[HN Gopher] Tempted by the Dark Side, I now have a Commodore 128
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Tempted by the Dark Side, I now have a Commodore 128
        
       Author : rbanffy
       Score  : 50 points
       Date   : 2024-09-09 10:33 UTC (12 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.goto10retro.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.goto10retro.com)
        
       | daneel_w wrote:
       | _" I knew the Commodore 128 was released in 1985 as a sort of
       | bridge between the Commodore 64 and Amiga ..."_
       | 
       | That may have been Commodore's intention, I don't know, but
       | technically the C128 is merely a modest step from the C64 and
       | _very far_ from the Amiga in every way. All the same the C128
       | offers a lot to explore, whether you run it as a C64 or as a
       | C128, and I wish you lots of fun with it!
        
         | mixmastamyk wrote:
         | I remember drooling over one and the Plus/4 in the store at the
         | time. Didn't realize they were mostly smaller C64s with double
         | the RAM. But compared to my ancient Vic-20 (C-5? :-) it was
         | very advanced. So it did cp/m as well? Oh well, had no money
         | for software anyway.
        
           | wazoox wrote:
           | The Plus/4 had 64KB but absolutely no software available,
           | because it wasn't C-64 compatible... at least the C128 has a
           | C64 mode.
        
           | cmrdporcupine wrote:
           | I (VIC-20 owner) drooled over the C128, too. 80 columns! Mo
           | memory!
           | 
           | Then I realized I could get an Atari ST with 512KB of RAM,
           | 68000, 3.5" drive, mono monitor for the same price. The C128
           | made no sense, price wise.
           | 
           | So I followed Tramiel over to his new venture, too.
        
       | shellac wrote:
       | I assumed this would a Spectrum user. How wrong I was: don't
       | remember any Atari machines from that 80s 8-bit generation.
        
         | jhbadger wrote:
         | The Atari 8-bits were introduced in 1979 and were moderately
         | popular in the early 1980s at least in the US because they had
         | considerably better graphics and sound than their competitors.
         | This was due to (unlike most other early 8-bits) they used
         | custom chips similar to those later used in the Amiga -- and in
         | fact one of the primary engineers for the Atari 8-bits was Jay
         | Miner, who also played a big role in the Amiga.
        
           | shellac wrote:
           | Ah, it may never have reached the UK. Conversely you've
           | probably never heard of the Oric-1 or Dragon 32. The 8 bit
           | boom was quite a time.
        
             | fortyseven wrote:
             | As an American I love hearing all about machines that we
             | completely missed from overseas. Little parallel universes
             | to learn about and experience. (Helps that a lot of my
             | favorite retro gaming YouTubers are British, too. ;))
        
       | gmiller123456 wrote:
       | I'm surprised some of the C64s still work. I had to return mine
       | (for exchange) many times. I remember seeing huge signs at the
       | return counter that said "NO RETURNS ON COMMODORE EQUIPMENT". As
       | a kid it didn't set off any alarm bells. But apparently quality
       | wasn't a goal at all. I remember seeing a talk by a former
       | employee where he saw a stack of C64s and a sign that said "bad".
       | He walked by the same spot a little later and someone had shipped
       | them. Apparently the 1541 drives were even worse. I could never
       | find one to buy, as anytime they were in stock people would bring
       | theirs back for exchange, so not a lot of motivation for stores
       | to stock them.
        
         | exitb wrote:
         | First of all, the later "short board" models (including C64C,
         | most popular in Europe) run much cooler, which makes them less
         | prone to failure. Second - we got pretty good[1] at fixing the
         | faults.
         | 
         | [1] https://www.pictorial64.com/
        
         | daneel_w wrote:
         | It's likely the actual problem you had was with the epoxy-
         | encased "wedge" PSU model. Most of them have lasted fine
         | through decades of use but there were some batches that kept
         | giving people problems.
        
         | jandrese wrote:
         | MOS chips are notorious among system restorers even today.
         | Commodore's power supply design that made the most common
         | failure mode one that increased the voltage output so it fried
         | the attached machine is another stellar design decision.
         | 
         | That said, Commodore sold a ton of hardware in the 80s. There
         | is a cottage industry around getting C64s up and running again,
         | and since they're so plentiful and well known it's almost
         | always possible to fix them. There are replacement chips for
         | everything on the board, even the weirdo custom stuff like the
         | PLAs. Everything on the C64 has been reverse engineered and
         | well documented.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-09-09 23:01 UTC)