[HN Gopher] One pioneering grizzly and her two cubs appear on Va...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       One pioneering grizzly and her two cubs appear on Vancouver Island
        
       Author : abscond
       Score  : 50 points
       Date   : 2024-10-04 23:36 UTC (23 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (hakaimagazine.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (hakaimagazine.com)
        
       | AlbertCory wrote:
       | I've been up REAL close to grizzlies, on Kodiak Island [1].
       | However, that has a population of 13,000 [2], whereas Vancouver
       | has 840,000, according to that article.
       | 
       | That means on Kodiak, the bears have the land mostly to
       | themselves, and humans aren't much of a threat to them. You
       | wouldn't try this in Yellowstone, where fatal bear-human
       | encounters happen regularly. And probably will on Vancouver, too.
       | 
       | [1] https://albertcory50.substack.com/p/travel-disasters
       | 
       | [2] https://usafacts.org/data/topics/people-
       | society/population-a...
        
         | wk_end wrote:
         | It's important to distinguish "Vancouver" (a city on the
         | mainland) and "Vancouver Island" (an island off the coast).
         | 
         | Vancouver Island has a population nearing a million, but half
         | of it live in the greater Victoria area, which occupies a tiny
         | little peninsula and change on the southern tip. Most of the
         | island - which is huge, approximately four times the size of
         | Kodiak Island, for what it's worth - is pretty wild and
         | untamed.
        
           | AlbertCory wrote:
           | I'm sure, but the question is, do the populations intersect?
           | Looking at the map, I see three Provincial Parks up in the
           | north, plus towns and roads. That will mean vacationers will
           | encounter them.
           | 
           | Whereas on Kodiak, there is nothing on one side of the
           | island.
        
             | WillyWonkaJr wrote:
             | I think it's time that we start to make room once again for
             | the animals we almost drove to extinction. This would be a
             | good, controlled setting to see if we can do this
             | responsibly.
        
               | AlbertCory wrote:
               | How is Vancouver "controlled"? The grizzlies can
               | obviously swim back to the mainland if they don't like
               | it.
               | 
               | > we almost drove to extinction
               | 
               | In the Lower 48, yes. Not in Canada and Alaska.
        
               | tastyfreeze wrote:
               | For good reason. Brown bears eat people. You are no more
               | than a slow meal to them. Coexistence means accepting
               | that people will be eaten by bears or bears will be
               | killed by people defending themselves. I think it is
               | worth noting that native tribes prepared for war if the
               | needed to kill a brown bear.
        
               | mistrial9 wrote:
               | > Attacks on humans, though widely reported, are
               | generally rare.
               | 
               | Brown bears prefer salmon to geezers who talk big, for
               | certain.
        
       | LilBytes wrote:
       | Might make for an interesting development on future seasons of
       | Alone if Grizzles become a common presence on Vancouver Island.
       | 
       | My understanding of read materials so far is the amount of work
       | gone into the program to risk profile danger was incredible, the
       | change in risk profile of the addition of Grizzles on top of
       | wolves and black bears would be quite an adjustment.
        
         | grecy wrote:
         | My Yukon buddy was the safety officer/local guy when they did
         | alone up on great slave lake in the NWT.( near Yellowknife)
         | 
         | He hung around all the time with his hunting rifle and a 12
         | gauge loaded with slugs to make sure nobody got eaten.
         | 
         | He got in trouble for sharing smokes and giving fire to the
         | contestants a few times.
        
         | dghlsakjg wrote:
         | They have done at least one season in Interior BC where
         | Grizzlies are present. They have also done seasons in northern
         | Canada where within range of those predators as well.
        
       | pvaldes wrote:
       | They will need to watch very carefully for any negative
       | relationship with the endemic Vancouver Island Marmot, that only
       | lives in a couple spots in the Island. In this case, those bears
       | will need to be captured and moved out of the Island again.
       | Grizzlies have the rest of N America to live.
        
