[HN Gopher] Deepwater Sub Recovers Roman Battering Ram Used in C...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Deepwater Sub Recovers Roman Battering Ram Used in Carthage in
       Punic Wars Battle
        
       Author : rntn
       Score  : 100 points
       Date   : 2024-08-31 13:27 UTC (9 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (gizmodo.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (gizmodo.com)
        
       | AmericanChopper wrote:
       | The Punic wars are a fascinating era of history, and the article
       | says this ram was used in the decisive battle of the first Punic
       | war. When the first Punic war started Rome had only just expanded
       | its territory to a portion of the Italian peninsula. By the time
       | the second Punic war was finished, Rome controlled all of Italy,
       | most of Iberia, Greece, Corsica and Sicily.
       | 
       | Carthage was much more powerful than Rome was, and Rome really
       | had no business thinking it could have won either of those wars.
       | Rome lost so many battles during those wars, and only survived by
       | outright refusing to give up, and then somehow pulling it out of
       | the bag at a key moment. This battle was one of those moments,
       | and Zama was another in the second war (in a campaign that Scipio
       | basically had to fund himself after failing to get the support of
       | the senate).
       | 
       | There were so many moments in both of those wars where if it had
       | gone another way, Rome could have very easily failed and become a
       | Carthaginian vassal state. There would have been no Roman Empire,
       | which arguably still shapes Europe to this day, and the history
       | of Europe would have been a continent dominated by a North
       | African empire.
        
         | mkoubaa wrote:
         | The Roman empire pretty much always contained Carthage
         | territory. It's like wondering whether the British empire would
         | have been meaningfully different if it's HQ was in Wales rather
         | than England. Probably not.
         | 
         | Consider also that the most important thinker in the empire
         | after the classical period was Augustin, a North African.
        
           | AmericanChopper wrote:
           | Not sure what you're trying to say here. By the time Rome
           | became an empire, Carthage had already been wiped out of
           | existence for over 100 years.
           | 
           | Who knows what Europe would have looked like under a
           | Carthaginian empire, but I'm rather confident it would be
           | quite different. Especially given how a lot of Europes
           | history post-Roman Empire revolved around attempts to
           | reestablish and re-bust-up the Roman Empire.
        
           | kibwen wrote:
           | _> The Roman empire pretty much always contained Carthage
           | territory._
           | 
           | I suspect this is being downvoted because the Punic Wars took
           | place hundreds of years before Rome became "The Roman
           | Empire", both in the sense of having a literal emperor and
           | also in the sense of being associated with the huge swathes
           | of the Mediterranean that we tend to think of when we think
           | of the empire's boundaries. It's just a different period of
           | history. Not only did Rome not control any bits of Africa at
           | this point, it didn't even control Sicily, which is what the
           | First Punic War was about:
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Punic_War
        
         | speedchess wrote:
         | > Carthage was much more powerful than Rome was
         | 
         | No it wasn't. The roman republic won the 1st punic war. The
         | carthaginian empire was older for sure but not much more
         | powerful.
         | 
         | > and Rome really had no business thinking it could have won
         | either of those wars.
         | 
         | Rome was the rising and expanding power. Carthage was an old
         | has-been. Rome had every right to think it would prevail. Hence
         | why Rome started the first punic wars.
         | 
         | > and only survived by outright refusing to give up, and then
         | somehow pulling it out of the bag at a key moment.
         | 
         | It's like you gleaned your information from sensationalizing
         | documentaries or a kid's book.
         | 
         | > Rome could have very easily failed and become a Carthaginian
         | vassal state.
         | 
         | The odds of carthage invading and holding rome is 0.
         | 
         | > There would have been no Roman Empire
         | 
         | So western europe could have skipped the dark ages and gotten
         | access to the ancient greek culture ( which is the foundation
         | of european civilization ) sooner?
         | 
         | > and the history of Europe would have been a continent
         | dominated by a North African empire.
         | 
         | Assuming that carthage could have held rome or made any
         | progress against the huns, germanic or slavic tribes up north.
         | If anything, the downfall of rome would have precipitated the
         | rise of northern europe which dominates europe today.
        
