[HN Gopher] Anime is eating the world
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Anime is eating the world
        
       Author : vishnurnair
       Score  : 95 points
       Date   : 2024-09-23 19:52 UTC (3 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (a16z.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (a16z.com)
        
       | earnesti wrote:
       | I watched it when I was younger, and read some comics. I don't
       | really know why, because it always felt like shoddy garbage. Now
       | the idea of spending time with some anime feels repulsive.
        
         | ethbr1 wrote:
         | So much of it is written for <21s.
         | 
         | Exceptions exist, but the average level of plot /
         | characterization / dialog is terrible by adult standards.
        
           | surgical_fire wrote:
           | Funny you say that, when probably some of the most memorable
           | plot/characterization/dialog I experienced I could find in
           | what can be considered anime.
           | 
           | Maybe I am just juvenile in my tastes. I just can't find a
           | western series (and nowadays not even movies) that does the
           | same for me.
        
             | ethbr1 wrote:
             | The Wire?
        
         | api wrote:
         | I too have never been able to get into it. The aesthetic just
         | does nothing for me. Not sure why, just not my thing.
        
           | giraffe_lady wrote:
           | Some of the technique is really impressive to me, it's
           | basically an entirely different visual tradition. Especially
           | the way motion and sound are depicted in manga I find just
           | totally fascinating. It's so creative and effective at
           | portraying these dynamic elements in a static form.
           | 
           | Unfortunately still I've never really found any that worked
           | for me as complete works of art for all the common reasons.
           | Bad dialog and plotting, off-putting tropes, juvenile subject
           | matter etc.
        
             | dmonitor wrote:
             | Try Chainsaw Man. The first ~100 chapters make up the first
             | "arc" of the series and it is incredibly well done. The
             | story starts to meander and the art seems more rushed in
             | the second arc (currently ongoing), but the art of the
             | first arc alone makes it well worth a read.
             | 
             | Dungeon Meshi is also really good from beginning to end.
             | Especially if you like D&D inspired material. It has a
             | clever take on fantasy settings and avoids the more
             | annoying anime tropes.
        
             | throw4847285 wrote:
             | Drop the zero (the most popular shonen manga) get with the
             | hero (the works of Taiyo Matsumoto).
        
           | haunter wrote:
           | >The aesthetic just does nothing for me
           | 
           | Like what? This is like saying the aesthetics of Hollywood
           | films just does nothing for me. Which can be Forrest Gump and
           | the Avengers Endgame too
        
         | renox wrote:
         | It's exactly like other media (TV, movies, books), most of it
         | is uninteresting but from time to time there's a jewel.
        
         | labster wrote:
         | Congrats on becoming an elitist.
        
         | marcellus23 wrote:
         | I never got the hype either. I tried watching Attack on Titan
         | and it feels like it's aimed at young adults. All the
         | characters just state out loud exactly how they're feeling
         | about everything. The setting is interesting but I just can't
         | take any of it seriously when the dialog is so childish.
        
           | kombine wrote:
           | > All the characters just state out loud exactly how they're
           | feeling about everything.
           | 
           | Yeah, this is one thing that I didn't like about AoT,
           | especially in the first 4-5 episodes. Later I accepted it as
           | its characteristic style, I think its strengths greatly
           | overweigh this particular aspect. And, there is much more
           | depth to the characters than the childish dialogs lead you to
           | believe.
        
           | latexr wrote:
           | > I tried watching Attack on Titan and it feels like it's
           | aimed at young adults.
           | 
           | It's aimed at children, that's what shonen anime is. The word
           | literally means "boy". For something of an older demographic,
           | you'll want to search seinen. Consider "Monster", which is
           | something that could've been a western show for adults.
           | 
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monster_(manga)
        
         | jarule wrote:
         | _I watched it when I was younger_
         | 
         | Yeah, it hits different when you start at 35.
        
       | dotnet00 wrote:
       | Unsurprising considering how a lot of other media has become
       | nothing but an endless series of big budget, overly "safe" or
       | overly ideologically motivated remakes/adaptations.
        
         | jeffwask wrote:
         | Produced by the same 5-6 companies regurgitating the same
         | stories and content I've already experienced and telling me I'm
         | wrong for preferring the original.
         | 
         | I've been into anime for over a decade and for fans of
         | animation, it's a wealth of unique stories and characters
         | tailored to any demographic. Like action, romance, slice of
         | life, etc., there are stories for you most with unique voices
         | from artists and creators doing it out of passion rather than
         | just another writing gig.
        
       | scandox wrote:
       | Sound of goose slaughtering knives being sharpened...
        
         | gloryjulio wrote:
         | At the end the day, the successful ip solely depends the talent
         | of the author. An army of marvel machines is not gonna produce
         | attack on titan written and drawn(with some help) by a single
         | person.
         | 
         | Another example is one punch man. The source material is just
         | some draft uploaded by some random guy.
         | 
         | Nothing can topple the talent yet
        
           | npinsker wrote:
           | Yes, this is exactly it.
           | 
           | Also makes me think a16z's games division may struggle to
           | find a hit... generally the people who are hyper-focused on
           | producing great work aren't also looking to make the next
           | billion-dollar empire.
        
       | spondylosaurus wrote:
       | (1) a16z has a games division?
       | 
       | (2) Mixed feelings about lumping all gacha games under the
       | "anime" umbrella based on art style, especially when so many
       | gachas are original properties (Genshin Impact et al) or spinoffs
       | of non-gacha games (Fire Emblem Heroes, Pokemon Masters). I get
       | why they're drawing the association, so maybe I'm just being a
       | purist for no reason, but in my head it's only an anime if it's
       | an animated show or movie!
       | 
       | ETA: Or how some gacha series get popular enough to have bona
       | fide anime spinoffs--I think both Fate and Granblue fall under
       | that category?
        
         | dragontamer wrote:
         | Fate/SN was originally a porno before it became a non-prono
         | anime before it became Fate/Grand Order.
         | 
         | Fate/ is one of the weirdest meta-stories of all time. The
         | evolution of that universe is utterly fascinating to me, more
         | so than the actual story today.
         | 
         | The gist is that Nasu always wanted to create a Comic book
         | style shared universe, and that Nasu sees himself as a Stan Lee
         | or George Lucas type who is in charge of a community of writers
         | rather than just writing one singular plot.
        
           | Terr_ wrote:
           | > Fate/ is one of the weirdest meta-stories of all time.
           | 
           | That reminds me of a not-really-description I read once about
           | Homestuck, basically saying that the many
           | manifestations/spinoffs are too twisty to be worth
           | explaining.
           | 
           | BTW, this comment is not a request for clarification, I'm
           | fine with my ignorance on the franchise itself.
        
           | Zircom wrote:
           | Calling FSN a porno because it has sex scenes is like calling
           | Wolf of Wall Street a porno just because it has sex scenes.
           | It's extremely reductive and entirely inaccurate. There's
           | like literally 3 or 4 h-scenes in the entire novel, and
           | collectively they all probably make up less than a few
           | percent of the text/screentime.
        
             | dragontamer wrote:
             | I'm calling it a porno because said scenes have foreplay,
             | climax and a full frontal nudity moneyshot.
             | 
             | It's just 3 or 4 scenes. But they are clearly full on
             | pornographic scenes. They are also completely irrelevant to
             | the story and were removed from later adaptations.
             | 
             | ---------
             | 
             | I'm mildly convinced that Nasu started with the
             | pornographic market so that his story would be the king-of-
             | porn first, building up a niche within that sub community
             | first. It's highly unusual for pornographic stories to
             | receive the shear detail and writing effort that went into
             | F/SN.
             | 
             | Call it the Facebook strategy. Don't aim to be king of all
             | the market, instead aim to be king of some sub-niche first.
             | You can always pivot away later.
             | 
             | But you are correct in that the level of detail and
             | character development even in the original novel far
             | exceeds that of any porno. But I argue that this fact was
             | Nasus explicit strategy for growth.
        
             | RockRobotRock wrote:
             | Read the second sentence on the Wikipedia page.
        
         | dotnet00 wrote:
         | Fate went in the other direction, started as a visual novel and
         | got some very popular anime adaptations, that led to the gacha
         | game being made, which led to some of the especially popular
         | parts of that game's stories being adapted into anime form.
        
         | throwanem wrote:
         | You're not the target audience of this blueprint for
         | decontextualization into maximally fungible product.
         | 
         | It's early days yet. Still plenty of time to get used to
         | reminding yourself of that.
        
         | dfxm12 wrote:
         | 2 - I think it's a distinction worth making. Genshin Impact is
         | not anime. That doesn't make it bad by any means, but it does
         | mean that maybe what they're arguing isn't true. Anime is
         | relatively strong now, but I don't think it is either at its
         | peak of popularity (anecdotally, I see more people wearing
         | demon slayer gear than I did bleach gear, but old school DBZ
         | shirts are still most popular) nor at levels that can be
         | described as "eating the world". Of course, the more vaguely
         | East Asian styled cartoons you throw into a pile and squint at,
         | the bigger it looks.
        
           | mattgreenrocks wrote:
           | Similar reaction to seeing FF lumped in there. FF7 in
           | particular might travel in some of the tropes, but I feel
           | like it was pulled in to bolster the game side rather than
           | being a true exemplar.
           | 
           | On a semi-related note: A16Z, stay the hell away from Square
           | Enix.
        
           | codedokode wrote:
           | That Chinese RPG game is not anime-based, but definitely
           | anime-styled (probably to appeal to audience of anime viewers
           | or maybe just because anime-styled characters look better
           | than realistic ones).
        
         | jsheard wrote:
         | > a16z has a games division?
         | 
         | They got into games during their Web3/Blockchain/Metaverse
         | phase so you're forgiven for not noticing given that hype train
         | went absolutely nowhere.
         | 
         | Now they're all about AI being the next big thing in games,
         | because of course they are.
        
           | lern_too_spel wrote:
           | They're still pushing their Blockchain grifts and supporting
           | political candidates who will look the other way.
        
           | reducesuffering wrote:
           | Don't forget about Clubhouse
        
         | grogenaut wrote:
         | they do, they also keep emailing me and I never signed up for
         | it. and they won't let me unsubscribe. it's wierd.
        
         | B-Con wrote:
         | Also the Gachas:
         | 
         | - Arknights - Azur Lane - Kancolle
         | 
         | Just off the top of my head.
         | 
         | I share your mixed feelings. On the one hand, I like "anime" to
         | refer to something very specific. I think the world is more
         | confusing when terms evolve and redefine too much.
         | 
         | But on the other hand, the Gacha games clearly owe a good deal
         | of their success to the anime elements they copy-pasted, even
         | if the core game mechanics are anime-indifferent.
         | 
         | Over time, these lines will get blurred even more as the market
         | maximizes where those elements can be incorporated. The art and
         | story elements clearly have appeal, and they'll probably get
         | incorporated into more and more into media that's not Japanese-
         | produced TV shows.
         | 
         | And when those non-animes get adapted into true animes because
         | they're obviously such a clean fit, it feels like the
         | similarity needs to be acknowledged with some a broad umbrella
         | word to cover everything. Which might as well be the word
         | "anime"...?
        
       | Trasmatta wrote:
       | While there seems to be a lot of money in anime, the animators
       | themselves are still underpaid and highly overworked:
       | https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/24/business/japan-anime.html
       | 
       | There are so many stories of the insane hours that animators in
       | Japan have to deal with. Part of that is the "normal" toxic
       | overwork culture in Japan, but animation seems to be one of the
       | biggest perpetrators.
        
         | Geezus_42 wrote:
         | Because people care about and are invested in the art they
         | make. It makes them easier to exploit "because they should feel
         | privileged to have the job they want." People who work in
         | creative industries all over the world face this issue.
        
           | Onavo wrote:
           | Video games industry software engineers are usually paid
           | peanuts
        
             | throw_pm23 wrote:
             | This is exactly what the parent comment said.
        
           | MichaelZuo wrote:
           | Who gets to define whether someone is 'exploited' or not?
           | 
           | There are artists who would rather be paid even less, but
           | given more creative freedom and control over the final
           | product, (deciding on dubs, script changes, etc...)
           | Especially in anime production.
        
