[HN Gopher] Why does man print "gimme gimme gimme" at 00:30? (2017)
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Why does man print "gimme gimme gimme" at 00:30? (2017)
        
       Author : jamesy0ung
       Score  : 868 points
       Date   : 2024-10-04 01:25 UTC (21 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (unix.stackexchange.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (unix.stackexchange.com)
        
       | addaon wrote:
       | This update broke my workflow!
        
         | dudeinjapan wrote:
         | This update fixed my workflow. I needed a man after midnight.
        
           | SCUSKU wrote:
           | Relevant: https://xkcd.com/1172/
        
       | AStonesThrow wrote:
       | Because you can tune a filesystem, but you can't tune a fish.
       | 
       | https://unixhistory.livejournal.com/1808.html
        
         | tonetegeatinst wrote:
         | Ah but you can tune a fish.
         | 
         | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F2y92obnsc0
        
         | hi-v-rocknroll wrote:
         | I prefer all bah corps.
        
       | chriscjcj wrote:
       | https://youtu.be/XEjLoHdbVeE?t=68
        
         | rectang wrote:
         | Gimme some more... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TcRujcvfQeY
        
         | snvzz wrote:
         | erb cover[0].
         | 
         | 0. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=whGM9_kZjLw
        
       | HackerQED wrote:
       | A fun idea, but it should not be put in the ordinary flow. It
       | will hurt users.
       | 
       | `man -abba` would be nicer, as the author said in the original
       | post.
        
         | thih9 wrote:
         | It has been removed, see:
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41738239
        
         | kevincox wrote:
         | The first answer explains that it was only supposed to trigger
         | on error cases (no page specified) but due to an oversight also
         | triggered if you specified a man page by the --path flag
         | (rather than just the page name)
        
         | DonHopkins wrote:
         | $ man --abba --format=json       ["gimme", "gimme", "gimme"]
        
       | worstspotgain wrote:
       | Narada Michael Walden came to mind, instead of Abba. Guess I'm
       | both too old and too young.
       | 
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OrnUuXiVgBc
       | 
       | Edit: It's also a way better song, no wonder I remember it
       | better.
        
         | jeltz wrote:
         | No idea what you mean about being too old and too young. The
         | ABBA song is from 1979 and the Narada song in 1985, just 6
         | years later.
        
           | worstspotgain wrote:
           | Too young to remember Abba's song when it was new, too old to
           | not remember Narada's song and get confused by it.
        
       | IgorPartola wrote:
       | Sorry time: years ago I worked on a telemedicine web app before
       | telemedicine was nearly as popular as it is today. Part of the
       | application had patients filling out questionnaires online to
       | show answers to the doctors. We were onboarding different parts
       | of a large healthcare system throughout all this (cardio, GI,
       | etc.) and each had questionnaires that required different logic
       | for when and how to display the questions, so the application had
       | a fairly powerful system for driving the conditional logic of
       | when questions do and do not show up.
       | 
       | Well one day I am working on a new set of features to help
       | support the new clinic that's coming online and for whatever
       | reason the question that should by all rights show up, does not.
       | As I am getting deeper into debugging why, I pepper the code with
       | nonsensical and slightly angry debug statements that show up
       | alongside the questions. After solving the problem I happily
       | clean up and commit the fixed code and move onto the next thing.
       | 
       | Well, it turns out I didn't clean up all the debug statements.
       | The statement I left in said I SEE YOU!!! in big red letters if
       | you answered a particular set of questions in a particular way.
       | This was discovered by a patient. Of the psychiatric clinic that
       | just came online. On the questionnaire meant to evaluate
       | paranoia.
       | 
       | Since then I have started using things like aaa and 111 as my
       | debug markers.
        
         | Terr_ wrote:
         | > Since then I have started using things like aaa and 111 as my
         | debug markers.
         | 
         | I often use my initials and "DEBUG", so that the string (A) is
         | distinctly grep-able before committing code and (B) if it
         | somehow ends up in production it's not totally mysterious.
        
           | adastra22 wrote:
           | I like this, but use the initials of annoying Steve down the
           | hall.
        
             | daurnimator wrote:
             | And if he isn't "annoying Steve" now he will be known as
             | that soon enough :)
        
               | dctoedt wrote:
               | > _And if he isn 't "annoying Steve" now he will be known
               | as that soon enough :)_
               | 
               | I once heard a guy -- named Ed -- who responded to a
               | query about something with, "Well, I'm _special_. " You
               | can guess how he was referred to from then on ....
        
           | jxramos wrote:
           | same, "DEBUG 1", "DEBUG 2", "DEBUG 3 with description xyz",
           | etc.
        
             | Terr_ wrote:
             | > "DEBUG 1", "DEBUG 2"
             | 
             | If you use language expressions that automatically become
             | file/line info, that frees you from juggling unique labels.
             | Then it can be saved into your IDE as a insertable code
             | snippet.
             | 
             | It goes without saying that a real interactive debugger
             | session is even better, but it isn't always convenient or
             | possible.
        
               | TremendousJudge wrote:
               | Sometimes an interactive debugger session will make the
               | issue you are researching not happen -- I don't know of a
               | way of tracking down race conditions that isn't logging
               | everything that happens until I find out which thing
               | happened before which other thing that wasn't supposed to
        
               | eastbound wrote:
               | And the reverse: I change values using breakpoints. So
               | the code runs (because the breakpoint condition is false)
               | but the value is different. Example of breakpoint
               | condition:
               | 
               | (licenseActive = true) != true
        
               | Terr_ wrote:
               | > Sometimes an interactive debugger session will make the
               | issue you are researching not happen
               | 
               | I still remember the first time that happened to me, I
               | think it had to do with some (not yet diagnosed) race
               | condition on a PHP server between the HTTP requests it
               | served, and the debugger had a side-effect of blocking
               | the next request while I was inspecting the first one.
               | 
               | That reminds me of another thing: Some debuggers allow
               | you to set breakpoints and set them to _not_ suspend or
               | pause execution, but to emits a log-message to the
               | debugger or terminal instead.
               | 
               | Those are an upgrade over print-statements in that:
               | 
               | 1. You can't accidentally commit it and it doesn't show
               | up to make your diffs weird
               | 
               | 2. You may be able to dynamically change what things it
               | prints out without restarting the program
        
           | ajross wrote:
           | FIXME is also popular.
        
           | sn9 wrote:
           | Am I the only one who just uses my name?
           | 
           | As in "MYNAME: " prefixed to whatever useful information I
           | might need.
        
         | laurent_du wrote:
         | This reminds me of the classical episode of the Onion "Is The
         | Government Spying On Schizophrenics Enough?".
        
           | blast wrote:
           | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FzoXQKumgCw
        
             | guenthert wrote:
             | Came for me with an ad for supposedly an in-ear hearing
             | aid. Of course it's such a whispering device. You can't
             | fool me!
        
         | evilc00kie wrote:
         | Well, maybe I shouldn't use "Hello" by Adele either for the
         | same reason ^^*
        
         | pcl wrote:
         | I use ##### along with a git commit hook that rejects commits
         | adding such text.
         | 
         | I like the 5 pounds because they are visually easy to find on
         | the screen, too.
        
           | throwawayk7h wrote:
           | I use DONOTCOMMIT the same way.
        
           | projektfu wrote:
           | Also prevents getting too deep in your markdown outline
           | structure.
        
         | mooktakim wrote:
         | It doesn't matter how advanced debugging gets. At the end we
         | always use print. Only reliable thing to do.
        
           | IshKebab wrote:
           | Sometimes you can't even print and have to resort to toggling
           | a GPIO pin...
        
             | bloak wrote:
             | I've worked with systems that were so utterly and entirely
             | broken that the only way I could confirm that a particular
             | code path was followed was by inserting an infinite loop
             | and observing that the system then hung instead of
             | crashing.
             | 
             | Combine that with a build system that is so utterly and
             | entirely broken that the only way to be sure is to do a
             | fresh checkout each time, and with a hardware set-up that
             | involves writing the binary onto flash memory and plugging
             | it into a device that is located under somebody else's desk
             | in another room and then perhaps you have the Debugging
             | Cycle From Hell.
        
               | Moru wrote:
               | When I was programming at home om my Atari ST I thought
               | debuggers was the greatest invention ever. It was
               | wonderful to be able to step through assembler code line
               | by line, instead of looking at BASIC print statement
               | output and guessing what was going on and where. Made
               | life so much easier.
               | 
               | Don't people believe in debuggers any more?
        
               | IshKebab wrote:
               | Some people just don't believe in tooling full stop. Kind
               | of mind-blowing. They're essentially coding with a fancy
               | notepad.exe.
        
               | db48x wrote:
               | What's weird is that debuggers are so advanced now. rr
               | and Pernosco are to regular debuggers like regular
               | debuggers are to inserting an infinite loop into your
               | code.
        
               | polotics wrote:
               | I guess that once you reach a certain level of coding,
               | static verification, strong typing, solid unit tests, you
               | only got timing multi-threaded Heisenbugs left to find...
        
               | qingcharles wrote:
               | This is a hacking technique too -- I've seen it used for
               | extracting entire databases via SQL injection by putting
               | delays in SQL statements and then measuring how long the
               | web page hangs, when you can't force any output on the
               | page. You put different delays in for different string
               | matches and eventually you can get all the table and
               | column names this way.
        
           | brunoarueira wrote:
           | Pretty much it https://tenderlovemaking.com/2016/02/05/i-am-
           | a-puts-debugger...
        
