[HN Gopher] Uber charges more if you have credits in your account
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Uber charges more if you have credits in your account
        
       Author : cwwc
       Score  : 114 points
       Date   : 2024-09-22 21:38 UTC (1 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (viewfromthewing.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (viewfromthewing.com)
        
       | INTPenis wrote:
       | I never even hear of uber credits. I always charge it to my card.
       | In europe we often use Bolt too, which is a competing service. So
       | I actually have used Bolt more than Uber.
        
         | Carrok wrote:
         | My credit card gives me monthly Uber credits.
        
           | eqvinox wrote:
           | These combination/cross deals are AFAIK quite rare in the EU
           | (or outside the US in general?) If your credit card is
           | branded some way, it'll give you something with that brand
           | (e.g. Lufthansa CC) but that's about it. (And I don't think
           | there's an Uber branded credit card?)
        
       | tomohelix wrote:
       | I always wonder what do the devs who coded these "features" think
       | about themselves and/or what other people think about them.
       | 
       | Yes I know they are literally paid to not have these questions.
       | But deep down, is there any remorse or guilt at all or is it just
       | "not my problem" attitude all the way to the bank?
       | 
       | On a tangent, this is why I think there need to be more
       | regulations with software development. Any real engineering
       | discipline has tons of oversight and government agencies
       | breathing down their neck to ensure compliance. Software came out
       | when all these pushes for safety has been gutted and as a result
       | we have a free for all race to the bottom.
        
         | ceejayoz wrote:
         | I suspect it's less apathetic than that; more "sweet, this'll
         | get me a bonus!"
        
         | howard941 wrote:
         | How would you word a regulation against this sort of thing to
         | apply against the low man on the totem pole, the lowly SWE?
         | Might it be better if it was regulated as unfair and deceptive
         | by a strong FTC with a nice bounty for SWEs?
        
         | parpfish wrote:
         | Instead of regulations, I think this is the kind thing that
         | should be driving a push to unionize tech. For the most part we
         | don't need to worry about dangerous job sites or low pay, but
         | we do have to worry about unethical business practices.
         | 
         | Specifically, if we had widespread "codetermination", which
         | gives board seats to union members, the people that build
         | things would have a say in what they're being asked to build.
        
       | JCM9 wrote:
       | Not surprised. Uber doesn't exactly have a reputation of being
       | the most ethical company out there.
        
         | bschmidt1 wrote:
         | During their growth years when they arguably did the shadiest
         | stuff they also had record-breaking quarterly losses in the
         | billions while their counterpart DiDi in China was doing well
         | enough to acquire Uber China (who according to Travis Kalanick
         | was losing over $1b a year).
        
       | jlund-molfese wrote:
       | Probably false, like the urban legend that Uber charges more when
       | a device's battery is low [0].
       | 
       | Claims like this go viral because they're practically
       | unfalsifiable (It isn't in Uber's best interest to make their
       | pricing algorithms public) and generate clicks. But when you take
       | a closer look, it's always some anecdote that can be explained by
       | people selecting different pricing tiers, or by multiple phones
       | looking at the same route implying increased demand (the latter
       | search might display a higher price). A proper experiment would
       | involve dozens of phones under different scenarios making
       | searches in a random order, then trying to correlate the
       | variables with the prices. But for whatever reason, nobody ever
       | does those experiments.
       | 
       | For what it's worth, I checked the price of an Uber with credits
       | in my account against Lyft to the airport just now, and Uber was
       | slightly cheaper.
       | 
       | 0. https://www.wkyc.com/article/news/verify/verify-does-uber-
       | ch...
        
         | Eddy_Viscosity2 wrote:
         | The fact that its unfalsifiable is the problem. They can (and
         | why wouldn't they) run all sorts of shenanigans with their
         | pricing algorithms.
         | 
         | Pricing algorithms should be not be private. Free markets
         | depend on transparent pricing.
        
           | steelframe wrote:
           | > Free markets depend on transparent pricing.
           | 
           | I mean, there are no surprise post-ride fees or anything.
           | They're quoting you what the actual price is, and they're
           | free to quote whatever they want for whatever reasons they
           | want. Nobody's forcing you to agree to it. There's nothing
           | stopping you from getting a competitive quote from Lyft by
           | simply switching apps on the phone. Or by calling a cab
           | company. Also there's nothing that keeps you from choosing to
           | wait for a bus.
        
             | echelon wrote:
             | What you're responding to is market demand for an
             | alternative. Who knows if it'll spring into existence, but
             | the words have been uttered into the universe.
        
             | endgame wrote:
             | My latest Uber receipt reads:
             | 
             | > Due to unanticipated tolls or surcharges on this trip,
             | we've adjusted your upfront fare to reflect the actually
             | incurred charges. Please see the receipt breakdown for
             | details.
        
               | admax88qqq wrote:
               | Were there tolls on your trip?
        
           | bdangubic wrote:
           | If free markets depended on transparent pricing we'd all be
           | communists now ;)
        
             | Eddy_Viscosity2 wrote:
             | What? How?
        
           | bongodongobob wrote:
           | Pricing algorithms have ALWAYS been private, for any
           | business. They tell you the price straight up. You either
           | like the price or you don't. They don't and should not need
           | to explain where the number came from. Do you whine about the
           | pricing algorithms behind McDonalds or the grocery store? I
           | would hope not.
        
             | Daishiman wrote:
             | Mass consumer products generally don't discriminate per
             | user like that.
        
         | tbrownaw wrote:
         | > _or by multiple phones looking at the same route implying
         | increased demand (the latter search might display a higher
         | price)_
         | 
         | This post sounded like it's saying that the later search is the
         | one with the _lower_ price.
        
       | OutOfHere wrote:
       | If they do charge more, it will only hurt them with people
       | checking and using a competitor for a lower price. It will not
       | hurt the employed economist's paycheck though who will continue
       | to peddle pricing patterns that don't actually work in the real
       | world, still collecting a generous salary for deceiving the
       | company and shareholders.
        
       | zeroonetwothree wrote:
       | I have a bunch of credit from the Costco thing and haven't
       | noticed any changes in pricing on my usual routes.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-09-22 23:00 UTC)