             | ethbr1 wrote:
             | Exploitation = leveraging a neverending stream of young
             | people interested in working in an industry, initially for
             | unsustainable wages, by dangling the prospect of eventual
             | liveable wages in front of them, death marching them, and
             | then firing them and hiring the next crop of new grads
             | 
             | Other industries do that, but at least they have the
             | decency to compensate fresh hires decently. (E.g. law,
             | management consulting)
        
             | TheAceOfHearts wrote:
             | Studio MAPPA was effectively grinding down the souls of
             | their artists during the production of Jujutsu Kaisen [0].
             | The linked article is just one of many. The work conditions
             | at MAPPA seem pretty unreasonable to me, so I'd consider
             | them exploitative. These animators aren't being given any
             | creative freedom either.
             | 
             | [0] https://comicbook.com/anime/news/mappa-studios-
             | animators-wor...
        
           | gruez wrote:
           | aka https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compensating_differential
        
             | lotsofpulp wrote:
             | Aka supply and demand.
        
         | BurningFrog wrote:
         | This is typical of "cool" jobs.
         | 
         | A lot of people grow up as anime fans and want to work with it.
         | With high supply comes lowered prices.
         | 
         | Something similar happens in (cool) computer games programming
         | compared to (dull) regular SWE jobs.
        
           | ghaff wrote:
           | It happens anywhere that people will basically work for free
           | if they can. Even where you have guilds and unions that try
           | to set a certain floor--e.g. with films in the US--it's only
           | somewhat effective in that the floors are fairly low and
           | people will still wait tables to try to get their big break.
        
         | layer8 wrote:
         | There is some parallel to CG artists around Hollywood, despite
         | Hollywood making vastly more money than anime studios.
        
         | booleandilemma wrote:
         | That seems to always be the case, doesn't it?
         | 
         | "While there seems to be a lot of money in X, the
         | $people_providing_value are underpaid and highly overworked"
         | 
         | They always let themselves get shafted.
        
           | Trasmatta wrote:
           | It's a spectrum though, and anime studios are on the very
           | upper end.
        
       | RandomThoughts3 wrote:
       | Is it me or this article is all over the place mixing together
       | the manga industry, cartoon production in Japan and Korea and the
       | style they use, ai companion (?), some style of games both in
       | terms of what they look like and their gameplay and basically
       | concluding nothing?
        
       | bdndndndbve wrote:
       | "This is currently a trendy aesthetic". Cool guys. You're like
       | Tiger Beat but you have billions of dollars.
        
       | anigbrowl wrote:
       | Cliches are eating the world, and a clicheed headline like this
       | promises commoditization, not creativity. Yes I know who
       | originated it.
       | 
       | Also, there is absolutely no way that the involvement of venture
       | capitalists is going to improve anime culture. [shigechi.gif]
        
       | dragontamer wrote:
       | It's because anime is multi-genre and sub-genres of anime cater
       | to basically every demographic.
       | 
       | Anime includes masterpieces like Spirited Away, trashy harem /
       | male fantasies like Jobless Reincarnation, touching dramas like
       | Anohana, female oriented romances like Fruitsbasket, literally
       | pornography like... Erm... Well you know.
       | 
       | Etc. etc. etc.
       | 
       | It's not fair to compare one anime with another. It's not like
       | cartoons in the USA that fall under the rough set of same humor
       | or writers. Anime is much broader and thus has something for
       | everyone
       | 
       | And anime also has a lot that you'll hate. I personally hate
       | recent male fantasy trends like Solo Leveling for example
       | (despite enjoying Overlord, a male fantasy from yesteryear).
        
         | entropicdrifter wrote:
         | Jobless Reincarnation is simultaneously trashy and also
         | prestige drama. I feel like you could have picked almost any
         | other harem show and been better off for your example lol
        
           | Devorlon wrote:
           | I think Jobless Reincarnation is a perfect example because of
           | its paedophilic undertones if not outright being so.
        
             | entropicdrifter wrote:
             | Jobless Reincarnation has a lot of fucked-up trashy aspects
             | to it, but it also explores how those things fuck people
             | up, why and how, and goes deep into character development
             | and a realistic depiction of what healing from trauma (and
             | people who haven't healed from trauma) looks like.
             | 
             | There are a lot of harem anime out there that do not do
             | that type of deeper character work and function solely as
             | male power-fantasies. See, for instance, _Tsukimitchi_ or
             | _Rosario X Vampire_
             | 
             | That was and still is my point
        
             | dragontamer wrote:
             | So people know: I've chosen a highly controversial anime on
             | purpose to prove that there's anime some people hate and
             | other anime people love.
             | 
             | I personally couldn't get very far into Jobless
             | Reincarnation. So I'm on the haters side. But in any case,
             | the controversies of this anime are well known.
        
               | Izkata wrote:
               | I actually didn't know there was any controversy around
               | it, but this:
               | 
               | > I personally couldn't get very far into Jobless
               | Reincarnation.
               | 
               | explains your choice. Based on how other modern isekais
               | typically go, it definitely starts out looking like this
               | one is going to go down a similar route, but it really
               | doesn't. The overall character development for the main
               | character is about him figuring out how to relate to
               | others and develop healthy relationships instead of the
               | fixations and fears he started with.
        
               | glandium wrote:
               | The interesting thing about Jobless Reincarnation is
               | that, even though the Anime was a late comer in the
               | Isekai genre, the original work, the online novel, is
               | actually a precursor if not the starting point of the
               | current wave of Isekai works.
        
               | dragontamer wrote:
               | [delayed]
        
             | claudiawerner wrote:
             | 'Pedophilic undertones' doesn't relate to 'trashy' or
             | 'harem', even if you read the anime that way. In fact, it
             | can be extremely interesting to see something which is so
             | rarely portrayed or discussed in fiction, even fiction for
             | adults.
             | 
             | The reality of child abuse is neither solved nor rebuked by
             | depictions or explorations of psychology in adult fiction.
        
               | mrsilencedogood wrote:
               | I don't even know what this show is, but I can guarantee
               | you any pedo-related stuff in there is highly unlikely to
               | be for the purpose of "depictions or explorations of
               | psychology".
               | 
               | Come on, don't try to kid me. It's there for the same
               | reason all the other seinen anime have a ton of
               | borderline softcore porn tropes in them.
        
               | claudiawerner wrote:
               | I don't really know how to respond to the idea that the
               | fact anime includes fanservice means it can't deal with
               | sensitive topics at the same time.
        
               | some_random wrote:
               | Why is the fanservice sexualized children?
        
               | claudiawerner wrote:
               | In this case, it's not; but even if it were, does that
               | limit the ability of a text to explore interesting
               | themes? Why?
               | 
               | I'd recommend reading deeper into the scholarly
               | literature of sexual themes in anime and manga before
               | assuming that fans necessarily interpret 'children' into
               | the text. See:
               | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26639806
        
           | cultofmetatron wrote:
           | > I feel like you could have picked almost any other harem
           | show and been better off for your example
           | 
           | agreed. redo of the healer or bastard would fit "trashy male
           | power fantasy" a lot better.
        
             | dragontamer wrote:
             | I mean, yes I wanted a Trashy shown for my example. But I
             | also wanted... A good show with merits.
             | 
             | I was optimizing on controversy with this pick. Looks like
             | it mostly worked given the conflicting viewpoints that have
             | come up.
             | 
             | There's very well written drama in Jobless Reincarnation.
             | But it is also paired up with a literally panty worshipping
             | (holy artifact of Roxy) panty-thief.
        
         | ToucanLoucan wrote:
         | It also can't be overlooked that the anime style is both highly
         | flexible and also very easy to reproduce. Like I remember it
         | being old hat to see books on "how to draw anime" when I was a
         | kid, and anime didn't have nearly the presence it did in the
         | west as it does now.
         | 
         | I'm genuinely not trying to be a shithead or anything, it's
         | just a style that lends itself well to industrialization and
         | specialized tooling to speed up the process of creating. Unless
         | you get into highly stylized executions, if you as a company
         | just want to turn out a perfectly average and forgettable
         | anime, you can do so at scale pretty easily, and the glut of
         | artists looking for work means you don't have to pay a lot for
         | the labor either.
         | 
         | I have nothing against this but frankly as a creative it is
         | slightly demoralizing to see just more and more consolidation
         | and mechanization in industry. There's so little that feels
         | genuinely creative anymore, and it feels like year over year
         | the art people produce is crushed harder and harder into pre-
         | made molds that do well on content algorithms.
         | 
         | Maybe nobody else gives a shit.
        
         | causal wrote:
         | Right, this article is lumping together a bunch of different
         | things that are maybe loosely related because of anime as a
         | style.
         | 
         | The unstated thesis might just be surprise that this once-nerdy
         | stuff has become mainstream at all and therefore has investment
         | potential that was heretofore unrecognized.
        
         | decafninja wrote:
         | Even the aesthetic/art style varies tremendously - i.e. even
         | the "big eyes" thing so often correlated with anime art isn't
         | universal either.
         | 
         | Can you have "Western" anime? Some hardcore otakus scoff at the
         | idea. If you made an animated version of Star Wars - is that
         | anime? Is Avatar: The Last Airbender an anime?
         | 
         | "Chinese anime" or "Korean anime"? Again, some would scoff at
         | the idea. But what is all that Hoyoverse stuff? Or all those
         | Korean webtoons (though that's really more comparable with
         | manga - and the korean word "manhwa" uses the exact same
         | Chinese characters as "manga").
        
           | Izkata wrote:
           | > If you made an animated version of Star Wars - is that
           | anime?
           | 
           | Rather than "if", here's two instances of that idea I know
           | of:
           | 
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suicide_Squad_Isekai
           | 
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marvel_Anime
           | 
           | Edit: And it actually looks like some anime studios did get
           | in on Star Wars:
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Wars:_Visions
        
             | dragontamer wrote:
             | ...
             | 
             | Are you unaware of
             | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Wars:_Visions
             | 
             | ??
        
               | Izkata wrote:
               | I was unaware, I'm not really a fan of that franchise
        
               | dragontamer wrote:
               | Yeah. The anime community has a lot of debate on these
               | things. I guess it makes sense that not everyone is on
               | the same page with regards to the eternal flame wars /
               | arguments here.
               | 
               | Avatar, Star Wars, even Boondocks comes up.
               | 
               | I think My Adventures with Superman was Korean at least,
               | but stylistically it's close to anime.
               | 
               | ---------
               | 
               | The one people may have forgotten about is RWBY, which
               | was the famous Texas Anime (erm... Texas made anime-
               | inspired art?) that split so many people with debates on
               | 'Anime or Not'.
        
               | MrDrMcCoy wrote:
               | "The famous Texas anime" is King of the Hill. People in
               | Japan argue over whether watching it is better with subs
               | or dubs. It's a slice of life anime in all but drawing
               | style and origin.
        
           | jwells89 wrote:
           | > Can you have "Western" anime? Some hardcore otakus scoff at
           | the idea.
           | 
           | There's not really anything stopping creative individuals who
           | aren't Japanese from producing anime. The thing that many
           | attempts miss (and I suspect what makes hardcores bristle) is
           | that they tend to miss the point in one way or another,
           | resulting in a product that might have many of the outward
           | characteristics but ultimately misses the mark.
           | 
           | In my opinion Avatar is actually pretty close. I've seen
           | clips from various animated productions from France that also
           | seem to capture a similar spirit.
        
           | RandomThoughts3 wrote:
           | > Can you have "Western" anime?
           | 
           | I would definitely think that all the French-Japanese and
           | Italo-Japanese coproductions of the 80s somehow qualify as
           | western anime, yes. See for exemple _Ulysses 31_ and
           | _Esteban: Child of the Sun_.
           | 
           | Then you have things like _Radiant_ which a "manga" by a
           | French artist in French which was turned into an anime by a
           | Japanese studio.
           | 
           | I guess there probably is animation made in the typically
           | Japanese somewhere. I can't really help you there because I
           | only read mangas and never watch adaptations (they are always
           | strictly inferior to the material they adapt). So the only
           | Japanese/Korean animation I watch is original content of
           | which there is sadly very little.
        
