[HN Gopher] Gustav Klimt's Obsession with Gold
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Gustav Klimt's Obsession with Gold
        
       Author : pseudolus
       Score  : 88 points
       Date   : 2024-10-06 23:52 UTC (2 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (news.artnet.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (news.artnet.com)
        
       | Daub wrote:
       | I teach digital painting. You would be surprised how many
       | students ask how to achieve 'the color gold'. One of the
       | qualifiers of physical paint (as opposed to digital paint) is,
       | not surprisingly, its materiality. Explaining to young people
       | what materiality is can be a tough ride. I have to remind myself
       | that for some of them the very first experience of painting was
       | on an iPad.
       | 
       | Of TFA, it is no surprise that he was greatly influenced by
       | Byzantine mosaics. Both are supremely decorative, flat and
       | strongly symmetrical.
        
         | Filligree wrote:
         | Well, hold on. Gold is a specific color, specularity and
         | emissiveness. I wouldn't expect to achieve it in a 2D drawing
         | program, and I'm not sure what fraction of monitors can achieve
         | it at all, but it's simple enough in Unreal Engine.
        
           | Daub wrote:
           | In addition to teaching digital painting I also teach 3d.
           | What you describe is completely correct and something I would
           | emulate using Blenders BSDF shader. This would emulate real
           | world materiality, but my point is that color is the lest of
           | the key properties of a metal. For the most part, the Colour
           | would derive from environment reflections, which would all be
           | tinted with 'gold color'.
        
           | reaperman wrote:
           | > it's simple enough in Unreal Engine
           | 
           | The color of physical metallic gold is outside of sRGB color
           | space. Maybe you could get close enough to fool people with
           | some of the best modern HDR's (I don't know), but for most of
           | the history of modern computing it didn't matter how good you
           | were at digital animation -- no display could display the
           | color "gold" even if you could mathematically compute the
           | right color.
        
             | numpad0 wrote:
             | It's just orange, _reflective_ orange. The italics part is
             | the rest of the owl.
        
         | jessekv wrote:
         | I've been learning digital painting. Getting realistic
         | materials is tricky indeed! So far, I've struggled with
         | liquids, metals, glass, and the hardest of all: rocks. It's
         | really hard to get the texture and shadow to feel natural! I'd
         | be thrilled to get a few tips here...
        
           | Daub wrote:
           | Top tips....
           | 
           | Using a digital brush on its own can be extremely limiting.
           | Digital paint is inherently flat and lifeless. Textured
           | brushes can help, but not much. I would recommend employing
           | natural textures via blend modes. The best blend mode for
           | passing textures from one image to another is overlay. In
           | this way the texture of a photo of a rusty surface may be
           | passed onto a painting of a rock. Essentially painting with
           | textures... or photo-bashing.
           | 
           | Here is a walk through I did for my students...
           | 
           | https://rmit.instructure.com/courses/87565/pages/photoshop-p.
           | ..
           | 
           | Happy to answer any questions.
        
         | krisoft wrote:
         | > Explaining to young people what materiality is can be a tough
         | ride.
         | 
         | Sounds like an excellent opportunity to introduce them to
         | drawing from observation? They don't have to understand what
         | "materiality" is, just see that the object appears different
         | depending on how they hold it, where the lights are and what
         | else is around it. (Assuming that you don't have a bar of gold
         | hanging out in your class you could grab some toy gold coins.)
        
         | twic wrote:
         | Skill issue, Warhammer painters are all over it:
         | 
         | http://razzaminipainting.blogspot.com/2016/07/non-metallic-m...
        
           | Modified3019 wrote:
           | What the fuck are you doing with that link?
           | 
           | Here's the link without the bullshit:
           | http://razzaminipainting.blogspot.com/2016/07/non-
           | metallic-m...
        
             | twic wrote:
             | Oh, sorry. I'm at work, and my company uses some dogshit
             | safe browsing wrapper service. Sometimes i forget to trim
             | the prefix off before posting a link. Fixed now, thanks for
             | pointing it out.
        
