[HN Gopher] Choosing solitude
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Choosing solitude
        
       Author : robg
       Score  : 61 points
       Date   : 2024-10-12 13:33 UTC (9 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.washingtonpost.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.washingtonpost.com)
        
       | ObiWanFrijoles wrote:
       | https://archive.ph/Hx4mj
        
       | lynx23 wrote:
       | Well, forecasts says 45% of women 20-44 will be single 2030. On
       | YouTube, you can find videos with tons of views discussing the
       | loneliness epidemic, focusing on men having checked out because
       | they are done with overly high expectations and plain entitlement
       | from younger women. I am a bit surprised, because I always
       | thought the inherent attraction towards your prefered sex would
       | always overrule bad experiences in the past, but apparently, I am
       | wrong. It almost feels like a coordinated campaign by the incel
       | community. Whatever it is, modern politics is dividing the sexes,
       | and it is starting to show stastistically.
       | 
       | And what does this article do? Find another excuse for this to be
       | OK.
       | 
       | Actually, good question. Can your personal experiences with other
       | people be so bad that it is actually beneficial for you in the
       | long run to stay in solitude? If so, thats an indicator that some
       | people are _really_ horrible.
        
         | Ancalagon wrote:
         | Do you have any sources?
        
           | lynx23 wrote:
           | For what, exactly? The 45%-single forecast is easy to Google.
           | And the word "male loneliness epidemic" is also easy to drop
           | into a YouTube search.
        
         | kayodelycaon wrote:
         | > I am a bit surprised, because I always thought the inherent
         | attraction towards your prefered sex would always overrule bad
         | experiences in the past, but apparently, I am wrong.
         | 
         | Sexuality is complicated. It isn't binary. It exists on a
         | spectrum and it would not be surprising for many people that
         | the need for sex is less than the need for safety.
         | 
         | And people like me have no attraction even though we may be
         | interested in relationships. I see so many bad relationships
         | around me that I am just not willing to take the risk.
         | 
         | No one taught me how this was supposed to work. How can I
         | mention I'm interested in someone without being fake or creepy?
        
           | lynx23 wrote:
           | I am not sure what safety-vs-sex has to do with sexuality
           | supposedly not being a binary thing? I deliberately wrote
           | "preferred sex" to be as inclusive as I could, but I find
           | everything else pretty much uncalled for. For me, for
           | instance, sexuality is pretty much the most binary thing I
           | can think of. Its OK that you see it differently. But hiding
           | advocacy in every statement is really tiring...
        
             | BiteCode_dev wrote:
             | And it was very condescending as well, like explaining to
             | you that the sky is blue while you were debatting of the
             | weather implications of the cloud shapes.
        
             | moralestapia wrote:
             | It really is a bummer when someone just straight out
             | projects all their trauma into a conversation, even when it
             | is totally uncalled.
             | 
             | An anecdote:
             | 
             | I am learning French, I want to find places where I can
             | listen/speak French all the time. I am also a Catholic and
             | go to church every Sunday. My two neurons connected one day
             | and I decided it is a great idea to join and hang out at a
             | French parish.
             | 
             | I have acquaintances who come from France, they send their
             | kids to French speaking schools here, they go to bars where
             | French people hang out, etc... So, naturally, I decided to
             | just ask them if they happen to know about French catholic
             | communities.
             | 
             | Their replies were nothing like "no, I have no idea", or
             | "yes, you can try at ..."; but, instead, they immediately
             | derailed the conversation into how they don't believe in
             | God and started rationalizing their decision to me as if I
             | was going to be interested on all that ...
             | 
             | Which leads me to a tangential issue, we have become
             | absurdly narcissistic. We think of us as the absolute
             | center of our (minuscule) worlds to a pathological level.
             | This is a major cause behind the rising problems regarding
             | loneliness and relationships in general, I think.
        
               | ravieira wrote:
               | What city would that be? Fellow francophone catholic here
               | :)
        
         | hybrid_study wrote:
         | It's all a matter of degree also
        
         | giantg2 wrote:
         | "Can your personal experiences with other people be so bad that
         | it is actually beneficial for you in the long run to stay in
         | solitude? If so, thats an indicator that some people are really
         | horrible."
         | 
         | It might not be dependent only on your own experiences or even
         | on specific people. If you have a significant number of friends
         | going through rough relationships or divorces, what's the
         | upside? Why bother getting married if the perceived risks
         | outweigh the perceived benefits? As a society, we overestimate
         | the benefits and heavily underestimate the risks. You can even
         | see this baked into our laws in the asymmetric
         | requirements/counseling to get married vs get divorced.
        
