[HN Gopher] Visit Bletchley Park
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Visit Bletchley Park
        
       Author : bookofjoe
       Score  : 150 points
       Date   : 2024-08-29 23:46 UTC (23 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (bletchleypark.org.uk)
 (TXT) w3m dump (bletchleypark.org.uk)
        
       | tgsovlerkhgsel wrote:
       | If you're interested in historical buildings, go ahead, visit
       | Bletchley Park. But expect most of the exhibits to be buildings,
       | living quarters, offices etc. and mundane descriptions of day-to-
       | day life there, not exhibits about the technical/cryptological
       | aspects (although they do have some of those too).
       | 
       | If you're interested in computer history and Bombe/Colossus,
       | visit the much lesser known National Museum of Computing at the
       | same site. https://www.tnmoc.org/
       | 
       | I spent way too much time at the the boring parts of Bletchley
       | Park and as a result didn't have enough time for the Museum of
       | Computing.
       | 
       | I'd recommend starting at the Museum of Computing, then if you
       | have time left, the 1-2 buildings inside the official Bletchley
       | Park museum that have the crypto exhibits.
        
         | rst wrote:
         | Note also that the two museums have different schedules, so
         | you'll want to make sure you go when both are open.
        
           | jwmcq wrote:
           | This caught me out when I was a teenager. Luckily, there was
           | a chap in the Museum of Computing who was spending his Sunday
           | working on the Colossus, and he was happy to let me in and
           | show me around! I'll never forget that kindness, it was truly
           | a fascinating trip.
        
             | RealityVoid wrote:
             | The people that work at the Museum of Computing are truly
             | amazing! I had such a blast there!
        
             | trebligdivad wrote:
             | I found chatting to the people working on stuff was the
             | best bit. Almost the level of ignoring the exhibits and
             | look at the bits of stuff being worked on around.
        
             | jtms wrote:
             | I was there a few years ago and will echo the fact that the
             | folks I interacted with at the museum of computing were
             | truly world class fantastic. When someone loves what they
             | do and where they are it really shows.
        
             | tialaramex wrote:
             | My boss at Experian took our team to Bletchley Park
             | intending to go to the NMOC but not having checked that was
             | actually open. Hilarious.
             | 
             | Fortunately the small Memorial to the Polish Cryptographers
             | who are the reason this was worth attempting is outside so
             | we could visit that, about a third of the team were Polish
             | (we hired away some subcontractors from a Polish firm, and
             | then we were in turn bought by Experian) so visiting this
             | memorial was a key part of our intent.
             | 
             | Also IIRC at that time the Bombe was still not in TNMOC,
             | and Colossus was in a separate building so you could see
             | it, but the rest of TNMOC was closed.
             | 
             | I've also seen an even earlier incarnation of TNMOC when I
             | was younger, just basically a room heaped with obsolete
             | computer gear, with some nerds who know roughly what it is
             | but aren't equipped to properly exhibit or explain it. I
             | remember they'd set up some video game consoles, something
             | like the original Sonic The Hedgehog maybe, because they
             | wanted children to have some positive impression, obviously
             | a kitchen appliance sized "disk drive" doesn't mean
             | anything to a child, but it's obvious Sonic is a game even
             | if you're used to much flashier graphics.
        
         | RealityVoid wrote:
         | I visited both, on a whim, while I was by accident in the area,
         | prodded by a comment just like this. It was a fantastic
         | experice! And I did enjoy the National Museum of Computing
         | more! There was an excellent elderly guide there that seemed to
         | have been in computing since forever and told us stories of
         | when he worked on machines just like the ones in the
         | exhibition. A small bunch of us nerdy guys hung around him and
         | it was great interacting with them and the tour guide. It was
         | really really an excelent experice!
         | 
         | If I'm ever in the area again, I would love to revisit and I
         | would love to have my young son with me as well.
        
         | trsohmers wrote:
         | +1 this commenter. I just visited the UK for the first time at
         | the beginning of this month and had a fantastic ~3 hours at
         | Bletchley Park, but felt I had to cram TNMOC and the amazing
         | Colossus live demonstration (where I asked a million questions)
         | and everything else in the museum in the 90 minutes I was
         | there. If I assume other HN readers are like me, I would
         | dedicate at least 2.5-3 hours for TNMOC to actually get a
         | chance to actually see and play around with their extensive
         | collection of vintage machines.
        