           | AmericanChopper wrote:
           | Rome didn't even have a navy when it started the first war
           | with Carthage, who were the dominant naval power of the
           | Mediterranean at the time. During the first war Rome had the
           | navies that it managed to build wiped out more than once
           | before the Battle of the Aegates, which it probably wouldn't
           | have been able to rebuild from if it had lost. They'd been
           | fighting a losing war for nearly 30 years at that point.
           | 
           | Rome also lost every major engagement in the second Punic war
           | prior to Scipio's campaign through Iberia and North Africa,
           | which very nearly never happened at all. Cannae was probably
           | the most comprehensive military defeat ever at the time, and
           | is still one of the most famous routs in history.
           | 
           | It is possible that Rome could have survived if it lost
           | either of those wars, but it certainly wouldn't have risen to
           | be the most dominant empire in European history. Rome could
           | have very easily fallen after Cannae if Hannibal had been
           | reinforced, which he very nearly was.
           | 
           | Speculation about what would have happened to Europe without
           | the Roman Empire is just that, and I'm not trying to say it's
           | a good or bad thing, it's just fascinating to think how close
           | it came to being something completely different during that
           | part of the republic era.
        
           | inglor_cz wrote:
           | "Rome was the rising and expanding power. Carthage was an old
           | has-been. "
           | 
           | This sounds like "reading history with a benefit of
           | hindsight". Rising powers may, in fact, well lose their
           | challenge against the old has-beens. Germany and Japan in the
           | 20th century were those rising and expanding powers, but
           | ultimately reaped catastrophic defeats.
           | 
           | Rome survived and won mostly due to their enormous capability
           | to reconstitute their forces after major losses. That was an
           | untypical capability in the premodern world, where a single
           | battle gone wrong (e.g. Gaugamela) could topple an entire
           | empire.
           | 
           | But major losses they did have and the fact that they could
           | still hold after Cannae was a bit of a miracle. They even
           | recruited slaves into the army, a feat that could have easily
           | backfired against the weakened Roman elite.
        
       | analog31 wrote:
       | Oops, missed that. Too late to delete.
        
         | Etheryte wrote:
         | It's written right under the lead image, it is bronze.
        
       | jaynetics wrote:
       | Quite a few of these rams have been found. It seems the design of
       | the front, with three horizontal edges, remained almost unchanged
       | for centuries.
       | 
       | Wikipedia [1] has this to say about the rationale:
       | 
       | > The blunt edge of the ram and the patterned protrusion were
       | intended to break open the seams of the target ship while at the
       | same time dispersing the force of impact on the attacking ship to
       | prevent the ram from twisting off and damaging the attacking
       | ship. It was also less likely to become stuck in the hull of its
       | target.
       | 
       | [1]: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naval_ram
        
       | Luc wrote:
       | Surprisingly small!
       | 
       | More pictures:
       | https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=910340217792618&set=pcb....
       | 
       | It's only about half a meter wide by about 1 meter long (Euro-
       | pallets measure 80 x 120 cm). From reading Asterix & Obelix
       | albums I'd have expected something more substantial.
        
       | hendler wrote:
       | Peaches         4 hours ago              Maybe try posting a
       | picture of the darned thing in use? RN it's a pile of coral.
       | Yellowfoot             3 hours ago
       | Unfortunately, all contemporaneous photographs of the item in use
       | were lost during the burning of the Library of Alexandria a few
       | centuries later.
        
       | Log_out_ wrote:
       | one may be part of your car or house right. after all metal
       | artifacts were continously recycled throughout history .
        
       | takinola wrote:
       | If you would like to learn more about the Punic Wars,
       | Oversimplified has a very, very good (and humorous) explainer
       | video
       | 
       | https://youtu.be/yRmOWcWdQAo?si=6FNtH2zqJ9XAMh3g
        
       | ccity88 wrote:
       | I would thoroughly recommend the Fall of Civilizations podcast
       | episode on the ancient Phonecians. It goes into detail about life
       | in Phonecian society, particularly Carthage, and its rivalry with
       | Rome and ultimately the Punic wars. It's quite long, but well
       | worth it if you want a broad picture of how life was like in that
       | period.
       | 
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6dbdVhVSat8
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-08-31 23:01 UTC)