           | lynx23 wrote:
           | I am fully on your side. The asymmetry, or shall we call it
           | sexism, in how divorces are handled, is definitely a
           | contributing factor for younger men to no longer aim for
           | marriage. If you look at it rationally, its simply too high a
           | risk that you will get treated unfairly down the road in a
           | few years.
        
             | giantg2 wrote:
             | I agree, but my original asymmetric comment was about how
             | it's so easy to get married but is painful to get divorced.
             | Making a massive legal decision of getting married doesn't
             | require counseling, but most divorces require counseling
             | sessions. Most people get lawyers for a divorce, but very
             | few people get lawyers (or counseling, or financial
             | consults) before marriage. So it seems all the focus is on
             | the aftermath with new laws, regulations, or rulings on how
             | to handle divorce with no focus on preventative education.
        
             | safety1st wrote:
             | Oh yeah, young men have figured out the game and are done
             | with marriage. There's only one statistic you need to know
             | which is that 8 out of 10 divorces are initiated by the
             | woman.
             | 
             | Why the fuck would any man marry ever again once he knows
             | that? The odds are against you. Marriage and reproduction
             | are such a fundamental thing that this took a couple
             | generations to kick in after divorce laws were liberalized,
             | but the jig is up now.
        
               | dambi0 wrote:
               | In what proportion of those marriages did the partner not
               | initiating the divorce want the marriage to continue?
               | Because without knowing that, this just tells is who more
               | likely to act first.
        
               | moralestapia wrote:
               | >this just tells is who more likely to act first
               | 
               | Which is irrelevant as that doesn't seem to be biased
               | towards any specific sex.
        
         | SoftTalker wrote:
         | As a male near 60, all my relationships and a marriage have
         | ended in heartbreak. I've been solo by choice since my mid 40s,
         | and have never even thought about getting into another
         | relationship. Just not worth it.
        
           | lynx23 wrote:
           | Thanks for proofing my point. Also, congrats for actually
           | following through with your decision. Thats not a given for
           | many, because natural urges typically are so strong, they
           | sometimes resemble addicition. In any case, full power to
           | you.
        
             | fyolnish wrote:
             | A single anecdote proved your point?
        
         | stonethrowaway wrote:
         | I'm upvoting this comment because it's a good bit of juicy
         | flamebait and I wouldn't like it to go to waste. Not on HN
         | anyway. It has all the hallmarks of the genre trope. The
         | undertone is that of the cliche: it's women who are suffering,
         | and the underlying blame is on men because people in general
         | don't care about the percentage of men who are lonely between
         | the ages of X1 and X2. My feelings disagree with reality, so
         | those high IQ incels have hijacked the narrative and are
         | pushing their agenda. I'm chuckling at someone seriously
         | suggesting that incels have the pop culture pull to execute on
         | this. But I can play along - there are no wrong answers here.
         | 
         | I think there are a handful of reasons, some obvious, some too
         | disturbing to discuss on a polite forum - but I'm sure folks
         | here will jump to conjecture all the same that align with their
         | educated opinions, as to the reasons why this narrative/reality
         | is unfolding. This has been dragging on for decades and is only
         | now really picking up steam.
         | 
         | In all seriousness, I would look towards in a kind of a
         | squinting eyes way towards what Haidt is talking about. Social
         | Media is toxic cancer and it has replaced a notion of positive
         | communal relationships. I would then follow up with life
         | priorities, and somewhere, very far down the line, interview a
         | handful of those incels to get a raw (though tunnel-visioned)
         | perspective on why they are the way they are. I would bridge
         | topics like peoples needs and wants and desires and obsessions
         | with wealth and being seen and heard and all these things as a
         | kind of maelstrom for the unhappy and sad/solitudal landscape
         | we have in front of us. Lives bereft of deeper joys and harmony
         | in living.
         | 
         | People of course, both men and women, (and sometimes children
         | too!) want it easy. They grow up with celeb magazines of the
         | old or the Disney+ of the new and they have it in their mind
         | that somewhere down the line, the cosmic balance will right
         | itself and they will come out alright. But we all know, seeing
         | the wealthy and prosperous on Instagram and TikTok and god
         | knows what they'll invent tomorrow, that we couldn't be further
         | from that. That the world is wholly, in human terms anyway,
         | unfair unjust cruel et cetera. So naturally people gravitate
         | towards complete detachment and, I suppose in a good bit of
         | cases, resentment that manifests itself in all sorts of ways.
         | Some inward, some outward.
         | 
         | But, nevermind that. I'm here for the flamebait, and OP
         | delivered.
        
