[HN Gopher] The Pentium as a Navajo Weaving
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The Pentium as a Navajo Weaving
        
       Author : GavinAnderegg
       Score  : 444 points
       Date   : 2024-09-01 16:46 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.righto.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.righto.com)
        
       | kens wrote:
       | Author here for your obscure Pentium questions...
        
         | hindsightbias wrote:
         | Well done.
        
           | kens wrote:
           | Thanks! Curiously, the article doesn't show up on HN. Maybe
           | my domain got banned or something?
        
             | Joe_Cool wrote:
             | I just saw it on the frontpage and very much enjoyed it.
        
             | throwaway290 wrote:
             | Check if you accidentally clicked "hide"... (hidden posts
             | in your profile)
        
         | teruakohatu wrote:
         | That was a very interesting and well researched article. Thank
         | you.
        
         | omoikane wrote:
         | I laughed at the bit where the gallery picked the wrong side of
         | the rug to display, but this got me thinking -- presumably all
         | the die photos we see are from the etched side of the wafer,
         | what does it look like on the other side? Is it just all flat?
        
           | kens wrote:
           | The other side is plain gray silicon; I've looked at the back
           | side of dies by mistake many times. (Intel is starting to do
           | power through the back side, which would make the back more
           | interesting.)
        
             | Tuna-Fish wrote:
             | Note that it's entirely transparent to some wavelengths of
             | light, which is why a lot of die shots are taken from the
             | backside, as it allows doing them non-destructively. You
             | just cannot use visible light.
        
               | kens wrote:
               | Unfortunately it's not that easy. I was working with John
               | McMaster to get backside die shots of the 386 using
               | infrared but it didn't work out.
        
           | OldGuyInTheClub wrote:
           | "Such hearts, such brains, would be unable to comprehend that
           | one's attachment to a masterpiece may be utterly
           | overwhelming, especially when it is the underside of the
           | weave that entrances the beholder and only begetter, whose
           | own past intercoils there with the fate of the innocent
           | author." --- Nabokov, "Pale Fire"
        
         | n8henrie wrote:
         | Just moved back to ABQ from Shiprock last month, after 8 years.
         | Not every day you see Shiprock featured in an HN post!
        
           | benatkin wrote:
           | Not every day I see a place on the Colorado Plateau in an HN
           | post! I live in the SF Bay Area but am from Flagstaff!
        
         | chiph wrote:
         | I had a dual Pentium II board (made by Tyan, with an Adaptec
         | Raid Option slot) but I don't recall ever seeing a dual P54C
         | board. Did a mainstream motherboard maker ever release one, to
         | your knowledge?
        
           | h2odragon wrote:
           | there was tyan, supermicro, and MSI? at least
           | 
           | i thin my board with the dual pentium 60mhz chips was msi.
        
             | xanathar wrote:
             | Pentium 60MHz was P5 though, not P54C ... if I'm not
             | mistaken. IIRC the slowest P54C was the 75MHz one as they
             | all had 1.5x multiplier or greater? Again, I wouldn't rule
             | out my memory being wrong.
        
               | TheAmazingRace wrote:
               | That sounds correct to me. Also, the P5 was a 5V design!
               | Intel went to 3.3V soon after the very first Pentium
               | CPUs.
        
           | gattilorenz wrote:
           | You can find multiple of them here, with pictures too: https:
           | //theretroweb.com/motherboards/?page=1&itemsPerPage=24...
        
         | toast0 wrote:
         | Not a pentium question, but..
         | 
         | > Due to the end of the Cold War, Hughes acquired General
         | Dynamics' missile business in 1991 before being acquired by
         | General Motors in 1985 and sold to Raytheon in 1997.
         | 
         | I'm guessing that's supposed to be 91 -> 95 -> 97?
        
           | kens wrote:
           | Trying to sort out aerospace companies is always a mess. I
           | got the dates mostly right but reversed the timeline. GM
           | acquired Hughes Aircraft in 1985, forming the Hughes
           | Electronics unit which consisted of Hughes Aircraft and Delco
           | Electronics. Hughes Aircraft acquired General Dynamics'
           | missile business in 1992 to form the Hughes Missile System
           | Company. In 1994, Hughes Electronics combined three
           | operations into the Hughes Aerospace and Electronics Company
           | (still a unit of GM). In 1997, Raytheon acquired the military
           | business of Hughes Electronics Corporation from General
           | Motors for $9.5 billion. At least I think that's what
           | happened :-)
        
         | MandieD wrote:
         | As a hobby hand-spinner and occasional weaver who's been in IT
         | my entire working life, and interested in learning more about
         | what my home country has done to the nations that were already
         | there, this article is excellent in all regards.
        
