[HN Gopher] Transferring energy from nitrogen to argon enables 2...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Transferring energy from nitrogen to argon enables 2-way cascaded
       lasing in air
        
       Author : wglb
       Score  : 62 points
       Date   : 2024-08-25 02:46 UTC (20 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (phys.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (phys.org)
        
       | dynjo wrote:
       | Are we one step closer to lightsabers?
        
         | alsaaro wrote:
         | Or sci fi holograms?
        
         | at_a_remove wrote:
         | Exploring this, I think lightsabers would be Really Hard. Not
         | transporter-level hard, but still tough. I see two paths:
         | 
         | 1) Using actual photons in something laser like. The problem
         | here is that your lightsaber would go on forever, photons won't
         | just peter out after a meter or so. So, you would need, well,
         | something to "cap" the lightsaber, both as a cap in terms of
         | ending something, and a cap as in "capture" or possibly even
         | "reflect." So you would need a teensy something floating at the
         | end of your lightsaber, perfectly synchronized with the
         | positions and velocities of the hilt. Also, small enough not to
         | make a viable target for hitting with some other light saber in
         | your duel. It would either be suspended by antigravity or as
         | some kind of tiny drone.
         | 
         | 2) Your other alternative is that your lightsaber is really
         | some kind of plasma bottle, a hideously distorted ellipsoidal
         | electromagnetic confinement field. This has its own problems,
         | like your blade not wildly changing shape near metal or if
         | someone throws a refrigerator magnet at your odd Jedi or Sith.
         | You _might_ be able to compensate with some kind of high-speed
         | computations accounting for the magnets and such on the fly and
         | "fixing" the distortions as they occurred. The plasma would be
         | quite different from the plasma you might see in hopeful fusion
         | projects. It would have to be quite hot and dense, eager to
         | dump energy. This might also benefit from the "cap" in the
         | first one.
         | 
         | I could see blasters being a little more likely. Your plasma
         | packet could be self-propagating and you would not have to
         | worry about its stability over multiple seconds and such. Each
         | plasma packet might also benefit from the aforementioned caps,
         | one on each end, zipping toward the target and simply
         | destabilizing when the target is reached, releasing all of the
         | energy at once, rather than the buttery-smooth slices of
         | lightsabers.
         | 
         | 3) Circling back, perhaps some esoteric corner of yet-to-be-
         | discovered physics might allow for temporary bosons (the boson
         | nature of photons is what allows for lasers to really do their
         | thing), so perhaps there is some unknown cousin of the photon
         | which could be coaxed into lasting for roughly three and a
         | third nanoseconds (or one meter, take your pick), And hopefully
         | it can come in green, blue, purple, and red.
        
           | ganzuul wrote:
           | A diffraction grating made up by free electrons could do it.
           | Alternatively total internal reflection by heating a volume
           | with a phased array.
           | 
           | At least that's how we used to do it a long, long time ago.
        
             | actionfromafar wrote:
             | were you far away?
        
               | r2_pilot wrote:
               | Considering how long free electron lasers have to be for
               | the wigglers to work, I'd imagine so. But if you can get
               | electrons to oscillate fast enough in a small enough
               | distance, hit me up.
        
           | meindnoch wrote:
           | >Using actual photons in something laser like. The problem
           | here is that your lightsaber would go on forever, photons
           | won't just peter out after a meter or so. So, you would need,
           | well, something to "cap" the lightsaber, both as a cap in
           | terms of ending something, and a cap as in "capture" or
           | possibly even "reflect."
           | 
           | What about using a proton beam, and exploiting the Bragg peak
           | to ionize a finite-length column of air?
        
