[HN Gopher] What it's like to work on cold cases
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       What it's like to work on cold cases
        
       Author : samclemens
       Score  : 29 points
       Date   : 2024-08-25 13:23 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.nytimes.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.nytimes.com)
        
       | brudgers wrote:
       | https://archive.ph/pT0gz
        
       | xivzgrev wrote:
       | I have a lot of respect for good detectives. I really enjoyed
       | "Homicide Hunter" - which is a retired detective's recollection
       | of past murder cases. Who knows how much was myth vs fact, but I
       | got the sense he kept good notes because he would speak to
       | exacting detail about decades old cases.
       | 
       | One of my favorite episodes was his first homicide case. A gas
       | station was robbed and the clerk was killed. No video, no prints,
       | etc. However there was a necklace that was dropped. It had some
       | kind of pattern, so he called every. single. jeweler in the area.
       | He called a lot, and eventually got a hit and found his man.
       | 
       | It's this kind of diligence and dedication (plus technology) that
       | can crack cases open, even cold ones. Like the article here, he
       | found 4 untested hairs that cracked it open.
        
       | drewcoo wrote:
       | Outlier amateur detective wins are commendable, but also
       | emblematic of a problem.
       | 
       | Why aren't the real police revisiting these cases? Why are we
       | arming them better and better against our own people instead of
       | spending some money on actual cops to solve crimes?
       | 
       | Every time one of these is solved by amateurs, we should be
       | asking why the system is failing.
        
         | jimbob45 wrote:
         | _Why are we arming them better and better against our own
         | people instead of spending some money on actual cops to solve
         | crimes?_
         | 
         | The current party in power ran verbatim on a platform of
         | "defund the police".
        
           | LevGoldstein wrote:
           | You say that as though this is a brand new problem and not
           | something that's been an issue for many, many decades
           | regardless of what party has majority control at the federal
           | level.
        
           | hoten wrote:
           | That's hardly a supported policy you'd find in the Democratic
           | party platform, or the position of the Biden administration.
           | Don't confuse a few of the most left leaning members of the
           | party with the whole. It's a big tent.
           | 
           | https://www.cnn.com/factsfirst/politics/factcheck_fa5dd2d9-b.
           | ..
        
           | altruios wrote:
           | Sigh...
           | 
           | Remove funding for the police to gather used and new military
           | gear to use against the populace, while much more accurate -
           | isn't as sticky...
           | 
           | Sticky thoughts win over accurate ones. Truth needs a proper
           | wrapping now a-days to even get looked at.
           | 
           | How about this for a new phase:
           | 
           | "pay for: effective Detectives; not toys."
           | 
           | OR:
           | 
           | "detectives solves cases: military toys melt faces."
        
             | munificent wrote:
             | "Demilitarize the police" would certainly have been a
             | better slogan than "defund the police".
        
               | altruios wrote:
               | It was more accurate. I've heard that around the same
               | time defund was going around...
               | 
               | But humans don't select catch-phases and sound-bites by
               | their truth value...
               | 
               | Sticky truths: that's what we need.
        
           | throwway_278314 wrote:
           | That phrase was probably a bad choice of words; I believe the
           | fuller intent was
           | 
           | "Let's fund initiatives which build our community, like
           | teachers and school lunch so our kids aren't hungry. That's
           | more important than funding police who come from outside our
           | community and have a reputation for extortion and murder of
           | our citizens instead of protecting us."
           | 
           | You may disagree with the read on the situation of the people
           | involved, but I would be very surprised if you support the
           | idea of you being taxed to support an armed force which was
           | sent into your community and only ever acted in a hostile way
           | towards you.
           | 
           | By the way, the DOJ seems also to feel that the Minneapolis
           | Police was hostile to the citizens
           | 
           | Minneapolis Police Used Illegal, Abusive Practices for Years,
           | DOJ Finds https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36917349
           | 
           | Minneapolis Police Use Force Against Black People at 7 Times
           | the Rate of Whites
           | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23403891
           | 
           | At urging of Minneapolis police, EMS workers subdued dozens
           | with ketamine https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17328770
           | 
           | And the slogan comes as part of a larger discussion of what
           | the role of police should be in society, see i.e.
           | 
           | Minneapolis City Council looking into disbanding police
           | department https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23398910
           | 
           | > We can totally reimagine what public safety means, what
           | skills we're recruiting for, what tools we do and don't need.
           | We can invest in cultural competency and mental health
           | training, de-escalation and conflict resolution.
           | 
           | > We can resolve confusion over a $20 grocery transaction
           | without drawing a weapon, or pulling out handcuffs.
           | 
           | > The whole world is watching, and we can declare policing as
           | we know it a thing of the past, and create a compassionate,
           | non-violent future. It will be hard. But so is managing a
           | dysfunctional relationship with an unaccountable armed force
           | in our city.
        
             | banannaise wrote:
             | That phrase got so much traction precisely because it's a
             | bad choice of words. It's easy to dismiss a movement if you
             | latch onto the worst framing you can find, take it
             | literally to the point of bad faith, and refuse to dig any
             | deeper.
        
         | leobg wrote:
         | It's not just the U.S..
         | 
         | Here in Germany, there are several multi million Euro fraud
         | cases that have been going on for decades. They get picked up
         | by the media every couple of years, with hidden camera footage
         | and everything. But the authorities do nothing.
         | 
         | I suspect they are all overworked - police, judges,
         | prosecutors. They are all in reactive mode, trying to reduce
         | the pile of paper on their desk. And, presumably, plan their
         | next holiday.
         | 
         | The days where a cop, judge or prosecutor identified as the
         | function they render to society are over, I suspect. It's work
         | life balance all the way.
         | 
         | And they may have a point. The woman who solved the Golden
         | State Killer case, didn't she die quite young because of the
         | stress? If you look into the abyss for too long, the abyss
         | looks back into you.
         | 
         | To do good work means risking divorce, lowering your per hour
         | wage, becoming a target for the bad guys, watching your lazier
         | colleagues pass you by, and putting your health in jeopardy.
         | This was seen as heroic in the 80s. Today it is seen as dumb,
         | naive and futile.
        