           | B-Con wrote:
           | What I find the most interesting is that there is clearly
           | something that makes anime stand out as being its own thing,
           | distinct from the majority of other animated TV, but it's
           | hard to put a finger on exactly what that attribute is and
           | where to draw the line.
           | 
           | The anime community has, for as long as I've been a part of
           | it (13 years or so), decided that anime is "animation made in
           | Japan". This heuristic has actually worked pretty well.
           | 
           | But the lines are increasingly blurred.
           | 
           | - Japanese produced shows are outsourcing some animation to
           | China and Korea, and sometimes taking direct funding and
           | story writing input from the USA.
           | 
           | - Non-Japan produced shows are taking notes on what works,
           | drawing on it for inspiration, and in rare recent cases even
           | outsourcing animation directly to Japan.
           | 
           | - There is a TON of money in gacha games, and the biggest
           | "anime" titles some people may recognize are gacha games,
           | butand the majority of those are run 100% by Chinese
           | companies. Ironically, sometimes sending them over to Japan
           | for the TV adaptation.
           | 
           | Just like food: Italy may have "invented" pizza, but New York
           | pizza is now its own thing.
        
         | layer8 wrote:
         | The Solo Leveling anime adapts a Korean Manhwa, so maybe not
         | the best example here. Not that there is any shortage of male
         | wish fulfilment in original Japanese works.
        
           | smusamashah wrote:
           | Shite, I wasn't expecting bad sentiment on Solo Levelling. I
           | love games and this series touches me so differently. But
           | unlike the parent comment, I have watched may be 4-5 anime
           | series in total because I generally don't like anime, they
           | look all same to me.
        
             | dragontamer wrote:
             | There's a lot of better trapped in a video game anime out
             | there.
             | 
             | Overlord does a better job with grimdark. I'm fond of Log
             | Horizon though S3 sucked. Solo Leveling came out the same
             | time as Weakest Tamer began a journey to pick up Trash, and
             | that was delightful for me.
             | 
             | I think the visceral stuck at the bottom of the ladder
             | feeling was better handled by weakest tamer. A young girl
             | who was forced to run away from home because her village
             | considered her 0-star skill literally a heresy and
             | religious blight.
             | 
             | Unlike Solo Leveling, the Weakest Tamer actually sticks
             | with the plot. She never becomes much more powerful than
             | she was, and instead leverages her relationships / friends
             | she makes rather than literally solo leveling.
             | 
             | --------
             | 
             | The Isekai / Reverse Isekai genre is literally animes
             | biggest genre right now. There's so so so many better shows
             | out there than Solo Leveling.
             | 
             | But I guess the question is: what do you like about it?
             | Solo Leveling is a passable male fantasy do-it-myself-by-
             | plot-armor always win kind of show. But.... This plot
             | honestly has been done better back by Sword Art Online (and
             | I didn't even like that anime either).
             | 
             | ------
             | 
             | Jobless Reincarnation, despite all the controversy, is
             | probably the local optimum on that 'Do it myself' / solo
             | leveling / get stronger loop.
             | 
             | Hmmmmm... I'd give either Reincarnated as a Slime or I'm a
             | Spider, So What? As my top picks on this genre /
             | storytelling style. For personal enjoyment. Maaayyyyybe
             | Re:Zero if you're into the body horror stuff that Solo
             | Leveling also does.
        
               | fwip wrote:
               | I loved all the spider bits of "So I'm a Spider, So
               | What?" But every time they cut to the other half of the
               | cast members it sucked so bad.
        
               | zmgsabst wrote:
               | > Unlike Solo Leveling, the Weakest Tamer actually sticks
               | with the plot. She never becomes much more powerful than
               | she was, and instead leverages her relationships /
               | friends she makes rather than literally solo leveling.
               | 
               | But that's a different plot than Solo Leveling, and in
               | particular, a female rather than male power fantasy.
               | (Social control vs individual strength.)
               | 
               | Your criticism that Solo Leveling isn't something it
               | wasn't meant to be is strange.
        
               | glandium wrote:
               | Heck, it's even in the title that the story is about
               | leveling.
        
           | glandium wrote:
           | Serious question, do Korean web comics count as Manhwa? I
           | mean, the difference in media makes it a very different art
           | form. (Although, in the case of Solo Leveling, it started as
           | a web novel)
        
             | layer8 wrote:
             | At least the Wikipedia article counts them as such:
             | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Webtoon. Good point about the
             | web novel, I have only passing familiarity with the
             | franchise.
        
         | layer8 wrote:
         | It's true that Anime is a broad field, but the vast majority of
         | works is heavily shaped by Japanese idiosyncrasies and themes,
         | which also means that, barring singular exceptions, anime is
         | not really something for everyone. Conversely, the non-Western
         | storytelling, themes, and character/interaction stereotypes are
         | what many are drawn to (but still only a small minority of the
         | population). I therefore don't see it "eating the world" in the
         | sense of becoming completely mainstream. It's arguably not even
         | mainstream in Japan itself.
         | 
         | However, to me this is a good thing, in terms of cultural
         | diversity. Trying to adapt anime to more mainstream tastes in
         | the name of global profit would do it a disservice.
        
           | diob wrote:
           | Saying it's not mainstream in Japan is a heck of a claim.
        
             | booleandilemma wrote:
             | Anime is an important part of their culture.
        
             | layer8 wrote:
             | The majority of the Japanese population doesn't watch
             | anime: https://unseen-japan.com/is-anime-popular-in-japan/
             | 
             | And a large portion of those who do watch is due to a small
             | number of very popular tentpole series. Most anime
             | productions cater to a relatively niche nerd/geek audience.
        
               | hnthrowaway6543 wrote:
               | 32% of Japanese people watching anime is pretty damn
               | mainstream. Marvel is indisputably some of the most
               | mainstream US media in the past 20 years and yet "only"
               | ~50% of the US population has seen a Marvel movie.[0]
               | 
               | [0] https://www.statista.com/statistics/807367/marvel-
               | movie-view...
        
               | layer8 wrote:
               | I'm saying this in the context of the root comment claim
               | that there is anime for everyone. Only a very few anime
               | series are mainstream in the same sense that Marvel
               | movies are mainstream. Continuing that analogy, most
               | anime series are more akin to serialized superhero
               | comics, which are only read by relatively few. Looking at
               | the shape of the distribution here is important.
        
               | RajT88 wrote:
               | You do not have to have a majority of people consuming
               | something to be considered mainstream.
               | 
               | TFA quotes 31-32% of people (young and old) in Japan as
               | anime watchers. That is very mainstream!
               | 
               | Your argument is like trying to claim Metallica is not
               | mainstream. Sure, most people do not listen to them, but
               | _everyone_ has heard of them. I would wager back in the
               | day less than 32% of people listened to Michael Jackson.
        
         | RandomThoughts3 wrote:
         | You are mixing together under anime shows which are produced in
         | Japan from manga or from light novels with shows produced in
         | South Korea from manhwas. They don't have much in common. Even
         | the art style is different. It's a bit like mixing together
         | European comics and American ones. It doesn't make much sense.
        
         | Der_Einzige wrote:
         | It's disgusting to claim that Western "Cartoons" fall under a
         | "rough set of same humor or writers". It is just as varied, and
         | frankly as good if not better than eastern Anime.
         | 
         | You obviously didn't watch enough varied western cartoons. The
         | following are just a small sample of different, highly varied
         | western studios/artists.
         | 
         | 1. Don Bluth
         | 
         | 2. Hanna-Barbera
         | 
         | 3. Pixar
         | 
         | 4. Bill Kroyer
         | 
         | 5. Ralph Bakshi
         | 
         | 6. Mike Judge
         | 
         | 7. Genndy Tartakovsky
         | 
         | 8. Vivienne Medrano
         | 
         | 9. Jerry Rees
        
           | cyberax wrote:
           | > It's disgusting to claim that Western "Cartoons" fall under
           | a "rough set of same humor or writers".
           | 
           | There's a grain of truth here. A huge grain. The US comics
           | were long stunted by the Comics Code of 1954:
           | http://www.mit.edu/activities/safe/labeling/comics-code-1954
           | 
           | It had been revised a bunch of times, but arguably it went
           | away only in early 2000-s. Mostly because of the anime/manga
           | influence.
           | 
           | See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comics_Code_Authority
        
             | pferde wrote:
             | Did that code even apply to cartoons? I thought it didn't.
        
           | lioeters wrote:
           | > Genndy Tartakovsky
           | 
           | An artist with a unique vision and aesthetic. Samurai Jack is
           | one of my favorites.
        
         | deepzn wrote:
         | Though the most popular anime by far around the world is
         | shonen. Which caters to the typical male teen/pre-teen
         | audience, but also adults and is typically characterized by
         | action, typical underdog protagonist stereotypes of a loner,
         | outcast, who develops a tight knit support group or team on
         | their quest to overtake or defeat a great evil in the world.
         | 
         | E.g. One Piece, Naruto, Bleach, Attack on Titan, etc.
        
           | zmgsabst wrote:
           | Everyone likes a good retelling of "A Hero's Journey".
           | 
           | That's why properties like Star Wars rose to prominence as
           | well:
           | 
           | > underdog protagonist stereotypes of a loner, outcast, who
           | develops a tight knit support group or team on their quest to
           | overtake or defeat a great evil in the world
        
         | vunderba wrote:
         | _" It's not like cartoons in the USA that fall under the rough
         | set of same humor or writers"_
         | 
         | Such a hysterically bad take that it calls into question your
         | entire point.
         | 
         | Quick list of cartoons that have an incredible variety, both in
         | terms of animation quality, sophistication of humor, and target
         | demographic:
         | 
         | - Steven universe
         | 
         | - Bojack Horseman
         | 
         | - adventure time
         | 
         | - helluva boss
         | 
         | - Invincible
         | 
         | And this is just within the last decade. Want me to go farther
         | back?
         | 
         | - Animaniacs (the original series)
         | 
         | - Spaceghost Coast to Coast
         | 
         | - Justice League
         | 
         | - Ugly Americans
         | 
         | I'm also excluding for the most part animated comedies, such as
         | Futurama, South Park, the entire Adult Swim lineup of the late
         | 90s / early 2000s.
        
           | bawolff wrote:
           | I'm not sure i agree. Yes there are exceptions, but they tend
           | to be few and far between, and fairly niche themselves.
           | 
           | Most american animation seems to be: stuff aimed at young
           | children (pixar type shows), super hero adjacent stuff, or
           | adult commedy (like south park). A few exceptions here and
           | there but on the whole there just isn't that much variety.
        
             | galleywest200 wrote:
             | Are you talking about made for TV animation or others? I
             | would suggest animated feature films such as The Secret of
             | Kells, A Scanner Darkly, or even Waking Life and Heavy
             | Metal to see that this is not entirely the case.
        
               | bawolff wrote:
               | I liked a scanner darkly and think it was a great use of
               | the medium. However it was made close to 2 decades ago.
               | 
               | That's kind of my point though. There are exceptions (for
               | a recent example i really liked "undone"), they just tend
               | to be few and far between.
        
             | vunderba wrote:
             | I can pull the same thing with anime - the vast majority
             | pumped out are either:
             | 
             | - slice of life
             | 
             | - isekai
             | 
             | - shonen
             | 
             | Here's a few more: (not super hero, not necessarily geared
             | towards children, and not comedy)
             | 
             | - Owl House
             | 
             | - Pantheon
             | 
             | - Infinity Train
             | 
             | - Final Space
             | 
             | - Castlevania
             | 
             | I think you're simply less well versed in the variety of
             | western animation. There's also not nearly as much _MONEY_
             | in western animation, so of course there 's less of it.
        
           | cyberax wrote:
           | I've not grown up in the US, and I know only about Bojack.
           | And even that from a few memes I've seen.
           | 
           | Around 20 years ago, I tried watching a few US cartoons and
           | comics to get better acquainted with the culture, but they
           | were all pretty bad.
        
             | vunderba wrote:
             | Bojack deals with very heavy themes (depression, self
             | destructive behavior, etc) in a scatological and satirical
             | manner.
             | 
             | Without listing specific cartoons that you watched, it's
             | hard to know where you "went wrong". Part of it might have
             | been a culture gap - pop culture heavy cartoons wouldn't
             | really appeal to somebody who didn't grow up in the US.
             | 
             | This could have just as easily happened to you if you'd
             | moved to Japan and been exposed to shows like:
             | 
             | - Failure Frame (PARALYZE POISON PARALYZE POISON LOOK
             | LISTEN LOOK LOOK) - if you get this joke, you get it.
             | 
             | - Faraway Paladin (devolves into some of the cheapest flash
             | animation YTMND level I've ever seen)
             | 
             | - Diabolik lovers (...)
             | 
             | Conversely there's a lot of good anime out there as well:
             | 
             | - Cowboy Bebop
             | 
             | - Mob Pyscho 100
             | 
             | - Hells Paradise
        
           | hiccuphippo wrote:
           | You are underestimating the sheer amount of Anime produced
           | every year. You probably get as much variety in a single year
           | as a decade of western animation.
        