         | steve_adams_86 wrote:
         | The marmots are in so few locations and in such small numbers,
         | it seems exceedingly unlikely that it would become an issue. It
         | would be awful if it was a problem though. The marmots have
         | been having record years, and their recovery is really just
         | beginning.
        
           | pvaldes wrote:
           | 1) Grizzlies are known to ear marmots if they can catch them.
           | Those bears are able to move big stones. One bear that would
           | specialize on open the tunnels and chase the rodents on their
           | nests, could trigger the demise of the wild population in
           | months or weeks. Even before we could notice it.
           | 
           | 2) Bears will compete for the same fruits and resources in
           | autumn and have big appetites. Marmots need those fruits to
           | survive winter.
           | 
           | 3) Vancouver Marmot societies can collapse suddenly if the
           | number is reduced, because they need a minimum number of
           | watchers for protection while the other eat.
           | 
           | The risk simply doesn't worth it at this moment. Professional
           | advice should be relocation of the bears until the marmot
           | situation improves and creates a minimum number of
           | individuals that would act as a safety buffer. Those bears at
           | least should be radiotracked ASAP and followed by Biologists
           | and specialized workers. That would be the minimum action
           | required. If they enter on the area with marmots they must
           | go. Prioritizing safety of the critically endangered animals
           | over the common species is the correct decision.
        
             | steve_adams_86 wrote:
             | I agree they should be tracked, absolutely. I should have
             | specified that I wouldn't expect it to be an issue in the
             | short term. Eventually they would almost certainly
             | interact, though at that point hopefully the marmots will
             | be established with stable populations.
             | 
             | I also agree that prioritizing endangered species is the
             | right decision here. We have more than enough bears on the
             | island. We don't really need to ensure grizzlies stay in
             | the mix at the moment, haha.
        
             | AlbertCory wrote:
             | I have kinda mixed feelings on this. Protecting an
             | endangered species against human hunting, habitat
             | reduction, or other unnatural dangers makes total sense.
             | 
             | But what's unnatural about grizzlies? Were they introduced
             | onto the island by man? Nope. For that matter, the bears on
             | Kodiak -- how did they get there in the first place? They
             | have plenty of salmon so they probably don't need to eat
             | marmots, if there are any. But maybe they wiped out other
             | species we don't know about.
             | 
             | What are you going to do to protect them against other
             | natural predators? And why not introduce them into other
             | suitable habitats, like we've done with wolves in the US?
             | Then we wouldn't be so dependent on one island.
        
       | skwb wrote:
       | My wife and I went to Tofino (on Vancouver) this last summer
       | where you can rent a boat for a tour of the coastal black bears.
       | Very highly recommend it.
        
         | jacobaul wrote:
         | (As a local) it sounds weird to say "on Vancouver" without the
         | island part. Vancouver means the city. If you want to sound
         | cool you can say "the Island".
        
         | vavooom wrote:
         | Super cool! I love Vancouver island - normally visit Campbell
         | River where I used to have family. Always wanted to make it to
         | the west side for Tofino or the West Coast Trail.
        
         | grecy wrote:
         | I hope you made a stop in Hot Springs Cove.
         | 
         | That place is magical.
        
       | blindriver wrote:
       | How would they avoid inbreeding and genetic mutations if only a
       | single bloodline existed there?
        
         | AlbertCory wrote:
         | I think the grizzlies will take care of that on their own.
         | Either some bears from the island will swim to the mainland, or
         | vice versa.
         | 
         | Note: don't ask for a link on that. I just suspect animals
         | prefer not to mate with their siblings.
        
           | pentamassiv wrote:
           | The article says "As the first known female grizzly on
           | Vancouver Island, she could be the progenitor of an entirely
           | new, self-sustaining grizzly population--the first in as many
           | as 12,500 years".
           | 
           | They might be waiting for a long time for other bears to come
        
       | hi-v-rocknroll wrote:
       | Note that Vancouver Island has absurd numbers of black bear but
       | pretty much or at zero brown bears until now.
       | 
       | I'm wondering if they're u. a. stikeenensis, gyas, dalli, or
       | merely the terribly-named horribilis.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-10-05 23:00 UTC)