           | serf wrote:
           | I sort of laugh when using chatgpt/claude to code anything,
           | if you ever mention to it that something isn't quite working
           | right it'll pepper the entire code with printed debug
           | statements rather than assisting you with any more advanced
           | debugging methods.
           | 
           | even the bots do it (joke)
        
         | tomphoolery wrote:
         | I had a comment in this file for a very long time but the
         | project lead was something of a Professional so he removed it.
         | The comment was "# MULTIPASS!"
         | 
         | https://github.com/workarea-commerce/workarea/blob/master/co...
         | 
         | Some context:
         | 
         | - The 5th Element is a cool movie
         | 
         | - My sister's dog was named Leeloo Dallas Multipass and she was
         | like my favorite dog of all time
         | 
         | - I was the original developer of the `ProductMultipass` search
         | query feature
         | 
         | - Turns out, funny comments make other developers like your
         | product more
        
           | roydivision wrote:
           | I handed a project over to a new developer once before
           | leaving the company. I returned about 18 months later, and
           | he'd stripped out the one Easter egg I'd put in. No sense of
           | humor that chap. Good coder though.
        
             | PetahNZ wrote:
             | I made a website for a goat breading society. It played
             | screaming goat sounds if you typed the Konami code. I was
             | sad the day that site was replaced.
        
               | yellowapple wrote:
               | If I was a goat I, too, would scream if I was breaded :)
        
           | worstspotgain wrote:
           | She's not my bride. She's my fare.
        
           | qingcharles wrote:
           | Username checks out.
        
           | 0xfeba wrote:
           | I just made one last week that cracks me up still:
           | 
           | // We are liiiiiving in a material world, and I am a ma-ma-
           | material org.
           | 
           | const materialOrgs = await db_read<Org>(organizations, {
           | type: 'materials' });
        
         | xnorswap wrote:
         | This is why I enjoy writing C#/.Net, I don't need to deal with
         | nonsense like print debugging.
         | 
         | I don't think I'd be anywhere near as productive without:
         | - Conditional breakpoints        - Debugger.Launch         -
         | Debugger.Break        - Debugger.Write
         | 
         | Conditional breakpoints are essential, just run as normal and
         | it'll only break when your bizarre edge case is hit.
         | 
         | Debugger.Break and Debugger.Launch are like a breakpoint that
         | gets hit even when you're not debugging, and prompts you to
         | attach a debugger. ( Launch won't pause if you already have one
         | attached, but especially useful when you want to attach to a
         | start-up routine in an IIS hosted web-app. )
         | 
         | Debugger.Write writes to a different output stream, and like
         | all Diagnostic.Debug statements, isn't even compiled into
         | release builds, so there's zero chance of it ending up in prod.
         | 
         | These are essential tools for rapid debugging. Printing
         | nonsense and hoping to spot it feels 20+ years out of date.
        
           | rglullis wrote:
           | Get off your .NET high horse. Every reasonably mature
           | language has powerful debuggers.
        
             | xnorswap wrote:
             | Well indeed, I could have said, "this is why I enjoy
             | working in a mature environment". .NET just happens to be
             | my experience.
             | 
             | The point I was trying to make is that you shouldn't be
             | print debugging in 2024.
        
               | rezonant wrote:
               | Unfortunately it is not always possible to debug for a
               | myriad of reasons
        
               | appendix-rock wrote:
               | Yawn. I'm all but certain that all the environments in
               | these "print debugging fail" stories have debuggers. The
               | fact that generation after generation of programmers fall
               | into print debugging, despite there being "no reason" to
               | do it in many contexts for...decades at this point,
               | should tell you that you're missing something, _not_ that
               | everyone is dumb except for you.
        
               | xnorswap wrote:
               | I'm not saying people are dumb, I'm saying we've failed
               | to provide good dev UX for debugging, so that people find
               | it easier to reach for print debugging than leverage
               | their debugger.
        
               | xnorswap wrote:
               | It's also clear I got the tone of my original post wrong,
               | I was always trying to make this point, not some point
               | scoring "I'm better because I use X".
        
               | ziml77 wrote:
               | FWIW I didn't get the feeling at all that you were trying
               | to come off as superior because you use .NET and its
               | debugger.
        
             | high_na_euv wrote:
             | I wish it was true
             | 
             | My experience in cpp is 5 times worse than in .net
        
             | alfiedotwtf wrote:
             | I still haven't found a good way of debugging async code
             | that also has timing restrictions...
             | 
             | .., the world runs off print statements sprinkled
             | throughout by a very frustrated and angry developer
        
             | neonsunset wrote:
             | Does the GP comment claim that other languages cannot have
             | similar quality of tooling? Why reply with a swipe?
        
           | ploynog wrote:
           | Cool story bro. Let me tell the guys at work that we should
           | just run .NET on our multi-core digital signal processors.
           | 
           | And we should also teach them not to get their delicate
           | timing out of whack because they'll immediately stop dropping
           | incoming samples if any of them gets interrupted by a
           | debugger.
           | 
           | I'm sure everyone will be delighted.
        
           | dotnet00 wrote:
           | There are endless numbers of cases where you can still end up
           | having to just resort to print debugging, even in C#. Race
           | conditions are a great example.
        
             | chris_pie wrote:
             | you can configure the breakpoint to log stuff to the
             | console, instead of breaking
        
           | throwaway2037 wrote:
           | Real question: Does Java have equivalent methods? I have
           | never seen them.
        
         | mwkaufma wrote:
         | CVS at my first job was configured to reject commits containing
         | f-bombs after a spicy debug message sneaked into production and
         | showed up in a children's game.
        
           | PhilipRoman wrote:
           | Lol, at $work there is a big list of forbidden words, I was
           | not aware of it until I created a pull request containing the
           | phrase "bad packet". Turns out "bad" is in the list, along
           | with stuff like "workaround", "hard-coded", and also a huge
           | list of every slur and vaguely sexual term known to man, some
           | of them oddly specific like "son of a motherless goat".
           | Learned a few new words myself that day...
        
             | johnisgood wrote:
             | Why is "bad", "workaround" and "hard-coded" are on the list
             | of blacklisted words? Sounds kind of dystopian; just
             | because you forbid a word from the dictionary or remove it,
             | it does not solve the underlying issue.
        
               | Anthony-G wrote:
               | Dystopian for sure: I'd wager that if the code-base lives
               | long enough and the pool of developers is large enough,
               | they will start using Newspeak words such as "ungood" or
               | "doubleplusungood" - or other synonyms for "bad" - to
               | work around the blacklist.
        
               | dotnet00 wrote:
               | You mean to work around the ungoodlist :)
        
               | geoduck14 wrote:
               | You joke, but the phrase "black list" isn't allowed where
               | I work. It contains "black," which has racial
               | connotations. We use "block list" instead. I didn't
               | realize the connection to Newspeak until now
        
               | dotnet00 wrote:
               | Yes, a lot of dumb little "American political brainrot"
               | like that has been getting pushed in places.
               | 
               | Another example is GitHub changing the default branch
               | name from master to main due to their perception that the
               | existence of a master implies the existence of slaves.
        
               | jacoblambda wrote:
               | okay so as much as people like to meme on the whole
               | banning blacklist/whitelist thing, it actually makes
               | things clearer to just say blocklist/allowlist,
               | especially for non-native speakers.
               | 
               | People got grumpy about master/slave being replaced with
               | server/client, superior/subordinate, leader/follower, and
               | similar terms but that actually largely benefits as well
               | in that it makes things clearer. Anyone who has dealt
               | with bus protocols that support the more complex "multi-
               | leader" setups or peer-to-peer setups knows how the
               | master/slave terminology can be confusing and potentially
               | limiting in accurately describing the parts of the
               | system.
               | 
               | And the git master/main thing also is more a matter of
               | just making things easier to pick up. Master can be
               | confusing there for the same reasons it's confusing in
               | bus topologies. Main instead is obvious. It's the
               | main/mainline branch of the project. And that also helps
               | set the divide for main vs feature vs maintenance
               | branches (and release tags).
               | 
               | So yeah some of it was done under the guise of politics
               | but that's generally been more about getting an excuse to
               | make the change without people dismissing it rather than
               | the underlying reason for the change to happen.
        
               | dotnet00 wrote:
               | I tend to not really notice whtever slight
               | cleanliness/communication improvement any of these
               | changes add (this is probably just a me thing).
               | 
               | So, putting politics aside, I don't really care as long
               | as it isn't breaking existing stuff. My only point of
               | contention has been the politics behind some of the
               | pushes.
        
               | kevin_thibedeau wrote:
               | Electronics protocols are getting a newspeak renaming
               | with sometimes humorous results when you see
               | documentation where mass search-and-replace mangled a
               | substring or they forgot to replace the bad words in all
               | caps.
        
               | PhilipRoman wrote:
               | This gem comes to mind: https://github.com/rust-
               | lang/rust/pull/95508/files/76cf1e1e4...
               | 
               | Reads almost like a haiku                    struct Simba
               | {         -    mother: u32,         -    father: u32,
               | +    parent: u32,         +    parent: u32,          }
               | "I don't think this will compile"
        
               | jrockway wrote:
               | 2 fewer characters to type every time you switch
               | branches. I can't complain.
        
               | snapcaster wrote:
               | Aren't blocklist and allowlist strictly better as terms?
               | Black and white (even ignoring the connotations) require
               | at least one level of indirection compared to explicit
               | terms that describe what they are
        
               | nuancebydefault wrote:
               | I don't like the 'bad gateway' Http response. I'd rather
               | it'd find the good way and show me the freakin' website
               | /i
        
               | HanClinto wrote:
               | My guess is it's about client perception (and perhaps
               | even admission of guilt).
               | 
               | My first encounter with this was as a young developer at
               | an electronics manufacturing company. When discussing a
               | request from a customer to change a particular
               | undesirable behavior of the device, I referred to this as
               | a "bug" in an e-mail to them.
               | 
               | I was quickly reprimanded / corrected, with the
               | explanation that -- while "bug" is a somewhat innocuous
               | term to engineers, to non-engineer types it brings to
               | mind a whole host of bad images, fears, and can lead to
               | canceled contracts under the premise that we've delivered
               | bad-faith product. I was initially very resistant to this
               | idea, but I've seen the wisdom in this as I've matured as
               | an engineer over the past 20 years since this run-in.
               | 
               | For a related example, it reminds me of this issue that
               | was opened on llama.cpp by a user who was concerned that
               | the software had been "hacked":
               | 
               | https://github.com/ggerganov/llama.cpp/issues/33#issuecom
               | men...
               | 
               | > Hey, I was reading your Readme.md and I saw that your
               | repo was hacked. I want to ask what this means and wanted
               | to check if the users like me also get the impact of
               | hacking. Or, this is not the thing I should worry about?
               | 
               | Of course, the repo was not hacked -- but the founder of
               | the project mentioned that it had been "hacked together"
               | (as a term of humility / self-deprecation) and some users
               | got the wrong idea of what he meant by that.
               | 
               | So I don't think this is about censorship, so much as
               | good public relations. "Don't spook the horses" -- not
               | all words mean the same things to engineers as people
               | whose perceptions of technology are shaped more by movies
               | and headlines.
        