           | extr wrote:
           | This is the exact same dilemma that you face in any other
           | job. Working extremely hard and burning yourself out does
           | nothing except cover up the problem that the function you are
           | providing is under-resourced.
        
           | linotype wrote:
           | > The days where a cop, judge or prosecutor identified as the
           | function they render to society are over, I suspect. It's
           | work life balance all the way.
           | 
           | This is terrifying and also true in many other industries,
           | including software.
        
             | jayofdoom wrote:
             | I'm really confused as to why it's bad we identify people
             | by their preferences and the content of their character
             | instead of by the role they play in our capitalist economy.
        
               | blargey wrote:
               | People not giving a shit about their jobs means their
               | jobs don't get done well - if at all.
               | 
               | We're quite dependent on the fastidiousness and
               | conscientiousness of our peers, at least if you want life
               | to be pleasant. People don't have the ability to
               | contractually enforce and codify good work ethic (see:
               | people just trying to define SLOs for machines).
               | 
               | Especially with "public servant" type jobs which the
               | comment was referring to.
        
             | devjab wrote:
             | I worked a decade in the public sector in Denmark and I
             | think it's sort of natural when MBAs enter and flood the
             | work with pseudo work. A nurse went from maybe filling out
             | paperwork a few hours a week to two full days a week. What
             | was "fun" about that is that I worked on the data, and I
             | may have been the only one to ever come hear 99% or it as
             | it was only ever audited after someone did something bad.
             | They didn't even use the data for anything analytical
             | because it tended to show just how bad their budget cuts
             | were hurting the area and that the best way to improve
             | quality was through more resources and less administration.
             | 
             | Add to this that most public servants make very little
             | money and that nobody in the chain of command actually
             | listens to the people on the floor... Well why would they
             | care?
        
         | dylan604 wrote:
         | There's not enough cops to handle crimes committed today, so
         | why is it a question on why cold cases are just sitting there
         | getting colder? How does the budget for that get approved when
         | current cases aren't getting solved? It's really not a hard
         | thing to understand when you compare it to software teams that
         | get shuttered because managers are scared that it is not
         | revenue positive.
        
         | paulpauper wrote:
         | Better armed police act as a deterrent though . I don't think
         | these are mutually exclusive: police are better-armed, yet more
         | funding for the FBI for investigating more complex crimes.
        
         | malcolmgreaves wrote:
         | Detectives. You want more detectives. Cops do not solve crimes.
         | They're the foot soldiers -- enforcers -- of domestic politics.
         | Detectives have to get a college degree and actually know the
         | law! At best, cops will cordon off a crime scene and protect it
         | until detectives and CSI arrive.
        
           | philwelch wrote:
           | Detectives are sworn law enforcement officers employed by a
           | law enforcement agency such as a city police department, and
           | in many places they are required to have prior experience as
           | uniformed officers. They _are_ cops.
        
         | levocardia wrote:
         | Isn't the answer simple? Most cold cases have a very low
         | probability of ever being solved. The rare exceptions make
         | headlines, but I'd rather police dedicate finite resources to
         | the hot cases with a better chance of getting solved. Those are
         | also the ones where solving them actually helps protect public
         | safety. Solving cold cases appeals to a more vague notion of
         | justice, which is fine, but you're not likely to get robbed by
         | the killer from a cold case in 1987.
        
       | paulpauper wrote:
       | This is why stats that purport a low clearance rate for murders
       | in the US are misleading. Cases never expire until either someone
       | is convicted or the perp can be presumed dead. The file is always
       | open, someone is always investigating.
        
         | IncreasePosts wrote:
         | Just this morning, there was a story on CNN about a cold case
         | hit and run from 1989 being solved because of DNA on a joint
         | left in the stolen car.
         | 
         | It wasn't even solved because detectives were actively looking
         | at it - they received an (incorrect) tip, and decided to just
         | check out what else was in the case, and ended up sequencing
         | some DNA left in the vehicle. I imagine there are hundreds of
         | thousands of such cases out there like that.
         | 
         | https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/25/us/charlotte-nc-cold-case-sol...
        
           | philwelch wrote:
           | If it takes over thirty years to clear a homicide case,
           | that's a failure by any reasonable standard.
        
             | jjtheblunt wrote:
             | ...or a success for a serial killer.
             | 
             | i mention this becaues the golden state killer was a police
             | officer _and_ serial killer, and took advantage of the
             | delay to kill over a great span of time.
             | 
             | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_James_DeAngelo
        
             | bsder wrote:
             | Almost all of these cases are being cleared because DNA got
             | shoved into a large enough private database that
             | practically everybody now coughs up a correlation.
             | 
             | This has very little to do with diligence and more with
             | technology advancing.
             | 
             | And, while clearing murders is nice, wait until the
             | equivalent RealPage gets hold of that database and starts
             | discriminating based on your DNA.
        
       | julienchastang wrote:
       | > there remain hundreds of thousands of unsolved homicides across
       | the country
       | 
       | Wow.
        
         | JohnMakin wrote:
         | If you want to be horrified, look up how many african american
         | women go missing every year without a trace - it is truly
         | insane.
         | 
         | https://naacp.org/resources/missing-african-american-women-a...
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-08-26 23:00 UTC)