       | axegon_ wrote:
       | As the son of two artists, both of whom never liked gold, Klimt
       | is a strange breed: My parents have made a ton of murals, jam-
       | packed with gold. Not because they wanted but because rich
       | people(the type of people who want murals in their homes and can
       | afford it) love it as an expression of their financial status.
       | Both of them hated much of those murals and I can only name a
       | handful of works they truly liked, at the end of the day, the
       | customer is always right. And having seen much of their work(and
       | taking some part on a few occasions circumstantially since I
       | can't draw a single line to save my life), I completely agree
       | with them. We have a word which roughly translates to mobbaroque
       | in English. In almost all cases, this is exactly what it is.
       | 
       | Having said that, my mom specifically has a few favorite artists,
       | Klimt being one of them. Over the years she's been asked to make
       | dozens of Klimt replicas(The Kiss probably accounting for 80% of
       | them) and she's loved doing all of them. I think Klimt is the
       | only artist to successfully incorporate gold into his paintings
       | without making them look obnoxious or ostentatious. Not only that
       | but made them look incredible. Admittedly I never looked all that
       | deep as to why he was "obsessed" with it.
        
         | ewuhic wrote:
         | What would be the original "mobbaroque" word your parents use?
        
           | axegon_ wrote:
           | They don't use it exclusively(they didn't come up with it),
           | it's a pretty common word across the country. So much so,
           | that even google has picked up on it a lil bit: https://www.g
           | oogle.com/search?q=%D0%BC%D1%83%D1%82%D1%80%D0%...
        
         | Daub wrote:
         | You may appreciate the following anecdote about Picasso. He was
         | offered a lot of money to make a sculpture entirely in hold.
         | His response was 'Great! I will paint it black!'.
        
           | axegon_ wrote:
           | I use it a lot but then again I lived a rock throw away from
           | his house for a long period of my life but since The Rolling
           | Stones are a bit closer to my heart, I usually resort to one
           | of their famous songs.
        
         | mannyv wrote:
         | Mobbaroque -> Mob Baroque.
         | 
         | To me that's New York Italian, with lots of marble, gold, and
         | extreme decor. It's a big marble tub with gold fixtures and
         | maybe a couple of statues hanging around for good measure...in
         | a marble/gold/mirrors bath.
        
           | apercu wrote:
           | Or the bathroom at Mar-a-Lago ?
        
           | devilbunny wrote:
           | Porcelain fountains!
           | 
           | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oofdn0MFDSQ
        
         | crabbone wrote:
         | > Mobbaroque
         | 
         | Oh, I didn't know the word, but I know what it means! Haha!
         | Back in the days I worked in a printing house, one of the most
         | common orders were business cards. Unimaginably large
         | proportion of those were to be screen-printed with gold paint
         | that increased in volume when heated on a paper that looked
         | like marble. These orders usually came from people who had...
         | well... no business to appear to be rich. Like, a local police
         | department chief or an owner of a small refrigerated delivery
         | service (that one was both morbid and bizarre as he wanted raw
         | meat texture for the business card).
         | 
         | Being an art college grad, I tend to think that a lot of
         | Klimt's portraits weren't particularly indicative of what he
         | _wanted_ to paint. It was what put food on the table, what
         | customers paid him for. He found a way to please the customers
         | that worked. How much did he enjoy it?--Hard to tell. From my
         | student years, when I had to make a living from art, which was
         | admittedly not so easy or successful, I 'd guess that in his
         | heart of hearts he probably at the minimum laughed at it.
        
         | lo_zamoyski wrote:
         | Klimt does use gold very well. But I am surprised by your
         | claim...
         | 
         | > I think Klimt is the only artist to successfully incorporate
         | gold into his paintings without making them look obnoxious or
         | ostentatious.
         | 
         | Byzantine iconography comes off as neither obnoxious nor
         | ostentatious. The use of gold in Botticelli's works
         | wonderfully. And so on. What exactly is an example of
         | "obnoxious or ostentatious" use of gold in art? I can only
         | think of ridiculous things like gold-plated toilets. Perhaps
         | you were exposed to especially egregious works that are not
         | familiar to the general public?
        
           | Retric wrote:
           | I think both Byzantine iconography and Botticelli's works
           | were invented to be ostentatious. Gold toilets/plates/etc
           | come off as obnoxious because the use of gold is actively
           | detrimental rather than simply eye catching.
        