               | secondcoming wrote:
               | "blacklist" is also blacklisted
        
             | arethuza wrote:
             | I remember reading a great story about someone doing
             | embedded development who was doing something like download
             | firmware onto a device and being told "Checksum is bad"...
             | 
             | After much checking it was realised that this was because
             | the checksum literally was 0xBAD....
        
             | int_19h wrote:
             | In some places, those lists are even more extensive as they
             | include transliterations of profanities in all the various
             | languages the product is ever localized in.
             | 
             | Sometimes this leads to embarrassing issues. I remember one
             | case where a Chinese guy named Hui was unable to make a
             | blog post on his team's official public blog. Turned out
             | that his name was on the list of banned words because of
             | https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%D1%85%D1%83%D0%B9#Russian
        
           | Daviey wrote:
           | Back in 2009, I saw something similar was when a user
           | reported a bug to Ubuntu regarding Pulseaudio[0]. Basically
           | the error messages was:                 $ pulseaudio       W:
           | main.c: D-Bus name org.pulseaudio.Server already taken. Weird
           | shit!
           | 
           | I thought a user facing error message like this is
           | inappropriate, so politely took the issue upstream [1].
           | 
           | Lennart, who I had spent some time with in real life a few
           | months previous, didn't yet have the reputation for being the
           | person he is today. I thought he'd be pretty reasonable about
           | it. Instead he closed the bug as "won't fix" and left the
           | comment, "Sorry, but please don't waste my time, will you?".
           | 
           | I was pretty shocked by his response, I lost a lot of respect
           | for him at this moment and then wrote a long ass blog post
           | about professionalism of developers and appropriate language
           | for user facing error messages.. but still, Lennart tainted
           | himself and showed the person we now know him as. (Also, if
           | you are reading this Lennart, fuck you).
           | 
           | Ubuntu ended up carrying a patch simply to remove this
           | inappropriate language, I never checked if it was eventually
           | cleaned upstream or if other distros also removed it.
           | 
           | EDIT: I just checked, and it was eventually removed in 2011
           | [2]
           | 
           | [0] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug
           | /44...
           | 
           | [1] https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pulseaudio-
           | bugs/2009-...
           | 
           | [2] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/pulseaudio/pulseaudio/-/co
           | mmi...
        
             | homebrewer wrote:
             | What "reputation"? He's disliked by a very loud minority,
             | the rest of us don't care. I will take someone like
             | Poettering who's actively solving decades-long problems
             | over a useless "professional" any day of the week. He's
             | effective _because_ of his bullish personality.
        
               | Daviey wrote:
               | Either you know about his "reputation" or you don't.
               | 
               | Those that have never interacted with him don't care, I
               | agree (I mean, why would they?). But those that have, i'd
               | suggest is a minority that can tolerate him.. but ho-hum,
               | neither of have statistics on this so we'll never know.
               | 
               | When I met and had discussions with him in 2007 he was
               | mild and seemed to be constructive, i'd suggest his
               | "bullish personality" became more prevalent with time.
        
               | majewsky wrote:
               | I met him once in 2012 and ate dinner with him and Kay
               | Sievers. I agree to your observation about "mild" and
               | "constructive", and will extend by saying that he
               | appeared to me as someone fiercely focused on technical
               | challenges. Therefore the "please don't waste my time"
               | bit further up the thread appears to me totally in
               | character for him. Lennart is really similar to Linus
               | pre-2018 in that regard.
        
               | speed_spread wrote:
               | There's no correlation between effectiveness and
               | rudeness. Some people are effective _despite_ being
               | assholes.
        
               | consteval wrote:
               | No, there's a strong correlation between leadership and
               | being bullish. Because in order to get what YOU want done
               | YOU have to advocate for yourself - other people won't
               | advocate for you. Being stubborn is a type of advocacy.
               | 
               | People will claim it's unprofessional, and it is. The
               | problem is that when other's are also unprofessional you
               | can't convince them by being professional.
               | 
               | If you look at who moves up the social ladder fastest and
               | retains their power the longest, they are typically hard-
               | headed people. The have an almost unreasonable amount of
               | confidence in themselves, and in many ways they are
               | delusional.
               | 
               | However, I would argue such a personality is better than
               | being timid. Ultimately, past the computers and the
               | programs we are humans, and human effects come into play.
               | Success is not just measured by correctness; it's
               | measured by perception.
        
               | mistrial9 wrote:
               | there is no simple way to dissect these inter-related
               | statements, but from my point of view, no. Plenty of
               | people here have dealt with serial abusers, which is
               | being defended as "ends justify the means" above
        
               | consteval wrote:
               | To be clear there's a far, far gap between being abusive
               | and being bullish. It's quite immature of you to make
               | that leap and use that to paint me as pro-abuse to
               | discredit my argument.
               | 
               | You could instead provide a real argument, not "well what
               | you say is used to defend abusers!"
               | 
               | Yes, and famously Hitler wanted economic strength for his
               | country. I guess wanting economic strength makes you
               | Hitler? ... wait no, definitely not.
               | 
               | I don't have patience for these weak types of arguments.
               | Saying nothing at all is free and easy, I would look into
               | that more if I were you. Seems more your pace.
        
               | tacitusarc wrote:
               | I find the content of your statements reasonable, but the
               | ad hominem really undercuts the message.
               | 
               | Many years ago, someone replied to me saying, "you're
               | right, but your comment is so abrasive," and that really
               | stuck with me.
               | 
               | Humility and grace can go a long way, even in internet
               | conversations.
        
               | consteval wrote:
               | To be fair, my argument was taken in such a ridiculous
               | and offensive direction I felt it necessary.
               | 
               | It's one thing to think I'm wrong, it's another all
               | together to warp my argument to make me appear crazy. Or
               | pro-abuse. Or whatever. That, to me, isn't in good faith
               | and I quickly lose the motivation to be kind. I work
               | under the assumption the people I talk to aren't stupid,
               | they're aware of what they're doing. I won't extend pity
               | or give people the innocence of a child. In my eyes, that
               | is even more offensive.
        
               | tbrownaw wrote:
               | > _There 's no correlation between effectiveness and
               | rudeness._
               | 
               | Ineffective assholes are nonentities. Therefore all
               | assholes worth noticing are effective, and all
               | ineffective people worth noticing are nice.
               | 
               | I believe there's a name for this effect, but what it is
               | escapes me at the moment.
        
               | toyg wrote:
               | _> Poettering who 's actively solving decades-long
               | problems_
               | 
               | He's doing that only because it's his job: his employer
               | has an agenda (i.e. steering Linux fast enough and
               | disruptively enough at a low level, so that serious
               | competitors cannot arise), and he's implementing that
               | agenda without a care in the world.
               | 
               | Would I personally take such a ruthless mercenary over
               | more community-minded folks? No.
        
             | pbhjpbhj wrote:
             | Based only on your post I'm confused. You better a person
             | for including "weird shit" in an error message. But the on
             | a pubic forum tell them "fuck you".
             | 
             | On the basis of profanity alone, your action seems far
             | worse than their's?
        
               | Daviey wrote:
               | This is a community, not an end user facing error message
               | for a product for the public used by millions of people.
               | 
               | I can use profanity in my communication, but I would
               | never put foul language in an error.. same as I wouldn't
               | in documentation or a formal letter.
               | 
               | Just imagine a pop-up dialogue box on Windows or OSX
               | showing an error with "Weird Shit!" in it. Could you?
        
               | beeboobaa3 wrote:
               | I can, and it'd be pretty funny. Better than "Something
               | went wrong!".
               | 
               | Why does it upset you so?
        
               | Daviey wrote:
               | It wasn't me that raised the original bug, but a user. I
               | didn't say it upsets me, but I do consider it
               | unprofessional for a product.
               | 
               | So tell me, why would it be "funny"? Are you, or have you
               | ever been responsible for content end users might see?
        
               | serf wrote:
               | I don't think it's funny , but I do feel it's entirely
               | more palatable than "WOOPS SOMETHING WENT WRONG
               | <cute_dog_picture.jpg>" scheme that Amazon and other
               | dotcoms use.
               | 
               | Regardless, the Lennart tirade added into the anecdote
               | really just convinces me that the anecdote is there
               | purely for axe-grinding.
        
               | beeboobaa3 wrote:
               | Because it's practically identical to "Something went
               | wrong!" but different and unexpected, which makes it
               | funny. I don't know. Can you really explain what exactly
               | makes something funny?
               | 
               | > Are you, or have you ever been responsible for content
               | end users might see?
               | 
               | Yes. I don't do such things because of curmudgeons like
               | yourself. But as a user I wouldn't mind at all, and think
               | it's funny.
        
               | Izkata wrote:
               | It would be less scary than "...has performed an illegal
               | operation" was to non-technical users.
        
             | sgarland wrote:
             | The larger WTF here is a developer thinking that Linux
             | having audio problems is weird.
        