         | __alexander wrote:
         | Excellent article. I know Shiprock but I didn't know it's
         | history with manufacturing processors. Thank you for writing
         | it.
        
         | wolf550e wrote:
         | I get the feeling Intel needed to "bribe" the Navajo by
         | ordering this work. Why did they need to do that? Was it part
         | of an agreement with tribe leadership?
        
           | kens wrote:
           | I think it's more likely that someone at Intel thought, "You
           | know what would be cool? A rug that looked like the Pentium
           | die." Note that unlike Fairchild, Intel's plant is not on
           | Navajo land so there are no tribal agreements.
        
           | klyrs wrote:
           | It's actually quite common for large companies to commission
           | artworks inspired by their products; American companies
           | frequently reach out to tribal artists for the uniqueness of
           | their artistic style. Your comment is pretty depressing --
           | despite the clear mastery demonstrated in this art, you're
           | insinuating a nefarious plot involving a long-scapegoated
           | population.
        
       | h2odragon wrote:
       | Fairly rare to be able to connect sheep with semiconductors.
       | 
       | I wonder if anyone is working on ovine AI opportunities yet.
        
         | eszed wrote:
         | No. Singularity risk has them cowed.
        
         | OogieM wrote:
         | As a programmer and Shepherdess I can tell you that sheep have
         | enough intelligence as is. Contrary to popular belief they are
         | not stupid but certainly have a very different world view.
        
       | NelsonMinar wrote:
       | That story about Fairchild manufacturing at Shiprock is
       | fascinating and heartbreaking. Glad to see it so thoughtfully
       | researched and presented.
        
         | tarellel wrote:
         | And as sad it is, they cycle as has repeated itself and its
         | still a sad situation around Shiprock. I'm someone who lives
         | within the general area and poverty is still saturating the
         | Navajo community. To make things worse the oilfield in the area
         | has shifted to Texas. And within the last year the Four Corners
         | Power Plant (PNM) and Navajo Mine (BHP) have shut down. These
         | have been 2 extremely large employers of the area for the
         | Navajo people since the 70's. Lots of businesses in neighboring
         | towns like Farmington and Gallup have shuddered. And a large
         | amount of people (who could afford to) have moved to places
         | like Phoenix and Denver so they don't get stuck being part of
         | the situation.
        
         | BoingBoomTschak wrote:
         | You know what they've said for millennia: "Vae victis"!
        
       | niccl wrote:
       | A fun full-circle. The Jacquard loom was influential for input
       | for early computers, and now the computer is influencing the
       | output of looms
        
         | xiande04 wrote:
         | I thought the same thing reading this! I'm currently reading
         | Prisoner's Dilemma by William Poundstone, which details the
         | life of John von Neumann. According to his brother Nicholas,
         | von Neumann likely got the idea to use punch cards for
         | computers from the Jacquard loom. One of his father's (Maxwell
         | von Neumann) clients at the turn of the century was a Jacquard
         | loom manufacturer, and Max would evidently discuss his work
         | with his kids everyday over supper.
        
           | kens wrote:
           | That doesn't make sense, since computers were using punch
           | cards before von Neumann got involved.
        
             | xiande04 wrote:
             | Ah, you're right. Babbage's Analytic Engine was designed to
             | use punch cards, and I totally forgot about the Hollerith
             | Machine that I read about just last year. I wonder what
             | other false information Poundstone's book has. Thanks for
             | the heads up!
        
               | aoanla wrote:
               | Not only did Babbage's Analytical Engine use punched
               | cards, it was specifically inspired by the Jacquard Loom,
               | as Babbage was a massive fan of it (and owned a portrait
               | made on one!)
        
       | swayvil wrote:
       | Speaking as an artist and a programmer, has it ever struck you
       | how utterly _low_ it is to sit in a room making things? You are
       | interacting with little speck of dead stuff. Staring, unmoving,
       | practically dead yourself. Playing with a little dream. There 's
       | something deeply wrong with that. Spiritually wrong even.
       | Sometimes I reflect and feel shame at my wastefulness.
        