             | lo_zamoyski wrote:
             | I don't see how. I do not find the works in question
             | ostentatious in the least. They deploy gold tastefully and
             | appropriately in relation to the subject matter. Purpose
             | and the role something plays in a composition determines
             | appropriateness. So, for example, while gold leaf on a
             | church ceiling can be beautiful when it plays a sensible
             | role in the composition, putting it slapdash on your
             | drywall McMansion ceiling because #GoldIsRich is incredibly
             | tacky.
             | 
             | I suspect you are judging gold not from reasoned taste, but
             | some kind of prejudice.
        
               | Retric wrote:
               | I am referring to the intent here. Gold in religious art
               | is ment to signify importance just as the tacky rich
               | guy's gold is.
               | 
               | Use of gold on a kings actual throne may seem more
               | appropriate than a CEO's chair but that's a judgement
               | about what should be venerated not the intent behind the
               | use of gold.
        
               | mecsred wrote:
               | The thing most people find ostentatious about the
               | "mobbaroque" examples is that gold is used to add gold to
               | the work. As a physical demonstration of wealth, i.e. "I
               | can afford so much gold it's all over my artwork". The
               | reason people find the Byzantine halos less ostentatious
               | is that gold is used symbolically in lesser quantities to
               | represent something else which is perceived as valuable.
        
             | AlanYx wrote:
             | It wasn't until later in the Byzantine period that gold was
             | used excessively in art. In the early period when it was
             | largely confined to halos, as a contrasting accent around
             | painted halos, or to convey specific religious symbolism,
             | it was hardly ostentatious.
        
               | Retric wrote:
               | > largely confined to halos
               | 
               | I'd say that's close to the definition of ostentatious.
               | So we may simply disagree with what the word means.
        
         | pseudolus wrote:
         | Aside from Klimt it could be argued that Maurizio Cattelan has
         | successfully incorporated gold into his work - although in the
         | form of sculpture. His work "America", a solid gold functioning
         | toilet, attracted quite a few crowds (apparently over 100K
         | people "used" it), one notable theft, and certainly made a
         | statement. [0]
         | 
         | [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/America_(Cattelan)
        
         | tambourine_man wrote:
         | I never particularly cared much for Klimt and usually despise
         | gold. But then I visited a museum in Vienna.
         | 
         | My wife prepared the whole trip and I was mostly going with the
         | flow. Unbeknownst to me, we would see The Kiss that day. It was
         | striking. I mean, the lighting was obviously perfect and the
         | surprise must have helped. But the colors, texture and shapes
         | are just remarkable. I'll never forget making a corner turn and
         | being completely mesmerized.
         | 
         | One of those moments that makes you realize the value of the
         | original, the whole Walter Benjamin aura thing.
        
       | amarcheschi wrote:
       | Ironically enough, when I visited the neue galerie in New York
       | (which hosts a small selection of klimt's paintings, including
       | the expensive Adele bloch Bauer), the painting that impressed me
       | the most was the most white and plain. The portrait of Gertrude
       | Loew really shook me. Photos don't do it justice. I was
       | hypnotized, it was such a strange feeling
        
       | dukeofdoom wrote:
       | It adds something sparkly reminiscent of life giving sun. Just
       | some moderation like jewelry.. too much and it's monkey puke
        
       | anigbrowl wrote:
       | Let me save you a click: _Goldsmithing Was the Klimt Family
       | Business_
       | 
       | This is TMZ-level art journalism.
        
       | SamBam wrote:
       | Klimt is one of those artists that I feel primed to dislike,
       | because it's so reproduced that's it's turned cheesy. I've
       | probably seen more _Kiss_ posters and fridge magnets and
       | whatevers than any other painting in the world.
       | 
       | But good god are they beautiful. They just make me so happy to
       | see them. Or sad.
       | 
       | My favorites are probably the birch forests, though, perhaps
       | _Birch Forest (1903)_ [1]
       | 
       | 1. https://www.wikiart.org/en/gustav-klimt/farmhouse-with-
       | birch...
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-10-09 23:00 UTC)