             | snapcaster wrote:
             | This seems so fragile and prudish. I can't imagine having
             | any other reaction beyond chuckling and moving on
        
         | mattnewton wrote:
         | The strings used for debugging at Google were supposed to
         | include "DO NOT SUBMIT" which, a bot to check for this was
         | added after a debug strings made it to production (It was
         | before my time but I believe it was after the legendary WD
         | incident- "western digital" was remapped to "woodly doodly" in
         | test code that accidentally shipped for those curious)
        
           | riffraff wrote:
           | Was the debug string that made it to production embarrassing?
           | 
           | I remember a swearword appearing in a very big national
           | company login form once, and I'd have felt sorry for the dev
           | if it wasn't so hilarious.
        
             | PetahNZ wrote:
             | Yea, I have seen a very inappropriate debug statement being
             | left in the led to the dev being promptly fired.
        
               | arethuza wrote:
               | I was leading a startup development team in the late 90's
               | and one of our developers told me that some _very_
               | inappropriate test data had been sent to IBM to be
               | included in a product demo and burned onto tens of
               | thousands of discs that they would distribute.
               | 
               | Eventually it turned out that it was the single word
               | "sheep" - which taken out of the relevant alt.* context
               | was pretty harmless.
               | 
               | Talk about a moment when I thought my career had crashed
               | and burned...
        
               | MonkeyClub wrote:
               | > Eventually it turned out that it was the single word
               | "sheep" - which taken out of the relevant alt.* context
               | was pretty harmless.
               | 
               | Please, do contextualize it?
        
               | HaZeust wrote:
               | Likewise; they tried to pin it on me, and I had to go to
               | the Git commit history to show it was another employee.
               | My administrative leave was promptly revoked.
        
             | mattnewton wrote:
             | "Western Digital" was replaced with "Woodly Doodly" on the
             | srp. Not really thag embarassing but I am sure WD didn't
             | appreciate it
        
           | raverbashing wrote:
           | Pro tip: never add a "funny comment" especially an error
           | message that's "never supposed to happen" unless you're happy
           | with that message showing up in a board meeting, in front of
           | your boss or worse (and it being traced back to you)
        
             | mackman wrote:
             | Listen. If it's never supposed to happen then you
             | definitely want a customer to tell you if it happens. Best
             | way to make sure that happens is to insult their mum. It's
             | just good engineering discipline.
        
               | bartread wrote:
               | In my younger and more foolish years I worked for a
               | company called Redgate and, whilst there, I had to do
               | some licensing jiggery pokery that stopped people using
               | our tools if the licensing code had been tampered with or
               | removed.
               | 
               | I didn't want to make it too easy for people trying to
               | crack our tools so, if such a problem were detected, the
               | error message spat out to the console bore no relation to
               | what had gone wrong.
               | 
               | By "bore no relation" I mean the error message would be
               | one of a number of lines of dialogue from a scene in a
               | House episode where House is trying to figure out who
               | Wilson's girlfriend is... which led to this:
               | 
               | https://gist.github.com/gregoryyoung/871736
               | 
               | Yes, Greg Young (the event sourcing guy) ran into an
               | error that said "Because I wanna ask you about your
               | girlfriend. I must know who she is, or you would've told
               | me her name," because he'd moved Smartassembly minus the
               | licensing DLLs. Of course, he didn't realise what he'd
               | done "wrong" so he tweeted it to his considerable
               | following and it went viral.
               | 
               | Because I'm exactly the sort of walking cliche you'd
               | expect I was blissfully unaware of the unfolding drama,
               | being away on sabbatical snowboarding at the time. I
               | hadn't taken my laptop with me, I'd disabled data roaming
               | on my phone to avoid a whopper of a bill after a couple
               | of months away, and had only a gen 1 iPad to access email
               | and internet. So of course I came back in the evening to
               | discover that it had all kicked off, with this ludicrous
               | chain of emails where people were trying to figure out
               | what was going on, until somebody had the sense to go and
               | look in our source control system (which at the time was
               | still svn for most things), and figure out that it was my
               | fault.
               | 
               | People saw the funny side and it wasn't that big a deal
               | but the reason I bring this up is that the last line of
               | dialogue in that scene is, "Your mama," delivered by
               | Wilson to House, and it was also the error message for
               | the final failure scenario I was looking for. I'm glad
               | that one didn't get printed.
        
               | tverbeure wrote:
               | Back in the nineties, 3D Studio used to be pirated by
               | every kid in their dorm and more. The software had
               | license checks all over the place apparently, but
               | crackers tried to remove all of them.
               | 
               | However, if they missed one, it would move a random
               | vertex by some random amount which is obviously very
               | visible when rendering a 3D scene.
               | 
               | When people complained about this on forums (usenet
               | mostly), they outed themselves for using pirated
               | software.
        
               | eastbound wrote:
               | System.exit(0); in Java is probably the most evil thing
               | invented, when the license check fails (preferably launch
               | a thread and do it without stacktrace, after a random
               | time).
               | 
               | To this day I still think Google's motto only referred to
               | "Do no System.exit(0)".
        
               | m3047 wrote:
               | Sadly I mostly agree with this. File it with "the first
               | time people get the password right tell them they failed,
               | making them enter it a second time" and other janky but
               | highly effective stuff.
        
               | eastbound wrote:
               | I believe you can get someone's entire list of passwords
               | this way.
        
             | nicce wrote:
             | I write alot of #![no_std] code in Rust and forgetting
             | debug messages is luckily impossible because compiler won't
             | compile in the end if you forget something.
        
               | mattnewton wrote:
               | The nice thing about DO NOT SUBMIT is that it worked in
               | comments, text protos and other configuration files, and
               | every language.
        
             | Suzuran wrote:
             | I did this once with the deliberate intention that be
             | traceable. Holding down a few keys while clicking on a
             | specific small set of pixels in an application we were
             | developing for a customer would produce a specific message
             | that was attributable to me personally. I did this sort of
             | thing in most things I worked on back then, partially as a
             | "calling card" and partially as a means of being able to
             | prove my involvement in a given product if the need ever
             | arose. This saved our bacon when a sales rep sent an
             | "evaluation" copy of the nearly completed product to the
             | customer, without authorization, that consisted of our
             | entire source tree. (This was the 1990s and we were running
             | MS-DOS, no file security)
             | 
             | Suddenly the customer tells us they have "repurposed" an
             | "internally developed program" and they cancel our
             | contract. The sales rep was upset that he would not be
             | getting a commission on the sale and mentioned that he had
             | "even sent them a demo", which led to the discovery of what
             | had happened. My boss and I went to the customer's site to
             | "finalize the paperwork", and when we were shown the
             | application (which had extremely minor UI changes) I
             | checked if the hidden click spot still worked, and it did!
             | The customer was horrified. My boss was outraged.
             | 
             | We ended up getting paid the full contract amount plus a
             | large bonus in exchange for agreeing not to sue. The sales
             | rep decided to leave voluntarily rather than be fired.
        
               | MonkeyClub wrote:
               | > Holding down a few keys while clicking on a specific
               | small set of pixels
               | 
               | Did you draw inspiration for it from Bullock's The Net
               | (1995) by any chance?
        
               | Suzuran wrote:
               | I don't think so; I don't remember ever seeing it
        
               | jpm_sd wrote:
               | I like the way you phrased this. Maybe someday academics
               | will refer to Bullock's net the same way we talk about
               | Occam's razor, or Maxwell's demon, today.
        
           | smitelli wrote:
           | > "DO NOT SUBMIT"
           | 
           | Kinda verbose, ain't it? Just speaking from my own personal
           | experience, usually when I resort to print-debugging I'm
           | already pretty punchy and more likely to use a quick
           | "ASDFASD" or similar.
        
             | bipson wrote:
             | Yes, but you can check for "DO NOT SUBMIT" with automation.
             | 
             | You can't automate checking for random strings, right?
        
               | neutronicus wrote:
               | Perhaps an abbreviation would be the best of both worlds,
               | and debug strings should be prefixed with "DNS"
               | 
               | You won't need to submit that particular string working
               | at Google, right?
        
               | tetha wrote:
               | We could also have an acronym for the more severe "DO NOT
               | SUBMIT - SECURITY EXPECTATIONS COMPROMISE".
        
               | pixl97 wrote:
               | DNS-SEC...
               | 
               | Confused sysadmins wondering if this is SOX code...
        
               | Tyr42 wrote:
               | The automation which can check for do not submit itself
               | is hard to submit. Or at least updates to it are hard to
               | submit.
        
               | Dylan16807 wrote:
               | forbidden_string = "DO NOT " + "SUBMIT"
               | 
               | Seems easy enough?
        
               | organsnyder wrote:
               | Just disable that particular linting rule (or however
               | it's implemented) in that repo.
        
               | pjerem wrote:
               | Well in the LLM era, you could. I'm not sure you should
               | :)
        
               | trelane wrote:
               | > You can't automate checking for random strings, right?
               | 
               | No, but you can make the string configurable.
        
               | anyonecancode wrote:
               | Related in terms of being easy to search for, I use the
               | abbreviation "TK" as a placeholder for text or incomplete
               | code. Took this from the publishing industry (my partner
               | worked in magazines) -- it's a combination that does not
               | appear in regular English and so is easy to both see and
               | to use search tools for.
        
               | ASUfool wrote:
               | I hope you never built a rooTKit.
        
               | anthk wrote:
               | TK is a semi-well known widget toolkit/GUI toolkit which
               | came from TCL and today it's the default toolkit for
               | Python. Nothing fancy, just basic menues/buttons and
               | widgets, but they get the job done in a hurry.
        
             | EvanAnderson wrote:
             | > > "DO NOT SUBMIT"
             | 
             | > Kinda verbose, ain't it?
             | 
             | I always used the word "doberman" for this purpose. I've
             | never written code for a project that legitimately included
             | the name of a dog variety. A simple grep for "doberman" in
             | the production release CI pipeline catches it. If one ever
             | did slip thru I figured it wouldn't be too offensive to
             | anybody.
        
               | durumu wrote:
               | I've used NOCOMMIT. Less verbose, equally clear.
        
               | domoritz wrote:
               | I'd be scared to spell it with one M or two Ts.
        
               | HaZeust wrote:
               | Not if a layperson comes across it and you miss an
               | omission.
        