         | groestl wrote:
         | Dead stuff is stuff without structure. I tend to think about my
         | interactions with the universe as extending the structure that
         | is me to dead stuff. Stuff is lifted to structuredness, and
         | becomes part of us as a whole. I don't feel that's low at all.
        
         | turtledragonfly wrote:
         | Hello, fellow artist+programmer (:
         | 
         | What do you think of the quote: "Whatever you do will be
         | utterly insignificant, but it is very important that you do it"
         | ?
         | 
         | Personally, I think playing with little dreams is beautiful,
         | but I do hope you find something that satisfies your soul.
         | 
         | In my experience, artistry and a bit of depression often go
         | hand-in-hand. If you spend a lot of time paying attention to
         | things, you're bound to notice the Abyss.
        
           | ahazred8ta wrote:
           | "Gaze not into the abyss, lest you become recognized as an
           | abyss domain expert, and they expect you keep gazing into the
           | damn thing." --@nickm_tor@mastodon.lol
        
         | robocat wrote:
         | Soeaking as an engineer, has it ever struck you how utterly low
         | it is to sit in a room making art? Sculptural materials and
         | paint is dead. Words are but faint echoes of human life.
         | 
         | Your comments are more a reflection upon your own worldview.
         | 
         | To improve things you merely need to change your own
         | perceptions.
        
         | underbooter wrote:
         | That's a remarkable question.
         | 
         | Have you, reader of this comment, ever created something that
         | will subsequently never interact with a living being?
         | 
         | I don't think I have... except maybe when I've blinked Morse
         | into the sky with a flashlight or laser.
         | 
         | There's always someone or something on the other end. I try to
         | remember that.
        
           | actionfromafar wrote:
           | The classic excercise is: write a poem, tear the paper to
           | pieces and throw it away.
        
         | Cthulhu_ wrote:
         | Sounds like you're going through a bit of a nihilism phase, the
         | futility of it all. It's cool.
        
         | cubancigar11 wrote:
         | Low and high are but you imposing your value system onto
         | something that exists irrespective of it. "Low" could very well
         | be the activity of breathing if one argues enough to show it.
         | In reality actions don't and shouldn't exist to serve a higher
         | purpose. Attachment with result is the cause of suffering.
         | Attach yourself to the action.
        
       | renewiltord wrote:
       | Are there automatic looms the way there are CNC machines so that
       | you can get a custom design on?
        
         | Stratoscope wrote:
         | Since 1804!
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacquard_machine
        
           | renewiltord wrote:
           | So _that's_ what a Jacquard loom is. I've seen it mentioned
           | often. Thank you.
        
             | kragen wrote:
             | dobbies automated looms before that
        
               | OogieM wrote:
               | dobby looms are an automated version of draw looms. Some
               | use a draw boy, small child in the loom itself to draw up
               | the warps as required for the patter. Later shortened to
               | dobby.
        
             | ahazred8ta wrote:
             | There are some old Jacquard card stacks which are literally
             | the oldest machine readable datasets in existence, a
             | century before Hollerith.
        
               | cmiller1 wrote:
               | The oldest datasets produced by humans intended to be
               | read by machines. With our advances in digital image
               | processing one could argue a cross section of a tree
               | trunk is a "machine readable dataset"
        
       | tithe wrote:
       | That's some serious...multithreading!
       | 
       | (I applaud others for resisting such cringe, but I just couldn't
       | help myself.)
        
         | koolba wrote:
         | The entirety would have complete faster if they only used green
         | threads.
        
           | lelanthran wrote:
           | Maybe if they switched all code to Java, they can run it on a
           | Loom?
        
         | DaoVeles wrote:
         | Don't hold back, that level of puns is what I live for.
        
         | layer8 wrote:
         | Just wait for the Pentium 4 with hyper-threading.
        
         | leed25d wrote:
         | I always look askance at a blanket statement.
        
         | drivers99 wrote:
         | "The Analytical Engine weaves algebraic patterns, just as the
         | Jacquard-loom weaves flowers and leaves."
         | 
         | - Ada Lovelace, 1843
        
         | Flop7331 wrote:
         | Just couldn't weave it awone, could you?
        