             | at_a_remove wrote:
             | Well, protons beat out electrons for at least keeping the
             | divergence down, any volume of lightsaber with a net charge
             | is still going to be vulnerable to fridge magnet attack.
             | Also, I have a strong feeling that it wouldn't _look_ very
             | lightsaber-ish. More like a rapier, although I guess for
             | aesthetic purposes you could have scores of little
             | emissions tubes and switch between them on the order of
             | milliseconds and hope that persistence of vision would
             | create an illusion of thickness.
             | 
             | I have a feeling that the sudden stop could be _nasty_ for
             | even the person holding the hilt, just tons of energy
             | spraying wildly around, a big enough radiation vacation
             | that even the Hulk might blanch at soaking up the gammas.
             | It would still technically qualify as handheld melee arm,
             | but it would be so indiscriminate as to be an inelegant
             | weapon of a more _un_ civilized age.
        
           | GolfPopper wrote:
           | Current lightsaber designs are all gas/plasma at the cost of
           | blade stability. [1][2] They look pretty cool and can cut
           | things, though.
           | 
           | [1]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xC6J4T_hUKg
           | [2]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RSSAhmmiZjM
        
           | sandworm101 wrote:
           | Or, use flame as the plasma. Confine the plasma with magnets
           | and let the burn time set the length. It could look and act
           | the part, but wouldnt involve actual lasers.
        
         | api wrote:
         | More efficient lasers are the big barrier to inertial
         | confinement fusion, which IMHO is much cooler given the
         | implications: cheap clean energy forever and awesome fusion
         | torch rockets.
         | 
         | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inertial_confinement_fusion
         | 
         | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nuclear_pulse_p...
        
         | jerf wrote:
         | If you search over YouTube, you'll find many people who have
         | built one aspect or another of a lightsaber. There are things
         | that look like lightsabers, but can't collide with each other.
         | There are things that look like lightsabers, but can't collapse
         | into a hilt. There are things that dump energy like lightsabers
         | but don't fit into a dapper little hilt.
         | 
         | It may just be a matter of perspective, but if you spend enough
         | time with the various options, you may well come away with a
         | much better perspective on why you're never going to have
         | anything just like them. You might think seeing the
         | possibilities would make it more likely, but you'll also see
         | just what it would take to be all these things at once.
        
       | charliewallace wrote:
       | at 261nm, this is far ultraviolet light
        
         | yorwba wrote:
         | Multiple other wavelengths are involved:
         | 
         | > Superfluorescent lasing occurs on cascaded 1327.3 nm (1st
         | lasing) and 840.8 nm (2nd lasing) transitions.
         | 
         | > Subsequently, superfluorescent lasing occurs on cascaded
         | 1409.4 nm (1st lasing) and 751.5 nm (2nd lasing) transitions.
         | 
         | ... but these are infrared, so still no visible laser.
        
           | pixl97 wrote:
           | Anyone concerned about their eye health should be very
           | worried about invisible lasers too. You won't notice you're
           | cooking your eyeballs.
           | 
           | Owned night vision and an IR laser at one point.
        
             | CoastalCoder wrote:
             | > Owned night vision and an IR laser at one point.
             | 
             | Could you clarify how this relates to your first statement?
        
               | mandmandam wrote:
               | I would imagine that IR lasers come with large and scary
               | warnings about the dangers of cooking anyone's eyes; and
               | that night vision lets you see the unexpected paths that
               | an IR laser can take, bouncing off reflective surfaces
               | and such.
        
       | adrian_b wrote:
       | The free variant of the research paper:
       | 
       | https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.04089
        
       | pfdietz wrote:
       | The old Amateur Scientist column in Scientific American had (in
       | June 1974, half a century ago) an installment on how to build a
       | pulsed nitrogen laser. It wasn't that hard. The emission is in
       | the ultraviolet.
       | 
       | https://www.jstor.org/stable/24950104
       | 
       | https://diverdi.colostate.edu/C431/experiments/time%20domain...
       | 
       | https://www.jonsinger.org/jossresearch/lasers/nitrogen/circu...
       | 
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pCnXftuJ9Zo
        
         | tonetegeatinst wrote:
         | Possible new power source for UV lithography for semiconductor
         | manufacturing. No more hitting tin with a laser many?
        
         | emchammer wrote:
         | Look at how cool the last guy's home lab is! I sincerely hope
         | that we are encouraging high schoolers to get into this kind of
         | stuff.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-08-25 23:02 UTC)