               | hotspot_one wrote:
               | depends. If you are paranoid and afraid of dogs, ...
        
             | corobo wrote:
             | I use xyzzy
             | 
             | - Nothing happens
             | 
             | - Easy to find string in code, output, wherever
        
               | medstrom wrote:
               | And in GNU info manuals. https://www.gnu.org/software/ema
               | cs/manual/html_node/elisp/Se... Just so happened to be
               | reading that in the next tab.
        
             | rlpb wrote:
             | XXX is already highlighted by most editors by default (or
             | at least mine) and seems suitable. Any comment to be
             | committed to a shared branch should probably contain more
             | specifics and not contain that, if you wanted to institute
             | a policy.
        
             | twic wrote:
             | I use the strings "XXX" and "999" for this (the latter
             | because you sometimes need a dummy value in a numeric
             | context), and have a global git hook which stops me
             | committing a changeset which includes them.
             | 
             | I occasionally need to override the hook, for example when
             | using mktemp -t, or when some floating-point data actually
             | contains a run of 9s. But mostly, it is quite specific at
             | catching stuff that shouldn't be checked in.
        
             | metrognome wrote:
             | It's about writing code that your peers can read. "DO NOT
             | SUBMIT" is clear as day. "ASDFASD" probably does not mean
             | "this is a debugging string" to most people.
        
             | mattnewton wrote:
             | Not really? it's close to the minimum string you'd be okay
             | with never actually wanting to commit. Never had a problem
             | with it in logs, but it could be in a comment next to the
             | log if you did. Easy enough to add a shortcut for if you
             | really have a problem typing it out, but at my typing speed
             | my brain has always been the bottleneck, not the number of
             | characters.
        
             | names_are_hard wrote:
             | I worked on a codebase that had a special logging function
             | with a name like NoPushLog that was just a direct wrapper
             | of the base log function. A githook checked that this
             | string was not in pushed code.
             | 
             | This solves many of the concerns raised in this thread
             | about readability, automation, avoiding typos in the magic
             | string.
             | 
             | The tricky thing you have to solve is how to push the code
             | that defines the custom logging function, but there are
             | solutions.
        
               | mattnewton wrote:
               | It doesn't allow you to put that in comments, config
               | files or other languages though like a plain text string.
        
               | sneak wrote:
               | Why wouldn't it? Sounds like the git hook is probably
               | just grep...
        
               | mattnewton wrote:
               | Then why have a function?
        
             | default-kramer wrote:
             | I use "NOMERGE" plus the habit of grepping for it before I
             | merge a branch.
        
             | secondcoming wrote:
             | "GOT_HERE_1"
        
             | refulgentis wrote:
             | They pay you enough that you'll respect the need to be
             | professional and write "DO NOT SUBMIT" over "ASDFASD" or
             | similar.
        
           | veunes wrote:
           | It's amazing how many processes evolve because of incidents
           | like these.
        
           | indrora wrote:
           | When I worked as a technical writer earlier in my career, we
           | had a debug/prod check: If you used a series of words it
           | would fail you in prod (refused to build). These were usually
           | codenames of projects and such.
           | 
           | One afternoon, I added the phrase "[Ww]ombo\s[Cc]ombo" (it
           | supported regular expressions) and an expansion set
           | (&prodbomb; evaluated to &wca; &wcb; to create "womb combo")
           | but only in prod. In debug builds, it would produce "Wombat
           | Combat"in bright red text.
           | 
           | This was a useful way to mark pages as "Don't build this in
           | prod yet" - a habit some teams had of just yolo'ing their
           | development branches right into production instead of doing a
           | rebase to main. More than one build was saved by it within a
           | few months.
        
           | thephyber wrote:
           | All of the comments seem to talk about automation for
           | detecting sloppy logging.
           | 
           | Is nobody reviewing code before merging it upstream?
        
             | mattnewton wrote:
             | Belt and suspenders.
             | 
             | Every line was reviewed but that doesn't mean it would be
             | caught every time. And if it's automatable to catch things
             | like this it should be.
        
         | mstade wrote:
         | I did something similar years ago when working on a gambling
         | site where people could upload bets in bulk using specially
         | crafted files.
         | 
         | During development this would sometimes break but only in very
         | specific circumstances, and because they were so absurd and
         | seemingly specific to our local development environment I just
         | added an error message saying "watch and amaze while the
         | application eats itself!" Or something to that effect. It was
         | inspired by an error I saw with the Discworld game for the
         | original PlayStation.
         | 
         | Of course, once this hit production it turns out the det of
         | circumstances necessary to trigger this error wasn't quite as
         | specific as I'd thought, and support was overloaded by hundreds
         | of people calling in to report the error, worried that their
         | money was gone. Of course, people using these feature were high
         | rollers placing very large bets, so management was not happy...
         | 
         | Fortunately I wasn't fired and we fixed the issue very quickly,
         | but man I felt the edge of that sword really close to my neck.
         | It was at one of my first jobs as well nearby 20 years ago. I
         | definitely learned some valuable lessons that week. :o)
        
           | doublerabbit wrote:
           | > I wasn't fired and we fixed the issue very quickly, but man
           | I felt the edge of that sword really close to my neck.
           | 
           | The same experience. I was working for a pornography company
           | and where I was configuring load balancers. I had a test page
           | of semi-naked red deviless with the words "Hello Minion"
           | above her head which I had forgotten to remove.
           | 
           | So during peak times, when the misconfigured LB went active
           | it threw that page to the public, advertisers and the other
           | white labelled websites.
        
             | eru wrote:
             | I feel like given the industry, they should have a higher
             | tolerance for slightly spicy placeholder images?
        
         | varjag wrote:
         | I remember a colleague leaving a debug popup "fuck is wrong
         | with the data" in a product outsourced to us. Naturally it
         | popped during the customer demo, in presence of someone like
         | Germany's minister of something.
         | 
         | We had a good laugh; the dude was fired on the spot tho.
        
           | veunes wrote:
           | It's one of those mistakes that's hilarious in hindsight for
           | everyone except the person responsible
        
         | lexicality wrote:
         | Personally I use the word "MEOW" because a) it's easy to search
         | for and spot in logs b) it will (hopefully) never be a
         | legitimate string in the kind of things I work on c) fairly
         | unlikely to cause offence (unless the customer is a dog)
        
           | SpaceNoodled wrote:
           | BRB grepping our codebase for MEOW
        
           | bendigedig wrote:
           | I use "meow", "woof", and "cheeseburger".
        
           | Tijdreiziger wrote:
           | https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/f/f8/Internet_dog..
           | ..
           | 
           | (alt text: vintage meme depicting two dogs using a computer,
           | captioned 'On the Internet, nobody knows you're a dog.')
        
           | ithinkso wrote:
           | Our testers (China and India) know that when they see KURWA
           | or DUPA in logs that to send it straight to the polish site,
           | we are considering adding a hook to check for those
        
           | ndsipa_pomu wrote:
           | Not a good choice if you refer to "homeowners" in the app
           | though.
        
             | stuartjohnson12 wrote:
             | Wanted to make this comment, scrolled in anxious
             | anticipation hoping no one else had made it yet, sadness
             | washes over me.
        
               | herodoturtle wrote:
               | Hacker news poetry right here.
        
               | Damogran6 wrote:
               | Have an upvote, just the same. (From someone else who's
               | thoughts aren't as original as he'd once thought.)
        
           | coldpie wrote:
           | I use "QWERT", for the same reasons.
        
           | mananaysiempre wrote:
           | Hope you aren't inspecting COM or DCOM data then. Those MEOW
           | all over the place.
           | 
           | > The header of the marshaled object reference begins with a
           | distinguished signature ('MEOW')6 [...].
           | 
           | > 6 A Microsoft Program Manager who shall remain anonymous
           | claims that MEOW stands for _Microsoft Extended Object Wire_
           | representation. The author, while somewhat gullible, is
           | skeptical of this story but is willing to give the
           | aforementioned source the benefit of the doubt.
           | 
           | -- Don Box, _Essential COM_
        
             | dh2022 wrote:
             | MEOW fits in 4 bytes and the string is probably aligned on
             | 4-bytes boundary (being at the start of the reference) So
             | probably not a bad choice for a binary protocol.
        
           | veunes wrote:
           | It has a kind of charm to it. Like leaving your own harmless,
           | personal mark on the code without risking another "I SEE
           | YOU!" moment.
        
         | systems_glitch wrote:
         | Ugh, we had a FNG that did debug things like that at a previous
         | job. His "humor" got exposed to the client several times.
        
         | veunes wrote:
         | This sounds like one of those lessons you never forget - the
         | hard way!
        
         | sensanaty wrote:
         | Lol I remember early in my career using "fuck" and "cock" a lot
         | for debugging. _Very_ quickly learned to not do that, I instead
         | replaced it with  "banana" for the most part
        
           | wraptile wrote:
           | banana has been there with me from the beginning! There's
           | something weirdly satisfying about this particular word - the
           | spelling, the sound and just sheer siliness just has a
           | calming effect.
        
             | twic wrote:
             | And for fine and trace logging, you've got bananana,
             | banananana, etc.
        
               | hermitdev wrote:
               | "ba" + "na" * severity
        
         | VBprogrammer wrote:
         | Yeah, someone did that at a place I once worked with the C-word
         | in some JavaScript debug logs. Never put anything in the code,
         | no matter how temporary, that you would be embarrassed to have
         | appear to a customer.
        
         | goblox9999 wrote:
         | I once did the same except my debug message, created in a
         | punchy mood late at night, was "YOU ARE BEING ATTACKED BY
         | MOTHS." Left that in there and forgot about it until I received
         | a very puzzled debug request months later...
        