         | Animats wrote:
         | Indeed. The two groups don't get along. The building
         | restoration people get most of the money. The computing people
         | are apparently a tenant.
         | 
         | I visited in 2002, before the building people were getting
         | money from the National Trust. Way too much tour guide info
         | about the architecture of the mansion, which is not of any real
         | architectural significance. If you like English manor houses
         | with the usual pond and swans, there are better ones to visit.
        
         | zulban wrote:
         | I recently visited London and TNMOC was the highlight of my
         | trip.
        
           | happymellon wrote:
           | But they are nowhere near London.
        
             | physicsguy wrote:
             | A 100 miles is a long distance in the UK, a 100 years in
             | the US is a long time.
        
               | happymellon wrote:
               | I went to Washington DC, the best part of that was
               | Philadelphia.
        
             | dmazin wrote:
             | This is a nonsense comment. Easy to get to by train from
             | London. Don't be discouraged by this comment.
        
               | OJFord wrote:
               | I think the point (see GP's other comment 'Philadelphia
               | was the highlight of my trip to Washington D.C.') is that
               | it's not part of a trip to London, your trip is to the
               | UK, or England, you stayed in London, and visited
               | elsewhere too.
               | 
               | A lot of foreigners seem to conflate London with the
               | entire country in a way that doesn't seem to happen for
               | other countries (you don't 'go to Paris' and actually
               | stay in Marseilles) and some people outside London
               | especially understandably don't like it.
               | 
               |  _Not_ that it 's an unreachable distance away for a trip
               | based in London.
        
               | atq2119 wrote:
               | It is clearly outside of London, but an easy enough day
               | trip by train.
               | 
               | Since you brought up Paris, I'd compare it to Versailles.
        
               | OJFord wrote:
               | As I said yes.
        
               | happymellon wrote:
               | Not really considering Versailles is in the suburbs of
               | Paris, whilst Bletchly is not a suburb of London but next
               | to Milton Keynes.
        
               | well_actulily wrote:
               | Sure, but if Versailles is 30-45 minutes outside of
               | central Paris by train, and Bletchley Park is about an
               | hour or so outside of London, I'd venture that the extra
               | ~hour round trip of travel time isn't that meaningful to
               | most tourists.
        
               | happymellon wrote:
               | I didn't say that you couldn't.
        
             | NoboruWataya wrote:
             | 45 minutes by train from London Euston. About the same time
             | as my commute and I live in Zone 3. Might not be
             | geographically that near but it's very accessible.
        
         | hakfoo wrote:
         | I walked from the train station to the Museum of Computing,
         | which provided enough of a walk through the Bletchley facility
         | (and noticing enough "Asbestos Warning" signs) to fill my need
         | for that portion of the site.
         | 
         | If nothing else, being able to say "Milton Keynes is on my
         | tourist bucket list" is an amusing thing to say to UK co-
         | workers.
        
           | OJFord wrote:
           | > If nothing else, being able to say "Milton Keynes is on my
           | tourist bucket list" is an amusing thing to say to UK co-
           | workers.
           | 
           | I'd probably guess you were fascinated by the idea of
           | roundabouts.
        
             | Arch-TK wrote:
             | I think it's testing how fast you can go from ~25 (depends
             | on how quickly you dare take a roundabout) to 70 in between
             | each roundabout that is the best part of living next to MK.
        
         | lfn3 wrote:
         | I can second this. The Museum of Computing was much more
         | interesting to me than Bletchley Park. The working replicas of
         | electro-mechanical computers were terrific, and the
         | guides/operators there had a wealth of interesting knowledge
         | and anecdotes. I learned much more about the use of these
         | machines for code breaking there than I did at Bletchley Park.
        
         | rdl wrote:
         | I went a few months ago -- was amazing how much better the
         | Museum of Computing was, given it obviously had a tiny budget
         | compared to Bletchley. Bletchley was mostly a bunch of school
         | groups being bored and filling the space, empty buildings, etc.
         | 
         | Museum of Computing was extra amazing because some of the
         | volunteers had worked on the hardware on display (and I'd
         | worked on stuff 20 years after that), so we were able to talk
         | about the actual hardware/OSes.
        
         | darreninthenet wrote:
         | Umm I've been to Bletchley and NMOC twice and although the
         | latter does have the particularly interesting live demos of the
         | restored/recreated Colossus etc, it's completely wrong to say
         | the "main" museum complex doesn't have much about the
         | technical/crypto aspects.
         | 
         | If anything I'd say it's the other way around - there are
         | exhibits on the way of life etc but the majority of them are on
         | the cryptology and the approach the people working there took
         | etc. I'm wondering if you accidentally missed one or two of the
         | buildings.
        
