[HN Gopher] William Cowper and the Age of the Earth [pdf] (2019)
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       William Cowper and the Age of the Earth [pdf] (2019)
        
       Author : hwayne
       Score  : 15 points
       Date   : 2024-10-02 20:50 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.charlespetzold.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.charlespetzold.com)
        
       | theodorejb wrote:
       | Why did people assume that strata were deposited over eons and
       | represent different ages? Many of these layers can be viewed in
       | the Grand Canyon, and there is a notable lack of erosion between
       | them. As I see it, these paraconformities are a strong evidence
       | that there were not large gaps of time between the strata - they
       | must have been laid down rapidly over a relatively short period
       | (e.g. by a great flood).
        
         | 082349872349872 wrote:
         | You could start with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stratigraphy
         | and go from there.
         | 
         | For the upper bound:
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clair_Cameron_Patterson#Measur...
        
         | pushcx wrote:
         | TalkOrigins.org has many detailed rebuttals to creationist
         | lies. This one hybridizes two topics, or maybe it's a garbled
         | version of CD210.
         | 
         | Grand Canyon: https://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CH/CH581.html
         | https://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/icr-science.html
         | https://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CD/CD210.html
         | 
         | Erosion: https://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CD/CD610.html
         | https://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CD/CD620.html
        
         | cossatot wrote:
         | It was assumed (correctly) by not long after Cowper's time that
         | the strata were of different ages because of the different
         | fossil assemblages in them, but of course no one had any data-
         | derived numbers to put on the different eras.
         | 
         | Furthermore, there is abundant evidence for erosion between
         | many of the layers in the Grand Canyon, and they don't look
         | anything like flood deposits, which are generally chaotic
         | (unsorted, discontinuous bedding, etc) because of the high
         | energy in the environment during deposition. Paraconformities
         | indicate a cessation of deposition, which is often accompanied
         | by erosion. They are 'para' conformities not because of the gap
         | in time between the layers, but because there wasn't major
         | deformation of the Earth's crust during that time (this means
         | substantial tectonic activity), which would cause regional
         | tilting of the lower (older) rocks. Throughout much of the
         | middle of the country, there are young sediments deposited in a
         | paraconformable relationship on top of rocks that are 400
         | million years old (making up the surficial bedrock of the
         | region), because there hasn't been major tectonic activity in
         | the region since those 400 million year old rocks were
         | deposited (and indeed, for close to a billion years before that
         | in much of the midcontinent).
        
       | PeterWhittaker wrote:
       | As much as I like poetry, why do we attribute to a poet that
       | which we owe to a most observant and introspective canal digger
       | who felt free to question dogma and received wisdom?
       | 
       | William Smith deserves so much of our respect. Cf, e.g.,
       | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Map_that_Changed_the_Wor...,
       | which summarizes the most excellent book.
        
         | pushcx wrote:
         | We don't. The article explains and credits the scientific
         | research that the poet is referring to. And to answer your
         | question a second way: because that research came decades
         | earlier than Smith's work.
        
       | alamortsubite wrote:
       | Slightly OT, but Cowper street in Palo Alto is named after
       | William Cowper. So a fun shibboleth (and as OP points out) is
       | that the name is pronounced KOO-per.
        
       | sgt101 wrote:
       | My uncle believed in bible chronology. He believed it so much
       | that he learned to program computers (to calculate and explore
       | patterns in dates) and then built a series of web sites
       | culminating in https://www.biblechronology.com/
       | 
       | When he died he had assembled a team of people who worked on it.
       | The site is now suffering from a bit of rot (the videos don't
       | serve anymore) but he has been dead for six years so I suppose
       | that's no surprise. I don't know if his "gang" still maintain it,
       | but someone must be paying for the domain and hosting I suppose.
       | 
       | The time and energy he committed to this are astonishing to me,
       | he was a talented man - he had the option to be a partner at
       | Arthur Anderson (progenitor of Accenture) before becoming a CFO
       | at a series of small banks and building societies. His career was
       | firmly on the up, he worked for one of the precursors of what
       | became RBS in the 1980's. If things had gone differently perhaps
       | he would have muzzled "Fred the Shred" and we'd all be the
       | richer, especially his kids. But, at some point a conviction and
       | faith gripped him and he gave up everything for his bible
       | project. He died penniless.
       | 
       | I wonder, because I don't understand, because I just see
       | numerology and over interpretation, does it mean he was wrong? I
       | think so, but perhaps that's just my faith talking.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-10-03 23:01 UTC)