         | throw18376 wrote:
         | outside of the actual pornography, more and more of anime is
         | just emotional pornography for people with attachment troubles.
         | 
         | it can be a great art form. even some of the emotional
         | pornography can have artistic merit (recently: Frieren). but
         | increasingly, despite diversity in genre and visual
         | presentation, all anime just tries to push the same emotional
         | buttons of loneliness, belonging, connection, in a very heavy-
         | handed way that is more about provoking the emotions in the
         | body than about artistic expression.
         | 
         | not everyone has those buttons, which is why anime fans are a
         | devoted minority, and why it seems like lonely, traumatized,
         | and marginalized people are drawn to it.
        
           | B-Con wrote:
           | Mass-produced media always recycles the same thematic
           | stories.
           | 
           | Western cartoons aimed at kids recycled the "power of being
           | yourself" to death. Ask my tweens about the shows they've
           | watched, and they'll pick apart how repetitive the story
           | beats are between them.
           | 
           | The beats that anime is recycling may be different, but all
           | of them get tiresome and feel pandering.
        
         | mitthrowaway2 wrote:
         | Exactly. Anime is really a medium, not a genre.
        
         | maxglute wrote:
         | There's something to be said about Waifu lists transcending
         | anime genres / subgenres. I would say compared to 70s-90s anime
         | landscape, stylisitically anime / east asian animation has
         | converged a lot. At least mainstream stuff - we've nearly
         | reached peak moe, there's still seasonable optimizations /
         | stylistic tweaks here and there - but IMO it's fair to suggest
         | convergence in waifu/husbando aesthetic has driven and is
         | driving a lot of growth, and it's fair to put everything under
         | umbrella for extrapolating market trends. I feel animes'
         | ability to make fans horny and the increasing culture around
         | anime fandom (now) unabashedly wanking over their
         | affection/fondness over random constructed characters across
         | genres is... potent.
        
         | RajT88 wrote:
         | I like that about Anime. I think part of my it and Manga have
         | such a broad spectrum is because it is relatively cheap to
         | produce - meaning the companies bankrolling production are less
         | risk averse, and as a result lots more weird ideas get to be
         | tried.
         | 
         | You do not have to watch too much of it to get the sense that
         | writers are just going nuts tossing stuff against the wall and
         | seeing what sticks. Endless remixing of ideas from what came
         | before, and outside influences.
         | 
         | Example: Legend of Black Heaven, which featured a middle aged
         | retired rockstar guitar player working as a software engineer,
         | who is tracked down by aliens to get him to use his guitar
         | playing as a weapon in an intergalactic war. Sure, why not? Is
         | it good? Debatable. Have you seen anything like it before?
         | Unlikely.
        
       | simianparrot wrote:
       | I have a feeling the industry will sink a lot deeper a lot faster
       | now that a16z has got their eyes on this goose, salivating at the
       | thought of squeezing ""value"" out of what remains of it.
       | 
       | RIP.
        
         | chomp wrote:
         | I thought the same thing as soon as they wrote the statement
         | about the value of the market being $50B. That private equity
         | is remarking on its market size means they are definitely
         | sizing up how to squeeze it. A16z has no shame and it shows
         | here.
        
           | xattt wrote:
           | Given that certain portion of the anime fan crowd is somewhat
           | socially vulnerable, a private equity firm stepping into this
           | space will no doubt create some predatory scenarios.
        
         | ChrisArchitect wrote:
         | Ya, my first reaction was I'm not taking advice from a16z on
         | what's "eating the world".
        
         | dogleash wrote:
         | >salivating at the thought of squeezing ""value"" out of what
         | remains of it
         | 
         | I'm amused at their assumption that they can squeeze tighter
         | than the currently existing notoriously abusive segment of the
         | market.
         | 
         | Also, the way they talk about exploiting parasocail
         | relationships, I'm assuming their next big announcement will be
         | funding a startup that is a call center to handle texting on
         | behalf of onlyfans creators.
        
           | ethbr1 wrote:
           | New Dragonball-level animation budgets?
           | 
           | Which is to say, a few dollars over $0?
        
         | postsantum wrote:
         | I can see the globohomo corporate memphis images being replaced
         | with globohomo anime characters
        
           | science4sail wrote:
           | Maybe if you live in an Anglophone country. In East Asian
           | countries, anime-style corporate mascots are everywhere!
        
           | phatfish wrote:
           | That sentence required a lot of Googling.
        
             | lioeters wrote:
             | > Used to sarcastically denote the predominant philosophy
             | espoused by the Western economic elite, formally known as
             | "neoliberalism". It combines ruthless capitalism by
             | transnational corporations with a facade of socially-
             | liberal politics.
             | 
             | > The ultimate end state of Globohomo is one in which all
             | sexual, ethnic, racial and national identity is broken
             | down, leaving the demoralized masses to work for $12 an
             | hour in an Amazon warehouse while a small cadre of
             | billionaires rule over them.
        
         | chrishare wrote:
         | Right. Between crypto shilling and this, A16Z is about
         | extracting profit, and not about principled value creation or
         | problem solving.
        
         | FridgeSeal wrote:
         | 2 of their listed categories are also shamelessly AI focused,
         | so you can really see them lining up the investor-catnip.
         | 
         | Would be nice if VC's would go destroy something of theirs for
         | once, and leave everyone else out of it.
        
         | geraldwhen wrote:
         | I doubt it. Anime is popular because people like it. A16z is
         | incapable of producing something people like.
        
       | mdni007 wrote:
       | The quality of anime has already started to decline especially
       | after Sony and other greedy companies started getting their hands
       | on animation studios.
        
         | bbqfog wrote:
         | There's a lot of great anime being produced today. Have you
         | watched Vinland Saga or Chainsaw Man?
        
         | leotravis10 wrote:
         | Also buying out streaming players such as Crunchyroll.
        
       | world2vec wrote:
       | Anime quality has been on a steep decline. It's all isekai stuff
       | these days and gacha is a disgusting mechanic no different from
       | slot machines at the casinos. This article left me with a bad
       | taste in my mouth.
        
         | bbqfog wrote:
         | No doubt that it would be best for fans if a16z stayed far away
         | from anime, but you're wrong about quality declining. There's a
         | ton of great stuff from recent times: Vinland Saga, Ranking of
         | Kings, Chainsaw Man, Dr. Stone...
         | 
         | There's always been trash anime, but it feels like there's some
         | very original work being produced.
        
         | leotravis10 wrote:
         | No question, especially when you have only two major players
         | distributing most anime in Sony and Netflix.
         | 
         | I enjoyed the good old days from the 1980s to the 2000s when it
         | was actually more creative and good quality not to mention that
         | there were more competition at that time period.
        
         | rootsudo wrote:
         | 100% this. I'm glad I'm not the only one. The article is
         | definetely written for someone that is not in the hobby and
         | looking for a place to park money for more enshitification of a
         | platform that already was, pretty much unrecognizable from a
         | decade ago.
        
       | outside1234 wrote:
       | Well, if this will get them off of crypto BS, I'm all for it.
        
         | par wrote:
         | yeah but we don't want the crypto bs guys shifting their
         | attention to anime.
        
         | FinalDestiny wrote:
         | I think this is directly related to https://anime.com - a new
         | product from the Azuki team (NFT collection)
         | 
         | It was announced about a week ago. Surprised no one mentioned
         | it yet.
        
       | msp26 wrote:
       | It's a breath of fresh air watching anime adaptations that
       | actually love and respect the original author's work like dungeon
       | meshi.
       | 
       | Meanwhile western fantasy adaptations seem to be full of arrogant
       | showrunners that think their vision is better: wheel of time, the
       | Witcher, House of the dragon (to an extent). George RR Martin
       | even publicly criticised HBO for this recently.
        
         | coolbreezetft24 wrote:
         | I loved the first two seasons of Wheel of Time (and also loved
         | the books growing up) - what is wrong with it?
         | 
         | Never read The Witcher or played the games but also really
         | enjoyed the netflix series
        
           | adamkittelson wrote:
           | If you find that you like something that most people don't
           | it's generally best to just leave it alone and be happy you
           | enjoyed it. If you try to delve into why so many people don't
           | like the thing you like then either they will manage to
           | convince you the thing you like is actually bad, which
           | doesn't benefit you, or you'll start to question whether or
           | not your taste in media is bad, which doesn't benefit you.
        
             | coolbreezetft24 wrote:
             | I guess I disagree with the premise that most people
             | dislike those two things, which seem quite popular and were
             | well-received
        
               | jasonlotito wrote:
               | Most people who watched it enjoyed it. Jordan fans were
               | big on it (at least from what I saw at JordanCon and
               | WoTCon). Will people not like certain things, sure. The
               | issue is that YouTubers will complain about anything
               | these days and rage videos get more traction, so it's
               | easier to pile on, and people who wouldn't watch it
               | complain about how bad it is.
               | 
               | I wouldn't put to much weight on someone not liking
               | something. After all, either they haven't watched it all,
               | or they are watching something they don't like. And
               | that's not someone's taste I trust.
        
               | dota_fanatic wrote:
               | One can enjoy the show as a kind of trashy fanfiction
               | while still finding it terribly unfaithful to the
               | original story and characters. We're only two seasons in
               | and massive changes have been made that invalidate
               | character arcs in the original, so I expect we'll
               | continue to see greater and greater divergence in plot
               | points.
               | 
               | Having said that, what do you think of people like GRRM
               | (wrt House of the Dragon) and Brandon Sanderson
               | critiquing these adaptations? Your last paragraph seems
               | to imply there's no value to someone dislike something.
        
               | bigstrat2003 wrote:
               | > I wouldn't put to much weight on someone not liking
               | something. After all, either they haven't watched it all,
               | or they are watching something they don't like. And
               | that's not someone's taste I trust.
               | 
               | That's some very "heads I win, tails you lose" logic
               | right there.
        
               | bigstrat2003 wrote:
               | WoT was very much not well received by fans, mainly
               | because it is so disrespectful to the source material
               | that you would think the showrunner actively hates it.
               | You asked for specifics, so:
               | 
               | * Rand and Egwene's relationship going from "they like
               | each other but are kind of hesitant" to "sneaking away to
               | have sex in the woods". Not only is this completely
               | unnecessary, it's completely at odds with the moral
               | values of Two Rivers culture for them to be doing that.
               | 
               | * Perrin being married (WTF), and then killing his wife
               | by accident (WTF squared). In the books Perrin is _very
               | careful_ to not accidentally hurt people as he is
               | conscious of his strength.
               | 
               | * In general, trying to change the Two Rivers to have the
               | diversity of modern day NYC. A region so far off the
               | beaten path that even their _de jure queen_ doesn 't
               | remember they exist is simply not going to have a broad
               | selection of races. This isn't as big of a sin as the
               | character changes, but it's also _completely free_ to
               | have this bit of worldbuilding via character casting.
               | There is no good reason whatsoever to give it up.
               | 
               | * Generally changing relationships in ways that just
               | aren't supported by the books. Like, Siuan and Moiraine
               | aren't in a sexual relationship at that point in the
               | story so it's idiotic to depict them as such.
               | 
               | * Trying to act as though the Dragon could be any of the
               | Emond's Field kids is against the very metaphysical
               | foundations of the WoT universe. The Dragon could _only_
               | be a boy, and Moiraine would _know_ this damn well. And
               | while we 're at it, Moiraine had no idea that there were
               | ta'veren in the Two Rivers at all, certainly not more
               | than one, unlike what the show claims.
               | 
               | * Aging up Min severely _and_ making her a Darkfriend.
               | Just WTF.
               | 
               | * At one point Nynaeve _heals death_ , which is again
               | completely impossible in this universe.
               | 
               | * The damane costumes... so bad it's laughable. What on
               | earth were they thinking? How could they get it so wrong?
               | How you go from collars (in the books) to _ball gags_ in
               | the show is utterly beyond my ability to even imagine.
               | 
               | Those are the main things I can think of, and that's just
               | season 1. I didn't even bother trying to hate read about
               | season 2 after how bad season 1 was, but from what I
               | heard it wasn't better (like apparently Rand bangs
               | Lanfear, which he _absolutely would never do_ ). I
               | understand that adaptations need to change things. But
               | the changes they made to WoT aren't necessary, and often
               | make the story _worse_ than what Jordan wrote.
               | 
               | It all shows a grave disrespect for the source material,
               | contrary to the staff's claims that they love the books
               | so much (bullshit). As far as I can tell, Rafe didn't
               | want to do an adaptation of Jordan's story, he wanted to
               | tell his own story. Which is fine, but then _tell your
               | own fucking story_ , don't take a massive dump all over
               | someone else's work which many people love.
        
