[HN Gopher] Companies Lobby Against Giving the Military the Righ...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Companies Lobby Against Giving the Military the Right to Repair
        
       Author : worik
       Score  : 63 points
       Date   : 2024-08-28 19:13 UTC (3 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.404media.co)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.404media.co)
        
       | robwwilliams wrote:
       | With Warren on this proposed legislation whatever the pain for
       | vendors. Lock-in on service might be acceptable during peace but
       | not at all in combat. Slightly ironic that this should apply with
       | equal force to code.
        
         | passwordoops wrote:
         | Lock-in on service should never be acceptable under any
         | circumstances, war, peace, military, civilian
        
           | crest wrote:
           | Lock-on instead of lock-in?
        
       | jmclnx wrote:
       | Of course they are :)
       | 
       | Military Vendors lap up Gov. money like a Camel in a desert at an
       | oasis. Without that money, the US economy would collapse over
       | night.
       | 
       | I hope the Military is allowed to repair their equipment. In a
       | war, that ability is mandatory.
        
         | darth_avocado wrote:
         | > like a Camel in a desert at an oasis
         | 
         | Well the camels stop after 30ish gallons. Military Vendors lap
         | up Gov. money like a blackhole laps up pretty much everything
         | in it's vicinity.
        
         | floxy wrote:
         | >Without that money, the US economy would collapse over night.
         | 
         | But that money would just get spent by other government
         | agencies, or the taxpayers, right? And if the military vendors
         | aren't efficiently using that money, then society would end up
         | better off if they (the military vendors) weren't spending it.
        
       | mc32 wrote:
       | This is ridiculous. Imagine you're in the middle of a battle and
       | you need to get an okay to fix something outside of an
       | approved/certified repair outfit?
       | 
       | That would be a physical DDOS attack with severe consequences.
       | 
       | I hope, one can hope, the brass, despite any consequence to their
       | kickbacks, care a little about the grunts on the ground who would
       | be exposed to the consequences of this nonsense and quash this
       | unpatriotic grift.
       | 
       | This is mercenary attitude --which if you're dealing with
       | mercenaries, you can expect, but your own people and companies?
       | That's... insane.
        
       | jauntywundrkind wrote:
       | It feels like the military is well into pushing back in a lot of
       | ways. "Modular Open Systems Architectures" ((M)OSA) is a buzzword
       | you can't go ten pages through a proposal or strategy doc without
       | running into, after years of the military enduring the same
       | locked down IP shit the rest of the world has been mixed in for
       | decades now. And the military seems to be one of the few places
       | opening up expectations that this unevolvable hell isn't good
       | enough.
       | 
       | One particular write up that really got me was just a brief part
       | of the extremely long & sad ProPublica write-up on the Litoral
       | Combat Ship (LCS). The part about the sailors not even having
       | physical access to a computing center was off the wall madness to
       | me, really epitomized & made real to me a certain despairing
       | level of madness that unregulated capitalism tries to steer
       | humanity into. https://www.propublica.org/article/how-navy-spent-
       | billions-l...
       | 
       | It's not entirely clear how much remedy we're getting from this
       | (M)OSA kumbaya, what are the bigger successes & failures or what
       | technically it looks like (would so love to be able to see how
       | the Arsenal of Democracy is coping with the corporate raiders
       | within), but there's at least strong lip service to change,
       | mutual recognition that systems need to be flexible &
       | reconfigurable & adjustable & modular, which is something.
        
         | georgeplusplus wrote:
         | >>>> that unregulated capitalism tries to steer humanity into.
         | 
         | What part of this economy seems unregulated to you? What a
         | ridiculous notion talking about military contracts no less.
         | 
         | You couldn't be more far off from finding the source of problem
         | then just mindlessly throwing in a dig at capitalism, the way
         | the government awards contract is anything but competitive or
         | capitalistic
        
       | djaouen wrote:
       | The CEOs proposing such ideas should be locked up as traitors lol
        
         | ansmithz42 wrote:
         | Nah! I think the CEOs should be the first ones sent into the
         | combat front line zones.
        
