[HN Gopher] Hacker trap: Fake OnlyFans tool backstabs cybercrimi...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Hacker trap: Fake OnlyFans tool backstabs cybercriminals, steals
       passwords
        
       Author : nazgulsenpai
       Score  : 50 points
       Date   : 2024-09-05 18:12 UTC (4 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.bleepingcomputer.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.bleepingcomputer.com)
        
       | namanyayg wrote:
       | This is quite genius.
       | 
       | A great example of cybercrime tools being used for good
       | 
       | Reminds me of how Russian malware never runs if it detects the PC
       | having Russian as the default language
        
         | sandworm101 wrote:
         | I wouldnt call it good. This is criminals stealing from other
         | criminals, which is still crime. Just as how gangland wars can
         | impact innocent bystanders, these nested layers of illegality
         | and theft of information can cause harm to others.
        
           | fsckboy wrote:
           | how often does somebody get prosecuted for stealing from
           | another criminal?
        
             | rad_gruchalski wrote:
             | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_forfeiture_in_the_Uni
             | t...
             | 
             | https://www.aclu.org/issues/criminal-law-reform/reforming-
             | po...
             | 
             | Not often enough, apparently. Not always "criminals". Just
             | suspects...
        
             | sa-code wrote:
             | How many crimes does one have to commit before they "are a
             | criminal"? If someone broke a law, but the law was later
             | amended so the act is now legal, are they still a criminal?
             | (E.g. cannabis)
        
               | sandworm101 wrote:
               | Yes. A town raising a speed limit on a road doesn't mean
               | everyone who ever got a ticket previous to the change
               | wasn't speeding. That's why it takes special laws and
               | acts by executive authorities to take retroactive action,
               | if the deem doing so a good idea.
        
               | ARandomerDude wrote:
               | This is a cute rhetorical trick, but if you can't see
               | that some people are criminals and some are not, then you
               | are blind.
        
             | jeroenhd wrote:
             | People do get killed quite often in cases of mistaken
             | identity. Not by the police, usually, but criminal gang
             | wars are not without innocent victims.
             | 
             | Criminals do get charged with theft from other criminals.
             | The only benefit to stealing from criminals is that they
             | won't go to the police, but that doesn't mean they won't
             | report you once they get caught. They may even get out if
             | jail earlier by coming clean and listing every criminal
             | they've interacted with.
        
             | sandworm101 wrote:
             | Possession of stolen goods. Possession of cocaine. It
             | doesn't matter where you got it. Criminals also still have
             | property rights. Stealing a car from Bernie Madoff is still
             | stealing a car.
        
       | userbinator wrote:
       | We used to call those who would fall for these tricks "script
       | kiddies", as all they know about how to "hack" is to blindly run
       | things others have made.
        
         | rmellow wrote:
         | "Don't even talk to me if your computer doesn't have homemade
         | transistors".
         | 
         | While I get the difference between creators vs users, in the
         | end we're all users in someone else's perspective.
         | 
         | Maybe you've built your own tools, but that's just applying
         | someone else's library.
         | 
         | Maybe you've built your own library, but that's just using
         | someone else's OS and IDE.
         | 
         | Maybe you've built your own OS, but you're still just applying
         | a language that an actually smart person developed.
         | 
         | Maybe you've developed your own language, but that's just an
         | abstraction of actual hardware activity, which the actual
         | geniuses who tamed silicon built.
         | 
         | Maybe you've built your own hardware, but you're really just
         | applying physical and chemical discoveries that actual smart
         | humans made.
         | 
         | Maybe you've even discovered physical and chemical discoveries
         | yourself! But that's nothing, you're just observing the laws of
         | nature.
         | 
         | Maybe you've created laws of nature yourself, but you're
         | nothing next to your mother, who gave birth to a god.
        
           | jvanderbot wrote:
           | I'm being generous and interpreting this as humor.
           | 
           | Otherwise, we can't disregard that there's a spectrum here,
           | and somehow move the "goalpost of lol" all the way to the
           | extreme end. You get to be smug at anyone who is on the "more
           | naive" side of you on this spectrum.
           | 
           | Sounds like GP is just remembering and recalling the days
           | when they were more sophisticated than most.
        
           | lo_zamoyski wrote:
           | "Maybe you've developed your own language, but that's just an
           | abstraction of actual hardware activity, which the actual
           | geniuses who tamed silicon built."
           | 
           | Tangent: the language isn't an abstraction of the hardware.
           | Hardware has _nothing_ to do with programming languages per
           | se. This is why I dislike the term  "low-level language", as
           | if this were some kind of computational atomism. There is no
           | inherent relationship between assembly and C++, for example.
           | C++ is a language, full stop. But if we want to _simulate_ a
           | language on a particular piece of hardware, we must simulate
           | it using the language of the hardware. We must translate it
           | into the language of the hardware. That is, after all, what a
           | compiler is: a translator.
        
             | PontifexMinimus wrote:
             | > the language isn't an abstraction of the hardware
             | 
             | Programming languages were designed to do useful stuff.
             | They can't do this without hardware. There are always
             | concerns of practicality.
             | 
             | > as if this were some kind of computational atomism
             | 
             | NAND gates are computationally atomic, IMO, since to go a
             | level below them you get to the level of physical processes
             | (e.g. electronics) that implement them.
        
           | Etheryte wrote:
           | This tries hard to sound deep, but it's nonsense. There's a
           | very big difference between someone who can just swing a
           | hammer and a carpenter. Saying that the two are the same
           | because they both use a tool someone else made is absurd.
        
           | AStonesThrow wrote:
           | "Script kiddie" always referred more to the level of
           | expertise and knowledge that these folks had, more so than
           | any elitist DIY ethic.
           | 
           | A script kiddie would only know enough to be dangerous, how
           | to download and run the prepackaged kit, and wouldn't
           | understand how/why it works or fails.
           | 
           | Whereas a seasoned cracker may apply the same tools in a
           | systematic way that's informed by knowledge of the underlying
           | concepts, and how to make the most out of options, and adapt
           | to particular targets.
        
           | vsuperpower2021 wrote:
           | This is the worst thing I've ever read. I'm not going to read
           | any more shit on this site.
        
       | mschuster91 wrote:
       | Ah, a classic. I 'member this kind of stuff from decades ago
       | already, and of course also with cheat tools, keygens and
       | whatnot. No chance I'd run a keygen outside of a VM, and for good
       | reasons.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-09-05 23:01 UTC)