[HN Gopher] A cartoon butt clenching a bar of soap has invaded m...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       A cartoon butt clenching a bar of soap has invaded my online ads
        
       Author : stalfosknight
       Score  : 15 points
       Date   : 2024-09-14 22:01 UTC (59 minutes ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (arstechnica.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (arstechnica.com)
        
       | LorenDB wrote:
       | This is a perfect reason to install uBlock Origin.
        
         | slater wrote:
         | Sidenote: your site's SCSS file 404s -
         | https://lorendb.dev/css/main.scss (Firefox, macOS)
        
         | mindslight wrote:
         | Seriously. If you have enough time and self actualization to
         | complain about the content of online ads, then you have more
         | than enough time to install an ad blocker and be done with that
         | particular form of malware.
        
         | Veuxdo wrote:
         | This might be a fine solution for individuals, but of course
         | won't help the ads/publishing industry recover from its current
         | death spiral.
        
           | bastawhiz wrote:
           | It's not intended to help anyone who runs ads.
        
             | Wowfunhappy wrote:
             | What is your suggested economic model for internet content?
             | Do you prefer paywalls?
        
               | QuadmasterXLII wrote:
               | What's the economic model for hacker news commenters?
        
               | Wowfunhappy wrote:
               | Commenting on Hacker News is fun. But I'm really glad the
               | internet has professional journalists as well.
        
               | jszymborski wrote:
               | Yes
        
       | dash2 wrote:
       | I have exactly this problem of gross online ads, sometimes
       | featuring ways to clear my bowels by eating/not eating bananas.
       | The graphics are, well, graphic.
       | 
       | I never click ads and I turn off personalisation wherever
       | possible. Could it be that the system is punishing me somehow? Is
       | this some dystopian algorithm?
        
         | Veuxdo wrote:
         | > I turn off personalisation wherever possible
         | 
         | Think about it: if the ad auction house knows nothing about
         | you, then you'd expect to only get least-common-denominator
         | ads. Everyone has a butt, after all.
        
           | fallingsquirrel wrote:
           | A saner fallback would be to target based on the content
           | (like advertisers did for centuries before the internet).
           | 
           | If someone's reading an article about guitars, there's a good
           | bet they'll respond more favorably to a guitar ad than to a
           | picture of someone's ass. Common sense was a casualty in the
           | transition to the internet.
        
         | whartung wrote:
         | I've always figured that these are the lowest common
         | denominator form of ads.
         | 
         | "Since we have no idea of who you are, this is the drek that
         | targeted to you -- i.e. 'everybody'".
         | 
         | This is also the reason I don't log in to YouTube, and if I do
         | find I video, I open it in a "private tab".
         | 
         | If I don't suddenly my "feed" explodes with even more stuff I
         | was barely interested in when I wanted to watch the video in
         | the first place.
         | 
         | Never let it know you might be casually interested in anything
         | borderline controversial, or you'll be overwhelmed with every
         | fringe dingbat clickbait video that's, perchance, even barely
         | related to the video you watched.
        
       | sen wrote:
       | Complaining about annoying ads while having ads literally _every_
       | paragraph.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-09-14 23:00 UTC)