         | ravenstine wrote:
         | I didn't expect someone else to say this, but that is my first
         | thought. If I became supreme leader overnight, I would place _a
         | lot_ of people behind bars, and these guys would be among the
         | first. It 's pretty outrageous how much society tolerates the
         | leadership class.
        
       | jprd wrote:
       | Eisenhower warned us about this kind of eventuality, and I
       | personally never thought it could ever get this far. Outrageous.
        
         | krapp wrote:
         | If you're referring to the military industrial complex, I don't
         | think this is what Eisenhower was warning about.
        
       | blahyawnblah wrote:
       | So the companies are going to send repair people all over the
       | world, have people that have clearance, and potentially go into
       | actively hostile areas?
        
         | ptero wrote:
         | That's what companies already do, charging the government a
         | pretty penny for being in theater.
        
         | istultus wrote:
         | Nice, you've found a pathway to hiring more veterans
        
         | bityard wrote:
         | It's not unheard of. The contractors are generally former
         | military.
        
         | Doches wrote:
         | Palantir has been doing exactly this for more than a decade...
        
         | psunavy03 wrote:
         | Contractor tech reps have been doing this already since the
         | Cold War.
        
       | trhway wrote:
       | [saying without prejudice, just using real example to illustrate
       | the power of tech company, or even a single person like in this
       | case, behind locked-in tech]
       | 
       | Back then Elon Musk refused to turn the Starlink on on the Black
       | Sea and the Ukrainian drones weren't able to perform the planned
       | attack on the Russian Navy ships there (the situation later was
       | rectified by Pentagon itself directly contracting some of the
       | Startlink terminals or something along these lines)
       | 
       | In general the modern weaponry is very complicated and Western
       | tanks and artillery systems would be transported to Poland from
       | Ukraine for service and repair. I think recently they tried to
       | establish a repair base in Ukraine, yet i'm wondering whether the
       | growing complexity of the hardware may make the "right-to-repair"
       | issue closer to moot in larger part. I mean the right-to-repair
       | in civilian case allows independent companies to provide repairs,
       | while i don't see any practical way for such independent
       | companies in the military case.
        
       | a3n wrote:
       | Simple solution: Only let contracts where verifiably senior
       | company technical employees are to accompany equipment in war and
       | peace, and to have all technical data in their possession,
       | verified unencrypted.
       | 
       | After they're all dead, the president signs an executive order
       | confiscating all on-site data and equipment, and authorizing
       | military to repair. This would also be spelled out in the
       | contract.
        
         | WillAdams wrote:
         | Admiral Rickover's solution here was to write into the contract
         | having company executives on the boat for its first dive.
        
       | jabroni_salad wrote:
       | If my exmil co-workers have taught me anything its that anything
       | and everything can be macgyver'd in a pinch. If jerry rigging was
       | a sport these guys would be ranked competitive players.
       | 
       | In this case, your 'threat actor' is servicemen and 'arms race'
       | is like, their whole thing. These guys are bored out of their
       | mind for 95% of their career and will take anything apart if the
       | activity gets them 2 hrs closer to a break.
        
         | lotsofpulp wrote:
         | I bet they cannot macgyver it if it's software locked.
        
           | fragmede wrote:
           | because they can't run Ida pro and hack it?
        
       | benreesman wrote:
       | Elizabeth Warren being in the DoD's corner on basic
       | serviceability of equipment critical to the sustained warfighting
       | capability of our military against an industry flexing DRM was
       | not on my late capitalism bingo card.
        
       | squarefoot wrote:
       | What a bunch of greedy bastards. Not being able to repair an
       | appliance/device/tool/whatever in some contexts could make the
       | difference between life and death. And not just in combat.
       | Imagine if the air filter on the Apollo 13 couldn't be hacked
       | with what the astronauts had at hand up there because it was
       | driven by closed electronics whose brain was sandwiched in
       | multiple layers of DRM, NDAs, stupidity and lawyers: the guys
       | would have been doomed.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-08-28 23:00 UTC)