         | wonnage wrote:
         | Twitter was working on streaming with chunked encoding, which
         | resulted in this:
         | https://x.com/ryankuder/status/474658110737371136
        
         | jdwithit wrote:
         | I've definitely committed debug messages before. Probably
         | everyone who writes code has at some point. Thankfully it's
         | never been anything TOO embarrassing. These days I try to
         | always do a git diff and search for "print" (or whatever the
         | language equivalent is) before I commit and push as a final
         | sanity check.
         | 
         | In high school, my friend had a habit of titling draft papers
         | something inappropriate. Which was funny when we were peer
         | editing each other. But inevitably, one time he forgot to
         | change it back. We sat down in English class and as the teacher
         | was walking around collecting papers, he glanced down at his
         | and suddenly UH I GOTTA GO TO THE BATHROOM. He sprinted out the
         | door straight to the computer lab and printed off a copy that
         | didn't have a bunch of profanity in 24 point font at the top. I
         | about died laughing.
        
           | bornfreddy wrote:
           | Instead of git diff, you can also use git add -p, which asks
           | you for each change.
        
         | dbmikus wrote:
         | I used to debug with curse words until I accidentally pushed
         | one of those into the company's open source repo and then we
         | went and did some `git push --force` to scrub it from history.
         | 
         | Now I just use my initials at the start of a debug line.
        
         | matheusmoreira wrote:
         | I gotta ask... Is the patient alright?
        
         | FuckButtons wrote:
         | I just have a snippet that prints "DEBUG", easy to grep for.
        
         | Philadelphia wrote:
         | I always use "elephant" as my debugging statement, since it's
         | unlikely to come up in the code and easy to search for when you
         | need to remove it, and also pretty innocuous. If you're writing
         | software for zoos, you might want to try something else,
         | though.
        
       | hirsin wrote:
       | It's not my first time seeing this, but I'm struck by some
       | disappointment in the legacy of OSS here. The author clearly
       | understood what was happening enough to post this to the unix SO
       | - but not enough to find the `man` code and grep for the string
       | that had to be present? I'll admit I don't immediately know where
       | to go to look for the source code, but I can't imagine it's some
       | tightly held secret address to a file share somewhere.
       | 
       | Alternatively - maybe it wasn't the difficulty of finding it but
       | the (perceived?) difficulty in requesting that it be changed?
       | 
       | E - maybe the likely alternative is the "the customer has nukes
       | so please fix it" entitlement?
       | https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95644#c4
        
         | jdnbndhxb wrote:
         | It's a nice anecdote, don't think too much about it
        
           | MiguelX413 wrote:
           | No.
        
         | strken wrote:
         | I don't see Bill as doing anything wrong here. Given that he
         | works for Cray on their own Fortran compiler, it seems
         | reasonable that he would be allowed to report bugs in the
         | competing product gfortran but not allowed to actually fix fix
         | them, and that he would ask a question knowing full well that
         | the answer would be "fuck you, pay me" just to be able to
         | truthfully report that back up the chain.
         | 
         | The nuclear-armed _client_ seems entitled, but I don 't think
         | he necessarily is.
        
           | eloisant wrote:
           | Nukes or not, telling open source developers "the customer is
           | asking for it" twice is either entitled or very ignorant.
        
             | coldpie wrote:
             | I spent years working on open source and I disagree.
             | Politely nudging bugs is fine. Sometimes things fall
             | through the cracks, and a quick prod will get someone's
             | attention to take the time to go fix it. We do actually
             | want to fix bugs for our users, after all. It is very easy
             | to nudge bugs impolitely, so do this with extreme caution,
             | but I don't think Bill stepped over the line in that issue.
        
         | gavindean90 wrote:
         | What does this have to do with the link?
        
       | krick wrote:
       | I hate such "jokes" so much. I just need to say it. Obviously, me
       | saying that won't change anything, I don't even believe there is
       | a minor possibility that anyone reading this may remember it in
       | the future and know better than doing something like that, but,
       | really, I hate it so, so, so much. As if there's not enough semi-
       | intended weird behaviors in all our systems. Of course, I won't
       | pretend that I believe that if not for the things like that we
       | could live in a world where technology actually exists to save
       | our time, not to spend more time on maintaining technology. What
       | a silly idea. The majority of people on this forum only exist to
       | maintain the technology.
       | 
       | But still, there's no more mind-numbing, infuriating, exhausting
       | feeling, than to find out that a thing you were debugging for the
       | last hour was supposed to be a "fun little joke". Fun? You know
       | what's fun: when stuff just works. That's about the most fun
       | thing there is.
        
         | tuyiown wrote:
         | You're so intense about it, I just want that there would be
         | more right now !
         | 
         | Generally people make way to much assumption about software
         | behavior <<just work>> is easily confused with <<works as I
         | personally expected>>
         | 
         | You're assuming too much, expecting too much, and get
         | frustrated. I don't think you deserve it, but I don't think you
         | have the right mindset about it either.
        
           | ozim wrote:
           | Let's not downvote the guy to oblivion.
           | 
           | He is somewhat right. I think Easter eggs belong in computer
           | games and user facing stuff like website or online forum.
           | 
           | There shouldn't be jokes in something like man or grep.
        
             | tuyiown wrote:
             | Yes, he and you should not be downvoted, I agree, I fully
             | understand how one can want to never be bothered by others
             | playfulness.
             | 
             | But I'm in the team that software is made by people, and
             | that should be reflected. Jokes, like always, must be
             | respectful to strangers, and strangers have to be polite
             | and allow others to express themselves, jokes are not a
             | trap.
             | 
             | There definitely should be jokes in man and grep, it's just
             | have to be of good taste (this one was good). We're not in
             | a high stake diplomatic field. Removing all the jokes by
             | principle is just giving in to the great consensus leveler
             | that crushes humanity. Embrace humanity, don't crush it.
        
             | aniviacat wrote:
             | Is man not user facing?
        
               | ozim wrote:
               | If we define users as a subset of all users - by gamers
               | and people who only visit websites or use web apps.
               | 
               | But I expected it could be inferred from my post.
        
         | travisjungroth wrote:
         | > The majority of people on this forum only exist to maintain
         | the technology.
         | 
         | That's quite a belief and would certainly affect how you
         | perceive easter eggs.
        
         | RHSman2 wrote:
         | Nothing more frustrating than being so offended, so easily.
        
         | pantulis wrote:
         | It depends on the particular easter egg. In this case, well,
         | printing "gimme gimme gimme" after midnight is not that hard to
         | catch and from what I understand it doesn't affect the basic
         | functionality. I prefer to think of it as a kind reminder that
         | software is written by humans, at least from the time being.
        
         | _V_ wrote:
         | Software bugs out sometimes. You cannot assume that everything
         | will work as you expect even without easter eggs like this.
         | 
         | If this triggers you so much then maybe, just maybe you chose
         | the wrong career path. You know, all that "if you can't stand
         | the heat, get out of kitchen. If you can't stand the debugging,
         | ...." ;-)
        
         | wodenokoto wrote:
         | HN is obviously not where you'll find people sympathetic to
         | this point of view, but in the grander scheme of things, the
         | no-Easter-eggs attitude won out
        
           | appendix-rock wrote:
           | The no-Easter-egg attitude 'won out'c sure. There's not much
           | else you can conclude from that, though. Not even that it's
           | the popular opinion.
        
         | keybored wrote:
         | This is OSS. So it is impossible to have a rational discussion
         | on it here--OSS has the halo of No Warranties And If You
         | Complain You Are Entitled. Including intentionally adding
         | things that turn to break things in the most puzzling,
         | Heisenbug-looking way.[1]
         | 
         | [1] It doesn't work after midnight???
        
       | thih9 wrote:
       | Note that it's no longer there.
       | 
       | > The developer of the man-db, Colin Watson, decided that there
       | was enough fun and the story won't get forgotten and removed the
       | easter egg completely.
       | 
       | https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/man-db.git/commit/?id=b225...
        
         | m463 wrote:
         | I just tried it on an old raspberry pi and it is there. (based
         | on debian 9 stretch)
        
           | blahyawnblah wrote:
           | You can't really expect that old of a version of Debian to be
           | up to date
        
           | thih9 wrote:
           | This can be your reason to update to a non-EOL system.
        
             | m463 wrote:
             | or the humorous reason not to bother. :)
             | 
             | (lol, this is not a mission critical, internet connected
             | system)
        
               | thih9 wrote:
               | Looks like you're fine with not getting updates, you get
               | to enjoy the easter egg then.
        
         | cyptus wrote:
         | at a discussion about this issue i read a comment which i cant
         | find right now but was very beautiful. It was saying that we
         | should keep easter eggs like this, because in the end this is
         | what differs us humans from machines.
        
           | Cthulhu_ wrote:
           | Which is valid. But it's also valid that certain systems
           | should work consistently and reliably. I mean in this case it
           | seems mostly harmless, but in a hypothetical scenario a
           | hacker needs to fix the production system of a hospital after
           | a major disaster but needs to look up the docs for a command
           | aaand... "gimme gimme gimme" shows up. No internet either.
           | 
           | I'm all for easter eggs (and haven't added one in forever,
           | maybe unit test test strings), but they shouldn't interfere
           | with regular operation. This particular one could've been
           | updated to only trigger for a certain command, for example.
        
             | thih9 wrote:
             | > in a hypothetical scenario a hacker needs to fix the
             | production system of a hospital after a major disaster but
             | needs to look up the docs for a command aaand... "gimme
             | gimme gimme" shows up. No internet either.
             | 
             | I thought the easter egg only occurs when man is called
             | without arguments.
        
             | itsoktocry wrote:
             | > _but in a hypothetical scenario a hacker needs to fix the
             | production system of a hospital after a major disaster but
             | needs to look up the docs for a command aaand... "gimme
             | gimme gimme" shows up._
             | 
             | What obligation does a developer/maintainer have in this
             | situation? If the hospital is using free/open source code,
             | it's on them to understand how it works and how to fix it.
        
             | chgs wrote:
             | this ain't the movies bruv
        
             | bongodongobob wrote:
             | Then fork it and maintain it yourself, that's the beauty.
        
