[HN Gopher] OpenSCAD: The Programmer's Solid 3D CAD Modeller
___________________________________________________________________
OpenSCAD: The Programmer's Solid 3D CAD Modeller
Author : LorenDB
Score : 30 points
Date : 2024-09-14 22:02 UTC (57 minutes ago)
(HTM) web link (openscad.org)
(TXT) w3m dump (openscad.org)
| zimpenfish wrote:
| I've made a bunch of stuff in OpenSCAD and it can be really nice
| to work with but... it does have a bunch of weirdnesses like not
| being to find the size of a compound object, having to micro-
| manage your objects to avoid the spinning beach ball render,
| fillets/chamfers/rounded edges/etc. are dark arts, etc.
|
| If you're basically sticking simple shapes together or cutting
| simple shapes out of other shapes, it's fine enough.
| arghwhat wrote:
| Yeah, it has its charms but... Good luck making a filet or a
| chamfer between two faces whose intersection has a non-trivial
| placement.
|
| Being able to easily reference existing edges and faces for
| future operations is one of the things that make other CAD so
| simple.
| timschmidt wrote:
| Don't miss the https://github.com/nophead/NopSCADlib library for
| OpenSCAD, which includes a tremendous amount of useful shapes,
| functions, and the ability to produce exploded diagrams, assembly
| instructions, etc.
| spiritplumber wrote:
| thank you!
| janice1999 wrote:
| Wow, looks like the project might still be alive. Hopefully we
| get a new release year.
| ta988 wrote:
| it is still alive yes the repo is active.
| h2odragon wrote:
| the "manifold" renderer makes possible some stunts that couldn't
| be done before. for example, i made this "usa counties" outline
| from a _png_ : https://www.printables.com/model/895723-usa-
| counties
|
| its under the "features" preference, doesn't work for everything
| yet, but is worth investigating if you haven't.
| randomghost1 wrote:
| What are people's thoughts on CAD generation with LLMs for
| OpenSCAD and other proprietary GUI-based softwares? I imagine
| soon we will also be able to "autocomplete" or "semantically
| edit" feature trees in SolidWorks, Fusion, etc.
| stavros wrote:
| I made some simple stuff using Claude with OpenSCAD, it was
| eminently decent. LLMs really have made the start of all
| learning curves flat.
| pbronez wrote:
| OpenSCAD has been great for simple projects. It's very easy to
| get productive with if you know basic programming concepts.
| However, I've run into frustrating limitations on more complex
| projects. The core geometry engine is skittish.
|
| I still use OpenSCAD, but I'm diving into the OCCT ecosystem. It
| has a steeper learning curve, but seems to be significantly more
| robust.
|
| https://dev.opencascade.org/
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2024-09-14 23:00 UTC)