           | msp26 wrote:
           | I'm surprised to hear that. I've genuinely never held so much
           | disdain for a TV show (season 1) in my life. But when season
           | 2 hit I was too apathetic to even bother watching.
           | 
           | They made so many changes (mostly shit) that it was hard to
           | even see it as an adaptation. The official statement (mental
           | gymnastics) was that it's "another turning of the wheel".
        
             | jasonlotito wrote:
             | > I'm surprised to hear that
             | 
             | In the fandom, it's fairly well received. JordanCon/WoTCon
             | had everyone loving it. Sure, some people might not like
             | it, but the majority of people who watched it loved it.
             | 
             | Martin's criticism of HoD is silly considering he still
             | hasn't stuck the landing on his original series, and I
             | imagine is holding back because people didn't like his
             | resolution and is now stuck. Regardless, lots of people
             | love these things. That you don't is fine. Not everything
             | needs to be for you.
             | 
             | I didn't like Witcher 3. Overrated lame open world with
             | boring stories and poor combat. Never finished it. So I had
             | zero interest with any of the Witcher shows. But I also
             | realize that a lot of people love it. I'm happy those
             | people have something they enjoy.
        
               | dota_fanatic wrote:
               | What makes you think ".. had everyone loving it" and "the
               | majority of people who watched it loved it"? Was there a
               | study done? I don't know either way, and am genuinely
               | curious what that distribution looks like. I suspect
               | nobody knows the answer but you seem confident in your
               | assertion.
               | 
               | As an aside, I imagine the commenter you're replying to
               | will find "That you don't [love these things] is fine.
               | Not everything needs to be for you." to be patronizing.
        
               | bigstrat2003 wrote:
               | > In the fandom, it's fairly well received.
               | 
               | No it isn't. On Reddit, people are extremely critical of
               | the show. And outside of Reddit, I literally do not know
               | one fan of WoT who actually enjoyed that monstrosity.
        
           | MrDrMcCoy wrote:
           | The Witcher books are great. A refreshing take on fantasy
           | from an entirely different set of folklore, and the English
           | translation was done so well that you can't even tell.
           | 
           | I also played the games (which take place after the books)
           | and loved them - although despite having a great story, the
           | first game was really rough. Witcher 3 is in my top 10 games
           | of all time, and it rewards you for playing all three by
           | letting you carry over your saves and seeing your impact on
           | the world. I hear they're remaking the first game as well as
           | a fourth, so there's a lot to look forward to there.
        
         | A_D_E_P_T wrote:
         | Right. And anime tends to stick very closely to the manga which
         | inspired it, because, commercially, it's often a vehicle
         | designed to increase the sales of that manga.
         | 
         | Take Dungeon Meshi, for instance: The anime only covered about
         | half of the material of the manga. So if you liked the show and
         | you want to know how the story ends, you've got to pick up the
         | books. If the showrunners changed important plot points,
         | finishing the story might not be so easy...
         | 
         | The Dungeon Meshi anime probably made some money on its own
         | account, but there are a lot of marginal anime series that
         | aren't really designed to make money, but are intended to
         | increase awareness/sales of various manga properties.
        
           | spondylosaurus wrote:
           | Dunmeshi's getting a second season--hopefully enough ground
           | to cover the rest of the series :)
        
           | AdmiralAsshat wrote:
           | The anime following manga orthodoxy is a relatively recent
           | thing, especially compared to earlier 90's adaptations.
           | Compare Sailor Moon, Helsing, etc, where they deviated so far
           | that both of them got subsequent "re-do" animes that tried to
           | more explicitly follow the manga.
           | 
           | I would argue that reinterpretations/taking liberties aren't
           | always a bad thing. I went back and watched the Jojo's
           | Bizarre Adventure OVA from the 90's that compressed/deviated
           | the Stardust Crusaders arc considerably, especially compared
           | to the more recent anime, which follows the manga panels to a
           | 't'. I would argue the OVA holds up _very_ well and makes
           | some necessary edits for the sake of the pacing. Plus, the
           | OVA staff clearly did their research, because OVA Egypt feels
           | _way_ more authentic than anime Egypt (which looked like your
           | stereotypical mishmash of Middle East /India).
        
             | phatfish wrote:
             | Fullmetal Alchemist and the redo Fullmetal Alchemist:
             | Brotherhood is the one I'm familiar with. Also the "filler"
             | episodes from Naruto.
             | 
             | It seems like mega series with 200+ episodes where fillers
             | are needed aren't getting made now? Demon Slayer is only on
             | 63 for example.
        
             | t-3 wrote:
             | It's even more than anime following manga - it's anime
             | following manga following light novels. The vast majority
             | of new anime were first successful novels and manga before
             | getting an anime adaptation. The pathological and deeply
             | systemic aversion to risk is extremely obvious. This is
             | also why so many series are extremely generic - the same
             | tropes and tired character archetypes, the same storyline
             | that's been done 1000x - writing webnovels is a huge
             | industry in east Asia, and the dynamics are very similar to
             | print-magazine/newspaper periodicals but even more so.
        
         | spondylosaurus wrote:
         | Watched a few episodes of dunmeshi before binge-reading the
         | manga, and I was surprised/impressed that the anime is
         | essentially a shot-for-shot recreation of the manga. I assume
         | they used manga panels as the storyboards, which speaks to how
         | good Ryoko Kui is at visual framing, timing beats for action
         | sequences and jokes, etc.
        
           | frozenlettuce wrote:
           | that's the source of some cheesy anime cliches like having
           | every character react and say something while an arrow is
           | still mid-flight - in a manga it makes sense but when
           | animating it makes it feel slow (looking at you Saint Seya)
        
           | dale_glass wrote:
           | That's extremely common, it's been happening for ages. You
           | can see it in things like Naruto, too.
           | 
           | That's because they made it at a rate of an episode per week,
           | and in parallel with the source material. That doesn't give
           | time for anything very fancy, so it's mostly a panel by panel
           | adaptation. Plus some filler in the mix, because a chapter
           | usually doesn't have enough meat in it to last a whole
           | episode. It's often 2 chapters per episode or so.
           | 
           | And that's why the slow pacing and the awful fillers.
        
         | throw4847285 wrote:
         | That's because the gap between comic books and animation is one
         | of the smallest between mediums. Not that it doesn't take
         | creativity to adapt a manga into anime, but there is a template
         | for a very faithful adaptation that is available to you.
         | 
         | If you're turning a prose novel into a tv show, you have to
         | basically create everything from scratch. You can set it in the
         | world of the novel and basically follow the plot, but the
         | pacing is impossible to translate directly, and you don't have
         | any of the visuals.
        
         | Barrin92 wrote:
         | >be full of arrogant showrunners that think their vision is
         | better
         | 
         | Most just want to have their own take on whatever they're
         | adapting and I think that's preferable because whether good or
         | bad, at the very least they're adding something new.
         | 
         | The nostalgia and fanbase driven reproduction of the same stuff
         | over and over adds nothing, it's just fanservice. If I want The
         | Witcher the game I can just play the actual game, if I want
         | GRRM I should read his books. Adaptions in which authors take
         | liberties have much more potential to be interesting. King
         | famously hated Kubrick's The Shining, Garland took a lot of
         | liberties with Annihilation and Starship Troopers was straight
         | up subversion and satire of the book and Heinlein's worldview.
         | 
         | Given that we're in the age of maximally non-offensive Disney
         | and comic book adaptions that just refuse to die and with so
         | few genuinely novel media out there to begin with, I'm in favor
         | of people at least taking some risks with adaptions.
        
           | jwells89 wrote:
           | The biggest issue with divergent adaptations in my opinion is
           | that there aren't many that are middling or on par with the
           | original. They tend to either be good, uplifting the source
           | material into something greater, or not well thought out and
           | somewhere between bad and awful, and it's easier to fall in
           | the latter of those two buckets than the former.
        
           | themaninthedark wrote:
           | But if you wan to have your own vision, why don't you just
           | create your own world to do that in?
           | 
           | If I took Fahrenheit 451 and adapt the story so that the
           | state executes Guy Montag because my vision is that hate
           | speech is dangerous, it's not Fahrenheit 451 anymore.
           | 
           | Take the most recent Dune movies as an example; In the books,
           | Paul spends so much time becoming Fremen and trying to resist
           | the prophecy as well as endlessly worrying about a space
           | jihad, only taking the water of life when he was not able to
           | predict that Gurney would try and kill his mother.
           | 
           | In the new vision "Let the Jihad begin!"
           | 
           | The first is the story of a reluctant hero who is trying to
           | keep his family alive and cherish the love of the desert
           | people who adopted him.
           | 
           | The second portrays a mother and son who scheme to use those
           | around them to further their end goal of power and revenge.
           | 
           | If I enjoy eating Oreo cookies and I buy an ice cream that is
           | labeled "Oreo Ice Cream" but when I taste it, it is
           | Strawberry Jam flavor, I am not going to be writing a review
           | that praises the product designer for their bold vision. I
           | will be taking the product back for a refund.
        
             | bawolff wrote:
             | > The second portrays a mother and son who scheme to use
             | those around them to further their end goal of power and
             | revenge.
             | 
             | That was present in the books at times as well.
        
             | Barrin92 wrote:
             | > it's not Fahrenheit 451 anymore.
             | 
             | What it is, is _your relationship to the story_ and that 's
             | really what an adaption is about. A good adaption I think
             | always shows you what someone feels in regards to the
             | original work, it's a response to or a dialog with the
             | original and that can include any emotion you have towards
             | it. Artistically you don't really owe Fahrenheit anything,
             | that's the sort of "fandom" mentality that I think is
             | pretty misplaced and immature in art, but popular now
             | because everything has fans and followers.
             | 
             | I agree with your observation about Dune but I think it's
             | quite smart. Villeneuve has basically rewritten Chani
             | entirely and shows us the story from her point of view,
             | starting and ending the two movies with her deliberately.
             | It's a critical outside view on Paul unlike the book in
             | many ways, and I think that just reflects Villeneuve's
             | perspective. (and also coincidentally Herbert's actual
             | intent for Paul, it will hopefully spare people the awkward
             | monologues from the second book)
             | 
             | Deep Space 9 is another example of this right, there's the
             | die-hard fan mentality of "It goes against everything ST is
             | about!", but ultimately it makes the universe much more
             | interesting and compelling because it gives you another
             | perspective from another point in time from someone who
             | didn't quite buy into the utopianism and just expressed
             | that.
        
         | jeffchien wrote:
         | Anime has had no shortage of adaptations disrespectful of the
         | original. Most of the time it's due to not having enough source
         | material like HBO GoT, which somehow sent Fullmetal Alchemist
         | to 1920s Germany in the first adaptation's movie. But sometimes
         | you get people like Bokurano's director who straight up said he
         | hated the manga.
        
       | clearleaf wrote:
       | This has to be an AI generated article. It doesn't take 1/10th
       | this much gobbledygook to announce you'll try injecting AI into
       | anime and pray that money comes out somehow. Crap on crap on
       | crap.
        
       | candiddevmike wrote:
       | I'm finding myself pulled towards anime after being exhausted
       | from CGI and terrible/reused set design. Live action shows are so
       | boring and plain these days, everything looks the same with
       | slightly different costumes. Nothing is really engaging visually,
       | and the storylines seem to be held back by what they can do
       | visually/"within their budget" for a lot shows.
        