         | cjbgkagh wrote:
         | Some of us saw what our fathers went through and thought
         | 'that's not for me'
         | 
         | For me it's more 'been there done that, got the postcard'. In
         | the past I have had little influence on my partners decisions
         | but when they make bad decisions I'm expected to bail them out
         | the consequences. Perhaps there is some selection criteria bias
         | - women who date me are more likely to make bad decisions.
         | Being old enough to have seen what has happened to the women
         | I've dated and the women I've not dated makes me think I've
         | dodged enough bullets for one lifetime.
         | 
         | The probability that when meet someone new that I like that
         | person more than the people I have already met decreases as I
         | meet more people. Since I've previously gotten to know a large
         | number of people that probability is now too low for me to
         | bother with it.
         | 
         | I covet intelligence and only find intelligent people
         | interesting, instead of searching the globe for these people I
         | prefer reading old books written by smart people.
        
           | thefaux wrote:
           | I sometimes wonder about the negative effects of media
           | (particularly literature) on my personal relationships. Minds
           | in real life rarely measure up to what I find on the page.
           | And yet I know that those words were the product of an
           | embodied human and I wonder where they are.
        
             | cjbgkagh wrote:
             | They exist but are rare - with books you're generally
             | looking at the best of all time that have undergone a very
             | strong selection criteria bias. I think the shift from an
             | intellectual elite culture to a more egalitarian culture
             | has reduced the extent that such elites could be found in
             | the same place and thus the likelihood of a very smart
             | person meeting another very smart person is similarly
             | greatly reduced.
        
         | globular-toast wrote:
         | > I am a bit surprised, because I always thought the inherent
         | attraction towards your prefered sex would always overrule bad
         | experiences in the past
         | 
         | Porn exists. If you've had enough with the heartbreak etc then
         | this is just an itch that's easy to scratch.
        
         | bluefirebrand wrote:
         | > Well, forecasts says 45% of women 20-44 will be single 2030
         | 
         | From my (cis white mid-30s) male perspective, if this winds up
         | being true then it will be because they choose to be single
         | 
         | They will lament that they cannot find any good men, but they
         | will be overlooking "good enough" men in thier lives, I
         | guarantee
         | 
         | I see this with all of my wife's friends all the time. They are
         | all single and they have insane expectations for what they want
         | out of a man
         | 
         | It's a mix of funny and sad because they often will tell her
         | how she's lucky to have found such a great guy, but I wouldn't
         | check even half of their dating requirements
         | 
         | And of course men have high standards too. But despite how
         | gender norms have changed, it remains the case that men pursue
         | women and women choose who they date. So it's on men to meet
         | women's standards but also on women to have realistic,
         | reasonable standards. I see women with unreasonable standards
         | all the time.
        
           | cjbgkagh wrote:
           | Price is set at the margin with fewer females dating the
           | remaining set the price. I think the core part of the problem
           | is that women do not seem to know the actual distribution of
           | men and what should be the expected likelihood of desired
           | attributes. This is most obvious when they sincerely pick
           | attributes which they believe to be the median range but are
           | in fact only in the >90% of men. I think this is the
           | predominant reason why fewer women are at the price setting
           | margin.
           | 
           | There is little attention paid to the negative consequences
           | of this overestimation - possibly because few people pay
           | attention to older women who have paid those consequences and
           | older women have no incentive to inform younger women as
           | quite often they are still in competition with them. Trying
           | to educate young women that they really should realistic
           | about their prospects is not going to be popular. In general
           | men appear to already have an accurate estimate of the
           | distribution of attributes. I think the proportion of the
           | difference is demonstrated by the attributes that men and
           | women covet and the difficulty in achieving those attributes.
           | For example losing weight is far easier than growing taler.
        
             | namaria wrote:
             | Women have no obligation to date or pair up. Why is it a
             | problem if a lot of women's standards are too high for the
             | majority of men and they decide to not date? It's well
             | within their right to be single.
        
