[HN Gopher] My job is to watch dreams die (2011)
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       My job is to watch dreams die (2011)
        
       Author : eezurr
       Score  : 165 points
       Date   : 2024-09-05 18:43 UTC (4 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (old.reddit.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (old.reddit.com)
        
       | ChrisArchitect wrote:
       | (2011)
       | 
       | Some discussion then:
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2959137
        
         | zzzbra wrote:
         | we've been online for so long now...
        
       | analyte123 wrote:
       | During this same time period I had a project at a part-time gig
       | which involved updating document templates and adding a few
       | fields here and there for a legal application. The application
       | was used by a law firm which specialized in mortgages. So I saw
       | the details of various documents one is served in these
       | situations: notice of default, acceleration notices, notice to
       | vacate, and ultimately evictions and foreclosure auctions. And of
       | course you could see thousands of these documents being generated
       | and mailed out. For a guy like the one in the post to show up,
       | you probably would have had to completely ignore probably a dozen
       | of these documents for at least 6 months, not paying your
       | mortgage all along.
       | 
       | Sometimes I feel like this experience, especially the idea that
       | the entire principal balance can be accelerated if you don't make
       | your payments regardless of the value of the house, left a bit of
       | a scar on me that caused me to miss out on the ZIRP real estate
       | boom II. But I am still happy with the way things are turning out
       | overall.
        
         | DaiPlusPlus wrote:
         | > you probably would have had to completely ignore probably a
         | dozen of these documents for at least 6 months, not paying your
         | mortgage all along.
         | 
         | Fun-fact: thems the benefits of being a mortgage holder.
         | 
         | If you're a tenant that's renting, you get no such legal
         | protections - let alone discretion from whichever faceless
         | entity actually owns the property: where I am in King County
         | WA, I think, at most you can get 30 days' notice tops (and
         | that's if nonpayment is the only thing they allege; it's
         | trivially straightforward to make it a 3-day nuisance eviction,
         | honestly).
         | 
         | The whole thing doesn't feel right (I don't want to say "class
         | warfare", but I haven't heard a better explanation for this
         | double-standard).
        
           | BobbyTables2 wrote:
           | Indeed. When I lived in an apparent, got a very angry knock
           | at the door. Before I even got up, manager already was
           | unlocking the door without asking, with a formal eviction
           | notice in hand.
           | 
           | Every month I faithfully put my rent check in an envelope,
           | deposited the slot at the office.
           | 
           | That month they accidentally threw away the check after
           | opening the envelope.
           | 
           | They really didn't believe I had paid, despite being a good
           | tenant for years, always on time. Never caused any trouble.
           | 
           | Marched me to the office and they discovered they had
           | photocopied my check but didn't deposit it (threw it away).
           | 
           | That all happened in one month -- no prior
           | notice/warning/call about being late on rent.
           | 
           | I'm still shocked at this treatment many many years later.
           | Can't even chalk it up to any type of prejudice... just utter
           | stupidity.
        
             | jopsen wrote:
             | No amount of laws can protect renters from a stupid
             | landlord :)
             | 
             | I could certainly see places where using a master key
             | without authorization is a stupid move.
        
           | bombcar wrote:
           | This is why the "if you have a loan you're just renting from
           | the bank" people aren't right - sure, in a way it's true but
           | there really IS a legal difference, and it DOES come into
           | play when things go south.
        
             | santoshalper wrote:
             | Yes, of course, there is a huge difference between having a
             | mortgage (you are the owner but the investor has a lien on
             | your property) and renting.
        
           | Denvercoder9 wrote:
           | > If you're a tenant that's renting, you get no such legal
           | protections
           | 
           | In the USA. Many countries in Europe have renters protection
           | similar to that of mortgage holders.
        