         | dmonitor wrote:
         | I think the manga format is really effective at letting new
         | stories reach audiences. US media companies need to realize
         | that funding authors/artists to test run their new stories as
         | cheap comics and increasing funding to the 1/20 that gain
         | traction is a great way to incubate the new talent that the
         | industry desperately needs.
         | 
         | American comic books are incredibly stagnant and have been so
         | for the past 20 years. Not a single new character with any
         | cultural relevancy (besides reboots of old characters) has been
         | made in the last 20-odd years. Meanwhile, series like Attack on
         | Titan, Chainsaw Man, and Jujutsu Kaisen have become million
         | dollar global franchises in the last decade. The manga => anime
         | => cultural zeitgeist pipeline has produced tons of recent
         | compelling series.
        
           | hiccuphippo wrote:
           | What I like from manga is that there's usually a single
           | author who envisions the whole story, there could be a small
           | team of assistants and an editor to help but the story
           | belongs to a person alone. Not a team of people writting a
           | story by committee.
        
       | oDot wrote:
       | I spend most of my time writing and researching live-action
       | anime, and I can say that for it to really blow up, there needs
       | to be a paradigm shift.
       | 
       | Currently many of the efforts are trying to fit a peg into a
       | square by either "westernizing" the content, as done in
       | Hollywood, or completely jumping the shark as with most Japanese
       | releases. Both only make for a less palatabl result.
       | 
       | Instead, a selective "offset" approach should be taken. I
       | illustrate this briefly in a YouTube mini-essay:
       | 
       | https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=WiyqBHNNSlo
       | 
       | It is also how I write my IP:
       | 
       | https://www.weedonandscott.com/narrative/keepers-of-alteria
       | 
       | And it's how I assess exiting IPs for adaptation.
       | 
       | Until current stakeholders shake the current models out of their
       | system, this field is leaving a lot of creative output (and
       | profits) on the table.
        
         | da02 wrote:
         | Is this your day-job? That's impressive. Did you cry on the
         | travesty of Netflix Cowboy Bebop?
        
           | oDot wrote:
           | No, not quite my day job yet.
           | 
           | I have stopped watching the live-action Cowboy Bebop after
           | about 5 minutes, so much of it was spared.
           | 
           | The same production company (Tomorrow Studios) is currently
           | making the live action One Piece, which, ironically, could be
           | more detrimental to live-action anime than Cowboy Bebop was.
           | 
           | The reason is that even though the live-action One Piece is
           | not something I'd consider live-action _anime_, it's actually
           | quite good and is definitely well received, which may cause
           | producers to adopt its formula, and stop researching
           | alternative adaptation paths.
        
           | SV_BubbleTime wrote:
           | > travesty of Netflix Cowboy Bebop
           | 
           | Ugh. I just... it was so... ugh.
        
         | aspenmayer wrote:
         | > I spend most of my time writing and researching live-action
         | anime
         | 
         | What do you mean by live-action anime? This reads to me as
         | contradiction in terms. Anime is a term of art for CJK
         | animation, especially Japanese animation.
        
           | oDot wrote:
           | Live-action anime is an oxymoron commonly used to describe
           | live-action film or TV series based on anime or manga, or
           | having similar style to them.
           | 
           | The term is not well-defined.
           | 
           | You could say it applies to Ghost in the Shell, because it is
           | based on existing IP of the genre.
           | 
           | You could stretch it to include The Matrix, which is an
           | original IP but employs a lot of the style
           | 
           | Edge of Tomorrow, even though based on a Japanese light
           | novel, has deviated enough both in plot and style for the
           | term not to apply
        
             | aspenmayer wrote:
             | That's interesting. Is this phrasing used by others or is
             | it your own? I haven't ever heard it before. As an
             | anime/manga fan, it seems confusing and slightly grating.
             | It feels similar to intentionally wrong or "not even wrong"
             | engagement bait.
             | 
             | The closest thing I can think of that I myself could
             | describe that way would be Alita: Battle Angel, due to the
             | big eyes/small mouth style of Alita, but I would never
             | actually call it live action anime, but rather, a live
             | action anime _adaptation_.
             | 
             | Maybe this is related to modern speech patterns? The
             | closest thing I can think of is "it's giving x" which seems
             | to me to be a shortened version of related phrase "it's
             | giving x vibes."
             | 
             | On a related note, The Matrix actually has an animated
             | spinoff The Animatrix, which has segments that are arguably
             | anime, as they are produced by Japanese creators in a
             | typical style.
             | 
             | However, I find that the phrase live-action anime perhaps
             | says more about the person saying it and their perspective
             | than it says about the content being described as such.
        
               | oDot wrote:
               | I could see why this rubs you the wrong way.
               | 
               | I have never thought of its origins before, but I'd
               | assume it's a short hand for "live-action anime
               | adaptation". Maybe this makes it more palatable for you?
               | 
               | As for Animatrix, yes -- it really went full circle,
               | considering how they pitched the original feature:
               | 
               | > When Larry and Andy Wachowski were pitching The Matrix
               | to their producers, they played them a DVD of an
               | 82-minute Japanese cartoon and said: "We wanna do that
               | for real."
               | 
               | https://www.theguardian.com/film/2009/oct/19/hollywood-
               | ghost...
        
               | aspenmayer wrote:
               | I think it's mostly me. In another comment you mentioned
               | the live--action Netflix One Piece adaptation as live
               | action anime, and I think that description actually felt
               | somewhat apropos in that specific case, due to the
               | adaptation employing lots of CGI and special effects to
               | ape the style and mannerisms of the anime.
               | 
               | I think finding the term live action anime slightly off
               | is my own issue, as I also find the term Japanimation
               | also slightly grating. It probably has something to do
               | with being a fan of a historically somewhat
               | mocked/maligned subculture.
        
       | thefz wrote:
       | Might be an US thing, I don't think I talked to anyone watching
       | anime in the past IDK, 20 years? Besides kids watching dragon
       | ball at the TV after lunch, if that counts as anime.
       | 
       | I can't even tell a modern title or an author.
        
         | bbqfog wrote:
         | Demon Slayer is incredibly popular with younger people.
        
         | decafninja wrote:
         | Could certainly be a US thing, but I've found the tech crowd
         | and the anime otaku crowd to overlap a lot. Ditto for science
         | fiction.
        
           | codedokode wrote:
           | Also in screenshots from underground hacker forums in the
           | news the users who leak databases or hack something often
           | have anime-styled kind-looking avatar which creates a
           | contrast with post content.
        
         | rauljordan2020 wrote:
         | Opposite experience. Here in the US, I've heard a lot more
         | people watching anime than when I was a kid. Especially modern
         | ones such as Jujutsu Kaisen, Demon Slayer, etc.
        
           | decafninja wrote:
           | Same. Being into anime (and gaming, and RPGs, and sci-fi,
           | etc.) marked you as an outcast nerd when I was a kid.
           | 
           | Nowadays, most of it is nearly mainstream. Granted there is
           | still some weirdness like grown 40yo men obsessed with
           | schoolgirl harem anime...
        
             | Dweller1622 wrote:
             | Take a guess at what they might have been into when they
             | were kids!
        
           | kaashif wrote:
           | I think the only way to get a real picture here would be
           | doing surveys and finding out quantitatively.
           | 
           | I also don't watch anime and don't know anyone who does
           | really.
        
         | mattlondon wrote:
         | Same here in the UK. Not a single sniff of anything anime at
         | all in my day to day life, but I am bombarded by all sorts of
         | other shite (Marvel and other comic-based movies etc) on
         | billboards and the like. I've never seen it pushed to the top
         | on any of the UK streaming services.
         | 
         | I know nothing of anime nor manga, apart from recognising the
         | style. Never watched it - looks like kid stuff TBH.
        
           | acheong08 wrote:
           | I think a lot of anime watchers hide it.
           | 
           | > looks like kid stuff TBH.
           | 
           | Especially when this is the attitude held by most of the
           | older generation.
        
         | daedrdev wrote:
         | The US and France are the highest consumers of Anime content
         | from what I recall
        
         | GaggiX wrote:
         | How old are you? Because people talk about it all the time.
        
       | wormlord wrote:
       | I know that this is a website for startups, but looking at art
       | that people enjoy and put their soul into and thinking "how can I
       | extract profit from this" I think is actually close to a mental
       | illness.
       | 
       | I understand that commodification is inevitable (and yes anime is
       | already a soulless business), but goddamn if it doesn't look like
       | some form of neurosis. It's like walking into an old growth
       | forest and seeing the potential for a toothpick factory.
        
         | gruez wrote:
         | To a first approximation, "extract profit from this" means
         | providing goods/services that people are willing to pay money
         | for. If people are willing to pay for more anime content,
         | companions, vtubers, and streaming sites, why is it a "mental
         | illness" to provide that?
         | 
         | >It's like walking into an old growth forest and seeing the
         | potential for a toothpick factory.
         | 
         | At least for old growth forests you could argue that it's
         | mispriced because it's providing biodiversity/carbon
         | sequestration which can't be sold on the market. Meanwhile the
         | benefits provided by anime accrue solely to its consumers.
         | What's the problem with getting them to pay for it?
        
           | jjulius wrote:
           | >To a first approximation, "extract profit from this" means
           | providing goods/services that people are willing to pay money
           | for.
           | 
           | This is too generous, particularly with regards to a16z
           | coming into an already existing market. In reality, it's more
           | akin to taking something that already exists in a form that
           | people enjoy and are already willing to pay for, and both
           | bastardizing and cannibalizing it into something of lesser
           | quality just so that you can have additional excuses to
           | charge more money for things that you never used to charge
           | money for before.
           | 
           | "Nice thing you have there, be a shame if we fucked it up so
           | that we could make more money off of it," is a mental
           | illness.
        
             | AlexandrB wrote:
             | To put it another way, it's taking surplus value that was
             | previously going to either the producers or consumers of
             | the product and funneling it to Silicon Valley VCs instead.
        
             | lioeters wrote:
             | This is a main driver of the enshittification of society,
             | people who are net negative being in the middle of all
             | interpersonal transactions, seeking every opportunity to
             | exploit and extract value. As another comment mentioned,
             | the self-styled "elite" ruling class is mostly made up of
             | sociopaths who are excellent at being parasites.
        
             | anomaly_ wrote:
             | It takes two parties for a transaction to work. Basically,
             | you're railing against free markets and the free exchange
             | of ideas/money/work/etc.
        
               | jjulius wrote:
               | This is a black and white perspective, while the world
               | happens to be quite nuanced.
        
               | phs318u wrote:
               | You're assuming that the other party in this transaction
               | is rational. If there's one thing that should be obvious
               | to all by now it's that humans as consumers can be
               | incredibly irrational to the point where entire
               | industries have flourished by gaming this irrationality
               | for the aforementioned purpose of squeezing even greater
               | profits.
        
           | robbiewxyz wrote:
           | > "extract profit from this" means providing goods/services
           | that people are willing to pay money for
           | 
           | This is definitely not accurate: a functioning market drives
           | profits toward zero. Therefore "extract profit" is always
           | synonymous with "break the market" i.e. monopolize through
           | regulatory capture, trade secrets, network effects,
           | proprietary protocols, or whatever else.
           | 
           | To quote Mr Thiel [to a venture capitalist, at least]
           | "monopoly is the condition of every successful business".
           | 
           | Fwiw it might be fair to say extracting revenue means
           | providing something people are willing to pay for. Not profit
           | though.
        
         | teachrdan wrote:
         | Your comment made me think of a blog written by Marc Andreessen
         | at the beginning of Covid.
         | 
         | >It's time for full-throated, unapologetic, uncompromised
         | political support from the right for aggressive investment in
         | new products, in new industries, in new factories, in new
         | science, in big leaps forward.
         | 
         | He writes from the perspective of, "How are we having so many
         | shortages during this global pandemic? We used to BUILD things,
         | goddammit!" And now, fewer than 5 years later, a16z says:
         | 
         | > Yet, _we believe that anime is just getting started - today,
         | new technologies and business models are accelerating a once
         | niche industry to even greater heights._
         | 
         | To the extent that anyone in power in tech claims to believe in
         | the greater good, they are full of shit, a16z very much
         | included. It's fun for CEOs and VCs to make grand proclamations
         | about what's wrong in the world. But at the end of the day,
         | they only care about making money.
         | 
         | Or maybe anime is one of those "new industries" Marc Andreessen
         | said he was so excited about?
         | 
         | https://a16z.com/its-time-to-build/
        
         | codingdave wrote:
         | You may be right, but it is hardly unique to either startups or
         | to anime. The fine art world is full of artists who put their
         | soul into their work, and galleries who try to profit from it.
         | In an ideal world, both sides get value from working together
         | despite being at odds philosophically, but in reality there is
         | certainly some misalignment of incentives.
        