               | bluefirebrand wrote:
               | It's well within their right to be single, but don't
               | complain if you want to be in a relationship and "can't
               | find a good man"
               | 
               | Men aren't obligated to meet some unreasonable set of
               | standards either
               | 
               | For this stuff to work, people need to meet each other in
               | the middle somewhere
        
               | chongli wrote:
               | It's not about obligation, it's about loneliness. That
               | was the start of this whole thread. Women with
               | unrealistic expectations creating the conditions for
               | their own loneliness.
               | 
               | I don't think it's entirely their fault though, as others
               | in the thread seem to imply. The rise in expectations
               | seems to closely match the rise of mass (and later
               | social) media. Simply put, women and girls are exposed to
               | all kinds of images and stories about attractive and high
               | status men. Along with that we have dating apps that seem
               | to reinforce this illusion of abundance. So then we
               | should not be surprised at all that it's so common for
               | women to have an unrealistic picture of their prospects.
        
               | namaria wrote:
               | > Women with unrealistic expectations creating the
               | conditions for their own loneliness.
               | 
               | Replace that with 'solitude' and the article pretty much
               | explains why that is a non-issue. Women deciding they are
               | better off alone is not a problem. Accusing them of being
               | unhappy and then purporting to explain why is pretty
               | weird.
               | 
               | If there are psychological issues with people being
               | lonely, coming to the conclusion that they should date
               | more and if they can't it's "women's fault" is kinda
               | flabbergasting. The social fabric isn't made of romantic
               | pairs, and that's definitely not women's collective
               | responsibility.
        
               | chongli wrote:
               | I'm not accusing anyone of being unhappy. I am believing
               | people when they say they are unhappy.
               | 
               | Furthermore I said specifically that it's not women's
               | fault.
        
               | namaria wrote:
               | > it's so common for women to have an unrealistic picture
               | of their prospects
               | 
               | You kinda did.
               | 
               | > I am believing people when they say they are unhappy.
               | 
               | Who are these unhappy women that need to lower their
               | standards to be happy? I see two different problems:
               | people seem to be lonely because the social fabric is
               | being corroded away; and some people seem to think that
               | the issue is somehow related with too many single women.
        
         | darth_avocado wrote:
         | Just because you're single doesn't mean you're alone.
         | Anecdotally, a lot of people are married or in relationships
         | and are completely alone, miserable and struggling. Meanwhile
         | despite being single, a lot of people are finding meaning
         | beyond marriage. From a personal experience, being with the
         | wrong partner can be worse than being single.
        
         | abeppu wrote:
         | This article is about time spent alone, which isn't
         | intrinsically tied to the kinds of relationships one has (i.e.
         | can be a thing you do more than a long-term state you're in),
         | and which certainly is not the same as not being married or in
         | a romantic relationship:
         | 
         | - those not in a romantic relationship can have friends, family
         | or community that they spend a lot of time with, or not
         | 
         | - those in a romantic relationship can have time alone (chosen
         | or incidental, as in distanced relationships), or not
         | 
         | In fact there's some evidence on single people having more
         | friends. Perhaps describing unmarried people as "single" is
         | fundamentally misleading, and says more about society
         | privileging certain relationships than it does about the person
         | being described.
         | 
         | https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/living-single/201905...
        
         | keybored wrote:
         | First step is to read the article.
         | 
         | Is "solitude" distinguished as a voluntary activity as opposed
         | to involuntary aloneness (we could call it invalone)? Check.
         | Does the article make clear that you should do this because you
         | want to and not be alone if you _feel_ lonely? Check. Does the
         | article explain that being "lonely" is really a feeling of
         | inadequacy, thus a first-person felt experience and not
         | something that someone can just say that someone _is_? Check.
         | Does the article make clear that you should be conscious about
         | how you spend your time alone (don't be mindless about it)?
         | Check.[1] Does the article remember to remind us that so-called
         | extroverts are a superior breed compared to those so-called
         | introverts? Check.[2] Does the article _mention the "loneliness
         | epidemic"_??? CHECK.
         | 
         | Is the article just a promotional piece for a book? Unclear
         | (semi-check).
         | 
         | Your inane response makes as much sense as someone protesting
         | on an article about people practicing Japanese tea rituals.
         | "But we already consume too much coffeine!"
         | 
         | [1] We must use our noggin' here: "solitude" here is not about
         | doomscrolling Twitter. It's about quality solitude, like going
         | for a quiet walk or maybe meditating, not mindless social media
         | consumption or something like that. Can you even _call_ social
         | media consumption solitude-time? I wouldn't. You are too likely
         | to get caught up reading annoying opinions from other people
         | (Hell is other people's opinions).
         | 
         | [2] > She adds that this may be because extroverts are often
         | happier and better adjusted overall, and it's likely their
         | happiness and well-being -- rather than their extroversion
         | itself -- that drives their enjoyment of solitude.
        