             | rayiner wrote:
             | Depends on where you are in the U.S. Some places have
             | extreme renter protections. Tenants can refuse to pay rent
             | for months before you can even start an eviction
             | proceeding. Then it takes months more. E.g. New York. https
             | ://www.reddit.com/r/Landlord/comments/15nn6o0/landlordu....
             | Landlords may forgo six months of back rent just to get the
             | tenant out of the unit.
        
             | pkaye wrote:
             | How long can renters go without paying their rent in those
             | countries?
        
               | alphager wrote:
               | In Germany, the process to evict may start after three
               | months of unpaid rent.
               | 
               | The eviction process itself takes about two years.
        
           | bgnn wrote:
           | That sounds indeed not right.
           | 
           | Here in the Netherlands the renters have the right, but
           | mortgage holders do not. I was renting a place the owner had
           | mortgage. For some reason the bank wanted to sale the place
           | but couldn't evict me. Since this was the owners fault the
           | bank's lawyers helped me to get like 6 months of rent back to
           | agree to leave. The bank even offered me to buy the place,
           | which in the hindsight, I should have done.
           | 
           | Long story short, what you guys have in US feels wrong and
           | it's not always like that in the rest of the world.
        
             | ghaff wrote:
             | It's very local location dependent. You can find lots of
             | horror stories from both the renter and the landlord side.
             | And, in a lot of cases, renters can probably get off with a
             | lot unless the landlord is willing to take extreme illegal
             | measures (which they may).
        
           | lacker wrote:
           | TLDR: You pay for the benefits of being a mortgage holder,
           | when you make the down payment.
           | 
           | Think of it from the bank's point of view. A bank can afford
           | to be patient with mortgage holders because there's an
           | underlying asset. There's a $300,000 house and the owner
           | still owes you $150,000. If you repossess right now as
           | opposed to a few months from now, either way you're getting
           | repaid from the value of the asset, minus the cost of dealing
           | with everything.
           | 
           | Whereas when renting, if someone misses rent one month, if
           | you evict them immediately you're out a month's rent. If you
           | wait two more months before evicting, now you're out three
           | months' rent. The longer you delay, the more it costs you.
        
         | 0cf8612b2e1e wrote:
         | There was a Planet Money story about Zombie Mortgages. Home
         | owners thought a second mortgage had been annulled, sometimes
         | even being explicitly told that. Years of no statements being
         | sent and suddenly collections was asking for money on what the
         | home owner thought was a done deal. Even the bank was claiming
         | it was some weird fraud attempt. So of course you could feel
         | safe ignoring that paperwork. Until they came and sold her
         | house out from under her.
         | 
         | https://www.npr.org/2024/05/10/1197959049/zombie-second-mort...
        
         | ToucanLoucan wrote:
         | > For a guy like the one in the post to show up, you probably
         | would have had to completely ignore probably a dozen of these
         | documents for at least 6 months, not paying your mortgage all
         | along.
         | 
         | I find it interesting that in all of these discussions it's
         | treated as known that the person at hand is ignoring the
         | notices and just pretending they aren't in danger of losing
         | their home, just like in issues of evictions for rent, it's
         | treated that for some reason the tenant has decided they don't
         | need to pay. When IMO, in both of these, it's much more
         | reasonable to assume they _can 't pay._
         | 
         | Maybe it's just a reflexive self-protection thing in people.
         | It's easier to watch/envision a family being forced out of
         | their home via state violence if you assume they were just
         | stupid/inept in some way, that they did something wrong. That
         | the very same thing couldn't happen to you because you would
         | never just not pay your mortgage. And I mean, same. I would
         | never not pay my mortgage. But I can easily conjure all kinds
         | of nightmares that would render me _unable to pay my mortgage._
         | 
         | Maybe people just don't like thinking about that.
        
           | brudgers wrote:
           | People often moralize about money in ways that are personally
           | beneficial just like they often moralize about other things.
        
           | yieldcrv wrote:
           | the reddit post doesn't assume that.
        
