[HN Gopher] End of an era: Landsat 7 mission takes final images
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       End of an era: Landsat 7 mission takes final images
        
       Author : Qqqwxs
       Score  : 76 points
       Date   : 2024-09-26 21:13 UTC (1 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.usgs.gov)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.usgs.gov)
        
       | tiffanyh wrote:
       | In the Las Vegas slider, the Lake Mead before/after difference is
       | startling.
        
         | Dalewyn wrote:
         | I'm more intrigued at the increased green of the landscape at
         | large, did the water supply actually improve to encourage more
         | plant growth?
        
           | stouset wrote:
           | The diminishing quantities of blue stuff got put on the brown
           | stuff to turn it into green stuff.
        
             | eep_social wrote:
             | By people, in case that isn't clear.
        
       | Yawrehto wrote:
       | It seems like a lot of these government-owned space things last a
       | lot longer than they're made for. There's Landsat, Spirit,
       | Opportunity, Hubble, the Voyagers, et cetera. It seems to be a
       | pretty steep curve - either they fail on launch or landing or
       | very early, or they far outlast expectations. There seems to be
       | little that meets expectations. I can see lots of failures -
       | space stuff is hard - but why so many things exceeding it?
        
         | conception wrote:
         | The engineering to get it to last a year probably isn't
         | significantly different from five years, etc.
        
         | wongarsu wrote:
         | They build and design everything in a way that ensures a 99%
         | chance that after successful launch and deployment it will last
         | for the mission duration in a harsh and still somewhat
         | unfamiliar environment. That happens to translate into a very
         | high chance that it will still work after twice the mission
         | duration, or ten times the mission duration.
         | 
         | Part of this is cultural, part of it is political: nobody wants
         | a failed mission, it's better for the image of the agency and
         | the involved politician to spend a bit more money and
         | underestimate the lifetime. Higher chance of success, and
         | nobody complains if the mission can be extended afterwards.
        
         | bmsan wrote:
         | For this particular satellite, I think it's actually both. One
         | of the components of the imaging system failed relatively early
         | on[1], but they've worked around the issue for the past 20
         | years.
         | 
         | 1: https://landsat.gsfc.nasa.gov/satellites/landsat-7/
        
         | beerandt wrote:
         | Because you set a min life, but statistics aside, the design
         | for that minimum life isn't usually something that can be
         | tweaked on a continuous scale, but ends up being binned by
         | design constraints.
         | 
         | Eg, you need an industrial road with a 5-year lifespan over a
         | swamp. To meet this minimum you actually have to build a
         | bridge, which when built to industry standards, might start at
         | lifespans of 20-30 yrs.
         | 
         | Space is a bit different because of budgeting for ongoing
         | operations, so you frontload the cap-x, knowing that asking for
         | addl op-x funds later to extend the program will seem like a
         | no-brainer deal.
         | 
         | Plus sometimes it's as simple as: if you design something to
         | statistically survive space launch, it results in something
         | that is overdesigned to just sit in orbit for years (given that
         | it survives that initial launch).
         | 
         | It's similar to human lifespan statistics- if you get over the
         | historical infant mortality hump, every adult seems
         | 'overdesigned' compared to the historical expected lifespan.
        
       | maxclark wrote:
       | Life expectancy is statistical probability
       | 
       | The mission targets a length of time, then the engineering
       | matches for the design and build
       | 
       | Reality is usually much longer
        
       | bmsan wrote:
       | Dang, hits home. When I was a senior in high school, I was lucky
       | to able to volunteer under Dr. Eric Brown De Colstoun at NASA
       | Goddard, checking error rates for tree cover estimates using
       | Landsat data^. Many hours that fall spent trudging around parks
       | and forests, looking at the sky through a PVC pipe. It still kind
       | of blows my mind at how much is able to be gained from images
       | where each pixel is 15mx15m of ground-level area (and, I believe,
       | with an important component of Landsat 7's imaging system broken
       | for most of its lifespan).
       | 
       | I also wasn't aware that Landsat program imagery had been made
       | free to access a few years later. Nice.
       | 
       | ^(A massive thank you to him, since I wouldn't have graduated
       | without being able to participate in that project. And a massive
       | apology for going on to get a fine arts degree.)
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-09-26 23:00 UTC)