         | jajko wrote:
         | Look at the top world leaders, so called captains of business.
         | Cold stone heartless sociopaths, every single one of them.
         | Jobs, Gates, Musk, Bezos, Schmidt and so on and on.
         | 
         | For a second imagine what environment they went through, what
         | battles they had to fight _for decades_ and keep being on top.
         | You can 't be a normal balanced person with good friendly
         | personality and achieve any of that. Even if you start at
         | absolutely stellar lucky place, you will end up as say Stallman
         | (respect to that guy, but you can see life path vs Jobs
         | difference mainly due to character).
         | 
         | The fact that such people are celebrated and imitated and there
         | is a lot of strive to replicate their success path is normal.
         | Why - as per J. Peterson (topic on its own, but his
         | psychological stuff I still respect) there is cca 1:20
         | sociopaths and 1:100 psychopaths in general population. Do the
         | numbers, they are not nice but then you can understand whats
         | happening in this world and politics much better. HN isn't
         | representative of general population, that ratio is much worse
         | although smart folks like that know when to be quiet and just
         | watch/read.
         | 
         | I am not trying to scorn those folks, at their best they do
         | move whole society further, and we desperately need that now.
         | But they are overall not good people, sort of necessary evil
         | IMHO.
        
           | disqard wrote:
           | HHGG-style, like how our planet was summarized as "Mostly
           | Harmless", your comment is a pithy summary of CEOs:
           | "necessary evil".
        
         | NoCoooode wrote:
         | That's what I found so dystopian about web3. It seemed they
         | were trying to financialize everything, declaring they were
         | making payments frictionless while inserting themselves into
         | every new financial stream they were trying to create.
         | 
         | As for a16z, andreeson's 30k word moronic Randian rant speaks
         | for itself. People obsessed with optimization should not be
         | involved in public policy.
        
           | karaterobot wrote:
           | > People obsessed with optimization should not be involved in
           | public policy.
           | 
           | I mean, they should. It would be cool if we could optimize
           | public policy. Optimize means make as effective as possible,
           | right? They should just not be so laser-focused on one metric
           | that they're blind to the side effects created by optimizing
           | for it.
        
         | MetaWhirledPeas wrote:
         | That's why I like things like the PICO-8 "fantasy console".
         | People making games just for the heck of it, with no objective
         | of a paycheck.
         | 
         | If you make a good one you could always port it and sell it
         | later (Celeste), but that's kinda beside the point.
        
       | asdf123qweasd wrote:
       | The most important part about anime is- with computer assisted
       | tooling, its cheaper to make - cheaper to make means less
       | oversight by creative handicaps like financeer gremiums, means
       | artists get a shot earlier, instead a few making it to the honey
       | pots. Thus more artists, who want a shot try the medium instead
       | of waiting for there day in the sun in some cooperate mausoleum.
       | 
       | Tl,DR; All of culture is constantly fleeing the curse of the MBAs
       | - the destroyers of all things good with the Middas touch.
        
       | FigurativeVoid wrote:
       | If you're new to anime, it's hard to figure out where to start.
       | 
       | If you're able to tolerate some more intense themes, Fullmetal
       | Alchemist Brotherhood is widely regarded as one of the best anime
       | ever created, and rightly so.
        
         | vundercind wrote:
         | Like a lot of things, I think it can also be hard to remember
         | how much effort it took to get into it.
         | 
         | Most anime's pretty off-putting if you don't know how to "read"
         | it--you have to get used to all three of: quirks of the medium
         | (e.g. how emotions are expressed visually, confused Engrish
         | intro songs); cultural differences between your culture and
         | Japan's; and a pile of tropes that are very common in anime but
         | less common elsewhere, which you can use as a way to understand
         | the genre of what you're watching and how it's supposed to be
         | read.
         | 
         | It's why Cowboy Bebop is such a popular gateway anime: Ed aside
         | (and even there, only sometimes) there's minimal reliance on
         | alien-to-Westerners visual expression, the genre is entirely
         | familiar and uses familiar tropes and archetypes, and it's
         | culturally hardly any more Japanese than Blade Runner. (Plus, I
         | mean, it's good--but so are a bunch of others that _do not_
         | work well as gateway anime)
        
       | maxglute wrote:
       | I was expecting report to acknowledge "AI Waifus / Husbandos" at
       | some point, nevermind first point. Whatever the artistic merit of
       | anime, it's nice to see analysis that acknowledges anime
       | popularity is simply driven by sheer horniess by both genders.
       | IMO functionally PG13 softer softcore pornography.
        
       | adamwong246 wrote:
       | While elevated Anime does exist, it by-and-large deserves it's
       | reputation as pulp. It was cheap to produce by humans, and even
       | cheaper to produce by machines, but the kids simply can't get
       | enough of it. I am slightly terrified at the thought that should
       | the matrix ever come to pass, it will appear as a endless tide of
       | cat-girl avatars.
        
       | marginalia_nu wrote:
       | Something has happened with western television where it's like
       | everyone is angry all the time and can never come together to
       | solve a problem without arguing about it for half a season first.
       | 
       | I find it incredibly exhausting to watch. Anime can be a nice
       | refuge from that, as can older tv-shows from before this was a
       | thing.
        
         | jwells89 wrote:
         | That cynical bent you mention along with a takeover of
         | dark/gritty aesthetic, with both being positioned as more
         | "realistic" or "mature" and thus preferable has made western TV
         | somewhat exhausting to me too.
        
           | marginalia_nu wrote:
           | Yeah, don't know how mature it actually is though, given how
           | everyone acts like a self centered teenager now more than
           | ever ;-)
           | 
           | I think the transition to streaming is also an exaserbating
           | factor, since it's less important to resolve events the same
           | episode, characters can now hold much longer grudges.
        
             | jwells89 wrote:
             | Yep, that's why I included those quotemarks. I don't think
             | that behavior or gritty aesthetic is actually mature, but
             | there's a popular conception that it is for reasons that
             | are unclear to me.
             | 
             | My best guess is that the overarching emotional climate
             | biases what people consider "realistic" or "mature", and
             | since the mid-to-late 2000s it's been pushing that
             | perception in a more cynical direction.
        
               | marginalia_nu wrote:
               | I mostly think it's bad writing. You can make mature,
               | gritty tv-shows without the protagonist running to their
               | room and slamming the door very hard when they don't get
               | what they want, but the problem is that this is much
               | harder.
               | 
               | Breaking Bad is a solid example that gets it right.
        
         | hiccuphippo wrote:
         | The "iyashikei" subgenre is specially nice for that. I'd really
         | like to see what a western tv take on iyashikei would look
         | like.
        
       | FigurativeVoid wrote:
       | I've recently gotten much more into anime, and I feel that I love
       | it because I love fantasy. There just aren't that many western
       | fantasy shows that are nearly as good as Frieren or FMAB.
        
       | hyggetrold wrote:
       | _> AI is deepening the previously parasocial relationships we had
       | with our favorite anime characters from passive linear media,
       | into powerful new, interactive relationships._
       | 
       | I truly can't believe they had the gall to publish this article.
       | The more of the article I read the more I felt like I was reading
       | their strategy for preying on the weak and unfortunate.
        
         | adamwong246 wrote:
         | You are right to be horrified but what is the use in
         | maintaining the pretense that we are not strip-mining our
         | citizens of their attention?
        
         | Vegenoid wrote:
         | It is truly shameless - and they are this shameless because
         | they can be, and may even be rewarded for it. AI "companions",
         | if left unchecked, will be as harmful as addictive drugs,
         | enabling companies to suck everything from some people.
        
           | imiric wrote:
           | But that future is coming regardless if VCs bet on it or not.
           | 
           | I'm not defending the article and agree with you that it's
           | despicable, but the only thing successful VC firms know how
           | to do is to bet on companies that will make them money. It's
           | clear that a future where AI companions exist is coming, and
           | it will be a huge industry, so it's only logical that they
           | would latch on to it and promote it in the only way they know
           | how.
           | 
           | As for AI companions themselves, sure. They will be addicting
           | and harmful, but technology is already that. Yet loneliness
           | is a worldwide epidemic, and I reckon that AI has the
           | potential to also improve the quality of life for many
           | people. This in turn will lead us to even lower birth rates,
           | but that seems inescapable as well. The next 50 years will be
           | interesting, to say the least.
        
         | papashell wrote:
         | > AI is deepening the parasocial relationships
         | 
         | Fixed.
        
         | latexr wrote:
         | And they called it " _our_ favourite anime characters", as if
         | we're supposed to believe the blood-sucking money-addicted
         | pariahs at a16z are fans.
         | 
         | The whole article reads like a book report from Steve Buscemi's
         | "how do you do, fellow kids" character, with a few choice
         | phrases from a "most popular anime quotes" buzzfeed article. I
         | cringed.
         | 
         | It is unsurprising that both "contributors" have "web3" listed
         | as one of their focus.
        
       | pupppet wrote:
       | I watch a lot of anime but I'd be surprised if we don't see a
       | crash similar to the video game crash of '83. There is a ton of
       | garbage being cranked out right now.
        
       | Wuzado wrote:
       | Holy hell, this is such a depressing, dehumanized, out-of-touch
       | article--especially regarding the fascination with AI in the
       | field of, admit it or not, art. The article even makes mistakes
       | in the most basic factual areas, such as calling light novels
       | "visual novels." It's deeply saddening.
       | 
       | For a more positive outlook on the animation industry, check out
       | "Keep Your Hands Off Eizouken!"--an incredibly creative love
       | letter to the joy and passion of creating art through the lens of
       | animation.
        
       | dvh wrote:
       | After 2+ decades of watching anime I was struggling to find
       | something that would interest me, I thought I got tired of it.
       | 
       | But then I made a scatter chart of my ratings of all 200+ anime I
       | watched vs MAL rating and I found literally ZERO correlation! The
       | MAL rating means nothing for my anime tastes. So now I start
       | watching random anime starting from episode 1 and if I hate it I
       | drop it, no bad feelings, if I don't love it by episode 3 I drop
       | it as well. There are over 17000 anime. And finally I was able to
       | find good anime again that I truly enjoy watching, easily 10*. I
       | don't even read ratings or reviews beforehand as there is no
       | correlation for me. Just pick random anime and watch.
        
         | t-3 wrote:
         | There's a lot of good stuff from China - Mo Dao Zu Shi,
         | Thousand Autumns, Fairies Album, All Saints Street, Forty
         | Millenniums of Cultivation, Fog Hill of Five Elements, Psychic
         | Princess, Fei Ren Zai, Fabulous Beasts, No Choice but to Betray
         | Earth, etc. There is of course a lot of mediocre and garbage
         | stuff as well, but the tropes are far less annoying and thanks
         | to Chinese censorship there's far less pandering and it's much
         | more tasteful on average than Japanese anime.
        
       | legitster wrote:
       | The traits that define anime all trace back to post-WWII creative
       | innovations intended to work around limited budgets and
       | resources. So pound-for-pound you can maximize the amount of
       | "hit" you get from stories, characters, emotions, etc. And by its
       | nature its cheap and fast to make.
       | 
       | It's the ultimate form of mass-produced entertainment for the age
       | of cheap, binge-able content. "Quantity has a quality all of it's
       | own".
        
       | hintymad wrote:
       | Following this, the next one that "eats the world" could be web
       | novels (https://www.webnovel.com/). If I'm not mistaken, the
       | trend was started by the Chinese authors. Chinese companies
       | created those hyper competitive yet super lucrative platforms for
       | the authors. Over the past 20 years, the authors truly evolved
       | through generations of competition. They may lack of deep skills
       | in writing world classics, but they certainly have mastered the
       | art of creating captive stories with vast scale and scope. They
       | also invented more genres than I can care about. Some of the
       | stories were so intriguing that some readers on web novel
       | resorted to Google translate to read the untranslated version --
       | something that I can't fathom. And it looks western authors have
       | slowly picked up the trend, so I'm hopeful that we will see a lot
       | more authors coming up with amazing stories.
        
