm a little disappointed none of the train museums I've
         | visited have mentioned plate ways or wagon ways.
         | 
         | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wagonway
        
       | blutack wrote:
       | Author of this has an interesting live/realtime(?) podcast called
       | "Railnatter" about the railways, public transport and UK
       | infrastructure politics.
       | 
       | Recently in the news as the UK government rail minister appeared
       | to have directly requested he be sacked from the (private)
       | company he worked at, after (pre-cleared with said company)
       | comments he made to media about Euston station safety during peak
       | times [0].
       | 
       | 0: https://www.politico.eu/article/uk-rail-minister-peter-
       | hendy...
        
       | ttepasse wrote:
       | Good thing that two decades before the Gauge Act there was the
       | standardisation of the imperial units in the Weights and Measures
       | Act. In the 20th century then the whole yard/feet/inch shebang
       | got longer by a very minuscule measurement and then got redefined
       | in meters.
        
       | yzydserd wrote:
       | I don't know if it's true, but I learned that the differing east
       | and west European gauges were to stall any invasion.
       | 
       | At any rate, I've had occasion to cross the Poland-Belarus border
       | by train and while you're in the carriage they lift it several
       | feet in the air and change bogies over the course of a couple of
       | hours. At least a number of years ago when I did it. At the time,
       | it was said in years gone by the authorities would conceal the
       | passenger view during the procedure.
       | 
       | I wonder if there remain many "live bogie" changing locations in
       | operation around the world?
        
         | ahazred8ta wrote:
         | Yes, there are many 'break of gauge' points. They're mainly for
         | historical inertia and economic reasons, but the military
         | impediment is a known side effect.
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/5_ft_and_1520_mm_gauge_railway...
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-10-16 23:02 UTC)