       | howard941 wrote:
       | I worked the other side of this thing, as a debtors' bankruptcy
       | attorney. Sometimes I could save the house but usually it wasn't
       | in the cards: The income wasn't there and the bankruptcy laws
       | were skewed by GWB. Fortunately there were many times when - if a
       | house wasn't an issue - the debtor was much better off without an
       | albatross around his neck. Overall it was a rewarding occupation
       | - not monetarily, the rules kept debtor's attorneys on a very
       | short leash - but morally.
        
       | coding123 wrote:
       | There needs to be some standard addendum attached to homes as an
       | option that anyone selling a home can attach to the sale.
       | Something like:
       | 
       | This house cannot be used as an investment vehicle. It cannot be
       | sold by a real-estate agent with a contract of more than 1%. It
       | cannot be used as a rental. It cannot be sold for more than
       | inflation would allow.
       | 
       | Anyone found violating this addendum may be sued. All proceeds
       | from the lawsuit (after fair lawyer fee of 40%) shall be used to
       | build new homes (as in it can only be used to fund actual
       | building materials, not generic non-profit companies).
       | 
       | This might not be the best approach, but we need a home
       | renaissance that redefines home ownership across the world so
       | that no one has to be homeless anymore.
        
         | crooked-v wrote:
         | Or, you know, just actually build enough houses for people to
         | live in. I feel like that would be a better start than suing
         | people into bankruptcy because they made 5% off a house sale
         | instead of of 4.5%.
         | 
         | Houses are only an attractive investment vehicle in the first
         | place because there is a massive shortage of housing.
        
         | peterldowns wrote:
         | (Ignoring the obvious problems of how such an addendum could be
         | written and enforced.)
         | 
         | Why? When would it make sense for someone to attach this
         | addendum to a sale? All these penalties and restrictions would
         | only mean getting paid less for the same property. On the buyer
         | side, why would anyone want an asset like you've described?
         | 
         | I live in a home that I enjoy in part because it is a fantastic
         | investment that is highly-leveraged (through a mortgage) in a
         | way not possible for other types of assets. If I need to I can
         | rent out rooms or the entire property. I can sell it to whoever
         | I want, whenever I want. I can borrow against my partial equity
         | in the property. My mortgage is 30-year fixed, but I can always
         | refinance (with no prepayment penalty) if rates go down below
         | my locked rate.
         | 
         | I wouldn't want to buy a house without these benefits, and I
         | don't know who else would. If this became standard it would
         | reduce demand for this asset class, and therefore make it less
         | profitable to build new housing, which is exactly the opposite
         | of what you want.
        
         | coolspot wrote:
         | Homelessness is mostly caused by drugs and/or psychiatric
         | illness.
        
       | santoshalper wrote:
       | I have spent about 20 years in the mortgage and housing industry,
       | a decent amount of that in servicing and default. I have seen
       | some shady shit including borrowers who committed mortgage fraud
       | and lenders who made loans they knew would ultimately blow up in
       | someone's face (not theirs!).
       | 
       | That said, 99% of defaults are very simple: At the time of the
       | loan, the borrower could afford to make the mortgage payment.
       | Later down the road, something changes in their circumstance, and
       | they can no longer afford to make the monthly payment (or
       | anything close enough to work out a deal). The most common
       | reasons are a loss of income or severe medical issues.
       | 
       | Mortgage servicers and investors almost never want to foreclose
       | on a home. An extended default leading to a foreclosure is very
       | costly, and the servicer is usually fronting the money to the
       | investor the entire time. Everyone loses when a foreclosure
       | happens (though only one party doesn't have a home anymore).
       | 
       | I am profoundly sympathetic to anyone who gets evicted, but
       | lenders only make mortgage loans because the property is
       | collateral. How else would someone front a normal borrower
       | hundreds of thousands of dollars?
        
       | commandlinefan wrote:
       | > thieves don't grin at them through the kitchen window while
       | they disconnect a running air conditioner
       | 
       | Not in Texas, they don't.
        
