[HN Gopher] AMD EPYC Turin delivers better performance/power eff...
___________________________________________________________________
AMD EPYC Turin delivers better performance/power efficiency than
AmpereOne
Author : geerlingguy
Score : 18 points
Date : 2024-10-10 20:38 UTC (2 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (www.phoronix.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.phoronix.com)
| gary_0 wrote:
| EPYC Turin Dense is TSMC 3nm and AmpereOne is TSMC 5nm, so that's
| to be expected.
|
| Given that most (all?) cutting-edge chips use TSMC nowadays, can
| you really have an apples-to-Apples comparison if the chips being
| compared aren't on the same process node?
|
| Unless you're comparing price/performance, since nowadays there's
| no guarantee that a process shrink will get you significantly
| cheaper transistors (RIP, Dr. Moore).
| qball wrote:
| >since nowadays there's no guarantee that a process shrink will
| get you significantly cheaper transistors
|
| That is _because_ all cutting-edge chips use TSMC.
|
| No competition means price per transistor can stay consistent
| or even rise, which is one part of why most modern CPUs and
| GPUs have price/performance ratios that are the same or worse
| than their previous-generation counterparts.
|
| >can you really have an apples-to-Apples comparison if the
| chips being compared aren't on the same process node?
|
| Of course not, but that isn't going to stop people from doing
| it, nor is it going to stop people from going "x86 is dead"
| when comparing last-gen-node AMD processors to CPUs only Apple
| can use (conveniently forgetting that Qualcomm's products
| underperform at the same process node).
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2024-10-10 23:01 UTC)