       | ein0p wrote:
       | I've long considered "hard tech" (semiconductors, high end
       | manufacturing, aerospace, etc) to be the embodiment of our
       | culture, because it's not something you can just start doing, it
       | takes generations of improvement to make anything worthwhile.
        
         | DaoVeles wrote:
         | That is how I generally see it. The technological suite needed
         | to get to that stage is astounding.
         | 
         | It is a great indicator of progress and decline, like how the
         | quality of crockery dropped in the roman empire showed how
         | their economics hampered their skills.
         | 
         | Maybe computing is one of the big hurdles that shows the
         | overall capabilities of economies and on a much more broad
         | scale, species. Like wrap drives in Star Trek.
        
       | Taniwha wrote:
       | I'm building a stained glass window for our front entrance, as a
       | sometimes chip designer it's going to be a half adder (so much
       | much smaller than a pentium) - the big challenge is showing all
       | the layers (si, implantation, poly, metal, vias etc) I'm only
       | doing 1 level of metal. The result is going to be more of a thin
       | layered sculpture than a traditional stained glass window
        
         | bankcust08385 wrote:
         | Neat. 2 RTL gates -> 16 CMOS transistors (10 for XOR and 6 for
         | OR)
        
           | Taniwha wrote:
           | Actually I misspoke, it's a full adder and very similar to
           | the one on page 5 here
           | 
           | https://www.cerc.utexas.edu/~jaa/vlsi/lectures/8-1.pdf
        
         | anthonix1 wrote:
         | Don't bother with the rectilinear pakeha layouts, do your half
         | adders in curvilinear patterns, Koru style
        
           | Taniwha wrote:
           | I am pakeha and tangata triti .... now I have an idea for the
           | next window (I was thinking about a neuron ...)
        
             | anthonix1 wrote:
             | AHh gotcha.
             | 
             | Well yeah I reckon you render a full custom 4004 w/ koru
             | patterned transistors into about 4m x 4m stained glass
             | panel. Would look good as the foyer panel for the CS dept
             | at the University of Waikato
        
               | Taniwha wrote:
               | Probably best to tape it out to https://tinytapeout.com/
               | first
        
               | anthonix1 wrote:
               | Do they support curvilinear cells?
        
               | Taniwha wrote:
               | The simple openlane flow just uses standard cells, but
               | you have the ability to just tape out polygons so
               | curvyish is possible
        
               | Taniwha wrote:
               | (I already have a 4-bit CPU there)
        
         | kragen wrote:
         | this sounds awesome! do you have drawings?
        
       | LennyHenrysNuts wrote:
       | Absolutely fascinating article. I wasn't aware of any of the
       | Navajo history of Farichild Semiconductors.
       | 
       | Thanks for sharing.
        
       | 0xbadcafebee wrote:
       | Wow. They have _got_ to turn this into a 99% Invisible podcast
       | episode. (if you stopped at the weaving - which is incredible in
       | its own right - you missed the much more amazing story)
        
       | tug2024 wrote:
       | Do sha nada da da !
        
       | mlsu wrote:
       | Wow, what a gem of a post. I knew about the Navajo codebreakers
       | but didn't ever hear about the Shiprock connection.
       | 
       | I also am admiring how deftly the author was able to weave in
       | (heh) little bits of low-level computer knowhow. This is an
       | article I can send to my non-tech friends!
        
       | datavirtue wrote:
       | This how I have always thought of the Giza plateau and other
       | temple sites. They look like different digital components or
       | circuits attached to each other. It was easy to convince myself
       | that they were indeed designing some type of deep logic within
       | the structures.
        
       | squarefoot wrote:
       | This triggered a memory about the Native American code talkers
       | employed by the US military during WWII to encode communications
       | using their own languages which were unknown to the Axis forces.
       | First thought: "ha! Now they're doing firmware?":)
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_talker
        
         | kens wrote:
         | Interestingly, Peter MacDonald, the Navajo tribal leader at the
         | time, had been a code talker during World War II.
        
       | 1bent wrote:
       | This sounds like the backstory for Alan Dean Foster's "Cyber
       | Way". I enjoyed the novel, didn't realize how well rooted it was
       | in actual history.
        
       | elzbardico wrote:
       | I wonder how much debate and how many PhD dissertations in
       | archeology will result when this rug in found in a excavation
       | some 2000 years from now.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-09-02 23:02 UTC)