[HN Gopher] Why did Windows 95 use blue screen error messages in...
___________________________________________________________________
Why did Windows 95 use blue screen error messages instead of hard
error messages
Author : Tomte
Score : 26 points
Date : 2024-09-03 16:39 UTC (1 days ago)
(HTM) web link (devblogs.microsoft.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (devblogs.microsoft.com)
| PaulHoule wrote:
| ... sounds like this is why Win 95 seemed to crash all the time.
| plorkyeran wrote:
| As time has gone on I have become increasingly impressed by the
| fact that Windows 9x worked at all. There's so many of these
| things that sound like they should individually cause the
| system to be crashing constantly, and yet somehow they got it
| to mostly work.
| thelastparadise wrote:
| > There's so many of these things that sound like they should
| individually cause the system to be crashing constantly, and
| yet somehow they got it to mostly work.
|
| You just described all of humanity.
| jmkni wrote:
| I knew before I clicked this that it would be a Raymond Chen
| article
| bubblesnort wrote:
| If you enter C:\PROGRA~1 during setup, you end up with Program
| Files being the only folder in the C: drive.
| alliao wrote:
| where were you in 1994
| alliao wrote:
| what I'd really like is some comparison between all OSs in
| handling these and maybe we'd have new OS some day? I remember
| the scintillating days of OS/2 Warp/BeOS/linux distros and
| everything called itself windows killer. I feel like an old man
| shouting at cloud but I swear Windows used to be slow and then
| got pretty snappy around windows2000 and nowadays I feel like
| it's back to win98 days in terms of latency/response
| theandrewbailey wrote:
| Depends on the hardware used to run it. Windows 98 on a Pentium
| 2 or 3 with 64+ MB RAM is quite snappy.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2024-09-04 23:01 UTC)