         | Andys wrote:
         | Or, to flip it, what is your reason for being biased against
         | solitude?
         | 
         | Isn't the pressure to be in a relationship just a form of
         | "expectation" and/or "entitlement"?
        
       | wklm wrote:
       | I'm wondering if it works the same way if the solitude is
       | choosing you.
        
         | tayo42 wrote:
         | The first line under the article headline says solitude isn't
         | the same as loneliness.
        
           | moralestapia wrote:
           | And I assume you understand that ... ?
           | 
           | Why are you replying to GP's comment that is not talking
           | about loneliness but solitude?
        
             | Zooti wrote:
             | What exactly is it meant by Solitude choosing you? To me
             | that sounds like involuntary time spent alone, solitude
             | chasing you, which could also be understood as loneliness.
        
               | moralestapia wrote:
               | You are sent to Antarctica for 3 months.
               | 
               | You don't feel lonely but the contrary, you are quite
               | excited.
               | 
               | You come back and write a blog post titled "I found my
               | true self during an unexpected trip in solitude" or
               | something.
        
         | nuancebydefault wrote:
         | Weird that this good curiosity got downvoted... for some reason
         | when you say "I wonder" on HN it tends to be taken as if you're
         | being sarcastic or something the like.
        
       | jmbwell wrote:
       | Alone time I find quite valuable.
       | 
       | Every now and then I find myself with a day or two by myself,
       | having no expectations, nobody to have to coordinate with,
       | nowhere to be at a particular time. It's incredibly resetting.
       | 
       | I know it's valuable because when I can pull it off, I feel like
       | I'm stealing something.
        
         | apwell23 wrote:
         | Joys of being a non parent. I miss those 'open days' :(
        
           | plasma_beam wrote:
           | Au contraire, I get Columbus day off work. None of my kids
           | are off school :) I've been looking forward to this coming
           | Monday for months. Those brief periods of solitude must be
           | taken advantage of with kids.
        
           | jmbwell wrote:
           | Being a parent is why I value them
        
           | lostemptations5 wrote:
           | You're right though -- all the parents I know desperately
           | want alone time.
        
           | kaffekaka wrote:
           | Can't speak for anyone else of course, but before kids a day
           | with no obligations was mostly just a nice day. With kids it
           | is so much more significant.
           | 
           | My colleagues that don't have kids, they waste their time.
           | Not by doing nothing - that would be awesome - but by
           | creating problems for themselves that end up taking their
           | spare time. It is like they believe they will always have
           | empty days to spare.
        
       | synthoidzeta wrote:
       | https://archive.ph/Hx4mj
        
       | randcraw wrote:
       | Interesting theory. The notion that some expressions of
       | personality are obstructed by social 'noise' and thus benefit
       | from solitude makes a lot of sense. By their reckoning, solitude
       | is positive, voluntary and purposeful, the means to a desired
       | end. In contrast, loneliness is negative, involuntary, a response
       | to the loss of several sources of social support.
       | 
       | The OP (and others) suggest solitude's desiderata to be: 1)
       | pursuit of a personal passion, and 2) disinterest in affirmation
       | (or criticism) from others, 3) the belief that this journey will
       | be preferable when taken alone.
       | 
       | Do the terms introvert and extrovert capture such personality
       | quirks usefully? And are solitude and loneliness synonymous? I've
       | long thought not.
       | 
       | As I understand the terms (informally), introverts are drained of
       | energy when in a group while extroverts gain energy. But by that
       | definition, loneliness should arise only when extroverts go it
       | alone. Introverts should be immune. But not so, so there must be
       | more to the story.
       | 
       | The best work I've read on the complexities of introversion and
       | the merits of solitude is Susan Cain's marvelous book, "Quiet".
       | As I recall, it confirms the OP's thesis.
        
       | nuancebydefault wrote:
       | For some reason, after being own my own for a few days, I start
       | to feel sorry for myself, feel nostalgic and don't take very well
       | care of self anymore. So I'm super lucky, privileged for not
       | being alone.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-10-12 23:01 UTC)