           | umanwizard wrote:
           | I'm sure I'm a human and not a machine. I even enjoy art and
           | humor. But I think Easter eggs are cringey and not funny in
           | the vast majority of cases.
           | 
           | It's just a difference in personality. Claiming that liking
           | Easter eggs is the essence of humanity is a pretty extreme
           | exaggeration.
        
             | K0balt wrote:
             | You need to report to lizard HQ to get your personality
             | simulator recalibrated immediately. You are risking
             | exposing all of us.
        
             | itsoktocry wrote:
             | > _Claiming that liking Easter eggs is the essence of
             | humanity is a pretty extreme exaggeration._
             | 
             | Claiming that the parent claimed that easter eggs are "the
             | essence of humanity" is an extreme exaggeration.
        
               | fkyoureadthedoc wrote:
               | Not surprising coming from someone trying to bully people
               | out of doing something they like by calling it cringe
               | though.
        
               | umanwizard wrote:
               | I'm not trying to bully anyone out of or into doing
               | anything. Just expressing an opinion.
        
       | Sparkyte wrote:
       | Easter eggs like this show the quality of the work. Very charming
       | and awesome!
        
       | larodi wrote:
       | Coding must be fun, using code too. Guys did right. This whole
       | idea of opensource having to be coldstone serious is only because
       | of corporations running it. But you see, when a program is being
       | written by myself and my brov, I'd put easter eggs all over it,
       | just ot remind people there were people on the other end of the
       | line.
        
         | Etheryte wrote:
         | Yeah, definitely agreed, there's few things as fun and
         | satisfying as a well hid easter egg. Doubly so if what you're
         | working on is surrounded by a lot of red tape. My personal
         | favorite is a Rick Roll I managed to hide in the source code of
         | a government application I helped fix years ago on a consulting
         | gig. The only way you'd find it is if you're a developer
         | working on a very specific subsystem, but if you do find it,
         | you'll know why it's there from the context.
        
         | bauerd wrote:
         | >I'd put easter eggs all over it, just ot remind people there
         | were people on the other end of the line
         | 
         | Most people won't come across your Easter egg since it's
         | hidden. The ones that do encounter it will likely stumble over
         | it, as did the OP, who had their CI pipeline broken. I think
         | easter eggs are a poor tool to "remind people there were people
         | on the other end of the line".
         | 
         | Edit: at least outside of entertainment software
        
           | fkyoureadthedoc wrote:
           | Oh no, anything but the pipeline run!
        
           | mrguyorama wrote:
           | If your build pipeline depends on "man -w" and you don't work
           | on man, the easter egg wasn't the problem.
        
             | rendall wrote:
             | Agreed. I'm really trying but failing to come up with a
             | non-screwed-up scenario where this Easter egg legitimately
             | breaks a well-planned testing suite.
        
             | Denvercoder9 wrote:
             | I guess you could have an integration test that validates
             | that your installer puts the man pages in a directory that
             | man searches in? It's a bit far-fetched but also not
             | entirely outlandish.
        
           | Nifty3929 wrote:
           | This! Is it illegal to have a sense of humor or something?
           | Must everything be serious, when the consequences are
           | essentially zero?
           | 
           | Some of these old easter eggs are great, and I don't think we
           | do enough of that anymore.
        
         | morning-coffee wrote:
         | One man's funny easter egg is another man's non-deterministic
         | trigger for errant behavior in their workflow with possible
         | real-world consequences, I suppose...
         | 
         | Yet another reason I have a hard time trusting software that is
         | the product of integrating many disparate pieces with different
         | engineering processes into something used in any life-safety or
         | mission-critical application.
        
           | kibwen wrote:
           | If you want serious software, then pay for it.
           | 
           | If you want free-as-in-beer software, you'll take what I give
           | you, easter eggs and all.
           | 
           | Anything else is just entitlement.
        
             | chgs wrote:
             | Absolutely, if you're precious about it review the code,
             | remove the lines, and away you go.
             | 
             | Your pipeline will error with an unexpected result from
             | man, you can grep the man code for "gimme" and remove it in
             | 2 minutes, far quicker than reading a man page.
             | 
             | I miss the Linux world of the 90s before all the money
             | grabbers came. I accept I'm in a tiny minority, and that
             | would be fine. Sadly corporate interests overwhelm the
             | ecosystem now.
        
             | retsibsi wrote:
             | You can have, and share, opinions about a thing without
             | feeling that you're 'entitled' to have it conform to your
             | wishes! I'll take it or leave it, but I'll also feel free
             | to say what I think about it (within bounds of politeness
             | and decency).
        
             | Ekaros wrote:
             | I wonder how many paid for Linux distributions patched this
             | out? As surely they have reviewed all pieces of code for
             | exactly this sort of malicious behaviour.
        
             | __MatrixMan__ wrote:
             | I have skepticism for anything that has a free/paid tier.
             | The reduced functionality version has typically been gimped
             | in a way that doesn't make much sense. You end up with
             | cases where the button for the paid functionality is just
             | missing so users don't even know that the thing is
             | possible... and other such problems. It ends up feeling
             | rather 1984. But I'd respect a maintainer who had a paid
             | tier which differed in some kind of goofy way:
             | 
             | - the free version does something goofy at 11:11, but works
             | fine otherwise
             | 
             | - the paid version is identical to the free version, but it
             | doesn't do anything goofy at 11:11
             | 
             | Of course it would be trivial to just do this:
             | if time.now() == time(hours=11, minutes=11):
             | sleep(60)             freeversion()
             | 
             | But if you've got a pipeline which absolutely must not fail
             | then you should probably be paying the maintainer. Hacking
             | around the easter egg would hopefully feel enough like an
             | admission of guilt to just talk your boss into paying.
        
           | Denvercoder9 wrote:
           | > non-deterministic trigger
           | 
           | This easter egg was entirely deterministic, though.
        
       | tempestn wrote:
       | Anyone have a hypothesis why there would be a test that calls man
       | without arguments? Is the goal just to check that man is
       | installed? Even so, you'd think you'd test the command as it's
       | normally used...
        
         | Ekaros wrote:
         | Automated test that verifies something like just build image
         | installs correctly and man produces expected output?
        
         | kevincox wrote:
         | Reading the answer it seems that the easter egg accidentally
         | also triggered if you pass the page to load via --path. This
         | was then fixed later (and then even later the whole easter egg
         | was removed).
        
         | caymanjim wrote:
         | I'm pretty sure the Stack Overflow question was contrived
         | nonsense just so the other dude could tell his story in public.
        
         | int_19h wrote:
         | It's discussed extensively in the comments on the linked SO
         | question. The short answer:
         | 
         | > Because we wanted the "manpath" - 'man -w'
        
       | thrdbndndn wrote:
       | After reading the whole thing there seems to be no explanation
       | why it was changed from 0001 to 0030?
        
         | ARandomerDude wrote:
         | > Let's mention that the initial commit triggered at 12:01am. A
         | followup commit changed that to 12:30am with the commit log
         | message "half past twelve" which is again quoted from the same
         | song
        
           | winwang wrote:
           | But 12:30am is 30 past twelve!
        
         | blipvert wrote:
         | Check the lyrics
        
       | martypitt wrote:
       | What a lovely, civil exchange. (I hope that the tone on the
       | socials at the time was just as civil).
       | 
       | Developer plants an easter egg. It was a good one ... and it was
       | a reasonable assumption it wasn't gonna break anything. Several
       | people have a good chuckle. Someone gets affected negatively by
       | it, so the developer says, "fair play, that wasn't the intent,
       | let's remove it". Everyone hugs it out and moves on.
       | 
       | I have no idea if this was the full story, or if his Twitter was
       | aflame with negativity, but I imagine if this happened today, the
       | tone would be much more combative than the exchange on the Stack
       | Overflow page (eg: this HN thread, which is full of 'Easter Eggs
       | Bad! Bugs!') -- which is a real shame.
       | 
       | If humour be the bugs of life, play on.
        
         | klez wrote:
         | Consider that SE comments are heavily moderated. Unfortunately
         | if you read the chat linked in the comments (which got moved
         | from the comments section) it's everything but fun and games.
         | Also apparently the developer who suggested the feature had to
         | set their twitter to private because he was getting bashed for
         | this.
        
           | bradley13 wrote:
           | That's a shame, but (sadly) not unexpected. Humorous people
           | who take themselves far too seriously. The negativity was
           | explained decades ago by the "Greater Internet Fuckwad
           | Theory". Sadly, things have not improved.
        
         | mjmsmith wrote:
         | Stack Exchange comments are where humor goes to die^H^H^Hbe
         | moved to chat.
        
       | tlrobinson wrote:
       | > Fixed in master: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/man-
       | db.git/commit/?id=84bd...
       | 
       | Waiting for the bug report that the fix broke someone's workflow.
       | https://xkcd.com/1172/
        
       | rcarmo wrote:
       | Oh man. I read the title and had immediate ABBA flashbacks, which
       | I think kind of dates me...
        
         | noja wrote:
         | Read the article...
        
       | BLKNSLVR wrote:
       | Almost totally off topic, but I love the scenario.
       | 
       | Great song to roller disco to. Great beat, great build up. Prior
       | to taking up roller skating (inline) I wouldn't have given the
       | song much credence, but I get a little surge of adrenaline just
       | thinking about having weaved through crowds of noobs with this
       | song pumping.
        
       | varelaz wrote:
       | I'm against easter eggs, at least right now. First of all not of
       | them are harmless, can you make sure that it wouldn't break
       | anything important, would it tolerate race, religion, gender and
       | after all of these would it remain fun? It's hard to be
       | responsible and fun in the same time.
        
         | 9dev wrote:
         | Well... I find your conclusion a bit sad, and turned upside
         | down. Instead of banning all things fun for fear of
         | misstepping, maybe it's time to take things less personally, be
         | more tolerant towards others, and push for positive change
         | instead of trying to punish others for not being "aware"
         | enough?
        
           | varelaz wrote:
           | I'm not trying to punish others, I just don't find it fun
           | anymore with all respect to everyone who keeps up. Before it
           | was naive and simple, right now it just more complicated,
           | often looks commercialized or not appropriate.
        