         | tomrod wrote:
         | Yep, the robbers just shoot you or wait for you to be asleep.
         | 
         | Or smile at you through the kitchen window while they
         | disconnect the running air conditioner.
         | 
         | Despite our bravado and ammosexuality, it turns out Texans are
         | people like everywhere else.
        
         | istjohn wrote:
         | After Uvalde, that Texan braggadocio looks sillier than ever.
        
           | optimalsolver wrote:
           | Don't mess with Texas (unless you have a gun).
        
       | RGamma wrote:
       | So this must be (one of the undoubtably many reasons) why our
       | transatlantic friends are trying to push the self-destruct button
       | since 2016. Reads like dystopian fiction. Canis canem possidet.
        
         | mminer237 wrote:
         | Where do you live that you don't have foreclosure sales?
        
           | RGamma wrote:
           | It's not about foreclosure sales. It's about the desperation,
           | the ruthlessness, the intense pressure, the instant legal
           | armament. Some other commenter here mentioned 3 day eviction
           | notices (when renting) are a thing. Come on...
        
       | sandspar wrote:
       | I've seen a few sides of money. Raised upper class, lost it all
       | and became underclass, then made it back. I'm always amazed at
       | how limited rich people's worldview is. The average software
       | developer, coastal liberal etc. They've never felt terror, the
       | visceral feeling of being terrified. They've never been predated
       | upon. They've never been used and discarded. The underclass lives
       | with this stuff every day, 24/7, and rich people never experience
       | it even once in their whole lives. And the rich people presume to
       | talk down to and lecture the poor. I have a great deal of
       | contempt for people of my class, the rich.
        
         | silisili wrote:
         | I was just discussing this with a friend last week. In my case
         | at least, it was too easy to forget. I grew up low end of
         | middle class at best, and after high school was dirt poor.
         | 
         | Getting overdrafts weekly, in that era where they reorder
         | transactions to really turn the screws. Sleeping early because
         | it's cheaper than eating. Working two jobs and still not
         | getting ahead. The shame of having to ask to borrow a few
         | bucks, but trying to hide it so you didn't seem ingenuous.
         | Having better off people talk to you like a child, giving you
         | unsolicited one liner advice that they probably read on a
         | motivational poster at work that morning, like they're doing me
         | a life favor.
         | 
         | The thing is, I got a lucky break in my mid 20s and haven't
         | struggled a day since. Now it's been almost 20 years, and I
         | find myself acting like the rich person you describe. I guess
         | like all things, appreciation wears off with age and becomes
         | the new normal.
         | 
         | I don't ever want to struggle like that again, but I'd love to
         | experience the feeling and appreciation I had for the first
         | couple years after climbing out of it. It's easy to forget.
        
       | UberFly wrote:
       | Many of the comments in that Reddit thread are heartbreaking.
       | Ouch.
        
       | hunter-gatherer wrote:
       | I've had a handful of lemons thrown at me during my life. One of
       | the most impactful ones as far as I can tell is that through a
       | weird chain of coincidences I ended up first in line to purchase
       | a foreclosed home. From what I understood, the couple was going
       | through a nasty divorce and couldn't agree on who would get the
       | house and ultimately didn't pay anything for a while, so I picked
       | it up for 80k, which back then was probably 50% of what the
       | market value was. This was hige for kme because as a kid my
       | family was actually evicted from the house we were renting (not
       | for financial-related reasons) but it was sudden so home security
       | has always been important to me.
       | 
       | Having been able to pay off my house has had the most tremendous
       | postive impact on my mental health I think. Sure, it's a small
       | house, and it's old, and the kitchen is small, and so on... but
       | man, I'm so glad I never have to worry about making a house
       | payment.
        
       | typeofhuman wrote:
       | Reminds me of a friend of mine who had a job serving final
       | eviction notices to people living in single-family houses. This
       | was during the 2008 financial crisis in the United States.
       | 
       | He said it forever changed him.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-09-05 23:00 UTC)