[HN Gopher] The Illusion of Information Adequacy
___________________________________________________________________
The Illusion of Information Adequacy
Author : omk
Score : 17 points
Date : 2024-10-11 16:43 UTC (6 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (journals.plos.org)
(TXT) w3m dump (journals.plos.org)
| the_real_cher wrote:
| Telling someone they have the illusion of information adequacy is
| how smart people call people dumb.
| stonogo wrote:
| There used to be a difference between stupidity and ignorance.
| Modern usage seems to blur them.
| jgeada wrote:
| Isn't this just restating the Dunning-Kruger effect?
|
| Without sufficient domain knowledge you don't even know you don't
| have the right data, perspectives, or even know the apparent
| obvious paths that are actually blind alleys in a subject. Every
| field of human knowledge is full of these.
| chrisweekly wrote:
| Yeah. It made me think of anosognosia -- a condition in which a
| person with a disability is cognitively unaware of having it
| (due to an underlying physical condition). Taking the Latin
| more literally, it's basically "ignorance of one's ignorance".
| Which is applicable to any number of human endeavors (maybe all
| of them).
| jtrn wrote:
| My interpretation: Illusion of information relates to adequacy
| when evaluating if you have all the necessary information,
| leading to potential misunderstandings or misinformed decisions
| because of unseen gaps in knowledge.
|
| The Dunning-Kruger effect is about misjudging your own
| abilities, leading to overconfidence in tasks or self-rated
| knowledge of domains.
|
| Both tries to explain why people make mistakes, but one through
| the lens of cognition and information processing, the other to
| through arrogance and level of domain expertise.
|
| If these concepts are useful is another matter.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2024-10-11 23:01 UTC)