             | 9dev wrote:
             | I didn't mean to imply you personally aim to punish others,
             | but that we should collectively strive to foster a culture
             | of positivity rather than instilling fear of offending
             | others, until people say nothing at all anymore (or say a
             | lot that doesn't _mean_ anything).
        
         | _V_ wrote:
         | Why on Earth would jokes have to "tolerate" race, religion and
         | gender or anything else? The point of (some) jokes is to
         | challenge anything and everything you deem to be a norm.
         | 
         | I'm starting to think that many tolerance-preaching people are
         | the most intolerant bunch by far.
        
           | illys wrote:
           | Well, my 2-cent is that you can laugth of everything but not
           | with everybody... So defying the norms with Easter Eggs sent
           | to the wild can be an issue. You have to know your audience
           | to properly chose your level of impertinence.
        
             | _V_ wrote:
             | I completely agree with the first sentence - however I
             | would argue that normal, level-headed and sane person
             | either laughs or just shrugs and moves on if that
             | particular joke is not to their taste.
        
         | aniviacat wrote:
         | Is the Google "Minecraft" easter egg intolerant of gender?
         | 
         | Easter eggs can certainly be problematic when used in APIs (or
         | similar) where access is intended to be automated (and
         | therefore vulnerable to surprises).
         | 
         | But in user facing code, easter eggs are perfectly fine.
        
           | varelaz wrote:
           | Is it just a marketing tool of a mega-corp which tries to
           | look nicer and engage you more?
        
             | aniviacat wrote:
             | I don't know what your point is.
             | 
             | Yes, Google is a corporation and yes, Google tries to build
             | a product people want to use.
             | 
             | (Building things that people like is a good thing.)
        
               | varelaz wrote:
               | I don't say it's bad. It's commercialized experiense and
               | it's cool if you love it. I just wouldn't treat it the
               | same as devs fun of hiding things for valuable user who
               | loves their product and I'm talking from dev prospective,
               | not user.
        
             | ARandomerDude wrote:
             | I'm sure some companies use easter eggs as
             | marketing/recruiting tools.
             | 
             | That said, I've put a small number of user-facing easter
             | eggs in publicly-traded MegaCorp code before. In every
             | case, it was an inside joke among devs that the higher-ups
             | never knew about it. The C-Suite is uptight and we
             | definitely would have been reprimanded if they were aware.
        
           | chuckadams wrote:
           | It's an _Easter_ egg, so clearly it 's intolerant of other
           | religions!
        
       | w4rh4wk5 wrote:
       | Obligatory meme https://www.youtube.com/shorts/KXonMpe4hr8
        
       | sebstefan wrote:
       | I feel like you can trust `man` to give you exit codes that make
       | sense if you want to determine whether it exited correctly or not
       | 
       | It's always shakey to use the length of `stderr` for that
        
       | lockedinspace wrote:
       | Love these easter eggs, makes you not forget we are all humans
        
         | veunes wrote:
         | Exactly! They're like the bloopers of the tech world
        
       | moatel wrote:
       | At 10:31 does it print "man man man"?
        
       | sirsinsalot wrote:
       | I know someone who was on a team whose proprietary software was
       | decompiled and it still contained the code comments.
       | 
       | They were made public. They were horrific. Assume all code may
       | become public.
        
         | jajko wrote:
         | Depending on language/compiler this is normal, ie Java
         | decompiled will contain all comments.
         | 
         | Idiots using nasty comments or test data and then this leaking
         | to management or users is nothing new, always a fireable
         | offense showing immature behavior and lack of professionalism,
         | something any company desperately need in software devs.
        
           | trashburger wrote:
           | Bet you're real fun at parties.
        
       | elif wrote:
       | Did ANYONE have "automated man calls" on their devops bingo card?
       | 
       | I still don't understand what they were trying to accomplish...
        
         | 4gotunameagain wrote:
         | If you read the linked question, they say that they were
         | testing the output of "man -w" which prints the path of man
         | pages.
         | 
         | I can easily see that as a test for deployment image generation
         | where you want to fiddle with the available man pages and test
         | whether they will be accessible.
        
         | dbtablesorrows wrote:
         | I can imagine using man to generate random but realistic text
         | in a test.
         | 
         | MANROFFSEQ= MANPAGER=cat man sprintf
        
       | xattt wrote:
       | I had a QNAP Celeron NAS where I installed Ubuntu because it was
       | out of support.
       | 
       | The trouble was that it threw a kernel panic at certain times of
       | the day. I troubleshooted it to no end - reinstalled Linux, did
       | an EFI update. I chalked it up to something I did because I was
       | running 16 GB of RAM when QNAP said max RAM was 8 GB.
       | 
       | Fast forward to this year, and it fails to load up completely.
       | 
       | It turned out that it was a silicon degradation bug that was a
       | problem with J1900 devices.
       | 
       | I wasted so much time over the years trying to troubleshoot
       | something that I could not fix...
        
         | bluedino wrote:
         | The best part of stuff like this is all of the other stuff you
         | fixed that you didn't know were broken or wrong, and all the
         | things you learned along the way
        
         | userbinator wrote:
         | There is a hardware workaround for those. Involves a little bit
         | of soldering.
        
       | sambeau wrote:
       | If your software is free and the maintainers aren't getting paid
       | then a few Easter eggs are a small price to pay.
       | 
       | Colin was being paid, of course, but not primarily for
       | maintaining man.
       | 
       | Having said that, I once worked at a company (incidentally one
       | where Colin worked, though after he'd left to join Ubuntu) where
       | a developer added a line to the T&Cs that meant that a user
       | granted their soul to the company. The intention was to check if
       | the execs/legals checked the T&Cs like they promised to. They did
       | not. Many souls were captured.
        
         | eastbound wrote:
         | It could make the entire T&C invalid.
        
           | alanbernstein wrote:
           | Why, is the soul an established legal concept? Or just the
           | fact that nobody checked the thing?
        
             | opello wrote:
             | Presumably if the T&C didn't have a severability clause the
             | impossible soul capturing part could be argued to
             | invalidate the entirety.
        
               | lolinder wrote:
               | Do any T&Cs _not_ have a severability clause? I 'm not a
               | lawyer and have written exactly one semi-legal document
               | ever, but even I knew to put one of those in.
        
             | eastbound wrote:
             | No, it's the fact that someone is joking in the ToS, proves
             | that no-one can take it seriously. It would require a
             | phrase like "If any term is considered invalid, it doesn't
             | invalidate the others", but even this sentence is not
             | always applicable.
        
       | unethical_ban wrote:
       | I don't think the minority opinion would have won out of it
       | weren't for social media.
        
       | karaterobot wrote:
       | More easter eggs please, not fewer.
        
       | kunley wrote:
       | Pity the author removed it
        
         | justin66 wrote:
         | _This joke only three people are ever going to see is fucking
         | up somebody 's automated tests but I'm going to leave it in
         | anyway_ seems like it would have been a poor approach to take.
        
           | kunley wrote:
           | I will raise a glass of wine for the good impressions of
           | whoever at 0:30am is taking care of automated tests instead
           | of a glass of wine.
           | 
           |  _kidding_ , but also: please get the perspective..
        
             | justin66 wrote:
             | > please get the perspective..
             | 
             | There are certainly different points of view here.
             | 
             | I'd immediately take the easter egg out because I just
             | assume if I hear about a bug once, I'm going to hear about
             | it again. The selfish reason to fix any bug ASAP: it's an
             | easy way to make life easier for my future self.
             | 
             | And yeah, also, why fuckup someone else's tests needlessly.
             | 
             | > I will raise a glass of wine for the good impressions of
             | whoever at 0:30am is taking care of automated tests instead
             | of a glass of wine.
             | 
             |  _Automated_ tests.
        
               | kunley wrote:
               | Are you serious?
               | 
               | I mean, are you writing automated tests of /usr/bin/man ?
        
               | justin66 wrote:
               | I'm reacting to a Stack Overflow comment that begins
               | "We've noticed that some of our automatic tests fail when
               | they run at 00:30 but work fine the rest of the day."
               | 
               | I don't know what you're doing.
        
       | jll29 wrote:
       | Got a good laugh out of this post, thanks.
        
       | dang wrote:
       | Related:
       | 
       |  _Why does man print "gimme gimme gimme" at 00:30? (2017)_ -
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27994194 - July 2021 (211
       | comments)
       | 
       |  _Why does man print "gimme gimme gimme" at 00:30?_ -
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15747313 - Nov 2017 (159
       | comments)
       | 
       |  _Why does man print "gimme gimme gimme" at 00:30?_ -
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15746972 - Nov 2017 (1
       | comment)
       | 
       |  _Why does man print "gimme gimme gimme" at 00:30?_ -
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15742221 - Nov 2017 (1
       | comment)
        
       | waynecochran wrote:
       | The ABBA song instantly came into my mind the second I saw it --
       | I am truly a child of the 80's.
        
       | feralchimp wrote:
       | "gimme gimme gimme" from man after midnight, you say?
        
       | joemi wrote:
       | I set up FreePBX at my work when we got rid of our old phone
       | system. We don't need a lot of extensions, so I just used 1xx,
       | 2xx, and 3xx for difference types of extensions and had plenty of
       | numbers leftover for future purposes with those. So I figured to
       | add a little easter egg if anyone ever calls the 666 extension:
       | it plays a clip of Vincent Price's terrifying laugh from the end
       | of Michael Jackson's Thriller.
       | 
       | Well, a year or two after I set that up, I got a text early one
       | morning from a coworker who said the phones must have been hacked
       | because they're not working right and whenever they try to call
       | anywhere they hear a scary voice. When I took a look, it turned
       | out that something went wrong somehow and all calls were getting
       | forwarded to the last extension I added, which was 666. Needless
       | to say, people weren't amused by my intended easter egg and felt
       | insulted by the laughter.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-10-04 23:00 UTC)