[HN Gopher] Applied Mathematical Programming
___________________________________________________________________
Applied Mathematical Programming
Author : ibobev
Score : 62 points
Date : 2024-09-21 18:00 UTC (4 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (web.mit.edu)
(TXT) w3m dump (web.mit.edu)
| 6gvONxR4sf7o wrote:
| Has this been updated since 1977? Because the field and tools and
| even the view points have changed a ton.
| Dr_Birdbrain wrote:
| Do you have a recommendation for a modern text?
| dr_kiszonka wrote:
| Based on the code output in the book, it is old. But the book
| seems pretty easy to follow even if you are not strong in math.
| Hopefully, in the near future I will be able to pass a book
| like this to an LLM and have it enrich it with code examples in
| a programming language I am familiar with.
| iamcreasy wrote:
| Can you share an example of change you are referring to? The
| topics looks on this book look pedagogical.
| whatever1 wrote:
| The tools probably have changed but the fundamental language is
| the same. The same way that you need to wire your brain to see
| how a problem can be casted as a dynamic programming one, you
| also need to learn how to formulate problems as integer/linear
| programming ones.
|
| For example all of the "hard" leetcode problems can be casted
| as math programming ones. But the interviewers will not
| appreciate this solution approach lol.
|
| Once you conquer the logic/language then learning the tools is
| the easy part.
| toolslive wrote:
| > But the interviewers will not appreciate this solution
| approach lol.
|
| I once witnessed a programmer with a PhD in Maths find closed
| form formulas for a lot of questions where it was expected to
| write some code with loops building/accumulating a result. As
| a simple example, to explain what was going on, if the
| question would be "calculate the 100th fibonacci number", she
| would just use Binet's formula to do so (as opposed to using
| a loop). I was rather impressed how often that happened.
| hyperthesis wrote:
| TBF Binet's formula is astonishing
| wheelinsupial wrote:
| This was posted as a comment on a thread about a new Google
| tool for LP [0]. It was in response to someone asking for
| resources on learning linear programming for business
| applications. It looks like the examples have been solved using
| Excel, and it's for business students at MIT. Definitely not
| cutting edge.
|
| The original posting is about new tools and algorithms, with
| some more analysis. Well beyond my background from undergrad
| courses in LP and OR, but probably more relevant and insightful
| to you.
|
| [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41609670
| npalli wrote:
| This is from 1977. I suppose it's ok for fundamentals but you can
| probably do better going with a modern text like
| Model Building in Mathematical Programming by H. Paul Williams
| (5th Edition)
| txnf wrote:
| convex optimization by boyd vandenberghe should be mentioned
| https://web.stanford.edu/~boyd/cvxbook/
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2024-09-21 23:00 UTC)