       | titanomachy wrote:
       | "AI is deepening the previously parasocial relationships we had
       | with our favorite anime characters from passive linear media,
       | into powerful new, interactive relationships"
       | 
       | One thing that troubles me about this is the idea of a human
       | having [what they feel is a] deep, meaningful relationship with
       | what ultimately is a bit of code and conversation history owned
       | by a for-profit corporation. They might even experience [what
       | they interpret as] romantic love towards this construct. This
       | could give the controlling corporation unbelievable leverage over
       | that person, even worse than casinos or cigarette companies,
       | because AI companions aren't as fungible as these other highly-
       | optimized dopamine delivery systems.
       | 
       | Of course, Blade Runner 2049 explored this well.
        
       | TheAceOfHearts wrote:
       | How do you go about directing / producing your own anime or
       | animated series anyway? I have stories within me that scream out
       | to be brought into this world.
       | 
       | I've watched a lot of anime and western cartoons and feel like
       | the bar isn't that high. I'm pretty confident I could write and
       | direct something that's competitive with most of what's currently
       | being produced. At a minimum, just making a solid show that
       | doesn't abuse common tropes while including a strong story and
       | art direction seems like it would put you miles ahead of most
       | existing anime; see for example: Frieren. Frieren avoids common
       | anime tropes and is happy to explore the setting while giving the
       | characters room to breathe; this was enough to propel the series
       | to the top of every anime rating website.
       | 
       | Even evaluating top-tier producers like Studio Ghibli, despite
       | being able to create S-tier art and animations, I think they no
       | longer have any stories worth telling which they haven't already
       | presented in some form or another. It's like they continue
       | producing movies because the studio has to do something, but
       | there's no strong driving force to guide them. Modern Studio
       | Ghibli movies aren't driven by a burning passion from the
       | director's soul to be summoned into this world.
        
         | zhizdev wrote:
         | I am trying to produce an anime / webtoon with an AI assisted
         | studio. Would love to chat more about your stories that scream
         | to be brought into the world! (X @zhizdev)
        
         | Der_Einzige wrote:
         | The best story telling in anime doesn't come from anything
         | close to Ghibli - at least not modern Ghibli.
         | 
         | If you want high concept, good, unique stories, it's going to
         | take you to some much more indie sutff. Serial Experiments
         | Lain, The Tatami Galaxy, Perfect Blue (and everything that
         | director made), Ghost in the Shell (the first movie), Akira,
         | and a bunch of other weird 80s/90s anime films you likely
         | wouldn't even consider.
        
           | SV_BubbleTime wrote:
           | > Perfect Blue
           | 
           | I saw it recommended somewhere. Had no idea I was in store
           | for a legit psychological thriller.
        
       | CommieBobDole wrote:
       | What a timely observation of this phenomenon that definitely
       | didn't happen twenty years ago. Now that they've discovered
       | anime, I wonder if they're going to start investing in other
       | current crazes like Y2K compliance or maybe this hot new "world
       | wide web" thing I keep hearing about.
        
       | PaulHoule wrote:
       | So many things are wrong with this article but I'll start with
       | Haruhi Suzumiya being a 'light novel' (a novel printed in large
       | text as if for seniors with a few illustrations) as opposed to a
       | 'visual novel' (something you would make with
       | https://www.renpy.org/)
       | 
       | It is hard to know because financials aren't public but it's not
       | clear to me that Crunchyroll has really addressed the commercial
       | problems anime had in western markets. In the VHS era there was a
       | fight over subtitles vs dubs which was acute because you could
       | not put multiple content tracks on the media, in the DVD age you
       | could.
       | 
       | More fundamentally, dubs cost a lot of money in comparison with
       | subs and were always terrible until the people who made those
       | terrible dubs gained experience and some of them got good.
       | (Though they do their best work for game publishers like Idea
       | Factory and ATLUS who care.) At the time people though subs had a
       | limited market but now subprime anime (and sometimes good anime)
       | gets shoveled onto Tubi and people watch it --- today we're in
       | the habit of watching movies with subtitles because you can't
       | make out the dialog on half of the new Hollywood movies anyway.
       | 
       | Since crunchyroll is in the vainglorious subscription racket I
       | can only assume they're as profitable as Netflix, Disney Plus,
       | Peacock, etc.
       | 
       | The article touches on but doesn't really stress how it is very
       | rare for an anime to start out as an anime ( _Precure?_ ) but
       | rather it is the way you know you made it if you made a manga,
       | light novel, visual novel, video game, etc. The economics are
       | brutal and nobody is going to invest in it if the story,
       | characters and settings haven't been market tested. Of course
       | this leads to problems like you can find out how the anime you
       | like ends if it you look at the source material.
        
         | skybrian wrote:
         | If that's an error, Wikipedia has it too:
         | 
         | > Haruhi Suzumiya (Japanese: Liang Gong haruhi, Hepburn:
         | Suzumiya Haruhi) is a Japanese light novel series written by
         | Nagaru Tanigawa and illustrated by Noizi Ito.
         | 
         | Also:
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Haruhi_Suzumiya_light_...
         | 
         | But apparently there's a Manga version too?
         | 
         | Never read it. Is it any good?
        
           | Izkata wrote:
           | A common pattern is light novel -> manga adaptation -> anime
           | adaptation. From the first few release dates on the sidebar
           | of the main page, it looks like this one followed that
           | pattern (with lots of spinoffs and sequels).
        
       | julianeon wrote:
       | I wouldn't group anime with Roblox, at all. Roblox has 10
       | thousand different themes and game worlds, and a small fraction
       | of them reflect anime, but that's not particularly interesting.
        
       | bawolff wrote:
       | I think part of the reason, is a lot of western media has become
       | very safe, and thus stale and repetitive.
       | 
       | Western (live action) movies are sequel after sequel of
       | predictable plots. Western animation is relegated almost
       | exclusively to children (and ocassionally raunchy adult comedy).
       | The formula is stale, so other media is taking its place.
        
       | aliasxneo wrote:
       | I have limited time with my existing responsibilities, but with
       | what little time I do have, I love investing it into a good movie
       | or TV show. I don't mean whatever "binge-worthy" show is on the
       | top 10 of Netflix. I like character development, good pacing,
       | non-standard plots, etc. It's pretty much the opposite of what
       | has come out in the West over the last five years.
       | 
       | So, I started investing more into anime, and I have had zero
       | regrets. Sure, there's plenty of low-quality near-pornographic
       | trash, but I've found far more diamonds in the rough than I was
       | initially expecting.
       | 
       | Let me give a recent example: Kotaro Lives Alone. It's a story
       | about a four-year-old who lives alone due to some extenuating
       | circumstances I won't cover for the sake of spoilers. It's funny,
       | heart-warming, cry-inducing, and overall, extremely entertaining
       | for an otherwise outrageous plot. I've found dozens of gems like
       | this in the past five years, and a lot of them are "recent"
       | enough to give me hope that the Japanese haven't forgotten the
       | art of making quality media.
        
       | slowhadoken wrote:
       | Yeah it has been since the late 1990's/early 2000's. Audiences
       | appreciate high concept and escalation of premise even if the
       | themes and storytelling aren't amazing.
        
       | par wrote:
       | Honestly I feel a16z as a 'tech vc' firm is just getting weird
       | now. It's like they're trying to be the de facto flag bearer for
       | like weird crypto otaku types. And I say this as someone who has
       | loved anime since the 90s, I don't think I want a16z getting
       | their mits into my special interests. To see them talking about
       | 'waifus' is just weird.
        
       | squidsoup wrote:
       | Anime seems to have a quality problem. Other than Miyazaki and
       | Satoshi Kon's work, I can't say there's much that has resonated
       | with me. Evangelion was interesting, but that was almost thirty
       | years ago!
        
         | GaggiX wrote:
         | Do you actually remember the TV season of Evangelion?
         | Especially the last episodes seem they have finished the
         | budget. I'm sure the films are better, but I still have to
         | watch them.
        
           | squidsoup wrote:
           | I thought the ambiguous ending was interesting and thought
           | provoking, even if it may have been the result of budgeting
           | issues, but I do recall they tied up the loose ends in the
           | movies.
        
             | GaggiX wrote:
             | I think it's quite easy to find anime that are better than
             | the TV season of Evangelion, if you like it.
        
               | squidsoup wrote:
               | Open to recommendations!
        
       | SV_BubbleTime wrote:
       | It's getting like no love... but Blue Eye Samauri on Netflix was
       | really something fucking else.
       | 
       | SO hates animation things usually and really liked it.
        
       | citizenpaul wrote:
       | I've always liked memes and anime for their entertainment. Though
       | I've always cringed when people feel the need to try to bring
       | them into their work or work life.
        
       | manicennui wrote:
       | I mean this as unkindly as possible: please stay the fuck out of
       | anime.
        
       | drbig wrote:
       | "Please, keep _these_ people away from art and culture. Isn't
       | blockchain AI enough already?"
       | 
       | Well, of course it isn't! They ain't vampires - these just need
       | blood an power, and also are completely fictional.
        
       | rootsudo wrote:
       | Anime today isn't what it was a decade or two ago. While tastes
       | and styles change, and I accept that, what this article defines
       | as anime isn't anime in any traditional sense.
       | 
       | The article claims:
       | 
       | "Anime is where the future of creation and play is happening--
       | whether through mobile games, fanfiction, roleplaying, or AI
       | interactions. We believe anime will become a dominant format for
       | content engagement."
       | 
       | But is this really "anime"? In my opinion, no. Vtubing and AI
       | tools aren't anime.
       | 
       | The article describes a fan's journey as starting with popular
       | IPs like _Attack on Titan_ or _One Piece_ , then moving into
       | deeper social engagement with UGC, VTubing, and cosplay. They
       | argue anime has evolved from passive to interactive.
       | 
       | This shift, however, feels like a corporate "anime-as-a-service"
       | model, exploiting aesthetics rather than preserving the original
       | spirit of anime before the 2010s.
       | 
       | And of course, the 2010s anime is nothing compared to the 00s
       | which, really felt like the height of anime with fansub
       | communities and then The 90s where the community really started
       | cosplaying and trading by VHS tapes while being blinded by the
       | futurism of Japan.
       | 
       | This article really paints a dim future to what brought me joy
       | and what pulled me into IT/Tech/NetSec/Programming and I couldn't
       | even get out of the first few paragraphs before I wrote all this.
       | 
       | But I'm flabbergasted. Anime as a service is here.
        
       | codedokode wrote:
       | My own observations in my country:
       | 
       | - in recent year or two, saw lot of people in the streets wearing
       | clothes with Japanese words. Saw such clothes in stores. I
       | thought initially that they were fans of Japanese culture, but it
       | seems that it is just a fashion trend and they probably cannot
       | even read them.
       | 
       | - when entering a bookstore or a school supplies store, there are
       | notebooks and sketchbooks and other goods with anime-style
       | characters, translations of novels. Novels are now even in some
       | supermarkets. Again, it started recently.
       | 
       | - that anime-styled Chinese RPG game is somewhat popular among
       | young people, and when reading laptop reviews there are comments
       | like "Will (anime-styled Chinese game) run on this?"
       | 
       | - I am not sure if we can count anime-styled avatars on social
       | media because I don't remember if they were always widespread or
       | only recently
       | 
       | Hope these trends will continue. I wonder is it our local
       | (Russian) trend or something global?
        
       | stonethrowaway wrote:
       | It's Time to Destroy
        
       | AndyKelley wrote:
       | As an anime enthusiast, seeing this breakdown from a powerful VC
       | is depressing. How about you go play your capitalism game
       | somewhere else. I'm sure my dishwasher can be made even worse
       | than it already is by adding AI features to it. Anime is great
       | precisely because it's mainly driven by artists with a creative
       | vision, not by hyenas scavenging for rotting meat.
       | 
       | Ew. I really hate this.
       | 
       | I'll go back to studying my WaniKani flash cards for the day and
       | hope that I forget that I read this by the end of it.
        
       | johnea wrote:
       | I've been a major fan of anime for decades. Including starting to
       | study Japanese at age 50 (not recommended).
       | 
       | I could care less about the game spinoffs, or the vtubers, but I
       | do hope we can get beyond the current plot trend of "living in an
       | imaginary world with my smartphone, where I pretend to be dwarf
       | listening to Irish jigg music".
       | 
       | There are so many awesome anime: Heike Monogatari, House of Five
       | Leaves, Angolmois - Genkou Kassenki (depicting the Mongol
       | invasion of Japan in the 1200s).
       | 
       | Sadly, anime for addults is not currently a factor in that
       | blossoming industry described in the article.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-09-23 23:01 UTC)