           | zitsarethecure wrote:
           | I'm strongly in agreement with you. I thought the main museum
           | was fascinating. You could only find it "boring" if you have
           | no curiosity about the history of world war two or you just
           | don't care about the human impact of the war on the
           | communities and the people it affected.
        
         | petecog wrote:
         | +1. TNMOC is a gem. If you visit, and you can, buy something in
         | their shop.
         | 
         | If you find yourself nr Cambridge. Then I highly recommend.
         | https://www.computinghistory.org.uk/
        
           | rwmj wrote:
           | The Cambridge museum you mention was surprisingly good. They
           | have all sorts of weird things (remember that time that Lyons
           | Tea manufactured their own line of mainframe computers? -
           | they have one!). Also an original wirewrapped Spectrum
           | prototype.
        
         | anonymous_sorry wrote:
         | If you can go for a live demo of Bletchley Park's fully
         | recreated Bombe, that's pretty special.
         | 
         | Edit: Oh wow, apparently the Bombe was moved to the National
         | Museum of Computing some years ago. TNMOC wins!
        
           | OJFord wrote:
           | Ah that explains a lot. I was confused reading some of the
           | comments here, because to my memory all the war
           | computing/enigma & post-war work was in BP museum, and TNMOC
           | had a brief mentioned to link but was mostly later personal
           | computing / early displays for ATC, etc.
           | 
           | TNMOC _wasn 't_ better to me, because I was more interested
           | in Turing et al. than 80s vintage computing. (And some people
           | would be the opposite, I was just surprised to see so many
           | comments saying it's almost objectively better for this
           | crowd.) But if all the computing side is there now makes
           | sense that people are saying that.
        
         | tialaramex wrote:
         | The current re-arrangement, in which the Bombe is housed by
         | TNMOC to me probably makes things murkier than would be
         | desirable although I'm sure it helps TNMOC attract visitors
         | because people do like a Bombe demo (the Bombe is a replica,
         | the real Bombes were destroyed because they were secret).
         | 
         | The Bombe isn't a computer any more than a basic electric
         | toaster is a computer, and Enigma is nothing like how you'd do
         | encryption today. It's cool to look at, but IMO it doesn't
         | belong in a Computing museum.
         | 
         | In contrast (and remember this is later in the same war)
         | Colossus is a digital computer (albeit not a _stored program_
         | digital computer) and it attacks Lorenz, which is a stream
         | cipher (albeit 8-bit bytes haven 't been invented back then).
         | Of course Colossus doesn't _look_ like anything much, it 's a
         | computer, most of the stuff that's happening is invisible, and
         | you can't understand why it breaks Lorenz, the math is very
         | difficult.
         | 
         | However Colossus and Lorenz, unlike the Bombe and Enigma, are
         | clear ancestors of the technologies we rely on every day,
         | Salsa20 is a popular modern stream cipher, you are undoubtedly
         | reading this on a digital computer. They're as connected to us
         | as the vast physical disks in another TNMOC room, or the BBC
         | Microcomputer (British older people may remember these from
         | school) or the exhibit about FIDO Bulletin Board Systems.
        
           | netaustin wrote:
           | We spent a whole gray day at Bletchley and TNMOC and I
           | appreciated the connection between Bletchley and TNMOC given
           | the context of WWII. To me Bletchley is more about process, a
           | metaphorical "Scrum room" of one of the most important math
           | and science programs in history. And taken together, they
           | encapsulate sort of a catalyzing moment that computing
           | prehistory transitioned to computing history.
           | 
           | My history-teacher wife liked Bletchley a lot more than
           | TNMOC, where I lingered too long, but I did like both. Even
           | though the Bombe replica was down for repairs that day.
        
             | tialaramex wrote:
             | Definitely if your interest is World War II, or the
             | Intelligence process, the human side, any of that - the
             | Bletchley Park exhibits are key and TNMOC is at most a side
             | visit, whereas if your interest is computing, TNMOC is key
             | and there's no reason to do more than pencil in the rest of
             | the Bletchley Park site as a possible extra.
             | 
             | I don't know about Science. There's a lot of math and logic
             | puzzle solving at Bletchley, but the other crash projects
             | of WWII have a lot more science, Los Alamos obviously,
             | translating from "In principle nuclear fission is a more
             | powerful bomb than anything previously made" to an actual
             | weapon you can use to destroy a Japanese city. But also the
             | invention of the Cavity Magnetron - a little box can make
             | enough radio waves to make a radar for your night fighter
             | so you can figure out where the enemy planes are relative
             | to you - or it can use those waves to heat a delicious
             | baked potato in a few minutes...
        
               | currymj wrote:
               | it does seem like working on the Bombe got Alan Turing
               | really deep into thinking about hardware. he'd previously
               | played around with building some logic circuits but seems
               | like he didn't go deep into it before Bletchley, before
               | that he was mostly a very pure mathematician.
        
               | tialaramex wrote:
               | Turing was interested in lots of things. As a coincidence
               | one of the small jobs I did many years ago was to develop
               | the Turing Archive's web site, which I'm glad to see has
               | since been substantially renovated:
               | https://turingarchive.kings.cam.ac.uk/ - For that work we
               | had a lot of high resolution images of non-Computing
               | stuff Turing cared about, including Morphogensis
               | (basically, why things are the shapes they are, for
               | example why is a rose petal shaped that way? Why stripes
               | on giraffes but spots on dalmations?).
               | 
               | So _mathematics_ yes, Turing was always interested in
               | that, but always applicability was on Turing 's mind. In
               | the early twentieth century Turing's "machine" in a paper
               | he wrote at Princeton (before the war) was just an idea,
               | but er, obviously with the exception of the need for an
               | "infinite" paper tape you can _realise_ Turing 's
               | machine, it's a computer, familiar to everybody today.
               | 
               | Even after Bletchley Turing wasn't a Software Engineer.
               | The meta-applicability isn't something which would occur
               | to a mathematician. That took Grace Hopper. Grace
               | understood that the problem her people were tasked with
               | (mechanically convert instructions to the code for the
               | actual machine) is exactly the same sort of task the
               | machine is doing anyway, and she invents the _Compiler_.
        
         | precommunicator wrote:
         | Wait, there was something other than Museum of Computing in
         | Bletchley Park?! I honestly didn't noticed, I went straight to
         | that museum and I don't think there were other notices that
         | there is something else there.
        
         | tmdetect wrote:
         | You would think they would make the differentiation quite
         | obvious. Thanks for the TNMOC tip.
        
         | hnlmorg wrote:
         | I hate to agree with you because Bletchley Park is a historic
         | site, but sadly your comment resonates with my takeaway from
         | when I visited too.
        
       | Zhyl wrote:
       | Bletchley Park is excellent - I went in the early 2000s when it
       | was just some huts and a country house. I return in 2024 and they
       | now have full exhibitions, including one that goes through the
       | full history and workings of the Bombe. I thought I was a bit of
       | an Enigma nerd but it turns out I hadn't heard of Lorenz/Tunny at
       | all and so it really added another layer to my knowledge of the
       | work at Bletchley.
       | 
       | Also visiting Bletchley and then watching the Imitation Game
       | makes it seem like the rushed medical drama from Mitchell and
       | Webb [0]
       | 
       | [0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_AmdvxbPT8
        
         | AndrewOMartin wrote:
         | Turing's life and work was a big part of my research and I was
         | involved with a number of academic Turing memorial events, I've
         | had dinner with his closest living relative. I'm well aware of
         | all the inaccuracies.
         | 
         | I was given 114 minutes I don't think I could have done a
         | better job of giving a feel for the guy, his work, and the
         | situation to an intelligent person who has a passing interest
         | in tech (e.g. my wife) than they did in the film.
         | 
         | This may just say more about me as a story-teller than as a
         | genuine appraisal of the film.
         | 
         | If you want detail, read Turing's biography by Andrew Wiles,
         | such a great work and impressively comprehensive. If you just
         | like code breaking and WWII history, read The Hut Six story by
         | "Turing's boss" Gordon Welchman, the publication of which lost
         | him his American and British security clearances.
        
           | Zhyl wrote:
           | >I was given 114 minutes I don't think I could have done a
           | better job of giving a feel for the guy, his work, and the
           | situation to an intelligent person who has a passing interest
           | in tech (e.g. my wife) than they did in the film.
           | 
           | I feel like I'm fairly forgiving when it comes to glossing
           | over some details in order to serve the greater narrative,
           | but I feel all of the film's points of conflict were
           | fabricated to the point of being misleading.
           | 
           | Turing was a genius, but he wasn't a sole genius loner - he
           | was a much liked and integral member of the team. Much of the
           | plot is about him supposedly single handedly and against the
           | will of Bletchley working on the Bombe when the Polish Bombe
           | was a tried and true solution to Enigma-sans-plugboard
           | already. This image of him being some kind of rebel is
           | absolutely not giving you a "feel" for his situation.
           | 
           | The idea that the machine wasn't working and they had no idea
           | how it was going to work until they "suddenly had the idea of
           | using a crib" is trying to add a peril and a Eureka moment
           | that didn't exist. From a "let's not get waded down in the
           | details" point of view, sure but again this really adds more
           | of a sole genius factor on Turing specifically when he was
           | but one genius in a factory of geniuses.
           | 
           | Things like having one bombe in the corner of a room quietly
           | breaking all the Nazi's codes? Sure, why not. It's very silly
           | and downplays the roles of hundreds of Wrens, but you can
           | have that for the sake of storytelling.
           | 
           | We may have different things that we wanted from this film,
           | but honestly rewatching it it just felt like it was muddying
           | the waters of what I already knew rather than being a fun
           | accessible glimpse into the life of one of History's greatest
           | minds.
        
       | sblank wrote:
       | If you're interested in the history of how the Poles and then
       | British not only cracked the German Enigma Cipher machine used in
       | world war 2, but then operationalized the interception,
       | decryption and dissemination process - this is the place. There's
       | quite a bit written about how the Enigma cipher system worked,
       | but it isn't until you get to Bletchley Park do you understand
       | the size, scope and scale of how they turned decryption of
       | intercepted messages into an industrial process that gave the
       | Allies a strategic edge in WW2. A must visit next time you're in
       | London (35 minute train from Euston station, 5 minute walk to the
       | museum.)
        
       | LennyHenrysNuts wrote:
       | I used to visit regularly when I lived in the UK. It's right on
       | the train line, go and see an important part of modern history.
        
         | glompers wrote:
         | And will, before long, be on the rebuilt Varsity Line between
         | Oxford and Cambridge.
        
           | IneffablePigeon wrote:
           | I'm not sure I'd bet much on that "before" long part. At
           | least not as far as Cambridge, the other end seems more
           | certain.
        
         | lostlogin wrote:
         | > It's right on the train line
         | 
         | If memory serves, this, and the proximity to London, Oxford and
         | Cambridge, are why it was chosen as the site for the code
         | breaking programme.
        
       | simonbarker87 wrote:
       | And the tickets are valid for 12 months. So you can visit one day
       | and if you run out of time or want to go back and dive into more
       | detail on something you can use the same tickets to come back
       | with in in a year and go round again.
        
       | mannykannot wrote:
       | Many of the people HN appeals to will find Bletchley Park
       | fascinating, but I can report that my wife, who has no specific
       | interest in any of the topics that makes the place historic, was
       | also fascinated when we visited some time ago, and regularly
       | recommends it as a place to visit.
        
       | PhilippGille wrote:
       | If anyone is looking for a great novel that partially takes place
       | in Bletchley Park, I can highly recommend Cryptonomicon by Neil
       | Stephenson (of Snow Crash fame).
        
         | KineticLensman wrote:
         | Usual caveats about Neal Stephenson apply but I think
         | Cryptonomicon presents a much more compelling portrait of Alan
         | Turing than the film The Imitation game which incorrectly
         | portrays him as a repressed nerd single handedly solving all
         | the problems.
        
           | beng-nl wrote:
           | Pardon me, I loved the cryptonomicon but I don't know what
           | the usual caveats are about the author, could you share with
           | the class please :-) ?
        
             | tialaramex wrote:
             | I don't know if this was what your parent meant, but
             | 
             | One of the fairly noticeable problems with Stephenson is
             | that he uses the "rape as character development" trope a
             | lot for female characters. So, that's not great. In general
             | in fact female characters in his novels are not written as
             | if they were - you know - people, and even when they're the
             | protagonist we get some weird male gaze stuff going on.
             | 
             | It's not a deal breaker, Diamond Age is one of my favourite
             | novels despite this. But certainly it feels at best lazy.
             | 
             | Other routine complaints are that Stephenson's novels are
             | too long (fair) under edited (presumably with the same root
             | cause, ie celebrity) and poorly paced (e.g. six chapters
             | about the protagonist preparing and then eating cereals,
             | two pages on the climactic bank heist they've spent the
             | whole book planning)
             | 
             | Technically I think Stephenson suffers from having noticed
             | that, unlike many contemporaries who wrote fiction set in
             | the near future, he actually has some idea what he was
             | writing about and not realising how limited that knowledge
             | is. William Gibson knows he has no idea how a computer
             | works, so in a Gibson novel he's not trying to convince you
             | his protagonist knows which IPv6 routing protocol to use -
             | William Gibson doesn't know what IPv6 is. But Neal might
             | spend a paragraph about some nonsense that seems plausible
             | if you know as much as he does... but then is laughable if
             | you know more. That seems if anything worse than what
             | Gibson chose.
             | 
             | I like hard SF, but hard SF is really difficult. One of my
             | other favourite novels is Greg Egan's "Incandescence". Egan
             | isn't great at writing women either, but in Incandescence
             | he cuts himself a break, nobody involved is technically
             | human anyway, but he did spend a _lot_ of time figuring out
             | all the tricky physics needed to make the novel 's story
             | work. Is there really a civilisation in the core of our
             | galaxy? We'll probably never know, but Egan attempted to
             | design a scenario that could, in principle, technically
             | work.
        
       | joe200 wrote:
       | You can also visit The Enigma Cipher Centre in Poznan/Poland [0]
       | 
       | It is an exhibition about cracking Enigma by the polish
       | mathematicians: M. Rejewski, H. Zygalski and J. Rozycki who then,
       | at the begin of the Second World War, handed it over to the
       | Allies.
       | 
       | [0] https://csenigma.pl/en/
        
         | FlyingSnake wrote:
         | Damn. I've been to Poznan many times and never even heard of
         | this place before. I'll check this one out soon.
        
           | highhedgehog wrote:
           | Flights are cheap for me to Poznan. Is it worth visiting
           | other then this museum?
        
             | FlyingSnake wrote:
             | Absolutely.
             | 
             | The old town is charming, the food is great and lots green
             | space to wander around. Citadel park is worth visiting and
             | you'll not regret it.
             | 
             | Wroclaw is 2 hours away and it's a wonderful city as well.
             | Extra fun if you like treasure hunt as the city is full of
             | tiny gnomes for that. Extra fun with kids.
             | 
             | Go for it!
        
       | imdsm wrote:
       | Fantastic place, and your tickets will last for a year. There's
       | also the computer museum close by (separate ticket). Really great
       | place to walk around, and I think, historically important to all
       | of us here. The original home of the hackers.
        
       | Buchstabensalat wrote:
       | Somewhat off-topic, but I find this webdesign hard to use,
       | especially on Desktop. It looks like a good design for a print-
       | out poster, but not so much for a digital site. Something is
       | just... off. Perhaps the work of a designer who usually works for
       | print media?
        
       | alexhutcheson wrote:
       | On a related note, if you're around Washington, DC in the US,
       | then the National Cryptologic Museum[1] is well worth a visit.
       | They have a ton of equipment on exhibit, including a variety of
       | mechanical encryption machines as well as early supercomputers.
       | 
       | It doesn't get that many visitors, because it's within Fort Meade
       | (home of the NSA), and most people probably don't even realize
       | it's open to the public.
       | 
       | [1] https://www.nsa.gov/museum/
        
         | memling wrote:
         | I second this: don't go down the wrong entrance, but definitely
         | do visit. It's a fun time with knowledgeable employees that
         | will take you on a tour. You can also see some of the machinery
         | used to crack Japanese codes and some historical attempts at
         | codes and code-breaking. It's a fascinating place.
        
       | jherskovic wrote:
       | I was there a few weeks ago! I had always wanted to visit, so it
       | was a bucket list item for me and I absolutely loved it. The
       | conditions in which people worked tirelessly while trying to eke
       | out a bit of a normal life in between were so interesting.
       | 
       | I am kicking myself that I couldn't stop at the Museum of
       | Computing, but the family was jetlagged and really tired.
       | Regardless of that, I considered Bletchley Park time well spent
       | and an awesome visit.
        
       | ape4 wrote:
       | I can't be the only one who did a "View Source" of that site
       | looking for Easter eggs
        
       | highhedgehog wrote:
       | i went there while in a summer school in Reading. Loved it and
       | highly recommended! One of the things I remember was an exibith
       | on how pidgeons were used in WWII
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-08-30 23:01 UTC)